基于集对分析的鞍山市人地系统脆弱性评估

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.03.010

Abstract

Abstract: Vulnerability assessment framework in sustainability science has properties of multi-scale, multi-element, multi-flow and multi-cycle, so vulnerability assessment is a new research paradigm in the realms of global environmental change and sustainable development, and provides an effective tool for the study of interaction mechanisms and processes of coupled human-land system. Based on the dependence of economic development on resources, and the instability in employment, and the ecology being relatively disrupted, the vulnerability assessment indexes of Anshan city are established. By using the set pair analysis and the entropy method, the essay analyzed the sensitivity, response capacity and vulnerability level of the economic system, as well as the employment system and the ecosystem. Then the vulnerability of human-land system of Anshan city are tested and the evolution of vulnerability characteristics during 1990 to 2009 has been revealed.
The relationship of human-land system of Anshan city belongs to the lower sensitivity and higher response capacity type. In comparison with other resource-based cities in Northeast China, the human-land stability of Anshan city is stronger, and the vulnerability is relatively weak, which means that Anshan city has lower sensitivity and better response capacity to the complicated human-land system. The sensitivity of Anshan city has a declining trend, and the economic sensitivity is bigger than the environmental sensitivity and the social sensitivity. The response capacity of Anshan city shows a rising trend, and the environmental system is more evident than the social system and the economic system. There is a rising trend for vulnerability of Anshan, and economic system is most vulnerable. The paper reflects that Anshan city has better potentials to develop a sustainable economy, but attention should be paid to lowering the sensitivity of the economic system and to increasing the response capacity.

Key words: Anshan city, human-land system, response capacity, sensitivity, set pair analysis, vulnerability

HAN Ruiling, TONG Lianjun, TONGWeiming, YU Jianhui. Research on Vulnerability Assessment of Human-land System of Anshan City Based on Set Pair Analysis[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(3): 344-352.

References

[1] 孙平军, 修春亮. 东北地区中老年矿业城市经济系统脆弱性. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(8): 935-942.
[2] Timmerman P. Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society: A review of models and possible climatic applications. Toronto: Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, 1981.
[3] 李鹤, 张平宇. 东北地区矿业城市经济系统脆弱性分析. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(1): 116-120.
[4] 方修琦, 殷培红. 弹性、脆弱性和适应: IHDP 三个核心概念综述. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5): 11-22.
[5] 苏美蓉, 杨志峰, 王红瑞, 等. 一种城市生态系统健康评价方法及其应用. 环境科学学报, 2006, 26(12): 2072-2080.
[6] 薛纪渝. 脆弱环境敏感性评价方法探讨. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 1995.
[7] Smit B, Wandel J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 282-292.
[8] 熊文, 吴玉鸣. 中国经济增长与环境脆弱性的因果及冲击响应分析. 资源科学, 2006, 28(5): 17-23.
[9] 刘燕华, 李秀彬. 脆弱生态环境与可持续发展. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2002.
[10] McLaughlin P, Dietz T. Structure, agency and environment: Toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 2008, 18(1): 99-111.
[11] Fraser E D G, Mabee W, Slaymaker O. Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence -The reflexive relation between human society and the environment. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 2003, 13(2): 137-144.
[12] 李鹤, 张平宇. 东北地区矿业城市社会就业脆弱性分析. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 751-758.
[13] Cutter S L. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93(1): 1-12.
[14] 苏飞. 基于集对分析的大庆市经济系统脆弱性评价.地理学报, 2010, 65(4): 454-464.
[15] 苏飞, 张平宇. 石油城市经济系统脆弱性评价. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(7): 1267-1274.
[16] Berry P M, Rounsevell M D A, Harrison P, et al. Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 2006, 9(2): 189-204.
[17] Li M S, Zhang H M, Li Z, et al. Economy-wide material input/output and dematerialization analysis of Jilin Province (China). Environ Monit Assess, 2010(165): 263-274..
[18] 赵克勤. 集对分析及其初步应用. 浙江科学技术出版社, 2000.
[19] 赵克勤. 联系数学的基本原理与应用. 安阳工学院学报, 2009(2): 107-110.
[20] 张斌. 多目标系统决策的模糊集对分析方法. 系统工程理论与实践, 1997(12): 108-114.
[21] 仇方道, 佟连军, 姜萌. 东北地区矿业城市产业生态系统适应性评价. 地理研究, 2011, 30(2): 243-255.

Research on Vulnerability Assessment of Human-land System of Anshan City Based on Set Pair Analysis

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHEN Mingxing, HUANG Xinrong, HUANG Gengzhi, YANG Yanshan. New urbanization and informal employment: Scale, pattern, and social integration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 50-60.
[2]	XUE Qian, XIE Miaomiao, GUO Qiang, WANG Yanan, WU Rongrong, LIU Qi. Research progress on urban heat wave vulnerability assessment: A geographical perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 685-694.
[3]	Chao YE, Liangming YIN, Qingmei YIN, Jianhua XU. Is geography a vulnerable discipline? Reflections on the elimination of geography at Harvard University [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(3): 312-319.
[4]	Hui ZHANG, Cheng LI, Jiong CHENG, Zhifeng WU, Yanyan WU. A review of urban flood risk assessment based on the framework of hazard-exposure-vulnerability [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[5]	Yanhua LIU, Yong XU. Analytical framework of sustainable poverty-reduction effect and mechanisms of anti-poverty models [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 567-578.
[6]	Lu TIAN, Sijing QIU, Jian PENG, Yina HU, Jinglei JIA, Qi MAO. Desertification sensitivity evaluation in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region based on PSR framework [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1682-1692.
[7]	Wenjie HUANG, Quansheng GE, Junhu DAI, Huanjiong WANG. Sensitivity of first flowering dates to temperature change for typical woody plants in Guiyang City, China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(8): 1015-1024.
[8]	Daming LU, Yuzhong SHI, Wenlong LI, Xinjun YANG. Spatiotemporal change of vulnerability in counties of northwest China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(4): 404-415.
[9]	Hui MENG, Chunyan LI, Ruolin ZHANG, Yamin LI. Risk assessment of geological hazards for counties and districts of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 327-334.
[10]	Yu SHI, Enpu MA, Tongsheng LI, Yang RUI. Social vulnerable degree of floods and its influencing factors based on the perspective of rural households: A case study of four riverside villages in Ankang City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1380-1390.
[11]	Tianyi LI, Jian PENG, Yanxu LIU, Yang YANG, Xin CHEN. Regional eco-cultural health assessment based on set pair analysis:A case study of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(10): 1270-1280.
[12]	Yuzhong SHI, Jun WANG, Ziqiao WANG, Daming LU, Xinjun YANG. Rural household vulnerability to drought and adaptation mechanism on the Loess Plateau [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(10): 1281-1293.
[13]	Yuchen DING, Changchun FENG, Liwei WANG. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe Town in Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 851-859.
[14]	Xianwu SHI, Zhixing GUO, Yao ZHANG, Jiayi FANG, Kejia HU, Qinzheng LIU. A review of research on vulnerability to storm surges [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 889-897.
[15]	Fei LI, Shengkui CHENG, Huilu YU, Qi QIN, Xiaojie LIU, Zengrang XU, Liang WU, Dan ZHANG, Xin LI, Dongmei CHU. National geopolitical vulnerability: A Myanmar case and implications for China’s geopolitical policy [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(6): 737-746.