PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1643-1654.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.10.018
• Special Issue | Empirical Study • Previous Articles
Received:
2019-06-17
Revised:
2019-09-01
Online:
2019-10-28
Published:
2019-11-01
Contact:
LI Erling
E-mail:erlingli@126.com
Supported by:
CHEN Yiwen,LI Erling. Spatial pattern and evolution of cereal trade networks among the Belt and Road countries[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(10): 1643-1654.
Tab.1
Top 10 countries of centrality index in the cereal trade network of the Belt and Road region, 1993-2016"
1993年 | 1998年 | 2003年 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中介度 | 度中心性 | 中介度 | 度中心性 | 中介度 | 度中心性 | ||||||||||||||
国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | ||||||||
中国 | 1.00 | 中国 | 1.00 | 印度 | 1.00 | 泰国 | 1.00 | 泰国 | 1.00 | 泰国 | 1.00 | ||||||||
泰国 | 0.52 | 泰国 | 0.90 | 泰国 | 0.94 | 中国 | 0.95 | 中国 | 0.64 | 中国 | 0.88 | ||||||||
印度 | 0.24 | 印度 | 0.68 | 中国 | 0.80 | 印度 | 0.95 | 埃及 | 0.64 | 印度 | 0.84 | ||||||||
土耳其 | 0.22 | 土耳其 | 0.65 | 俄罗斯 | 0.50 | 乌克兰 | 0.86 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.61 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.82 | ||||||||
捷克 | 0.19 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 0.40 | 乌克兰 | 0.45 | 俄罗斯 | 0.82 | 印度 | 0.42 | 俄罗斯 | 0.79 | ||||||||
罗马尼亚 | 0.12 | 罗马尼亚 | 0.38 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 0.35 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.66 | 俄罗斯 | 0.41 | 菲律宾 | 0.77 | ||||||||
沙特阿拉伯 | 0.04 | 斯里兰卡 | 0.30 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.22 | 匈牙利 | 0.64 | 菲律宾 | 0.41 | 乌克兰 | 0.73 | ||||||||
克罗地亚 | 0.03 | 新家坡 | 0.30 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 0.20 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 0.61 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 0.25 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 0.64 | ||||||||
匈牙利 | 0.02 | 马来西亚 | 0.28 | 埃及 | 0.20 | 土耳其 | 0.61 | 乌克兰 | 0.23 | 埃及 | 0.63 | ||||||||
斯里兰卡 | 0.02 | 匈牙利 | 0.28 | 土耳其 | 0.16 | 埃及 | 0.59 | 越南 | 0.19 | 越南 | 0.63 | ||||||||
2008年 | 2013年 | 2016年 | |||||||||||||||||
中介度 | 度中心性 | 中介度 | 度中心性 | 中介度 | 度中心性 | ||||||||||||||
国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | 国家 | 得分 | ||||||||
泰国 | 1.00 | 泰国 | 1.00 | 印度 | 1.00 | 印度 | 1.00 | 泰国 | 1.00 | 印度 | 1.00 | ||||||||
中国 | 0.80 | 中国 | 0.97 | 泰国 | 0.67 | 泰国 | 0.93 | 印度 | 0.77 | 泰国 | 0.97 | ||||||||
巴基斯坦 | 0.55 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.92 | 越南 | 0.63 | 俄罗斯 | 0.90 | 中国 | 0.69 | 俄罗斯 | 0.97 | ||||||||
俄罗斯 | 0.48 | 印度 | 0.90 | 中国 | 0.61 | 乌克兰 | 0.90 | 俄罗斯 | 0.69 | 乌克兰 | 0.97 | ||||||||
印度 | 0.45 | 乌克兰 | 0.88 | 俄罗斯 | 0.58 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.88 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.65 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.95 | ||||||||
乌克兰 | 0.41 | 越南 | 0.85 | 乌克兰 | 0.55 | 中国 | 0.87 | 乌克兰 | 0.63 | 中国 | 0.93 | ||||||||
越南 | 0.39 | 俄罗斯 | 0.83 | 巴基斯坦 | 0.49 | 越南 | 0.83 | 越南 | 0.44 | 土耳其 | 0.88 | ||||||||
埃及 | 0.30 | 埃及 | 0.78 | 土耳其 | 0.36 | 土耳其 | 0.82 | 土耳其 | 0.44 | 越南 | 0.86 | ||||||||
阿联酋 | 0.23 | 阿联酋 | 0.75 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 0.32 | 阿联酋 | 0.65 | 黎巴嫩 | 0.27 | 阿联酋 | 0.76 | ||||||||
哈萨克斯坦 | 0.21 | 土耳其 | 0.69 | 阿联酋 | 0.17 | 罗马尼亚 | 0.63 | 阿联酋 | 0.26 | 罗马尼亚 | 0.66 |
[1] | 程中海, 冯梅 . 2017. 基于动态复杂网络的世界棉花贸易时空分异特征与贸易格局分析[J]. 国际经贸探索, ( 10):37-51. |
[ Cheng Z H, Feng M . 2017. Spatial -temporal variation characteristics and trade pattern of the world cotton trade network based on the dynamic complex network. International Economics and Trade Research, ( 10):37-51. ] | |
[2] | 崔莉 . 2017. “一带一路”沿线国家农产品贸易格局分析[J]. 统计与决策, ( 16):152-156. |
[ Cui L . 2017. Analysis on agricultural product trade pattern of the countries along "the Belt and Road". Statistics and Decision, ( 16):152-156. ] | |
[3] | 蒋小荣 . 2018. 全球贸易网络研究及对中国地缘战略的启示[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学资源环境学院. |
