基于文献引用关系和知识图谱的时空关系研究热点分析

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.09.003

Abstract

Abstract: The field of space-time research has received wide attention in the past few decades. In order to explore the trend and hot issues objectively, a database is set up by the software Histcite, consisting of 2263 related papers included in the database of "Web of Science" from 1999 to 2013 and 78139 indirect papers referenced by the papers in first group. The historical citation relationships and the hot-spot papers, key words, and journals are visualized on the platform of Citespace. At the same time, the citation relationships between the 2263 related papers are also analyzed by Histcite. Some conclusions are drawn as follows: Firstly, the widely cited papers are exploding, with the trend from discussions on the theoretical framework to methods and applications. In detail, after the first widely cited paper, titled as "what about people in regional science" written by H?gerstrand in 1970, appears in the citation tree-rings, there scattered certain other widely cited papers during the 1970s when the theory of time geography was being formed. There appear a few hot-spot papers during the 1980s, including the papers from the field of transportation geography. After the 1990s, with the application of GIS, more and more publications related to the subject of space-time were cited, and the trend became more remarkable after 2000s. The content of studies gradually shifted from description of space-time behavior to the interpretation of it. As T-GIS technology matures, space-time behavior will be used not only as an object to be decrypted, but also as a variable to explain space-time phenomena and social problems, and the value of the application will be gradually revealed. Secondly, the main trends of the papers related to space-time published during 1999-2013 have been discovered, including the integration of space-time framework and GIS, the integration of space-time and travel demand, the impact of internet and mobile technology on spatio-temporal behavior, and the gender differences et.al. The potential widely cited but non-mainstream papers are in the field of transportation modeling and sociology. Finally, the key words of hot topics and journals related to space-time are also recognized.

Key words: hot spots of research, knowledge map, progress, space-time, time geography

GU Jie, ZHOU Suhong,YAN Xiaopei, CHAI Yanwei, ZHENG Zhong. The trend and hot issues in the field of space-time research: Based on the literature citation relationships and knowledge map[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(9): 1332-1343.

References

Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S. 1985. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chai Y W, Shen Y, Xiao Z P, et al. 2012. Review for space-time behavior research: Theory frontiers and application in the future. Progress in Geography, 31(6):667-675. [柴彦威, 申悦, 肖作鹏, 等. 2012. 时空间行为研究动态及其实践应用前景. 地理科学进展, 31(6):667-675.]
Chai Y W, Zhao Y. 2009. Recent development in time geography.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 29(4): 593-600. [柴彦威, 赵莹. 2009. 时间地理学研究最新进展. 地理科学,29(4): 593-600.]
Chapin F S. 1974. Human activity patterns in the city: Things people do in time and in space. New York:Wiley.
Doherty S T, Miller EJ. 2000. A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation, 27(1): 75-97.
Golob T F. 2000. A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34(5): 355-376.
Golob T F, Regan A C. 2001. Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: Research challenges and opportunities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 9(2): 87-121.
Graham S, Marvin S. 1996. Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places. London and New York: Routledge.
Hägerstrand T. 1970. What about people in regional science. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 24(1): 7-21.
Handy S L, Niemeier D A. 1997. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29: 1175-1194.
Hansen W G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2): 73-76.
Harvey D. 1989. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell Oxford.
Janelle D G. 1969. Spatial reorganization: A model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59(2): 348-364.
Jones P M, Dix M C, Clarke M I, et al. 1983. Understanding travel behaviour. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
Kain J F. 1968. Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(2): 175-197.
Kitamura R. 1988. An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation, 15(1-2): 9-34.
Kritzler M, Raubal M, Krüger A. 2007. A GIS framework for spatio-temporal analysis and visualization of laboratory mice tracking data. Transactions in GIS, 11(5): 765-782.
Kwan M-P. 1998. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3): 191-216.
Kwan M-P. 1999a. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer, 51(2): 211-227.
Kwan M-P. 1999b. Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of nonemployment activities. Economic Geography, 75(4): 370-394.
Kwan M-P. 2000a. Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: A methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 8(1): 185-203.
Kwan M-P. 2000b. Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area, 32(2): 145-156.
Kwan M-P. 2000c. Analysis of human spatial behavior in a GIS environment: Recent developments and future prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2(1): 85-90.
Kwan M-P. 2001. Cyberspatial cognition and individual access to information: The behavioral foundation of cybergeography. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1): 21-37.
Kwan M-P. 2002a. Time, information technologies, and the geographies of everyday life. Urban geography, 23(5):471-482.
Kwan M-P. 2002b. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4):645-661.
Kwan M-P. 2003. Gender troubles in the internet era. Feminist Media Studies, 3(3): 371-374.
Kwan M-P. 2004. GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography, 86(4): 267-280.
Kwan M-P. 2005. Gis methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography,86(4): 267-280.
Kwan M-P. 2006. Transport geography in the age of mobile
communications. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(5):384-385.
Kwan M-P. 2007a. Mobile communications, social networks,and urban travel: Hypertext as a new metaphor for conceptualizing spatial interaction. Professional Geographer,59(4): 434-446.
Kwan M-P. 2007b. Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. Professional Geographer, 59(1): 22-34.
Kwan M-P, Weber J. 2003. Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century. Geographical Analysis, 35(4): 341-353.
Lenntorp B. 1976. Paths in space-time environments. Lund, Sweden: Department of Geography, Royal University of Lund.
Massey D. 1999. Space-time, "science" and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(3): 261-276.
Miller H J. 1991. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 5(3): 287-301.
Miller H J. 1999. Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis, 31(1): 1-26.
Miller H J, Wu Y H. 2000. GIS software for measuring space-time accessibility in transportation planning and analysis. GeoInformatica, 4(2): 141-159.
Miller H J. 2005a. A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37(1): 17-45.
Miller H J. 2005b. A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37(1): 17-45.
Miller H J, Bridwell S. 2009. A field-based theory for time geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,99(1): 49-75.
Miller H J. 2010. The data avalanche is here: Shouldn't we be digging? Journal of Regional Science, 50(1): 181-201.
Miller H J, Witlox F, Tribby C P. 2013. Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: A measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 26: 51-64.
Pred A. 1977. The choreography of existence: Comments on Hägerstrand's time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53(2): 207-221.
Pred A. 1984. Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2): 279-297.
Preston J, Rajé F. 2007. Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography,15(3): 151-160.
Shaw S-L, Yu H. 2009. A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical-virtual space. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(2): 141-149.
Schwanen T, Kwan M-P. 2008. The internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum, 39(3): 1362-1377.
Shoval N, Isaacson M. 2007. Sequence alignment as a method for human activity analysis in space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2):282-297.
Timmermans H, Arentze T, Joh C-H. 2001. Modeling effects of anticipated time pressure on execution of activity programs. Transportation Research Record, (1752): 8-15.
Timmermans H, Arentze T, Joh C-H. 2002a. Analysing space-time behaviour: New approaches to old problems. Progress in Human Geography, 26(2): 175-190.
Timmermans H, van der Waerden P, Alves M, et al. 2002b.Time allocation in urban and transport settings: An international,inter-urban perspective. Transport Policy, 9(2):79-93.
Timmermans H, van der Waerden P, Alves M, et al. 2003. Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: An international comparison. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(1): 37-46.
Timmermans H, van derWaerden P. 2008. Synchronicity of activity engagement and travel in time and space descriptors and correlates of field observations. Transportation Research Record, (2054): 1-9.
Timmermans H, Zhang J Y. 2009. Modeling household activity travel behavior: Examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(2): 187-190.
Timmermans H, Arentze T A. 2011. Transport models and urban planning practice: Experiences with albatross. Transport Reviews, 31(2): 199-207.
Weber J, Kwan M-P. 2002. Bringing time back in: A study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. The Professional Geographer, 54(2): 226-240.
Weber J. Kwan M-P. 2003. Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geography, 24(8): 647-671
Yu H, Shaw S-L. 2008. Exploring potential human activities in physical and virtual spaces: A spatio-temporal GIS approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(4): 409-430.

