PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 1403-1415.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.08.005
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yuting(), YU Zhonglei(
), MIAO Changhong, ZHANG Jing, YUAN Liuyang, HOU Xiaojing
Received:
2022-04-07
Revised:
2022-05-27
Online:
2022-08-28
Published:
2022-10-25
Contact:
YU Zhonglei
E-mail:liyuting@henu.edu.cn;yzlei@mail.bnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
LI Yuting, YU Zhonglei, MIAO Changhong, ZHANG Jing, YUAN Liuyang, HOU Xiaojing. Influence of multi-proximities on floating population's return intention: An empirical study based on the China Migrant Population Dynamic Survey[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(8): 1403-1415.
Tab.1
Variable selection
解释变量 | 变量定义 | 变量说明 | |
---|---|---|---|
核心变量 | 地理邻近性 | 1-ln(a/b),其中a指流入地城市和流出地省会城市间最短铁路距离;b指全部样本城市间最短铁路距离的最大值 | 标准化处理 |
正式制度邻近性 | 流入地与流出地是否属于同一省份 | 是=1,否=0 | |
非正式制度邻近性 | 流入地与流出地是否属于同一方言区 | 是=1,否=0 | |
社会邻近性A | 参与流入地社会保障与保险情况 | 具体数值 | |
社会邻近性B | 是否在流入地建立健康档案 | 是=1,否=0 | |
控制变量 | 个体因素 | 性别 | 男=1,女=0 |
年龄 | 具体数值(岁) | ||
婚姻状况 | 已婚(含离婚)=1,未婚=0 | ||
受教育程度 | 大专及以上=1,高中/中专及以下=0 | ||
户口性质 | 农业=1,非农业和居民=0 | ||
家庭因素 | 代际 | 新生代=1,老一代=0 | |
子女数量 | 具体数值(个) | ||
迁移模式 | 陪同迁移=1,独自迁移=0 | ||
流出地集镇或县城是否购房 | 是=1,否=0 | ||
家庭月均收入 | 取对数 | ||
流动因素 | 流动时长 | 具体数值(a) | |
流动次数 | 具体数值(次) | ||
流入地是否购房 | 是=1,否=0 | ||
流入地住房性质 | 免费或低租金住房=1,租房=2,自有住房=3 | ||
流入地就业身份 | 雇员=1,雇主=2,自营劳动者=3,其他=4 |
Tab.2
Basic characteristics of returnee migrants
统计项 | 统计值 | 统计项 | 统计值 |
---|---|---|---|
年龄均值/岁 | 36.98 | 流出地集镇或县城购房比例/% | |
性别比例/% | 是 | 20.09 | |
男 | 54.96 | 否 | 79.91 |
女 | 45.04 | 家庭月均收入均值/元 | 6876.50 |
婚姻状况比例/% | 流动时长均值/a | 5.55 | |
已婚 | 80.35 | 流动次数均值/次 | 1.34 |
未婚 | 19.65 | 流入地购房比例/% | |
受教育程度比例/% | 是 | 27.51 | |
高中/中专及以下 | 91.31 | 否 | 72.49 |
大专及以上 | 8.69 | 流入地住房性质比例/% | |
户口性质比例/% | 免费或低租金住房 | 24.17 | |
农业 | 87.07 | 租房 | 71.03 |
非农业或居民 | 12.93 | 自有住房 | 4.80 |
代际比例/% | 就业身份比例/% | ||
新生代 | 57.91 | 雇员 | 57.62 |
老一代 | 42.09 | 雇主 | 4.82 |
子女数量均值/个 | 1.19 | 自营劳动者 | 20.79 |
其他 | 16.77 |
Tab.3
Regression results of influencing factors of floating population's return intention
解释变量 | 系数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | ||
地理邻近性 | 1-ln(a/b),a指流入地城市和流出地省会城市间最短铁路距离;b指全部样本城市间最短铁路距离的最大值 | -0.036*** | -0.046*** | |
正式制度邻近性 | 流入地与流出地是否属于同一省份(否) | -0.372*** | -0.264*** | |
非正式制度邻近性 | 流入地与流出地是否属于同一方言区(否) | -0.227*** | -0.094*** | |
社会邻近性A | 参与流入地社会保障与保险情况 | -0.118*** | -0.099*** | |
社会邻近性B | 是否在流入地建立健康档案(否) | -0.215*** | -0.084*** | |
个体因素 | 性别(女) | -0.014 | -0.026 | |
年龄 | 0.029*** | 0.030*** | ||
婚姻状况(未婚) | 0.080** | 0.091** | ||
受教育程度(高中/中专及以下) | -0.490*** | -0.318*** | ||
户口性质(非农业和居民) | 0.253*** | 0.202*** | ||
家庭因素 | 代际(老一代) | -0.055 | -0.023 | |
子女数量 | -0.037** | -0.052*** | ||
迁移模式(独自迁移) | -0.332*** | -0.312*** | ||
流出地集镇或县城是否购房(否) | 0.373*** | 0.371*** | ||
家庭月均收入 | -0.068*** | -0.111*** | ||
流动因素 | 流动时长 | -0.050*** | -0.051*** | |
流动次数 | 0.022*** | 0.010 | ||
流入地是否购房(否) | -1.343*** | -1.251*** | ||
流入地住房性质(免费或低租金) | ||||
租房 | -0.353*** | -0.360*** | ||
自有住房 | -1.120*** | -1.074*** | ||
流入地就业身份(雇员) | ||||
雇主 | -0.353*** | -0.440*** | ||
自营劳动者 | -0.374*** | -0.443*** | ||
其他身份 | -0.170*** | -0.247*** | ||
常数项 | -2.080*** | -2.262*** | -1.393*** | |
-2倍对数似然值 | 73264.626 | 68331.551 | 67556.458 | |
Prob>chi2 | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | P<0.001 |
Tab.4
Interactive effects of influencing factors of floating population's return intention
解释变量 | 系数 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型4 (学历) | 模型5 (代际) | 模型6 (时长) | 模型7 (次数) | ||
核心变量 | 地理邻近性 | -0.040*** | -0.032*** | -0.052*** | -0.042* |
正式制度邻近性 | -0.270*** | -0.196*** | -0.304*** | -0.293*** | |
非正式制度邻近性 | -0.121*** | -0.141*** | 0.345 | -0.117*** | |
