基于“三生”视角的镇域乡村功能空间分化研究——以山东省为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.04.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Rural revitalization needs to consider the regional differences in rural development, scientifically grasp the spatial characteristics of rural functions, reveal the spatial heterogeneity of the interaction between rural functions, and explore the unique value and multiple functions of rural areas in great depth. Based on the analysis of the connotation of rural multi-functionality from the perspective of production-living-ecological functions, this study used multi-source data such as points of interest and land use to construct the evaluation indicator system of rural multi-functionality, employed a functional index measurement model, global spatial autocorrelation, Spearman correlation analysis, and geographical weighted regression (GWR) to analyze the spatial pattern of rural production-living-ecological functions and the spatial heterogeneity of their interaction in 1636 towns of Shandong Province, and then classified the spatial differentiation types of rural functions and put forward the corresponding development strategies. The results show that: 1) The spatial pattern of rural production-living-ecological functions has obvious agglomeration distribution and spatial differentiation characteristics. The production function relies on the driving effect of the urban core area, showing a ring structure around the urban core area. The areas of predominately living function are mainly distributed on inland plains. The predominately ecological function areas are mainly distributed in mountainous hills of central and southern Shandong, hilly areas of eastern Shandong, and northern coastal areas of Shandong Province. 2) There are both similarities and differences between the overall and local relationships of production-living-ecological functional interactions, and the local relationships have obvious spatial heterogeneity. From the perspective of overall relationship, production function and living function are significantly positively correlated, production function and ecological function are not significantly correlated, and living function and ecological function are not significantly correlated. 3) According to the theories of rural functional space differentiation, the township-level rural space in Shandong Province was divided into eight functional types, the quantitative differentiation of interactions between different types of functions was revealed, and preliminary recommendations for the future development of different types of rural areas were put forward. The research results provide some reference for building a Qilu Model for rural revitalization, and provide a technical support for the formulation of differentiated collaborative development paths of rural functions.

Key words: production-living-ecological functions, point of interest, geographically weighted regression, spatial differentiation, Shandong Province

XU Kai, FANG Yangang, ZHOU Yuhang. Spatial differentiation of rural functions from the perspective ofproduction-living-ecological functions at the township level:A case study of Shandong Province[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(4): 644-656.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Fig.3

