PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 932-940.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.08.002
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fajian LIU1(), Dongdong CHEN2, Jianhua ZHU3, Zang QIAN1, Binbin LI1
Online:
2016-08-25
Published:
2016-08-25
Supported by:
Fajian LIU, Dongdong CHEN, Jianhua ZHU, Zang QIAN, Binbin LI. Structure and interaction of China's inter-provincial inbound tourism market: A 2-mode network analysis[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(8): 932-940.
Tab.1
Inbound tourism affiliated matrix of some Chinese provinces to 16 source countries"
日本 | 韩国 | 马来西亚 | 菲律宾 | 新加坡 | 泰国 | 美国 | 加拿大 | 英国 | 法国 | 德国 | 俄罗斯 | 澳大利亚 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
天津 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
河北 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
甘肃 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
青海 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
宁夏 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
新疆 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Tab.2
Centralities results of provinces and source countries"
省份或客源国 | 程度中心度 | 接近中心度 | 中间中心度 | 省份或客源国 | 程度中心度 | 接近中心度 | 中间中心度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 | 0.308 | 0.811 | 0.004 | 四川 | 0.538 | 0.869 | 0.039 |
天津 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.001 | 贵州 | 0.538 | 0.869 | 0.021 |
河北 | 0.615 | 0.913 | 0.046 | 云南 | 0.308 | 0.760 | 0.011 |
山西 | 0.462 | 0.849 | 0.014 | 西藏 | 0.154 | 0.702 | 0.001 |
内蒙古 | 0.077 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 陕西 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.001 |
辽宁 | 0.308 | 0.811 | 0.013 | 甘肃 | 0.462 | 0.849 | 0.031 |
吉林 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.008 | 青海 | 0.538 | 0.869 | 0.043 |
黑龙江 | 0.154 | 0.745 | 0.004 | 宁夏 | 0.385 | 0.830 | 0.008 |
上海 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.001 | 新疆 | 0.154 | 0.777 | 0.005 |
江苏 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.001 | 日本 | 0.710 | 0.775 | 0.149 |
浙江 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.001 | 韩国 | 0.839 | 0.873 | 0.258 |
安徽 | 0.385 | 0.830 | 0.009 | 马来西亚 | 0.355 | 0.579 | 0.036 |
福建 | 0.308 | 0.793 | 0.005 | 菲律宾 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
江西 | 0.385 | 0.830 | 0.010 | 新加坡 | 0.387 | 0.591 | 0.044 |
山东 | 0.231 | 0.793 | 0.001 | 泰国 | 0.097 | 0.455 | 0.001 |
河南 | 0.462 | 0.869 | 0.030 | 美国 | 0.806 | 0.846 | 0.228 |
湖北 | 0.462 | 0.793 | 0.027 | 加拿大 | 0.065 | 0.447 | 0.000 |
湖南 | 0.385 | 0.830 | 0.010 | 英国 | 0.226 | 0.534 | 0.012 |
广东 | 0.308 | 0.811 | 0.004 | 法国 | 0.226 | 0.534 | 0.011 |