社会邻近性A | -0.082*** | -0.097*** | -0.078*** | -0.110*** | |
社会邻近性B | -0.082*** | -0.113*** | -0.101*** | -0.098*** | |
控制变量 | 已纳入 | 已纳入 | 已纳入 | 已纳入 | |
交互项 | 地理邻近性×个体/流动 | -0.059*** | -0.026** | 0.001 | -0.003 |
正式制度邻近性×个体/流动 | 0.050 | -0.139* | 0.009 | 0.020 | |
非正式制度邻近性×个体/流动 | 0.345*** | 0.101* | -0.029*** | 0.015 | |
社会邻近性A×个体/流动 | -0.082*** | -0.005 | -0.005*** | 0.007 | |
社会邻近性B×个体/流动 | -0.033 | 0.053 | 0.004 | 0.009 | |
常数项 | -1.424*** | -1.424*** | -1.431*** | -1.372*** | |
-2倍对数似然值 | 67514.546 | 67535.053 | 67523.518 | 67552.296 | |
Prob>chi2 | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | P<0.001 |
[1] | 国家卫生健康委员会. 中国流动人口发展报告: 2018[M]. 北京: 中国人口出版社, 2018: 154-160. |
[National Health and Family Planning Commission of China. 2018 Report on China's migrant population development. Beijing, China: China Population Publishing House, 2018: 154-160. ] | |
[2] | 国家统计局. 2014年农民工监测调查报告[EB/OL]. 2015-04-29 [2021-12-15]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201504/t20150429_797821.html. |
[National Bureau of Statistics of China. Migrant workers monitoring survey report in 2014. 2015-04-29 [2021-12-15]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201504/t20150429_797821.html. ] | |
[3] | 国家统计局. 2020年农民工监测调查报告[EB/OL]. 2021-04-30 [2021-12-15]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/sjfb/zxfb2020/202104/t20210430_1816937.html. |
[National Bureau of Statistics of China. Migrant workers monitoring survey report in 2020. 2021-04-30 [2021-12-15]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/sjfb/zxfb2020/202104/t20210430_1816937.html. ] | |
[4] |
豆晓, Arellano B, Roca J. 基于相互作用关系的中国省际人口流动研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(9): 1848-1861.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201809015 |
[ Dou Xiao, Arellano B, Roca J. China's inter-provincial population flow based on the interaction value analysis. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(9): 1848-1861. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201809015 |
|
[5] |
高更和, 王玉婵, 徐祖牧, 等. 农民工回流务工区位研究: 以河南省45个村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12): 2083-2093.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.010 |
[ Gao Genghe, Wang Yuchan, Xu Zumu, et al. Work location choice of returnee migrant workers: Case study of 45 villages in Henan Province. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(12): 2083-2093. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.010 |
|
[6] |
林李月, 朱宇, 柯文前. 区域协调发展背景下流动人口回流的空间意愿及其政策含义[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(5): 1515-1528.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020201102 |
[ Lin Liyue, Zhu Yu, Ke Wenqian. Locational intention of return migration of migrants and its policy implications in the context of coordinated regional development. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(5): 1515-1528. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020201102 |
|
[7] |
罗小龙, 曹姝君, 顾宗倪. 回流城镇化: 中部地区城镇化开启新路径[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(5): 685-690.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.05.002 |
[ Luo Xiaolong, Cao Shujun, Gu Zongni. The returning-migrant-induced urbanization: The new path of urbanization in Middle China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(5): 685-690. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.05.002 |
|
[8] | 李海波, 陈政, 欧沙. 县域城镇化与人口回流耦合关系研究: 基于湖南省88个县(市)数据的分析[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(11): 25-32. |
[ Li Haibo, Chen Zheng, Ou Sha. The coupling relationship between county urbanization and population reflux: Analysis based on data of 88 counties (county-level cities) in Hunan Province. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(11): 25-32. ] | |