[ Jiang X R . 2018. Global trade network research and its enlightenment to China's geographical strategy. Lanzhou, China: College of Resources and Environment, Lanzhou University. ] | |
[4] | 刘卫东, 宋周莺, 刘志高 , 等. 2018. “一带一路”建设研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 73(4):620-636. |
[ Liu W D, Song Z Y, Liu Z G , et al. 2018. Progress in research on the Belt and Road initiative. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4):620-636. ] | |
[5] | 陆大道, 杜德斌 . 2013. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考[J]. 地理学报, 68(6):723-727. |
[ Lu D D, Du D B . 2013. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geoeconomic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(6):723-727. ] | |
[6] | 马述忠, 任婉婉, 吴国杰 . 2016. 一国农产品贸易网络特征及其对全球价值链分工的影响: 基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 管理世界, ( 3):60-72. |
[ Ma S Z, Ren W W, Wu G J . 2016. The characteristics of agricultural trade network and its effects on the global value chain division: A study based on social network analysis. Management World, ( 3):60-72. ] | |
[7] | 宋周莺, 车姝韵, 张薇 . 2017. 我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易特征研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 32(4):365-369. |
[ Song Z Y, Che S Y, Zhang W . 2017. Spatial-temporal characteristics of foreign trade between China and countries along the Silk Roads. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4):365-369. ] | |
[8] | 王磊 . 2001. 无政府状态下的国际合作: 从博弈论角度分析国际关系[J]. 世界经济与政治, ( 8):11-15. |
[ Wang L . 2001. International cooperation under anarchy: Analyzing international relations from the angle of game theory. World Economics and Politics, ( 8):11-15. ] | |
[9] | 魏素豪 . 2018. 中国与“一带一路”国家农产品贸易: 网络结构、关联特征与策略选择[J]. 农业经济问题, ( 11):101-113. |
[ Wei S H . 2018. Agricultural products trade between China and "The Belt and Road" countries: Network Structure, Correlation characteristics and strategy selection. Issues in Agricultural Economy, ( 11):101-113. ] | |
[10] | 詹淼华 . 2018. “一带一路”沿线国家农产品贸易的竞争性与互补性: 基于社会网络分析方法[J]. 农业经济问题, ( 2):103-114. |
[ Zhan M H . 2018. Research on grain price fluctuation and transmission effect in the background of impact growth. Issues in Agricultural Economy, ( 2):103-114. ] | |
[11] | 种照辉, 覃成林 . 2017. “一带一路”贸易网络结构及其影响因素: 基于网络分析方法的研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, ( 5):17-29. |
[ Zhong Z H, Qin C L . 2017. The trade network structure of "One Belt One Road" and its influence factors: A study based on analytic network process. International Economics and Trade Research, ( 5):17-29. ] | |
[12] | Bacon C M . 2013. A spot of coffee in crisis: Nicaraguan smallholder cooperatives, fair trade networks and gendered empowerment[J]. Latin American Perspectives, 37(2):50-71. |
[13] | Cai H, Song Y . 2016. The state's position in international agricultural commodity trade: A complex network[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 8(3):430-442. |
[14] | Ercseyravasz M, Toroczkai Z, Lakner Z , et al. 2012. Complexity of the international agro-food trade network and its impact on food safety[J]. PLoS One, 7(5):e37810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037810. |
[15] | Gephart J A, Pace M L . 2015. Structure and evolution of the global seafood trade network[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 10(12):125014. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125014. |
[16] | Heckscher A . 1919. Foucault und Fizeau[J]. Naturwissenschaften (The Science of Nature), 38(7):697-698. doi: 10.1007/bf01497798. |
[17] | Krugman P . 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3):483-499. doi: 10.1086/261763. |
[18] | Li E L, Cotaes K, Li X J , et al. 2017. Analyzing agricultural agglomeration in China[J]. Sustainability, 9(2):313. doi: 10.3390/su9020313. |
[19] | Natale F, Savini L, Giovannini A , et al. 2010. Evaluation of risk and vulnerability using a disease flow centrality measure in dynamic cattle trade networks[J]. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 98(2):111-118. |
[20] | Ohlin B. 1933. Interregional and international trade [M]. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. |
