PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 376-388.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.012
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Miaoxi ZHAO1,2,3(), Zhifeng LI4, Ye ZHONG1, Ben DERUDDER2
Received:
2015-03-01
Accepted:
2015-11-01
Online:
2016-03-25
Published:
2016-03-25
Supported by:
Miaoxi ZHAO, Zhifeng LI, Ye ZHONG, Ben DERUDDER. Polycentric network topology of urban agglomerations in China[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(3): 376-388.
Tab.1
Twelve urban agglomerations in China and the cities included"
城市群 | 包含城市 |
---|---|
京津冀 | 北京、天津、石家庄、唐山、秦皇岛、保定、张家口、承德、沧州、廊坊 |
辽中南 | 沈阳、大连、鞍山、抚顺、本溪、丹东、辽阳、营口、盘锦、铁岭 |
山东半岛 | 济南、青岛、烟台、潍坊、淄博、东营、威海、日照 |
长三角 | 上海、南京、无锡、常州、苏州、南通、扬州、镇江、泰州、杭州、宁波、嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、舟山、台州 |
海峡西岸 | 福州、厦门、漳州、泉州、莆田、宁德 |
珠三角 | 广州、深圳、珠海、佛山、江门、肇庆、惠州、东莞、中山 |
关中 | 西安、咸阳、宝鸡、渭南、铜川、商州 |
中原 | 郑州、洛阳、开封、新乡、焦作、许昌、平顶山、漯河、济源 |
武汉 | 武汉、黄石、鄂州、黄冈、仙桃、潜江、孝感、咸宁、天门、随州、荆门、荆州 |
长株潭 | 长沙、株洲、湘潭、岳阳、常德、娄底 |
北部湾 | 南宁、防城港、钦州、北海 |
成渝 | 重庆、成都、自贡、泸州、德阳、绵阳、遂宁、内江、乐山、南充、眉山、宜宾、广安、雅安、资阳 |
Tab.2
Original topology index of urban agglomeration network"
城市群 | 强度 | 对称性 | 层级性 | 自容性 | 密度 | 发育程度 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT | L | SL | SN | βin | βout | βn | βL | Le | γc | γL | γn | |||||||
京津冀 | 10.69 | 962 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 1.27 | 5.60 | 1.17 | |||||
辽中南 | 1.10 | 98 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.15 | 0.60 | 3.60 | 0.75 | |||||
山东半岛 | 2.86 | 160 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.29 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.77 | 0.14 | 1.27 | 5.25 | 1.17 | |||||
长三角 | 25.01 | 6002 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.20 | 2.82 | 11.38 | 2.17 | |||||
海峡西岸 | 5.73 | 172 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.74 | 0.15 | 0.86 | 3.67 | 0.92 | |||||
珠三角 | 35.57 | 2561 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.75 | 0.14 | 1.77 | 6.89 | 1.48 | |||||
关中 | 1.57 | 47 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 0.41 | 0.79 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 2.67 | 0.67 | |||||
中原 | 0.61 | 44 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.54 | 3.33 | 0.71 | |||||
武汉 | 0.29 | 61 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 2.40 | 0.46 | |||||
长株潭 | 1.50 | 30 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.33 | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.92 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 2.40 | 0.67 | |||||
北部湾 | 0.67 | 8 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.97 | 0.02 | 1.33 | 3.50 | 1.17 | |||||
成渝 | 0.53 | 192 | 0.39 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.86 | 0.08 | 0.68 | 4.22 | 0.79 | |||||
平均值 | 10.94 | 1700.84 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.71 | 2.43 | 0.45 | |||||
变异系数 | 1.52 | 1.97 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.44 |
Tab.3
Topology index deviation from the standard deviation of average values for urban agglomerations"
类别 | 强度 | 对称性 | 层级性 | 自容性 | 密度 | 发育程度 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT | L | SL | SN | βin | βout | βn | βL | Le | ? | γc | γL | γn | ||||||
Ⅰ类 | 1.58 | 1.99 | -0.25 | -0.55 | -0.36 | -0.55 | -0.82 | 1.24 | -1.61 | 1.65 | 2.55 | 2.80 | 2.60 | |||||
Ⅱ类 | 1.42 | 1.26 | 0.06 | -0.21 | -0.72 | -0.72 | -1.01 | 0.44 | -0.82 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 | |||||
Ⅲ类 | 0.37 | 0.03 | -0.08 | -0.42 | 0.91 | -0.06 | 0.74 | 0.34 | -0.61 | 0.66 | 0.08 | -0.05 | 0.08 | |||||
Ⅳ类 | -0.74 | -0.65 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.20 | -0.40 | 0.64 | -0.64 | -0.59 | -0.58 | -0.59 |
1 | 程连生. 1998. 中国新城在城市网络中的地位分析[J]. 地理学报, 53(6): 481-491. |
[Cheng L S.1998. China's new cities and their positions in the urban network[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 53(6): 481-491.] | |
2 | 方创琳. 2009. 城市群空间范围识别标准的研究进展与基本判断[J]. 城市规划学刊, (4): 1-6. |
[Fang C L.2009. Research progress and general definition about identification standards of urban agglomeration space[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (4): 1-6.] | |
3 |
顾朝林, 孙樱. 1999. 经济全球化与中国国际性城市建设[J]. 城市规划学刊, (3): 1-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.1999.03.001 |
[Gu Z L, Sun Y.1999. Economic globalization and construction of international cities in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (3): 1-6.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.1999.03.001 |
