区域经济发展的知识动力及其多区位机制

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.04.013

Abstract

Abstract:

In the era when information, labor, capital, and commodities are extremely mobile, knowledge increasingly shows multi-locational interactions characterized by the coexistence of interaction between neighboring areas and interaction between distant places, which has an important impact on regional economic development. Based on a series of changes in the current human social and economic systems, combined with the inherent inadequacies of the traditional regional innovation research paradigm, this article introduced the territorial knowledge dynamics theory with knowledge combination as the core. According to the theory of territorial knowledge dynamics, knowledge combination is the key driving force of regional innovation, characterized by multi-scale networks. The combination of different types of knowledge is realized through interaction between neighboring areas or interaction between distant places in space. According to the spatial pattern of knowledge combination, territorial knowledge dynamics can be classified into multi-locational knowledge dynamics and networks of distant knowledge dynamics. This study built an analytical framework of multi-locational knowledge dynamics for regional economic development. By introducing trust and learning mechanisms, this framework analyzes the mechanism of influence of local contexts, such as formal/informal institutions and cognitive level, on knowledge interaction and combination. Based on the external knowledge linkages and knowledge network externality, this framework explores the path and mechanism of influence of multi-locational knowledge networks on the evolution of regional industrial comparative advantage and endogenous economic growth. Finally, the logic of regional governance in the era of the knowledge economy was summarized from four dimensions: regional governance, regional strategic guidance, policy tools, and knowledge impact. The study of multi-locational knowledge dynamics promotes the regional innovation school's research on knowledge dynamics in regional economic development. It is also helpful for scientifically formulating policies for regional collaborative innovation and high-quality economic development.

Key words: knowledge combination, local context, trust-learning mechanism, external knowledge linkages, network externality, multi-locational knowledge dynamics, regional economic development

WANG Tengfei. The knowledge dynamics of regional economic development and its multi-locational mechanism[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(4): 782-795.