[21] | Raynolds L T . 2004. The globalization of organic agro-food networks[J]. World Development, 32(5):725-743. |
[22] | Ricardo D. 1817. On the principles of political economy, and taxation [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[23] | Shutters S T, Rachata M, Rodrigo H Q . 2012. Agricultural trade networks and patterns of economic development[J]. PLoS ONE, 7(7):e39756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039756. |
[24] | Singh S . 2013. South Asian agrifood trade networks in India: A case study of onion exports[J]. Millennial Asia, 4(2):159-184. |
[25] | Torreggiani S, Mangioni G, Puma M J , et al. 2017. Identifying the community structure of the international food-trade multi network[J]. Environmental Research Letters, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf23. |
[26] | Von Grebmer K, Bernstein J, Nabarro D , et al. 2016. 2016 global hunger index: Getting to zero hunger [M/OL]. IFPRI books, doi: 10.2499/9780896292260. |
[27] | Wasserman S, Faust K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and application [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[1] | SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737. |
[2] | ZHU Guanyu, CHEN Peng. Spatial evolution and influencing factors of criminals’ cross-area co-offending network: An example of fraud in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 792-803. |
[3] | ZHOU Xiaoyan, HOU Meiling, LI Xiaowen. Spatial structure of urban innovation network based on the Chinese unicorn company network [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1667-1676. |
[4] | Zhi ZHENG, Weidong LIU, Zhouying SONG, WUZHATI Yeerken, Yi LIANG. The Belt and Road production networks and China’s participation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 951-962. |
[5] | Fangye DU, Jiaoe WANG, Jiahao XIE, Delin DU. Spatial pattern and change of China’s international air transport network since the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 963-972. |
[6] | Dezhong DUAN, Ying CHEN, Debin DU. Technology trade pattern and change in the Belt and Road region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 998-1008. |
[7] | Mingqing MA, Wu YUAN, Quansheng GE, Wen YUAN, Linsheng YANG, Hanqing LI, Meng LI. Big data analysis of social development situation in regions along the Belt and Road [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1009-1020. |
[8] | Hongxia ZHANG, Qin SU, Yingsha ZHANG. Progress in the application of social network analysis in international tourism research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 520-532. |
[9] | ZHOU Zhengke,LIANG Yutian. Evolution of Sino-US product trade patterns and network characteristics [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(10): 1633-1642. |
[10] | Xiaoshu CAO, Wang LIAO. Spatial pattern and classification of the worldwide multi-airport regions [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(11): 1473-1484. |
[11] | Liang WU, Qi QIN, Dan ZHANG, Shengkui CHENG. Indian Ocean Passages and their geopolitical impacts on China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(11): 1510-1520. |
[12] | Weidong LIU, DUNFORD Michael, Boyang GAO. Discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neoliberal to inclusive globalization [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1321-1331. |
[13] | Zhouying SONG, Shuyun CHE, Yu YANG. Topological relationship between trade network in the Belt and Road Initiative area and global trade network [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1340-1348. |
[14] | Mengjue ZHU, Fang LI. Spatial characteristics of China's interprovincial migration network during 1985-2015 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1368-1379. |
[15] | Qingqing ZOU, Yong WANG, Guangbin LI. Network structure optimization of public space in new concentrated communities based on SNA [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 829-838. |
|