|
4 |
罗震东. 2010. 长江三角洲功能多中心程度初探[J]. 国际城市规划, 25(1): 60-65.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2010.01.011 |
[Luo Z D.2010. Study on the functional polycentricity of Yangtze River Delta[J]. Urban Planning International, 25(1): 60-65.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2010.01.011 |
|
5 |
宁越敏, 张凡. 2012. 关于城市群研究的几个问题[J]. 城市规划学刊, (1): 48-53.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2012.01.007 |
[Ning Y M, Zhang F.2012. On the research of large city clusters of China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (1): 48-53.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2012.01.007 |
|
6 | 唐子来, 赵渺希. 2010. 经济全球化视角下长三角区域的城市体系演化: 关联网络和价值区段的分析方法[J]. 城市规划学刊, (1): 29-34. |
[Tang Z L, Zhao M X.2010. Economic globalization and transformation of urban system in the Yangtze River Delta Region: Interlocking network and value-added hierarchy[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (1): 29-34.] | |
7 |
王发曾, 刘静玉. 2007. 我国城市群整合发展的基础与实践[J]. 地理科学进展, 26(5): 88-99.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2007.05.010 |
[Wang F Z, Liu J Y.2007. The foundation and practice of integration development of urban agglomeration in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 26(5): 88-99.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2007.05.010 |
|
8 | 吴志强. 1998. “全球化理论”提出的背景及其理论框架[J]. 城市规划学刊, (2): 1-6. |
[Wu Z Q.1998. On the background of "globalisation theory" and its theoretic framework[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (2): 1-6.] | |
9 | 曾鹏, 黄图毅, 阙菲菲. 2011. 中国十大城市群空间结构特征比较研究[J]. 经济地理, 31(4): 603-608. |
[Zeng P, Huang T Y, Jue F F.2011. Comparative study on spatial structure characteristics of Chinese ten top urban agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography, 31(4): 603-608.] | |
10 | 赵渺希. 2011. 长三角区域的网络交互作用与空间结构演化[J]. 地理研究, 30(2): 311-323. |
[Zhao M X.2011. Evolution of network and spatial structure in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Geographical Research, 30(2): 311-323.] | |
11 | 赵渺希, 刘铮. 2012. 基于生产性服务业的中国城市网络研究[J]. 城市规划, 36(9): 23-28, 38. |
[Zhao M X, Liu Z.2012. Research on China's city network based on production service industry[J]. City Planning Review, 36(9): 23-28, 38.] | |
12 |
赵渺希, 魏冀明, 吴康. 2014. 京津冀城市群的功能联系及其复杂网络演化[J]. 城市规划学刊, (1): 46-52.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2014.01.008 |
[Zhao M X, Wei J M, Wu K.2014. Functional linkages in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei conurbation region and the evolution of complex networks[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (1): 46-52.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2014.01.008 |
|
13 |
赵渺希, 吴康, 刘行健, 等. 2014. 城市网络的一种算法及其实证比较[J]. 地理学报, 69(2): 169-183.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201402003 |
[Zhao M X, Wu K, Liu X J, et al.2014. A novel method to approximate intercity networks and its empirical validation[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(2): 169-183.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201402003 |
|
14 |
Alderson A S, Beckfield J.2004. Power and position in the world city system1[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4): 811-851.
doi: 10.1086/378930 |
15 |
Batten D F.1995. Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century[J]. Urban Studies, 32(2): 313-327.
doi: 10.1080/00420989550013103 |
16 |
Burger M J, Meijers E J.2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity[J]. Urban Studies, 49(5): 1127-1149.
doi: 10.1177/0042098011407095 |
17 | Burger M J, Meijers E J, Hoogerbrugge M M, et al.2015. Borrowed size, agglomeration shadows and cultural amenities in North-West Europe[J]. European Planning Studies, 23(6): 1090-1109. |
18 |
Burger M J, van der Knaap B, Wall R S.2014. Polycentricity and the multiplexity of urban networks[J]. European Planning Studies, 22(4): 816-840.
doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.771619 |
19 | Castells M.1996. The rise of the network society[M]. Oxford: Blackwell. |
20 | Christaller W.1966. Central places in southern Germany[M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
21 |
Derrible S, Kennedy C.2011. Applications of graph theory and network science to transit network design[J]. Transport Reviews, 31(4): 495-519.
doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.543709 |
22 |
Green N.2007. Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis[J]. Urban Studies, 44(11): 2077-2103.
doi: 10.1080/00420980701518941 |
23 | Hall P, Pain K.2006. The polycentric metropolis: Learning from mega-city regions in Europe[M]. London, UK: Earthscan. |
24 | Lang R E, Dhavale D.2005. Beyond megalopolis: Exploring America's new megalopolitan geography[J]. Metropolitan Institute Census Report Series, 46(3): 5-6. |
25 |
Limtanakool N, Dijst M, Schwanen T.2007. A theoretical framework and methodology for characterising national urban systems on the basis of flows of people: Empirical evidence for France and Germany[J]. Urban Studies, 44(11): 2123-2145.
doi: 10.1080/00420980701518990 |
26 | Losch A.1954. The economics of location[M]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. |
27 | Marshall A, Marshall M P.1920. Economics of industry[M]. London, UK: Macmillan and Company. |
28 |
Meijers E, Burger M, van Oort F.2011. Report of the RSA research network on regional urban systems and their performance: Urban systems 20? Washington, USA and Delft, NL, 16-17th September 2010[J]. Regions Magazine, 281(1): 22.
doi: 10.1080/13673882.2011.9672728 |
29 | Parr J.2002. The location of economic activity: Central place theory and the wider urban system[M]//McCann P. Industrial location economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 32-82. |
30 |
Scott A J.1982. Locational patterns and dynamics of industrial activity in the modern metropolis[J]. Urban Studies, 19(2): 111-141.
doi: 10.1080/00420988220080261 |
31 | Scott A J.2001. Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy[M]. New York: Oxford University Press. |
32 | Taylor P J.2004. World city network: A global urban analysis[M]. London, UK: Routledge. |
33 | Taylor P J.2009. Urban economics in thrall to Christaller: A misguided search for city hierarchies in external urban relations[J]. Environment and Planning A, 41(11): 2550-2555. |
34 | Taylor P J, Pain K.2007. Polycentric mega-city regions: Exploratory research from western Europe, in the Healdsburg research seminar on mega regions[C]//The Healdsburg research seminar on megaregions. Healdsburg, CA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Regional Plan Association: 59-67. |
[1] | CHEN Zhuo, LIANG Yi, JIN Fengjun. Simulation of city network accessibility and its influence on regional development pattern in China based on integrated land transport system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 183-193. |
[2] | CHEN Ruishan, ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Di, CHEN Yi. Progress of research on sustainable development index for cities and urban agglomerations [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 61-72. |
[3] | JIANG Wanbei, LIU Weidong, LIU Zhigao, HAN Mengyao. Inequality and driving forces of energy-related CO2 emissions intensity in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1425-1435. |
[4] | HUANG Yingze, QIU Bingwen, HE Yuhua, ZHANG Ke, ZOU Fengli. Optimal elevation interval of rice expansion in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1557-1564. |
[5] | HU Guojian, LU Yuqi. Progress, thoughts, and prospect of urban network research based on enterprise perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596. |
[6] | FU Zhanhui, MEI Lin, ZHENG Rumin, WANG Tongtong. Spatial differentiation mechanism of urban female employment rate in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318. |
[7] | ZHU Shengjun, HUANG Yongyuan, HU Xiaohui. Research framework and prospect of industrial value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading based on a multiple scale perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1367-1384. |
[8] | DU Xinru, LU Zi, LI Renjie, DONG Yaqing, GAO Wei. Estimation of time delay cost of hub airports in China, air routes effect and comparison with the United States [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1160-1171. |
[9] | LIU Xiaopeng, CHENG Jing, ZHAO Xiaoyong, MIAO Hong, WEI Jingyi, ZENG Duan, MA Cunxia. Sustainable poverty reduction of China in a view of development geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 892-901. |
[10] | ZHOU Guohua, ZHANG Rujiao, HE Yanhua, DAI Liuyan, ZHANG Li. Optimization of rural settlements and the governance of rural relative poverty [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 902-912. |
[11] | TAN Xuelan, JIANG Lingxiao, WANG Zhenkai, AN Yue, CHEN Min, REN Hui. Rural poverty in China from the perspective of geography: Origin, progress, and prospect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 913-923. |
[12] | GUO Jianke, HOU Yajie, HE Yao. Characteristics of change of the China-Europe port shipping network under the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 716-726. |
[13] | SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737. |
[14] | TANG Chengli, GUO Xiashuang, ZHOU Guohua, WU Jiamin, CHEN Weiyang. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of innovation platforms in urban agglomerations of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Basin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 531-541. |
[15] | GUO Qingbin, LUO Kang, LIU Chengliang. A comparative study on the differences of factors aggregating ability among urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 542-552. |
|