Tab.2

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.3

References 43

[1]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[2]	李裕瑞, 尹旭. 镇域发展研究进展与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(7): 1-8.
	[ Li Yurui, Yin Xu. Current progress and future prospect of research in town development. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(7): 1-8. ] doi: 10.2307/142491
[3]	房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
	[ Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
[4]	Wilson G A. From productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the (un) changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2001, 26(1): 77-102. doi: 10.1111/tran.2001.26.issue-1
[5]	Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2): 142-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006
[6]	马历, 龙花楼, 屠爽爽, 等. 基于乡村多功能理论的贫困村域演变特征与振兴路径探讨: 以海南省什寒村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1435-1446. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.016
	[ Ma Li, Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang, et al. Characteristics of change and vitalization pathways of poor villages based on multifunctional rural development theory: A case study of Zahan Village in Hainan Province. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1435-1446. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.016
[7]	Marsden T. Rural futures: The consumption countryside and its regulation[J]. Sociologia Ruralis, 1999, 39(4): 501-526. doi: 10.1111/soru.1999.39.issue-4
[8]	Evans N. Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2010, 26(1): 81-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.10.001
[9]	张利国, 王占岐, 魏超, 等. 基于村域多功能视角的乡村振兴策略: 以鄂西郧阳山区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(9): 1703-1713. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.09.11
	[ Zhang Liguo, Wang Zhanqi, Wei Chao, et al. Rural revitalization strategy based on the perspective of rural multifunctions: A case of the mountainous areas in Yunyang District of Shiyan City, western Hubei Province. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1703-1713. ] doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.09.11
[10]	Maier L, Shōbayashi M. Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework[M]. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001.
[11]	Wilson G. Multifunctional 'quality' and rural community resilience[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2010, 35(3): 364-381. doi: 10.1111/tran.2010.35.issue-3
[12]	Marsden T, Sonnino R. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2008, 24(4): 422-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001
[13]	Huang J, Tichit M, Poulot M, et al. Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 149: 138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.020 pmid: 25463579
[14]	Knickel K, Renting H. Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development[J]. Sociologia Ruralis, 2000, 40(4): 512-528. doi: 10.1111/soru.2000.40.issue-4
[15]	Prändl-Zika V. From subsistence farming towards a multifunctional agriculture: Sustainability in the Chinese rural reality[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 87(2): 236-248. pmid: 17854974
[16]	Pribadi D O, Zasada I, Müller K, et al. Multifunctional adaption of farmers as response to urban growth in the Jabodetabek Metropolitan Area, Indonesia[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, 55: 100-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.001
[17]	徐凯, 房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别: 以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 482-495. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020170647
	[ Xu Kai, Fang Yangang. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 482-495. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020170647
[18]	杨忍, 张菁, 陈燕纯. 基于功能视角的广州都市边缘区乡村发展类型分化及其动力机制[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(2): 232-242. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.02.006
	[ Yang Ren, Zhang Jing, Chen Yanchun. Differentiation and dynamic mechanism of rural development in metropolitan fringe based on the functional perspective in Guangzhou City. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(2): 232-242. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.02.006
[19]	郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
	[ Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
[20]	刘玉, 刘彦随, 郭丽英. 乡村地域多功能的内涵及其政策启示[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(6): 103-106, 132.
	[ Liu Yu, Liu Yansui, Guo Liying. Connotations of rural regional multifunction and its policy implications in China. Human Geography, 2011, 26(6): 103-106, 132. ]
[21]	马晓冬, 李鑫, 胡睿, 等. 基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.011
	[ Ma Xiaodong, Li Xin, Hu Rui, et al. Delineation of "production-living-ecological" space for urban fringe based on rural multifunction evaluation. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.011
[22]	尹婧博, 李红, 王冬艳, 等. 吉林省乡村地域多功能时空变化与耦合协调测度研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(9): 63-73.
	[ Yin Jingbo, Li Hong, Wang Dongyan, et al. Spatial-temporal change and coupling coordination measurement of rural territorial multi-functions in Jilin Province. China Land Science, 2021, 35(9): 63-73. ]
[23]	徐凯, 房艳刚. 辽宁省乡村多功能评价和演变特征分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(1): 147-157.
	[ Xu Kai, Fang Yangang. Rural multi-function evaluation and evolution characteristics in Liaoning Province. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(1): 147-157. ]
[24]	杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005
	[ Yang Ren, Luo Xiuli, Chen Yanchun. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005
[25]	谭雪兰, 蒋凌霄, 安悦, 等. 湖南省传统农区乡村功能时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(12): 2168-2178. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.12.010
	[ Tan Xuelan, Jiang Lingxiao, An Yue, et al. The spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factors of rural functions in traditional agricultural areas in Hunan Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 2168-2178. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.12.010
[26]	王成, 唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806004
	[ Wang Cheng, Tang Ning. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural productionliving-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing Municipality. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806004
[27]	程宪波, 陶宇, 欧维新. 江苏省乡村三生功能耦合协调时空变化特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(1): 222-233.
	[ Cheng Xianbo, Tao Yu, Ou Weixin. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolutions of rural production-living-ecological function and coupling coordination in Jiangsu. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(1): 222-233. ]
[28]	戴路炜, 唐海萍, 张钦, 等. 北方农牧交错带多伦县生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(9): 2863-2876.
	[ Dai Luwei, Tang Haiping, Zhang Qin, et al. The trade-off and synergistic relationship among ecosystem services: A case study in Duolun County, the agro-pastoral ecotone of Northern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 2863-2876. ]
[29]	刘玉, 任艳敏, 潘瑜春, 等. 面向乡村振兴战略的乡村发展格局及其分区研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(12): 281-289.
	[ Liu Yu, Ren Yanmin, Pan Yuchun, et al. Rural development pattern and zoning for rural revitalization strategy. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019, 35(12): 281-289. ]
[30]	Liu Y S, Yang R, Long H L, et al. Implications of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yucheng, Shandong Province[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40: 111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.012
[31]	刘建志, 房艳刚, 王如如. 山东省农业多功能的时空演化特征与驱动机制分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2901-2915.
	[ Liu Jianzhi, Fang Yangang, Wang Ruru. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of agricultural multifunctions in Shandong Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2901-2915. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201207
[32]	Qu Y B, Jiang G H, Ma W Q, et al. How does the rural settlement transition contribute to shaping sustainable rural development? Evidence from Shandong, China[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 82: 279-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.027
[33]	史丹, 李鹏. 中国工业70年发展质量演进及其现状评价[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(9): 5-23.
	[ Shi Dan, Li Peng. Quality evolution and assessment of China's industry over the past seven decades. China Industrial Economics, 2019(9): 5-23. ]
[34]	McDonough W, Braungart M. Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things[M]. New York, USA: North Point Press, 2002.
[35]	安悦, 周国华, 贺艳华, 等. 基于“三生”视角的乡村功能分区及调控: 以长株潭地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(4): 695-703. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201804004
	[ An Yue, Zhou Guohua, He Yanhua, et al. Research on the functional zoning and regulation of rural areas based on the production-life-ecological function perspective: A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan area. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(4): 695-703. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201804004
[36]	杨涛, 陈海, 刘迪, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区乡村社区恢复力时空演变及影响因素研究: 以陕西省米脂县高渠乡为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 245-256. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.02.006
	[ Yang Tao, Chen Hai, Liu Di, et al. Spatiotemporal change of rural community resilience in loess hilly-gully region and influencing factors: A case study of Gaoqu Township in Mizhi County, Shannxi Province. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(2): 245-256. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.02.006
[37]	Henderson J V, Storeygard A, Weil D N. Measuring economic growth from outer space[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(2): 994-1028. pmid: 25067841
[38]	刘玉, 郜允兵, 潘瑜春, 等. 基于多源数据的乡村功能空间特征及其权衡协同关系度量[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(7): 2036-2050. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020201140
	[ Liu Yu, Gao Yunbing, Pan Yuchun, et al. Spatial differentiation characteristics and trade-off/synergy relationships of rural multi-functions based on multi-source data. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(7): 2036-2050. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020201140
[39]	孔冬艳, 陈会广, 吴孔森. 中国“三生空间”演变特征、生态环境效应及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(5): 1116-1135. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210503
	[ Kong Dongyan, Chen Huiguang, Wu Kongsen. The evolution of "production-living-ecological" space, eco-environmental effects and its influencing factors in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(5): 1116-1135. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210503
[40]	张小林. 乡村概念辨析[J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(4): 365-371. doi: 10.11821/xb199804009
	[ Zhang Xiaolin. On discrimination of rural definitions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(4): 365-371. ] doi: 10.11821/xb199804009
[41]	Peng J, Chen X, Liu Y X, et al. Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China[J]. Applied Geography, 2016, 74: 170-181. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.007
[42]	李裕瑞, 潘玮, 尹旭, 等. 镇域综合发展水平评价及影响因素: 基于江苏省抽样乡镇调查数据的分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(1): 127-132.
	[ Li Yurui, Pan Wei, Yin Xu, et al. Evaluation of township comprehensive development level and its influencing factors: Based on the survey data of sample townships in Jiangsu Province. Areal Research and Development, 2022, 41(1): 127-132. ]
[43]	刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
	[ Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007