Figures/Tables 4

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

References 80

[1]	Crevoisier O, Jeannerat H. Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus[J]. European Planning Studies, 2009, 17(8): 1223-1241. doi: 10.1080/09654310902978231
[2]	Crespo J, Vicente J. Proximity and distance in knowledge relationships: From micro to structural considerations based on territorial knowledge dynamics (TKDs)[J]. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(2): 202-219. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.984671
[3]	王腾飞, 谷人旭, 马仁锋, 等. “集聚—扩散”视角下中国区域创新极及其知识溢出区位[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(5): 11-18, 185.
	[ Wang Tengfei, Gu Renxu, Ma Renfeng, et al. Regional innovation pole and its location of knowledge spillovers in China from the perspective of "agglomeration-diffusion". Economic Geography, 2021, 41(5): 11-18, 185. ]
[4]	Hidalgo C A. Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies[M]. New York, USA: Basic Books, 2015.
[5]	王腾飞, 谷人旭, 姜炎鹏, 等. 长江三角洲城市创新梯度研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019(7): 78-84.
	[ Wang Tengfei, Gu Renxu, Jiang Yanpeng, et al. Research on urban innovation gradient in Yangtze River Delta. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2019(7): 78-84. ]
[6]	张翼鸥, 谷人旭, 马双. 中国城市间技术转移的空间特征与邻近性机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 370-382. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.03.007
	[ Zhang Yi'ou, Gu Renxu, Ma Shuang. Spatial characteristics and proximity mechanism of technology transfer among cities in China. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(3): 370-382. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.03.007
[7]	Boschma R, Capone G. Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1902-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
[8]	Capello R, Caragliu A, Fratesi U. Breaking down the border: Physical, institutional and cultural obstacles[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 94(5): 485-513. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1444988
[9]	钱肖颖, 孙斌栋. 跨区域产业技术关联与产业创新: 基于中国制造业的分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(11): 1822-1831. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.11.004
	[ Qian Xiaoying, Sun Bindong. Interregional technological relatedness and industrial innovation: An analysis based on China's manufacturing industry. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(11): 1822-1831. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.11.004
[10]	王姝楠, 陈江生. 数字经济的技术—经济范式[J]. 上海经济研究, 2019(12): 80-94.
	[ Wang Shunan, Chen Jiangsheng. The techno-economic paradigm of digital economy. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2019(12): 80-94. ]
[11]	黄群慧, 贺俊. “第三次工业革命”与中国经济发展战略调整[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(1): 5-18.
	[ Huang Qunhui, He Jun. "The third industrial revolution" and the adjustment of China's economic strategy. China Industrial Economics, 2013(1): 5-18. ]
[12]	马仁锋, 王腾飞, 张文忠, 等. 文化创意产业区位模型与浙江实证[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(2): 379-390. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201802011
	[ Ma Renfeng, Wang Tengfei, Zhang Wenzhong, et al. Location model of cultural & creative industry and its application in Zhejiang. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(2): 379-390. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201802011
[13]	王腾飞, 马仁锋. 宁波老工业区创意空间孕育机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(11): 1567-1580. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.11.012
	[ Wang Tengfei, Ma Renfeng. Cultivation mechanism of creative spaces in the old industrial districts of Ningbo City. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(11): 1567-1580. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.11.012
[14]	李丹丹, 汪涛, 魏也华, 等. 中国城市尺度科学知识网络与技术知识网络结构的时空复杂性[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(3): 525-540. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503011
	[ Li Dandan, Wang Tao, Wei Yehua, et al. Spatial and temporal complexity of scientific knowledge network and technological knowledge network on China's urban scale. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(3): 525-540. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503011
[15]	刘承良, 管明明, 段德忠. 中国城际技术转移网络的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1462-1477. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201808006
	[ Liu Chengliang, Guan Mingming, Duan Dezhong. Spatial pattern and influential mechanism of interurban technology transfer network in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(8): 1462-1477. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201808006
[16]	段德忠, 杜德斌, 谌颖, 等. 中国城市创新技术转移格局与影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 738-754. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804011
	[ Duan Dezhong, Du Debin, Chen Ying, et al. Technology transfer in China's city system: Process, pattern and influencing factors. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 738-754. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804011
[17]	马海涛. 知识流动空间的城市关系建构与创新网络模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 708-721. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004004
	[ Ma Haitao. The theoretical construction and network simulation of intercity innovative relationships in knowledge flow space. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 708-721. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004004
[18]	刘君洋, 朱晟君. “求人”还是“求己”: 多尺度知识溢出与企业出口产品演化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 397-409. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.004
	[ Liu Junyang, Zhu Shengjun. "Learning from yourself" or "learning from others": Multi-scalar knowledge spillovers and the evolution of firms' export products. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 397-409. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.004
[19]	Lagendijk A. Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: Framing present debates, unbracketing past debates[J]. Regional Studies, 2006, 40(4): 385-399. doi: 10.1080/00343400600725202
[20]	Storper M, Venables A J. Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2004, 4(4): 351-370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
[21]	Boschma R, Frenken K. The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective[M]// BoschmaR, MartinR.The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010.
[22]	Bathelt H. Buzz and pipeline dynamics: Towards a knowledge‐based multiplier model of clusters[J]. Geography Compass, 2007, 1(6): 1282-1298. doi: 10.1111/geco.2007.1.issue-6
[23]	滕堂伟. 从地方集群到集群网络: 产业集群研究的国际前沿进展[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2015(6): 171-175.
	[ Teng Tangwei. From local cluster to cluster network: International frontier progress of industrial cluster research. Gansu Social Sciences, 2015(6): 171-175. ]
