PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1819-1832.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.10.004
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZI Minggui1,2(), ZHOU Yi1,2, LUO Jing1,2, ZHANG Chunyan1,2,*(
), GAO Zixiang1,2
Received:
2022-03-24
Revised:
2022-06-21
Online:
2022-10-28
Published:
2022-12-28
Contact:
ZHANG Chunyan
E-mail:minggui@mails.ccnu.edu.cn;rhea@ccnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
ZI Minggui, ZHOU Yi, LUO Jing, ZHANG Chunyan, GAO Zixiang. Measurement and influencing factors of rural regional system resilience in mountainous areas: A case study of Luotian County in the Dabie Mountains[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(10): 1819-1832.
Tab.1
Evaluation indicators of regional system resilience in mountainous rural areas
维度 | 指标 | 指标阐释 | 编号 | 权重 |
---|---|---|---|---|
抵御能力 | 人均收入(元) | 反映乡村居民收入水平(+) | X1 | 0.0322 |
常住劳动人口占比(%) | 反映乡村劳动力水平(+) | X2 | 0.0284 | |
农业机械化水平(五点量表) | 反映乡村第一产业的机械化程度(+) | X3 | 0.0294 | |
距县城核心区距离(h) | 反映乡村到县城的远近(-) | X4 | 0.0187 | |
距最邻近乡镇距离(h) | 反映乡村到最邻近乡镇的远近(-) | X5 | 0.0134 | |
人均农业资源面积(km2) | 反映村民从事基础农业生产的资源(耕地、林地与养殖水面)条件(+) | X6 | 0.0263 | |
医疗保险覆盖率(%) | 反映村民医疗保障水平(+) | X7 | 0.0289 | |
适应能力 | 地区生产总值(元) | 反映乡村地区经济发展水平(+) | X8 | 0.0460 |
村委财政投入(元) | 反映政府应对风险的金融资本(+) | X9 | 0.1444 | |
社会网络(五点量表) | 反映乡村干部与村民间的融洽程度(+) | X10 | 0.0194 | |
社会参与(五点量表) | 反映乡村居民在公共事务层面的政治赋权(+) | X11 | 0.0329 | |
生计多样性(五点量表) | 反映村民生计方式多样化(务农、从事旅游业、打工等)程度(+) | X12 | 0.1359 | |
合作社数量(个) | 反映乡村农产品规模化经营的能力(+) | X13 | 0.0574 | |
养老保险参保率(%) | 反映抵御老年基本生活风险的能力(+) | X14 | 0.0340 | |
转型能力 | 二三产业产值占比(%) | 反映乡村产业结构优化程度(+) | X15 | 0.0437 |
文化设施数量(个) | 反映乡村教育、科普、宣传等文化基础设施配置情况(+) | X16 | 0.0287 | |
技能培训次数(次) | 反映村民接受生产、经营和管理等技能培训的机会(+) | X17 | 0.0270 | |
政策扶持力度(五点量表) | 反映上级政府对乡村发展的政策帮扶程度(+) | X18 | 0.0209 | |
互联网(宽带)普及率(%) | 反映乡村信息化水平(+) | X19 | 0.0101 | |
旅游资源丰度(个) | 反映具有旅游开发潜力的景点数量(+) | X20 | 0.0908 | |
乡村精英数量(个) | 反映乡村在政治、经济、教育、文化等的前瞻性(+) | X21 | 0.1316 |
Tab.2
Evaluation indicators of system risk
维度 | 指标 | 指标阐释 | 编号 | 权重 |
---|---|---|---|---|
社会系统风险 | 老龄化水平(%) | 反映村庄老龄化导致的劳动力负担程度(+) | Y1 | 0.1005 |
“三类人员”户数(户) | 反映乡村面临的相对贫困风险程度(+) | Y2 | 0.0947 | |
人口净流出率(%) | 反映乡村人口流失产生的社会压力程度(+) | Y3 | 0.0986 | |
自然环境风险 | 平均坡度(°) | 坡面物质随坡度增加而越不稳定,且易发生自然灾害(+) | Y4 | 0.1418 |
平均海拔(m) | 反映地区平均高程(+) | Y5 | 0.2219 | |
自然灾害损失(万元/a) | 反映乡村自然风险的暴露程度(+) | Y6 | 0.1656 | |
环境污染(五点量表) | 反映乡村水体、森林、土地等的污染程度(+) | Y7 | 0.1769 |
Tab.3
Classification criteria of regional system resilience index in mountainous rural areas
指数分级 | 抵御能力指数 | 适应能力指数 | 转型能力指数 | 综合韧性指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
低水平 | 0.0520~0.0698 | 0.0478~0.0769 | 0.0378~0.0521 | 0.1714~0.2182 |
较低水平 | 0.0699~0.0866 | 0.0770~0.1059 | 0.0522~0.0707 | 0.2183~0.2708 |
中等水平 | 0.0867~0.0995 | 0.1060~0.1726 | 0.0708~0.0950 | 0.2709~0.3657 |
较高水平 | 0.0996~0.1136 | 0.1727~0.2581 | 0.0951~0.1443 | 0.3658~0.5579 |
高水平 | 0.1137~0.1463 | 0.2582~0.4071 | 0.1444~0.2813 | 0.5580~0.8346 |
Tab.4
Classification and value assignment of independent variables
自变量 | 变量分类及赋值 |
---|---|
平均坡度(x1) | 依据数值运用自然断裂点分级法划分为5个等级 |
平均海拔(x2) | 依据数值运用自然断裂点分级法划分为5个等级 |
常住人口数量(x3) | 依据数值运用自然断裂点分级法划分为5个等级 |
区位优势度(x4) | 高山偏远村=1,乡镇腹地村=2,交通廊道村=3,城(镇)郊村=4 |
产业发展阶段(x5) | 初始期=1,发展期=2,成熟期=3 |
驻点干部帮扶类型(x6) | 以人居环境改善为主=1,以资金扶持为主=2,以产业发展为主=3 |
资源丰度(x7) | 依据数值运用自然断裂点分级法划分为5个等级 |
经济能人数量(x8) | 依据数值运用自然断裂点分级法划分为5个等级 |
[1] |
郭远智, 周扬, 刘彦随. 中国农村人口外流的时空演化及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(1): 50-59.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.01.007 |
[Guo Yuanzhi, Zhou Yang, Liu Yansui. Spatial-temporal evolution of rural population outflow and its mechanism in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(1): 50-59. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.01.007 |
|
[2] | 郑小玉, 刘彦随. 新时期中国“乡村病”的科学内涵、形成机制及调控策略[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(2): 100-106. |
[Zheng Xiaoyu, Liu Yansui. Connotation, formation mechanism and regulation strategies of rural disease in the new epoch in China. Human Geography, 2018, 33(2):100-106. ] | |
[3] |
王成, 任梅菁, 胡秋云, 等. 乡村生产空间系统韧性的科学认知及其研究域[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 85-94.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.008 |