乡村功能	子功能	指标层(单位)	方向	权重	指标解释与计算方法
生产功能	非农生产功能	夜间灯光密度(DN/km²)	+	0.550	夜间灯光灰度值(SUM)/区域面积
	非农生产功能	公司企业数量(个)	+	0.155	提取镇域范围的公司企业数量
	农业生产功能	农林牧渔基地数量(个)	+	0.201	提取镇域范围的农林牧渔基地数量
	农业生产功能	粮食产量(t)	+	0.095	根据耕地NDVI值和粮食产量计算得到
生活功能	居住保障功能	人口密度(人/km²)	+	0.406	从栅格数据中提取获得
	居住保障功能	居民点用地比例(%)	+	0.109	(城镇用地+农村居民点)/区域面积
	服务保障功能	路网密度(km/km²)	+	0.319	乡道及以上道路长度/区域面积
	服务保障功能	社会服务密度(个/km²)	+	0.165	社会服务数量/区域面积
生态功能	生态观赏功能	景观多样性指数	+	0.531	景观类型的丰富度和复杂度
	生态保持功能	植被覆盖度	+	0.157	NDVI均值
	生态保持功能	生物丰度指数	+	0.312	生态系统活力^[36]

功能类型	相关系数
功能类型	生产功能	生活功能	生态功能
生产功能	1.000	0.584^** (<0.001)	-0.038 (0.126)
生活功能	0.584^** (<0.001)	1.000	-0.018 (0.458)
生态功能	-0.038 (0.126)	-0.018 (0.458)	1.000