[9] | 李志刚, 刘达, 林赛南. 中国城乡流动人口“回流”研究进展与述评[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(1): 1-10, 62. |
[ Li Zhigang, Liu Da, Lin Sainan. A literature review of the study on return floating population in China. Human Geography, 2020, 35(1): 1-10, 62. ] | |
[10] | 周晓芳, 扶丁阳. 喀斯特高原山地区农民工回流与县域城镇化: 以贵州省织金县为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(1): 85-92. |
[ Zhou Xiaofang, Fu Dingyang. The backflow of rural migrant workers and the urban-townization of county: Taking Zhijin County of Guizhou Province as a case study. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(1): 85-92. ] | |
[11] | 李琴, 谢治. 青年流动人才空间分布及居留意愿影响因素: 基于2017年全国流动人口动态监测数据[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(9): 27-35. |
[ Li Qin, Xie Zhi. Spatial distribution of floating young talents and influencing factors of their settlement intention-based on the dynamic monitoring data of the national floating population in 2017. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(9): 27-35. ] | |
[12] |
Rendall M S, Parker S W. Two decades of negative educational selectivity of Mexican migrants to the United States[J]. Population and Development Review, 2014, 40(3): 421-446.
doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00692.x |
[13] |
杨忍, 徐茜, 张琳, 等. 珠三角外围地区农村回流劳动力的就业选择及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2305-2317.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811014 |
[ Yang Ren, Xu Qian, Zhang Lin, et al. Employment choice of rural return migrants around the Pearl River Delta region and its influencing factors. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2305-2317. ] | |
[14] |
Hao P, He S J. What is holding farmers back? Endowments and mobility choice of rural citizens in China[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 89: 66-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.014 |
[15] |
Stark O, Taylor J E. Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation[J]. The Economic Journal, 1991, 101: 1163-1178.
doi: 10.2307/2234433 |
[16] |
张华, 刘哲达, 殷小冰. 中国跨省流动人口回流意愿的空间差异及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 73-84.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.007 |
[ Zhang Hua, Liu Zheda, Yin Xiaobing. Spatial differences and influencing factors of inter-provincial migrant workers' backflow intention in China. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 73-84. ] | |
[17] |
Zhang J, Huang J, Wang J, et al. Return migration and Hukou registration constraints in Chinese cities[J]. China Economic Review, 2020, 63: 101498. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101498.
doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101498 |
[18] |
王利伟, 冯长春, 许顺才. 传统农区外出劳动力回流意愿与规划响应: 基于河南周口市问卷调查数据[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(7): 990-999.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.07.014 |
[ Wang Liwei, Feng Changchun, Xu Shuncai. Return intention of migrant workers in a traditional agricultural area and planning response: Based on a questionnaire survey in Zhoukou, Henan Province. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(7): 990-999. ]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.07.014 |
|
[19] |
殷江滨. 劳动力回流的驱动因素与就业行为研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(9): 1084-1095.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.002 |
[ Yin Jiangbin. Advances in research on driving factors of return migration and employment behavior of migrants. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(9): 1084-1095. ] | |
[20] |
Bastia T. Should I stay or should I go? Return migration in times of crises[J]. Journal of International Development, 2011, 23(4): 583-595.