[1]	HU Guojian, LU Yuqi. Progress, thoughts, and prospect of urban network research based on enterprise perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596.
[2]	REN Jiamin, MA Yanji. Research progress and prospects of green development from the perspective of geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1196-1209.
[3]	CHENG Hanbei, ZOU You, LIN Sainan, LI Zhigang. Review of recent research on the impacts of residential mobility on health [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1210-1223.
[4]	XIONG Chenran, WANG Limao, QU Qiushi, XIANG Ning, WANG Bo. Progress and prospect of geopolitical risk research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[5]	HUANG An, XU Yueqing, LU Longhui, LIU Chao, ZHANG Yibin, HAO Jinmin, WANG hui. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.
[6]	ZOU Lilin, LIU Yansui, WANG Yongsheng. Research progress and prospect of land-use conflicts in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 298-309.
[7]	YANG Jun, YOU Haolin, ZHANG Yuqing, JIN Cui. Research progress on human settlements: From traditional data to big data+ [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 166-176.
[8]	Hua GUO, Ling'en WANG, Enpu MA. The evolving concept of food system and a geographical paradigm of research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1034-1044.
[9]	Alexander DRUZHININ, Yawen DONG, Lei ZHANG, Jinlong GAO. Development of socioeconomic geography in Russia during the past three decades [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 941-950.
[10]	Dongsheng ZHAN, Wenzhong ZHANG, Li Chen, Xiaofen YU, Yunxiao DANG. Research progress and its enlightenment of urban public service facilities allocation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 506-519.
[11]	Xiaoshu CAO, Peiting HU, Dan LIU. Progress of research on electric vehicle charging stations [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 139-152.
[12]	Yinfeng XU, Degen WANG. Research progress and prospects of high-speed rail effects on urban spatial structure in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230.
[13]	Xiping YANG, Zhixiang FANG. Recent progress in studying human mobility and urban spatial structure based on mobile location big data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(7): 880-889.
[14]	Wenying FU. Research progress and prospect on the relationship between industrial clusters and local entrepreneurship [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(6): 739-749.
[15]	Lin LIU, Wenjuan LIU, Weiwei LIAO, Hongjie YU, Chao JIANG, Rongping LIN, Jiakai JI, Zheng ZHANG. Comparison of random forest algorithm and space-time kernel density mapping for crime hotspot prediction [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(6): 761-771.

The trend and hot issues in the field of space-time research: Based on the literature citation relationships and knowledge map

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0