广西 | 0.385 | 0.830 | 0.020 | 德国 | 0.355 | 0.579 | 0.036 |
海南 | 0.308 | 0.793 | 0.012 | 俄罗斯 | 0.258 | 0.524 | 0.064 |
重庆 | 0.462 | 0.849 | 0.030 | 澳大利亚 | 0.065 | 0.455 | 0.000 |
Tab.4
The scores of provinces on each factor"
维度 | 省份 | 维中得分 | 维度 | 省份 | 维中得分 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
1 | 天津 | 0.231 | -0.154 | 0.028 | 1 | 云南 | 0.101 | -0.058 | 0.047 |
河北 | 0.148 | 0.006 | 0.065 | 青海 | 0.150 | -0.094 | 0.134 | ||
山西 | 0.208 | -0.097 | -0.175 | 2 | 新疆 | 0.155 | 0.345 | 0.168 | |
辽宁 | 0.223 | 0.062 | -0.074 | 内蒙古 | 0.120 | 0.407 | 0.131 | ||
上海 | 0.153 | -0.098 | 0.140 | 黑龙江 | 0.250 | 0.645 | 0.092 | ||
江苏 | 0.190 | -0.124 | 0.069 | 海南 | 0.130 | -0.062 | 0.016 | ||
浙江 | 0.107 | -0.055 | 0.062 | 3 | 北京 | 0.148 | -0.062 | 0.168 | |
安徽 | 0.259 | -0.109 | -0.195 | 福建 | 0.144 | -0.116 | 0.294 | ||
江西 | 0.122 | -0.040 | 0.119 | 湖北 | 0.143 | -0.116 | 0.301 | ||
河南 | 0.198 | -0.066 | -0.012 | 广东 | 0.113 | -0.073 | 0.145 | ||
广西 | 0.106 | -0.062 | 0.016 | 重庆 | 0.148 | -0.102 | 0.161 | ||
陕西 | 0.115 | -0.060 | 0.057 | 四川 | 0.139 | -0.103 | 0.195 | ||
甘肃 | 0.187 | -0.115 | 0.080 | 贵州 | 0.129 | -0.089 | 0.189 | ||
湖南 | 0.254 | -0.116 | -0.296 | 西藏 | 0.096 | -0.038 | 0.174 | ||
山东 | 0.305 | -0.113 | -0.385 | 宁夏 | 0.131 | -0.090 | 0.136 | ||
吉林 | 0.335 | 0.201 | -0.412 |
Tab.5
The scores of inbound tourism source countries on each factor"
维度 | 客源国 | 维中得分 | 维度 | 客源国 | 维中得分 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
1 | 日本 | 0.375 | -0.238 | 0.326 | 3 | 马来西亚 | 0.145 | -0.091 | 0.180 |
韩国 | 0.694 | -0.145 | -0.696 | 澳大利亚 | 0.091 | -0.055 | 0.134 | ||
菲律宾 | 0.037 | -0.022 | 0.030 | 美国 | 0.340 | -0.231 | 0.484 | ||
新加坡 | 0.152 | -0.067 | 0.150 | 加拿大 | 0.096 | -0.053 | 0.126 | ||
法国 | 0.130 | -0.073 | 0.106 | 英国 | 0.126 | -0.079 | 0.141 | ||
德国 | 0.152 | -0.080 | 0.123 | 泰国 | 0.069 | -0.046 | 0.083 | ||
2 | 俄罗斯 | 0.371 | 0.911 | 0.178 |
[1] |
曹新向, 苗长虹. 2009. 20世纪90年代以来河南省入境旅游客源市场结构演化: 基于SSM方法的分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 24(2): 11-17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2009.02.007 |
[Cao X X, Miao C H.2009. On the structural evolution of inbound tourism generating market in Henan Province since the 1990s: Based on the analysis of SSM[J]. Tourism Tribune, 24(2): 11-17.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2009.02.007 |
|
[2] |
方世敏, 邓丽娟. 2014. 基于亲景度与竞争态分析的湖南入境旅游市场[J]. 经济地理, 34(12): 182-187.
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2014.12.027 |
[Fang S M, Deng L J.2014. Research on the inbound tourist market of Hunan Province: Based on the preference scale and competition state[J]. Economic Geography, 34(12): 182-187.]