[24]	吕拉昌, 黄茹, 廖倩. 创新地理学研究的几个理论问题[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(5): 653-661. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.05.002
	[ Lv Lachang, Huang Ru, Liao Qian. Several theoretical issues on innovation geography. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(5): 653-661. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.05.002
[25]	Asheim B, Coenen L, Moodysson J, et al. Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2007, 7(2-5): 140-155. doi: 10.1504/IJEIM.2007.012879
[26]	Asheim B, Boschma R, Cooke P. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases[J]. Regional Studies, 2011, 45(7): 893-904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
[27]	李琳, 蒋婷, 徐洁. 我国区域产业知识基础的测算及动态变化[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(5): 107-114.
	[ Li Lin, Jiang Ting, Xu Jie. The measurement and dynamic change of China's regional industrial knowledge base. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(5): 107-114. ]
[28]	叶琴, 曾刚. 解析型与合成型产业创新网络特征比较: 以中国生物医药、节能环保产业为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(10): 142-154.
	[ Ye Qin, Zeng Gang. Comparison of innovation networks of analytical and synthetic industries: An empirical analysis on China biomedicine and environmental protection industry. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(10): 142-154. ]
[29]	Strambach S, Klement B. Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(11): 1843-1866. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
[30]	Arthur W B. The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves[M]. New York, USA: Free Press, 2009.
[31]	Kim D, Cerigo D B, Jeong H, et al. Technological novelty profile and invention's future impact[J]. EPJ Data Science, 2016, 5: 8. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0069-1. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0069-1
[32]	Verhoeven D, Bakker J, Veugelers R. Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(3): 707-723. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010
[33]	Mewes L. Scaling of atypical knowledge combinations in American metropolitan areas from 1836 to 2010[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 95(4): 341-361. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2019.1567261
[34]	Manniche J. Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge bases model[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(11): 1823-1841. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723423
[35]	Halkier H, James L, Dahlström M, et al. Knowledge dynamics, regions and public policy[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(11): 1759-1766. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723419
[36]	Jeannerat H, Crevoisier O. From 'territorial innovation models' to 'territorial knowledge dynamics': On the learning value of a new concept in regional studies[J]. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(2): 185-188. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1105653
[37]	Paci R, Marrocu E, Usai S. The complementary effects of proximity dimensions on knowledge spillovers[J]. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2014, 9(1): 9-30. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2013.856518
[38]	Caragliu A, Nijkamp P. Space and knowledge spillovers in European regions: The impact of different forms of proximity on spatial knowledge diffusion[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2016, 16(3): 749-774. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv042
[39]	王腾飞, 谷人旭, 马仁锋. 知识溢出研究的“空间性”转向及人文与经济地理学议题[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(6): 47-59.
	[ Wang Tengfei, Gu Renxu, Ma Renfeng. The "spatiality" turn in knowledge spillovers research and the themes of human and economic geography. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(6): 47-59. ]
[40]	毛琦梁, 王菲. 制度环境、技术复杂度与空间溢出的产业间非均衡性[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(5): 118-136.
	[ Mao Qiliang, Wang Fei. Institutional environment, technical sophistication and asymmetric spatial spillovers across industries. China Industrial Economics, 2020(5): 118-136. ]
[41]	杨开忠, 范博凯, 董亚宁. 空间品质, 创新活力与中国城市生产率[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(1): 47-64.
	[ Yang Kaizhong, Fan Bokai, Dong Yaning. Qualities of space, innovation, and productivity of Chinese cities. Business and Management Journal, 2022, 44(1): 47-64. ]
[42]	Olsen L S. Territorial knowledge dynamics: Making a difference to territorial innovation models and public policy?[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(11): 1785-1801. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723421
[43]	Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K. Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics[J]. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(6): 907-920. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
[44]	刘伟. 社会资本与区域创新: 理论发展、因果机制与政策意蕴[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(2): 65-70.
	[ Liu Wei. Social capital and regional innovation: Theoretical development, causal mechanism, and policy implication. Chinese Public Administration, 2018(2): 65-70. ]
[45]	Nilsson M. Proximity and the trust formation process[J]. European Planning Studies, 2019, 27(5): 841-861. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1575338
[46]	Echebarria C, Barrutia J M. Limits of social capital as a driver of innovation: An empirical analysis in the context of European regions[J]. Regional Studies, 2013, 47(7): 1001-1017. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.603720
[47]	丁焕峰, 陈庆秋. 区域社会资本: 一种重要的区域创新动力[J]. 经济问题探索, 2006(9): 24-29.
	[ Ding Huanfeng, Chen Qingqiu. Regional social capital: An important driving force for regional innovation. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2006(9): 24-29. ]
[48]	Charron N, Dijkstra L, Lapuente V. Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European union member states[J]. Regional Studies, 2014, 48(1): 68-90. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
[49]	刘凤朝, 闫菲菲, 马荣康, 等. 多维邻近与跨区域研发合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(6): 1038-1047.
	[ Liu Fengchao, Yan Feifei, Ma Rongkang, et al. Multi-dimensional proximities and inter-regional R&D collaboration pattern. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(6): 1038-1047. ]
[50]	Cortinovis N, Xiao J, Boschma R, et al. Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2017, 17(6): 1179-1208. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbx001
[51]	克努兹・伊列雷斯. 学习理论发展简史(下)[J]. 陈伦菊, 盛群力, 译. 数字教育, 2020(2): 86-92.
	[ Knud Illeris. A brief history of the development of learning theory (II).Translated by ChenLunju, ShengQunli. DigitalEducation, 2020(2): 86-92. ]
[52]	Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
[53]	Huber F. On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster[J]. Regional Studies, 2012, 46(9): 1169-1182. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