类型	生产功能		生活功能		生态功能
类型	生活功能	生态功能	生产功能	生态功能	生产功能	生活功能
均衡发展型	+296, -299	+444, -151	+484, -111	+333, -262	+344, -251	+442, -153
生产功能主导型	+76, -63	+66, -73	+124, -15	+90, -49	+91, -48	+54, -85
生活功能主导型	+95, -89	+154, -30	+123, -61	+72, -112	+111, -73	+87, -97
生态功能主导型	+115, -164	+150, -129	+263, -16	+170, -109	+104, -175	+82, -197
生产—生活型	+134, -139	+219, -54	+241, -32	+170, -103	+134, -139	+127, -146
生产—生态型	+24, -25	+19, -30	+43, -6	+25, -24	+29, -20	+12, -37
生活—生态型	+11, -34	+27, -18	+40, -5	+28, -17	+22, -23	+14, -31
综合发展型	+32, -40	+43, -29	+67, -5	+53, -19	+42, -30	+23, -49

Spatial differentiation of rural functions from the perspective ofproduction-living-ecological functions at the township level:A case study of Shandong Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 43

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Zi'an, LU Minghua. A comparative study on the temporal and spatial characteristics and influencing factors of Beijing’s outward investment and inward investment [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(3): 438-451.
[2]	XIE Dixiang, WU Shuqi, CHANG Jiang. The spatial distribution of NIMBY facilities and housing prices in surrounding areas: A case study of Guangzhou [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(1): 42-52.
[3]	HAO Jingyan, LIU Yanjun. Spatial differentiation of housing prices and mechanism of influence in a shrinking city: A case study of Hegang [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(5): 812-824.
[4]	LI Zhixuan, ZHEN Feng, ZHANG Shanqi, YANG Yu. Characteristics of elderly activity space by public transport and influencing factors:Based on the comparative analysis of daily and occasional activities [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 648-659.
[5]	LI Jianchun, QI Xiaoxing, YUAN Wenhua. Spatial differentiation of multi-functional mixed use of construction land based on points of interest [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(2): 239-250.
[6]	GUO Lijia, LI Chang, PENG Hongsong, ZHONG Shi'en, ZHANG Jinhe, YU Hu. Tourism eco-efficiency at the provincial level in China in the context of energy conservation and emission reduction [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(8): 1284-1297.
[7]	WANG Anqi, PENG Jiandong, REN Peng, YANG Hong, DAI Qi. Impact of the built environment of rail transit stations on the travel behavior of persons with disabilities: Taking 189 rail transit stations in Wuhan City as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(7): 1127-1140.
[8]	GUO Qian, LIAO Heping, WANG Ziyi, LIU Yuanli, LI Tao. Measurement of rural poverty alleviation sustainability and return-to-poverty risk identification in Qinling-Bashan Mountains:A case study of Chengkou County, Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 232-244.
[9]	WANG Yahui, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie, TAN Minghong. Spatial differentiation of social security function of cultivated land assets: Comparison of different agricultural regions [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1473-1484.
[10]	ZHANG Jinping, LIN Dan, ZHOU Xiangli, YU Zhenxin, SONG Wei, CHENG Yeqing. Spatial difference of multidimensional poverty and its influencing factors in the rural areas of Hainan Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 1013-1023.
[11]	XIE Cheng, HUANG Bo, LIU Xiaoqian, ZHOU Tao, WANG Yu. Population exposure to heatwaves in Shenzhen based on mobile phone location data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 231-242.
[12]	HAN Jing, RUI Yang, YANG Kun, LIU Wei, MA Teng. Quantitative attribution of national key town layout based on geodetector and the geographically weighted regression model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1687-1697.
[13]	Chaofeng QIAN, Debin DU, Xuan HU, Dezhong DUAN. Does genetic difference influence inter-region technology transfer?Evidence from China’s provincial-level patent transfer data of 2001-2005 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 745-755.
[14]	Shaoxing LI, Xianzhi WANG, Xiaole JI, Ye ZHANG. Spatial change and influencing factors of population aging in Shandong Province at the township scale [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 567-576.
[15]	YANG Zhiwei, CHEN Yingbiao, WU Zhifeng, QIAN Qinglan, HUANG Qingyao. Spatial variability of urban thermal environment based on natural blocks [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1944-1956.