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2014.12.027 |
|
[3] |
冯娜, 李君轶. 2014. 外向在线旅游信息流与入境旅游流的耦合分析: 以美加入境旅游流为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 29(4): 79-86.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2013.04.009 |
[Feng N, Li J Y.2014. A couple analysis of the extraversion online tourism information and inbound tourist flow: A case of the American and Canadian inbound tourist flow[J]. Tourism Tribune, 29(4): 79-86.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2013.04.009 |
|
[4] |
黄秀娟. 2005. 福建省国际旅游市场营销目标选择研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 20(2): 15-19.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2005.02.003 |
[Huang X J.2005. A study on choosing Fujian international tourism marketing target[J]. Tourism Tribune, 20(2): 15-19.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2005.02.003 |
|
[5] | 纪小美, 陈金华, 付业勤. 2015. 中国入境旅游流的收敛与空间溢出效应分析[J]. 旅游科学, 29(4): 47-60. |
[Ji X M, Chen J H, Fu Y Q.2015. A study of the convergence and spatial spillover effects of Chinese inbound tourism flow[J]. Tourism Science, 29(4): 47-60.] | |
[6] | 李旭, 秦耀辰, 宁晓菊, 等. 2014. 中国入境游客旅游目的地选择变化及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 34(6): 169-175. |
[Li X, Qin Y C, Ning X J, et al.2014. Destination choice change and its influencing factors of inbound tourists in China[J]. Economic Geography, 34(6): 169-175.] | |
[7] |
刘法建, 张捷, 陈冬冬. 2010. 中国入境旅游流网络结构特征及动因研究[J]. 地理学报, 65(8): 1013-1024.
doi: 10.11821/xb201008012 |
[Liu F J, Zhang J, Chen D D.2010. The characteristics and dynamical factors of Chinese inbound tourist flow network[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(8): 1013-1024.]
doi: 10.11821/xb201008012 |
|
[8] |
刘法建, 张捷, 章锦河, 等. 2010. 中国入境旅游流网络省级旅游地角色研究[J]. 地理研究, 29(6): 1141-1152.
doi: 10.11821/yj2010060018 |
[Liu F J, Zhang J, Zhang J H, et al.2010. Roles and functions of provincial destinations in Chinese inbound tourist flow network[J]. Geographical Research, 29(6): 1141-1152.]
doi: 10.11821/yj2010060018 |
|
[9] | 刘军. 2004. 社会网络分析导论[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. |
[Liu J.2004. An introduction to social network analysis[M]. Beijing, China: Social Science Academic Press.] | |
[10] | 刘军. 2009. 整体网分析讲义: UCINET软件实用指南[M]. 上海: 格致出版社. |
[Liu J.2009. Lectures on whole network approach: A practical guide to UCINET[M]. Shanghai, China: Truth and Wisdom Press.] | |
[11] | 刘军胜, 马耀峰, 李振亭. 2013. 1997-2010年中部六省入境旅游流集散时空动态分析[J]. 地理科学, 33(4): 450-456. |
[Liu J S, Ma Y F, Li Z T.2013. The spatio-temporal dynamics evolution of the concentration and diffusion of inbound tourist flows in six provinces of central China in 1997-2010[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(4): 450-456.] | |
[12] |
潘裕娟, 曹小曙. 2012. 广州批发市场的供应物流空间格局及其形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 67(2): 179-188.
doi: 10.11821/xb201202004 |
[Pan Y J, Cao X S.2012. Spatial patterns and their formation mechanism of supply logistics network of wholesale markets in Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(2): 179-188.]
doi: 10.11821/xb201202004 |
|
[13] | 全华, 赵磊, 陈田, 等. 2012. 入境旅游客源市场结构实证分析: 以江苏省为例[J]. 经济地理, 32(1): 146-152. |
[Quan H, Zhao L, Chen T, et al.2012. An empirical analysis of tourist structure in the inbound tourism market based on SSM model: A case study on Jiangsu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 32(1): 146-152.] | |
[14] | 孙根年, 周功梅, 李红. 2015. 中美入境旅游, 谁的市场更大: 基于多样性、重要性、旅游偏好及市场吨位的比较[J]. 旅游科学, 29(3): 15-26. |
[Sun G N, Zhou G M, Li H.2015. A comparison of inbound tourism in China and U.S: Based on market diversity, proportion of international outbound trips, travel preference and travel tonnage index[J]. Tourism Science, 29(3): 15-26.] | |
[15] |
田祥利, 白凯. 2013. 旅游目的地突发事件对西藏入境旅游市场规模影响与政策响应[J]. 旅游学刊, 28(3): 38-46.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2013.03.005 |
[Tian X L, Bai K.2013. Assessment and policy response of unexpected event on Tibet's inbound tourism market scale[J]. Tourism Tribune, 28(3): 38-46.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2013.03.005 |
|
[16] | 王迪云, 李若梅. 2010. 基于对应分析的我国入境旅游相关结构研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 26(6): 84-87. |
[Wang D Y, Li R M.2010. A study on the relation structure of China's inbound tourism based on correspondence analysis[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 26(6): 84-87.] | |