[54]	Lin C, Wu Y J, Chang C C, et al. The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances: The absorptive capacity perspective[J]. Technovation, 2012, 32(5): 282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.004
[55]	宓泽锋, 曾刚. 本地知识基础对新兴产业知识流动的影响: 以中国燃料电池产业为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 1006-1018. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104015
	[ Mi Zefeng, Zeng Gang. The impact of local knowledge base on knowledge flow of emerging industry: A case of China's fuel cell industry. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 1006-1018. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104015
[56]	Miguélez E, Moreno R. Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(4): 833-848. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016
[57]	James L, Vissers G, Larsson A, et al. Territorial knowledge dynamics and knowledge anchoring through localized networks: The automotive sector in Västra Götaland[J]. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(2): 233-244. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007934
[58]	Abreu M. Absorptive capacity in a regional context[M] //Cooke P, AsheimB, BoschmaR, et al. Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
[59]	贺灿飞, 朱晟君. 中国产业发展与布局的关联法则[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2684-2698. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202012010
	[ He Canfei, Zhu Shengjun. The principle of relatedness in China's regional industrial development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(12): 2684-2698. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202012010
[60]	Zhu S J, He C F, Zhou Y. How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2017, 17(3): 521-545.
[61]	Trippl M, Grillitsch M, Isaksen A. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(5): 687-705. doi: 10.1177/0309132517700982
[62]	毛琦梁, 王菲. 地区比较优势演化的空间关联: 知识扩散的作用与证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(11): 136-154.
	[ Mao Qiliang, Wang Fei. Spatial correlation in evolution of regional comparative advantages: Evidence on the impact of knowledge diffusion. China Industrial Economics, 2018(11): 136-154. ]
[63]	Boschma R, Martín V, Minondo A. Neighbour regions as the source of new industries[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2017, 96(2): 227-245. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12215
[64]	Wang T F, Halkier H, James L, et al. External knowledge linkages and the evolution of comparative advantage: An examination of territorial knowledge dynamics in China[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(8): 4685. doi: 10.3390/su14084685. doi: 10.3390/su14084685
[65]	陆军, 毛文峰. 城市网络外部性的崛起: 区域经济高质量一体化发展的新机制[J]. 经济学家, 2020(12): 64-72.
	[ Lu Jun, Mao Wenfeng. The rise of urban network externalities: A new mechanism for the high-quality integrated development of regional economy. Economist, 2020(12): 64-72. ]
[66]	叶初升, 任兆柯. 经济学中的网络分析与网络的经济学研究: 经济学框架与网络分析方法的视界融合及其评述[J]. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(5): 39-46, 38.
	[ Ye Chusheng, Ren Zhaoke. The network analysis in economics and the economic research of the network: A review based on the integration perspective on the economic framework and the network analysis method. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 39-46, 38. ]
[67]	林柄全, 谷人旭, 王俊松, 等. 从集聚外部性走向跨越地理边界的网络外部性: 集聚经济理论的回顾与展望[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(12): 82-89.
	[ Lin Bingquan, Gu Renxu, Wang Junsong, et al. From agglomeration externalities to network externalities of crossing borders: Frontier progress of agglomeration economics. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(12): 82-89. ]
[68]	程玉鸿, 苏小敏. 城市网络外部性研究述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(4): 713-720. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.04.015
	[ Cheng Yuhong, Su Xiaomin. Review on the urban network externalities. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(4): 713-720. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.04.015
[69]	Burger M J, Meijers E J. Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2016, 95(1): 5-15. doi: 10.1111/pirs.v95.1
[70]	Meijers E J, Burger M J. Stretching the concept of 'borrowed size'[J]. Urban Studies, 2017, 54(1): 269-291. doi: 10.1177/0042098015597642
[71]	皮亚彬, 陈耀. 大国内部经济空间布局: 区位、禀赋与一体化[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2019, 18(4): 1289-1310.
	[ Pi Yabin, Chen Yao. Distribution of economic activities of big country: Location, endowments and integration. China Economic Quarterly, 2019, 18(4): 1289-1310. ]
[72]	殷德生, 吴虹仪, 金桩. 创新网络、知识溢出与高质量一体化发展: 来自长江三角洲城市群的证据[J]. 上海经济研究, 2019(11): 30-45.
	[ Yin Desheng, Wu Hongyi, Jin Zhuang. Innovation network, knowledge spillover and high-quality integrated development: An empirical study based on the urban agglomeration of the Yangtze River Delta. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2019(11): 30-45.]
[73]	Halkier H. Knowledge dynamics and policies for regional development: Towards a new governance paradigm[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(11): 1767-1784. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723420
[74]	刘秉镰, 边杨, 周密, 等. 中国区域经济发展70年回顾及未来展望[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(9): 24-41.
	[ Liu Binglian, Bian Yang, Zhou Mi, et al. 70 years review of China's regional economic development and its prospect. China Industrial Economics, 2019(9): 24-41. ]
[75]	孙涛, 温雪梅. 动态演化视角下区域环境治理的府际合作网络研究: 以京津冀大气治理为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(5): 83-89.
	[ Sun Tao, Wen Xuemei. Network analysis of regional environmental governance under inter-government cooperation: An example of the regional air governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area. Chinese Public Administration, 2018(5): 83-89. ]
[76]	张兵. 京津冀协同发展与国家空间治理的战略性思考[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2016(4): 15-21.
	[ Zhang Bing. Coordinated development for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: A strategic trade-off in state spatial governance. Urban Planning Forum, 2016(4): 15-21. ]
[77]	张学良, 林永然, 孟美侠. 长三角区域一体化发展机制演进[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 43(1): 138-147.
	[ Zhang Xueliang, Lin Yongran, Meng Meixia. The evolution of regional integration development mechanism in the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 43(1): 138-147. ]
[78]	胡剑双, 孙经纬. 国家—区域尺度重组视角下的长三角区域治理新框架探析[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020(5): 55-61.
	[ Hu Jianshuang, Sun Jingwei. A research on the new regional governance model of the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of state-region rescaling. Urban Planning Forum, 2020(5): 55-61. ]
[79]	钟韵, 胡晓华. 粤港澳大湾区的构建与制度创新[J]. 经济学家, 2017(12): 50-57.
	[ Zhong Yun, Hu Xiaohua. Construction and system innovation of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Economist, 2017(12): 50-57. ]
[80]	张福磊. 多层级治理框架下的区域空间与制度建构[J]. 行政论坛, 2019, 26(3): 95-102.
	[ Zhang Fulei. Regional space and institutional construction under multi-level governance framework. Administrative Tribune, 2019, 26(3): 95-102. ]