[Wang Cheng, Ren Meijing, Hu Qiuyun, et al. Rural production space system resilience and its research domains. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 85-94. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.008 |
|
[4] |
Skerratt S. Enhancing the analysis of rural community resilience: Evidence from community land ownership[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, 31: 36-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.02.003 |
[5] |
李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 刘彦随. 基于乡村弹性的乡村振兴理论认知与路径研究[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2001-2010.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004 |
[Li Yuheng, Yan Jiayu, Liu Yansui. The cognition and path analysis of rural revitalization theory based on rural resilience. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10):2001-2010. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004 |
|
[6] |
赵瑞东, 方创琳, 刘海猛. 城市韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.10.011 |
[Zhao Rui-dong, Fang Chuanglin, Liu Haimeng. Progress and prospect of urban resilience research. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.10.011 |
|
[7] |
Wilson G A, Hu Z P, Rahman S. Community resilience in rural China: The case of Hu Village, Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, 60: 130-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.016 |
[8] | 李玉恒, 黄惠倩, 王晟业. 基于乡村经济韧性的传统农区城乡融合发展路径研究: 以河北省典型县域为例[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(8): 28-33, 44. |
[Li Yuheng, Huang Hui-qian, Wang Shengye. Path of urban-rural integrated development in traditional agricultural zones based on rural economic resilience: The study of typical counties of Hebei Province. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(8): 28-33, 44. ] | |
[9] | 刘彬, 周国华, 贺艳华, 等. 乡村社区可持续性研究进展与展望[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(1): 11-20. |
[Liu Bin, Zhou Guohua, He Yanhua, et al. Progress and prospect of rural community sustainability. Human Geography, 2021, 36(1): 11-20. ] | |
[10] | 李博. 后扶贫时代深度贫困地区脱贫成果巩固中的韧性治理[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(4): 172-180. |
[Li Bo. Analysis on the resilience governance and the path to consolidate the achievements of poverty alleviation in deep-poverty areas in the post-poverty era. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 20(4): 172-180. ] | |
[11] | 吴雄周. 农户韧性能力促进高质量防贫的内在机制和实现路径[J]. 求索, 2021(4): 117-124. |
[Wu Xiongzhou. Internal mechanism and realization path of farmers' resilience to promote high-quality poverty prevention. Seeker, 2021(4): 117-124. ] | |
[12] |
李红波. 韧性理论视角下乡村聚落研究启示[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 556-562.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.007 |
[Li Hongbo. Rural settlements research from the perspective of resilience theory. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 556-562. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.007 |
|
[13] |
郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007 |
[Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007 |
|
[14] |
王成, 何焱洲. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统脆弱性时空分异与差异化调控[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1680-1698.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008009 |
[Wang Cheng, He Yanzhou. Spatio-temporal differentiation and differentiated regulation of the vulnerability of rural production space system in Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1680-1698. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008009 |
|
[15] |
李花, 赵雪雁, 王伟军, 等. 甘南高原乡村社会固有脆弱性及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(5): 804-813.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.05.015 |
[Li Hua, Zhao Xueyan, Wang Weijun et al. Inherent vulnerability of rural society in Gannan Plateau, China and its influencing factors. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(5): 804-813. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.05.015 |
|
[16] |
Payne P R, Kaye-Blake W H, Stirrat K A, et al. Identifying resilience dimensions and thresholds: Evidence from four rural communities in New Zealand[J]. Resilience, 2019, 7(2): 149-171.
