PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 441-446.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
• Invited Paper • Next Articles
FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei
Received:
2014-04-01
Revised:
2014-04-01
Online:
2014-04-25
Published:
2014-04-25
CLC Number:
FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services:concepts, methods and progress[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
傅伯杰. 2013. 生态系统服务与生态安全. 北京: 高等教育出 版社. [Fu B J. 2013. Ecosystem service and ecological security. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.]李文华, 等. 2008. 生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论方法 与应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. [Li W H, et al. 2008. Valuation of ecosystem services: theories, methods and applications. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.]吕一河, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 2007. 景观格局与生态过程的耦合 途径分析. 地理科学进展, 26(3): 1-10.[Lv Y H, Chen L D, Fu B J. 2007. Analysis of the integrating approach on landscape pattern and ecological processes. Progress in Geography, 26(3): 1-10.]谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 2008. 一个基于专家知识的生态 系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 23(5): 911-919.[Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911-919.]张立伟, 傅伯杰. 2014. 生态系统服务制图研究进展. 生态学 报, 34(2): 316-325.[Zhang LW, Fu B J. 2014. The progress in ecosystem services mapping: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(2): 316-325.]张舟, 吴次芳, 谭荣. 2013. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用变 化研究中的应用: 瓶颈和展望. 应用生态学报, 24(2): 556-562.[Zhang Z, Wu C F, Tan R. 2013. Application of ecosystem service value in land use change research: bottlenecks and prospects. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2): 556-562.]赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚. 2000. 生态系统服务的物质量与价值量 评价方法的比较分析. 应用生态学报, 11(2): 290-292.[Zhao J Z, Xiao H, Wu G. 2000. Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 11(2): 290-292.]Anderies J M, Cumming G, Janssen M, et al. 2001. A resilience centered approach for engaging stakeholders about regional sustainability: an example from the Goulburn Broken catchment in Southeastern Australia (Technical Report, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems). Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.Ayanu Y Z, Conrad C, Nauss T, et al. 2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: a review of remote sensing applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(16): 8529-8541.Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394-1404.Braat L, Ten B P. 2008. The cost of policy inaction: the case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Brussels, Belgium: The COPI Project.Briggs S V, Taws N. 2003. Impacts of salinity on biodiversity: clear understanding or muddy confusion? Australian Journal of Botany, 51(6): 609-617.Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21: 17-29.Carreño L, Frank F C, Viglizzo E F. 2012. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154: 68-77.Costanza R, D'arge R, Groot R D, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.Crossman N D, Burkhard B, Nedkov S. 2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2): 1-4.Daily G C. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems.Washington, DC: Island Press. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth P R, Anderson B J, et al. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(2): 377-385.Farrington P, Salama R B. 1996. Controlling dryland salinity by planting trees in the best hydrogeological setting. Land Degradation & Development, 7(3): 183-204.Feng X M, Fu B J, Yang X J, et al. 2010. Remote sensing of ecosystem services: an opportunity for spatially explicit assessment. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(6): 522- 535.Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M, et al. 2000. The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, China. Catena, 39(1): 69-78.Fu B J, Su C H, Wei Y P, et al. 2011. Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological Research, 26(1): 1-14.Fu B J, Wang S, Su C H, et al. 2013. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 4-10.Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al. 2012. Integrating ecosystem- service tradeoffs into land- use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (19): 7565-7570.Greiner R, Cacho O. 2001. On the efficient use of a catchment's land and water resources: dryland salinization in Australia. Ecological Economics, 38(3): 441-458.Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. 2012. Synergies, trade- offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17 (3): 22.Hein L, Koppen K V, Groot R S D, et al. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209-228.Hussain A M T, Tschirhart J. 2013. Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 93: 116-127.Jia X Q, Fu B J, Feng X M, et al. 2014. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the grain-for-green areas in northern Shaanxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 43: 103-113.Lamarque P, Quétier F, Lavorel S. 2011. The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334(5-6): 441-449.Lautenbach S, Volk M, Gruber B, et al. 2010. Quantifying ecosystem service trade- offs. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment's Sake. Ottawa, Canada: July 5-8, 2010.Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. 2012a. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 31-39.Maes J, Paracchini M L, Zulian G, et al. 2012b. Synergies and trade- offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155: 1-12.Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, et al. 2013. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: an analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Martínez- Harms M J, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2): 17-25.MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being.Washington, DC: Island Press. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, et al. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28): 9495-9500.Nedkov S, Burkhard B. 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem services: mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole Municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 21: 67-79.Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4-11.Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304: 1251-1252.Rodríguez J P, Beard T D J, Bennett E M, et al. 2006. Tradeoffs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28. Schofield N J. 1992. Tree planting for dryland salinity control in Australia. Agroforestry Systems, 20(1-2): 1-23.Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F V, et al. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3): 630-636.Su S L, Xiao R, Jiang Z L, et al. 2012. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography, 34: 295-305.Sutherland W J, Armstrong B S, Armsworth P R, et al. 2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43 (4): 617-627. |
|