主维度	次维度	工业经济时代区域治理	知识经济时代区域治理
区域管治	治理结构	集中和等级式	分散和多层级网络式
区域管治	扶持方式	自上而下集中扶持特定地区	自上而下和自下而上多元化扶持
区域战略导向	经济关系	市场关系	市场关系和网络关系
	组织机构	企业	企业、中介、大学和科研机构
	地方能力	投资基建改善硬环境，招商引资	强化行动者之间的知识互动关系，改善软环境
	发展目的	扩大/复制现有经济活动以促进产量和区域经济增长	已有产业现代化和创造新兴产业，促进区域经济高质量发展
政策工具	政策类型	金融和财政等工具性政策	工具性和“身份提供”性政策
政策工具	核心资源	资金	资金、信息和组织
知识影响	知识类型	合成型	合成型、解析型和符号型
知识影响	创新阶段	应用阶段	探索、检验和应用阶段

The knowledge dynamics of regional economic development and its multi-locational mechanism

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 80

Related Articles 9

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LIU Le, SHENG Kerong, ZHANG Jie, WANG Chuanyang. The impact of financial network embedding on entrepreneurial vitality of cities in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(12): 2244-2257.
[2]	REN Zhuoran, HE Canfei, WANG Wenyu. Progress of research on economic complexity and regional economic development in the perspective of evolutionary economic geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(12): 2101-2115.
[3]	SU Can, ZENG Gang, WANG Qiuyu. Progress and prospect of research on regional effect of variety [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1923-1933.
[4]	KONG Cuicui,LIU Jing,ZHU Qing,JI Xuze,WEI Xinyu,SONG Wenjie,ZHOU Yongru. Progress of social capital research in geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(8): 1039-1048.
[5]	LI Xiao jian, QIAO Jia jun . An Assessment of Household Living Quality and Its Relationship with Regional Economic Development [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 21(5): 484-490.
[6]	HU Liang min, MIAO Chang hong, QIAO Jia jun . A Study on the Divergence and Temperal-spatial Structure of Regional Economic Development in Henan Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 21(3): 268-274.
[7]	ZHANG Xiao ping . The changing networks of large state owned enterprise and the impact on regional economic development the case of first tractor company limited [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 1999, 18(2): 176-185.
[8]	Zhang Wenzhong . LOCATIONAL POLICY AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 1998, 17(1): 29-35.
[9]	Fu Xiaofeng, Zhang Yaocun, Peng Naizhi. AN ANALYSIS ON CHANGES OF THE LAND USE STRUCTURE IN THE SOUTH OF JIANGSU [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 1997, 16(4): 11-18.