生态系统服务价值评估理论框架与生态补偿实践

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.015

Abstract

Abstract: Ecosystem assessment is the foundation of ecosystem management and conservation. In recent years, many studies have assessed the ecosystem services for various types in multiple scales. These results enhance people’s understanding of ecosystem services. But some of the current assessment results are not reasonable so that they play a minor role in the practice of ecosystem compensation. So it is crucial to further study the framework of ecosystem services assessment so that we can better understand the actual value of ecosystem services. Based on the previous related theoretical framework for valuing ecosystem services, this study examines the advantages of each framework comprehensively, and summarizes an integrated framework for ecosystem services value assessment. In particular, this framework focuses on some key issues, including the economic theory for valuing ecosystem services, scales of ecosystem services and stakeholders. This framework aims to value the ecosystem services reasonably, to follow the wish to pay (WTP) rules and to combine the ecosystem services value with different stakeholders on multiple scales, which can enhance the applicability and maneuverability of assessment results and help determine the standard and objects of ecological compensation.

Key words: ecological compensation, ecosystem, ecosystem management, ecosystem services value assessment

DAI Junhu, WANG Huanjiong, WANG Hongli, CHEN Chunyang. An Introduction to Framework of Assessment of the Value of Ecosystem Services[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(7): 963-969.

References

[1] Helliwell D R. Valuation of wildlife resources. RegionalStudies, 1969, 3(1): 41-49.

[2] Holdren J P, Ehrlinch P R. Human population and theglobal environment. American Scientist, 1974, 62(3):282-292.

[3] Randall A. 资源经济学: 从经济角度对自然资源和环境政策的探讨. 施以正, 译. 北京: 商务出版社, 1989.

[4] Daily G C. Nature’s Service: Societal Dependence on NaturalEcosystems.Washington: Island Press, 1997.

[5] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of theworld’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature,1997, 387: 253-260.

[6] Turner R K, van den Bergh J C J M, Soderqvist T, et al.Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integrationfor management and policy. Ecological Economics,2000, 35(1): 7-23.

[7] de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans M J. A typology forthe classification, description and valuation of ecosystemfunctions, goods and services. Ecological Economics,2002, 41(3): 393-408.

[8] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 生态系统与人类福祉: 评估框架. 张永民, 译. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社,2007: 213- 214.

[9] 李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 1-10.

[10] 谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞. 生态系统服务研究: 进展、局限和基本范式. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 191-199.

[11] Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot R S, et al. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem servicess.Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(2): 209-228.

[12] 侯元兆, 吴水荣. 生态系统价值评估理论方法的最新进展及对我国流行概念的辨正, 2008, 21(5): 7-16.

[13] McNeely J A, Miller K R, Reid W V, et al. ConservingtheWorld Biological Diversity.World Bank, 1990.

[14] Pearce D W, Moran D. London: Earthscan PublicationsLimited, 1994.

[15] UNEP. Guidelines for Country Study on Biological Diversity.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

[16] Winpenny J T. The Economic Appraisal of Environmental Protects and Policies: A Practical Guide. Paris, Franceand Washington D C: Organization for Economic Cooperationand Development, 1995.

[17] Barbier E B. Valuing environmental functions: Tropicalwetlands. Land Economics, 1994, 70(2): 155-173.

[18] 周慧滨, 左旦平. 旅行成本法在我国应用中存在的几个问题. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 489-499.

[19] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196.

[20] 李文华, 李芬, 李世东, 等. 森林生态效益补偿的研究现状与展望.自然资源学报, 2006, 21(5): 677-687.

[21] 杜群, 生态补偿的法律关系及其发展现状和问题. 现代法学, 2005, 27(3): 186-191.

[22] 中国21 世纪议程管理中心. 生态补偿原理与应用. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2009: 213-217.

An Introduction to Framework of Assessment of the Value of Ecosystem Services

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	MA Enpu, CAI Jianming, HAN Yan, LIAO Liuwen, LIN Jing. Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of Human-Earth system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 310-326.
[2]	CHENG Chaonan, HU Yang, ZHAO Ming. Progress and prospect of the spatiotemporal change and ecosystem services evaluation of urban green space pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[3]	Yang LIU, Jianshu LV, Jun BI. Characterizing water purification services and quantifying their driving factors in watershed terrestrial ecosystems [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 588-599.
[4]	Ziwen LIU, Dan YIN, Qingxu HUANG, Chunyang HE, Fei XUE. Research and application progress of ecosystem services in land use planning: A bibliometric and textual analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 236-247.
[5]	Ping WANG, Xuejing ZHANG, Tianye WANG, Sergey P POZDNIAKOV. A review of the White method for the estimation of evapotranspiration from phreatophytes in arid areas [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1159-1170.
[6]	Wenwu ZHAO, Yue LIU, Qiang FENG, Yaping WANG, Siqi YANG. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.
[7]	Chuanzhun SUN, Lin ZHEN, Chao WANG, Jie HU, Bingzhen DU. Assessment of the ecological effects of the first-phase natural forest protection project in the Xiaolongshan region, Gansu Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(6): 732-740.
[8]	Weihua XU, Yanying YANG, Lu ZHANG, Yi XIAO, Xiaoke WANG, Zhiyun OUYANG. Evaluation methods and case study of regional ecological carrying capacity for early-warning [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.
[9]	Wenhuan WU, Jian PENG, Yanxu LIU, Yi'na HU. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581.
[10]	Zhe FENG, Xuegong XU, Jian ZHOU, Yang GAO. Land sparing versus sharing framework from ecosystem service perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1100-1108.
[11]	Guoqing LI, Xiaobing LI. Research progress of wind farm impact on the environment [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(8): 1017-1026.
[12]	Yuchen DING, Changchun FENG, Liwei WANG. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe Town in Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 851-859.
[13]	Wenjuan HOU, Jiangbo GAO, Tao PENG, Shaohong WU, Erfu DAI. Review of ecosystem vulnerability studies in the karst region of Southwest China based on a structure-function-habitat framework [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(3): 320-330.
[14]	Qun GAO, Cheng YU. A review of urbanization impact on nitrogen cycle [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(6): 726-738.
[15]	Jian HU, Yihe LÜ. Research progress on stochastic soil moisture dynamic model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(3): 389-400.