[17] | 王强, 马耀峰. 2013. 中小区域入境旅游量质交互成长研究: 以山西11市为例[J]. 经济地理, 33(12): 182-188. |
[Wang Q, Ma Y F.2013. Inbound tourism quantity and quality growth in small-mid areas: The case of eleven cities in Shanxi Province[J]. Economic Geography, 33(12): 182-188.] | |
[18] |
王永明, 马耀峰, 王美霞. 2012. 中国入境游客多城市旅游空间网络结构[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(4): 518-526.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.04.016 |
[Wang Y M, Ma Y F, Wang M X.2012. Network structure of multicity inbound tourists to China[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(4): 518-526.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.04.016 |
|
[19] |
翁瑾. 2008. 规模经济、产品差异化与中国入境旅游空间结构的变动[J]. 旅游学刊, 23(6): 30-35.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.06.010 |
[Weng J.2008. Scale economy, product differentiation and the evolution for spatial structure of China's inbound tourism[J]. Tourism Tribune, 23(6): 30-35.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.06.010 |
|
[20] | 吴晋峰, 潘旭莉. 2010. 京沪入境旅游流网络结构特征分析[J]. 地理科学, 30(3): 370-376. |
[Wu J F, Pan X L.2010. Characteristic of Beijing and Shanghai inbound tourists flow network[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 30(3): 370-376.] | |
[21] |
杨新菊, 吴晋峰, 唐澜, 等. 2014. 旅华外国散客旅游流地理分布和网络结构研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 29(5): 87-96.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.05.009 |
[Yang X J, Wu J F, Tang L, et al.2014. The geographical distribution and network structure of foreign independent tourist flows in China[J]. Tourism Tribune, 29(5): 87-96.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.05.009 |
|
[22] | 张春晖, 马耀峰, 吴晶, 等. 2013. 供需视角下西部入境旅游流与目的地耦合协调度及其时空分异研究[J]. 经济地理, 33(10): 174-181. |
[Zhang C H, Ma Y F, Wu J, et al.2013. Coupling coordination degree between inbound tourist flows and destinations and its spatio-temporal differences in the western region of China: A study from the perspective of supply-demand relationship[J]. Economic Geography, 33(10): 174-181.] | |
[23] |
张立生, 樊新生. 2007. 旅游客源市场等级划分理论的应用及比较[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 23(2): 101-103, 108.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2007.02.023 |
[Zhang L S, Fan X S.2007. Application and comparison of theory models for classification of tourism market grades[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 23(2): 101-103, 108.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2007.02.023 |
|
[24] |
赵东喜. 2008. 中国省际入境旅游发展影响因素研究: 基于分省面板数据分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 23(1): 41-45.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.01.012 |
[Zhao D X.2008. Study on the influencing factors of the development of China's provincial inbound tourism: Analysis based on the provincial panel data[J]. Tourism Tribune, 23(1): 41-45.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.01.012 |
|
[25] |
郑鹏. 2013. 基于社会宏观与个体微观视角的入境旅游流驱动模式[J]. 地理科学进展, 32(10): 1501-1510.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.10.008 |
[Zheng P.2013. Driving force model for inbound tourist flow from macroscopic and microcosmic perspectives[J]. Progress in Geography, 32(10): 1501-1510.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.10.008 |
|
[26] | 中国旅游研究院. 2015. 中国入境旅游发展年度报告: 2014[M]. 北京: 旅游教育出版社. |
[China Tourism Academy.2015. Annual report of China inbound tourism development: 2014[M]. Beijing, China: Tourism Education Press.] | |
[27] |
周彩屏. 2008. 基于SSM方法的入境旅游市场客源结构分析: 以浙江省为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 23(1): 46-51.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.01.013 |
[Zhou C P.2008. An analysis of tourist structure in the inbound tourism market based on SSM method: Taking Zhejiang Province as an example[J]. Tourism Tribune, 23(1): 46-51.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2008.01.013 |
|
[28] |
周成, 冯学钢. 2015. 泰国旅华市场时空结构与拓展策略研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 24(4): 142-151.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2015.04.016 |
[Zhou C, Feng X G.2015. Research on spatial-temporal structure and expansion strategy of Thailand visiting-China market[J]. World Regional Studies, 24(4): 142-151.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2015.04.016 |
|
[29] |
Hwang Y H, Gretzel U, Fesenmaier D R.2006. Multicity trip patterns: Tourists to the United States[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4): 1057-1078.
doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2006.04.004 |
[30] |
Jang S C, Chen M H.2008. Financial portfolio approach to optimal tourist market mixes[J]. Tourism Management, 29(4): 761-770.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.003 |
[31] |
Muñoz T G.2006. Inbound international tourism to Canary Islands: A dynamic panel data model[J]. Tourism Management, 27(2): 281-291.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.10.002 |
[32] |
Yang Y, Wong K K F.2012. The influence of cultural distance on China inbound tourism flows: A panel data gravity model approach[J]. Asian Geographer, 29(1): 21-37.
doi: 10.1080/10225706.2012.662314 |
[33] |
Zhang J, Jensen C.2007. Comparative advantage: Explaining tourism flows[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1): 223-243.
doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2006.08.004 |
[1] | CHEN Zhuo, LIANG Yi, JIN Fengjun. Simulation of city network accessibility and its influence on regional development pattern in China based on integrated land transport system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 183-193. |
[2] | ZHANG Hua, LIU Zheda, YIN Xiaobing. Spatial differences and influencing factors of inter-provincial migrant workers’ backflow intention in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 73-84. |
[3] | JIANG Wanbei, LIU Weidong, LIU Zhigao, HAN Mengyao. Inequality and driving forces of energy-related CO2 emissions intensity in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1425-1435. |
[4] | HUANG Yingze, QIU Bingwen, HE Yuhua, ZHANG Ke, ZOU Fengli. Optimal elevation interval of rice expansion in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1557-1564. |
[5] | HU Guojian, LU Yuqi. Progress, thoughts, and prospect of urban network research based on enterprise perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596. |
[6] | FU Zhanhui, MEI Lin, ZHENG Rumin, WANG Tongtong. Spatial differentiation mechanism of urban female employment rate in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318. |
[7] | ZHU Shengjun, HUANG Yongyuan, HU Xiaohui. Research framework and prospect of industrial value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading based on a multiple scale perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1367-1384. |
[8] | DU Xinru, LU Zi, LI Renjie, DONG Yaqing, GAO Wei. Estimation of time delay cost of hub airports in China, air routes effect and comparison with the United States [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1160-1171. |
[9] | ZHOU Guohua, ZHANG Rujiao, HE Yanhua, DAI Liuyan, ZHANG Li. Optimization of rural settlements and the governance of rural relative poverty [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 902-912. |
[10] | TAN Xuelan, JIANG Lingxiao, WANG Zhenkai, AN Yue, CHEN Min, REN Hui. Rural poverty in China from the perspective of geography: Origin, progress, and prospect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 913-923. |
[11] | LIU Xiaopeng, CHENG Jing, ZHAO Xiaoyong, MIAO Hong, WEI Jingyi, ZENG Duan, MA Cunxia. Sustainable poverty reduction of China in a view of development geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 892-901. |
[12] | GUO Jianke, HOU Yajie, HE Yao. Characteristics of change of the China-Europe port shipping network under the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 716-726. |
[13] | SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737. |
[14] | DU Delin, WANG Jiaoe, WANG Yi. Market structure and competition of the three major airlines in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 367-376. |
[15] | DUAN Qianwen, TAN Minghong. Temporal and spatial changes of urban forests in major cities in China and abroad [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 410-419. |
|