doi: 10.1080/21693293.2018.1545339 |
[17] |
丁建军, 王璋, 柳艳红, 等. 中国连片特困区经济韧性测度及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 924-937.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.004 |
[Ding Jianjun, Wang Zhang, Liu Yanhong, et al. Measurement of economic resilience of contiguous poverty-stricken areas in China and influencing factor analysis. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(6): 924-937. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.004 |
|
[18] | 胡霄, 李红波, 李智, 等. 河北省县域乡村韧性测度及时空演变[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2021, 37(3): 89-96. |
[Hu Xiao, Li Hongbo, Li Zhi, et al. Measurement and spatio-temporal evolution of rural resilience at County level in Hebei Province. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2021, 37(3): 89-96. ] | |
[19] | 邱明丽, 刘殿锋, 刘耀林. 乡村韧性理论框架与测度体系[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(8): 107-114. |
[Qiu Mingli, Liu Dianfeng, Liu Yaolin. Review on theoretical framework and evaluation system of rural resilience. China Land Science, 2021, 35(8): 107-114. ] | |
[20] | 朱媛媛, 汪紫薇, 顾江, 等. 基于“乡土—生态”系统韧性的红色旅游资源利用空间格局优化研究: 以大别山革命老区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(7): 1700-1717. |
[Zhu Yuanyuan, Wang Ziwei, Gu Jiang, et al. The spatial optimization of red tourism resources utilization based on the resilience of "ruralism-ecology" system: A case study of Dabie Mountains old revolutionary base area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(7): 1700-1717. ]
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210706 |
|
[21] | 王成, 樊荣荣, 龙卓奇. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统风险评价及其空间分异格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1119-1131. |
[Wang Cheng, Fan Rongrong, Long Zhuoqi. Risk assessment and spatial differentiation pattern of rural production space system in Chongqing Municipality. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(5):1119-1131. ]
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200509 |
|
[22] |
杨忍, 潘瑜鑫. 中国县域乡村脆弱性空间特征与形成机制及对策[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1438-1454.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106009 |
[Yang Ren, Pan Yuxin. Spatial patterns, formation mechanism and coping strategies of rural vulnerability in China at the county level. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6):1438-1454. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106009 |
|
[23] |
刘彦随, 李进涛. 中国县域农村贫困化分异机制的地理探测与优化决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 161-173.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701013 |
[Liu Yansui, Li Jintao. Geographic detection and optimizing decision of the differentiation mechanism of rural poverty in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1):161-173. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701013 |
|
[24] |
杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005 |
[Yang Ren, Luo Xiuli, Chen Yanchun. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005 |
|
[25] | 朱华友, 吉盼, 陈泽侠, 等. 异质性视角下浙江省农村韧性问题及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(8): 160-166, 222. |
[Zhu Huayou, Ji Pan, Chen Zexia, et al. Rural resilience and its influencing factors in Zhejiang Province from the perspective of heterogeneity. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(8): 160-166, 222. ] | |
[26] |
李玉恒, 黄惠倩, 宋传垚. 贫困地区乡村经济韧性研究及其启示: 以河北省阳原县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1839-1846.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.004 |
[Li Yuheng, Huang Huiqian, Song Chuanyao. Rural economic resilience in poor areas and its enlightenment: Case study of Yangyuan County, Hebei Province. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(11): 1839-1846. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.004 |
|
[27] |
张春燕, 资明贵, 周梦, 等. 乡村旅游融合性测度及其影响因素研究: 以大别山区潜山市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(4): 595-608.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.005 |
[Zhang Chunyan, Zi Minggui, Zhou Meng, et al. Measurement of rural tourism integration and influencing factors: A case study of Qianshan City in the Dabie Mountains. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(4): 595-608. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.005 |
|
[28] | 李媛媛, 陈国申. 中国共产党百年驻村工作的演进与展望[J]. 社会主义研究, 2021(5): 32-39. |
[Li Yuanyuan, Chen Guoshen. The evolution and prospect of the CPC's working team in villages over the past 100 years. Socialism Studies, 2021(5): 32-39. ] |
|