doi: 10.1002/jid.1794 |
[21] |
程晗蓓, 刘于琪, 苟翡翠, 等. 城市新生代流动人口的回流意愿与区位选择: 基于北京、深圳、成都和中山4个城市的实证[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(1): 63-73.
doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003166 |
[ Cheng Hanbei, Liu Yuqi, Gou Feicui, et al. Profiles and mechanisms of return migration in post-reform urban China: A case study of four cities. Tropical Geography, 2020, 40(1): 63-73. ]
doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003166 |
|
[22] |
朱羽佳, 汪德根, 曾鹏. 城市流动人口长期居留意愿的空间分异及影响因素: 以长三角城市群为例[J]. 热带地理, 2021, 41(3): 528-539.
doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003344 |
[ Zhu Yujia, Wang Degen, Zeng Peng. Spatial differentiation of the long-term residence intention of the urban floating population and its influencing factors: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Tropical Geography, 2021, 41(3): 528-539. ]
doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003344 |
|
[23] |
古恒宇, 覃小玲, 沈体雁. 中国城市流动人口回流意愿的空间分异及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 1877-1890.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180473 |
[ Gu Hengyu, Qin Xiaoling, Shen Tiyan. Spatial variation of migrant population's return intention and its determinants in China's prefecture and provincial level cities. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(8): 1877-1890. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180473 |
|
[24] |
de Haas H, Fokkema T. The effects of integration and transnational ties on international return migration intentions[J]. Demographic Research, 2011, 25: 755-782.
doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.24 |
[25] |
刘于琪, 刘晔, 李志刚. 中国城市新移民的定居意愿及其影响机制[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 780-787.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.07.780 |
[ Liu Yuqi, Liu Ye, Li Zhigang. Settlement intention of new migrants in China's large cities: Patterns and determinants. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(7): 780-787. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.07.780 |
|
[26] |
刘涛, 卓云霞, 王洁晶. 邻近性对人口再流动目的地选择的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(12): 2716-2729.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb202012012 |
[ Liu Tao, Zhuo Yunxia, Wang Jiejing. How multi-proximity affects destination choice in onward migration: A nested logit model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(12): 2716-2729. ] | |
[27] |
Pappalardo L, Simini F, Rinzivillo S, et al. Returners and explorers dichotomy in human mobility[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 8166. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9166.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9166 |
[28] | 田北海, 马艳茹. 文化距离、地域认同、社会资本与回流农民的文化再适应[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(5): 98-109, 195. |
[ Tian Beihai, Ma Yanru. Cultural distance, local region identification, social resource and the re-acculturation level of returned rural migrants. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021(5): 98-109, 195. ] | |
[29] | 鲁永刚, 张凯. 地理距离、方言文化与劳动力空间流动[J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(3): 88-99. |
[ Lu Yonggang, Zhang Kai. Geographic distance, dialect difference, and spatial labor mobility. Statistical Research, 2019, 36(3): 88-99. ] | |
[30] | 黄宗晔, 杨静. 方言对省际人口迁移的影响[J]. 人口研究, 2020, 44(4): 89-101. |
[ Huang Zongye, Yang Jing. The impact of dialect on inter-provincial migration in China. Population Research, 2020, 44(4): 89-101. ] | |
[31] |
王庆喜, 胡志学. 多维邻近下浙江城市创新网络演化及其机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(8): 1380-1388.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.08.009 |
[ Wang Qingxi, Hu Zhixue. Urban innovation network of Zhejiang from the perspective of multidimensional proximities. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(8): 1380-1388. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.08.009 |
|
[32] | 李琳, 雒道政. 多维邻近性与创新: 西方研究回顾与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(6): 1-7, 41. |
[ Li Lin, Luo Daozheng. Multi-proximity and innovation: The retrospect and prospect on western researches. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(6): 1-7, 41. ]
doi: 10.2307/142563 |
|
[33] |
Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74.
doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887 |
[34] |
卓云霞, 刘涛, 古维迎. 多维邻近性与城-城流动人口的流入地选择: 基于嵌套Logit模型的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7): 1210-1218.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.07.011 |
[ Zhuo Yunxia, Liu Tao, Gu Weiying. How multi-proximity affects destination choice in urban-urban migration: An analysis based on nested logit model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(7): 1210-1218. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.07.011 |
|
[35] |
Lee E S. A theory of migration[J]. Demography, 1966, 3(1): 47-57.
doi: 10.2307/2060063 |
[36] | 黄敦平, 方建. 资源禀赋对乡村劳动力回流意愿影响的实证分析[J]. 人口学刊, 2021, 43(5): 67-75. |
[ Huang Dunping, Fang Jian. An empirical analysis of the effect of resource endowment on the return intention of rural labor force. Population Journal, 2021, 43(5): 67-75. ] | |
[37] | 党兴华, 弓志刚. 多维邻近性对跨区域技术创新合作的影响: 基于中国共同专利数据的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(10): 1590-1600. |
[ Dang Xinghua, Gong Zhigang. Impact of multidimensional proximities on cross region technology innovation cooperation: Experical analysis based on Chinese coinvent patent data. Studies in Science of Science, 2013, 31(10): 1590-1600. ] | |
[38] | Chiswick B R, Miller P W. English language fluency among immigrants in the United States[J]. Research in Labor Economics, 1998, 17. |
[39] |
Cai H, Wang J. Factors influencing the migration intentions of rural workers in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2008, 29(3): 157-171.
doi: 10.1080/02529200802288559 |
[40] | 伍薆霖, 卢冲. 户籍制度改革会促进农村流动人口落户城市吗? 来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 人口与发展, 2020, 26(5): 49-61. |
[ Wu Ailin, Lu Chong. Will the reform of the household registration system promote the rural migrant population to settle in the city? Evidence from quasi-natural experiments. Population and Development, 2020, 26(5): 49-61. ] | |
[41] | 张展新, 高文书, 侯慧丽. 城乡分割、区域分割与城市外来人口社会保障缺失: 来自上海等五城市的证据[J]. 中国人口科学, 2007(6): 33-41, 95. |
[ Zhang Zhanxin, Gao Wenshu, Hou Huili. Urban-rural divide, regional segmentation and insufficient access of urban floating population to social security entitlements: Evidence from Shanghai and other four Chinese cities. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2007(6): 33-41, 95. ] | |
[42] |
Pendakur K, Pendakur R. Language as both human capital and ethnicity[J]. International Migration Review, 2002, 36(1):147-177.
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00075.x |
[43] | 王孝斌, 李福刚. 地理邻近在区域创新中的作用机理及其启示[J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(4): 543-546, 552. |
[ Wang Xiaobin, Li Fugang. Function mechanism of geographical proximity within regional innovation and its apocalypse. Economic Geography, 2007, 27(4): 543-546, 552. ] | |
[44] | Walker K N, MacBride A, Vachon M L S. Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 1977, 11(1): 35-41. |
[45] |
郑茹敏, 梅林, 姜洪强, 等. 基于随机森林模型的中国流动人口社会融合空间差异及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(10): 1763-1772.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.10.008 |
[ Zheng Rumin, Mei Lin, Jiang Hongqiang, et al. Spatial differences and impact factors of migrant integration in China based on random forest model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1763-1772. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.10.008 |
|
[46] |
湛东升, 张文忠, 党云晓, 等. 中国流动人口的城市宜居性感知及其对定居意愿的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(10): 1250-1259.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.10.007 |
[ Zhan Dongsheng, Zhang Wenzhong, Dang Yunxiao, et al. Urban livability perception of migrants in China and its effects on settlement intention. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(10): 1250-1259. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.10.007 |
|
[47] | 许抄军, 陈四辉, 王亚新. 非正式制度视角的农民工市民化意愿及障碍: 以湛江市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(12): 84-89, 119. |
[ Xu Chaojun, Chen Sihui, Wang Ya-xin. The willingness and obstacles for the citizenization of migrant workers in the perspective of informal institution: Take Zhanjiang City as an example. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(12): 84-89, 119. ] | |
[48] | 赵金丽, 张学波, 宋金平. 京津冀劳动力市场一体化评价及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(5): 94-100. |
[ Zhao Jinli, Zhang Xuebo, Song Jinping. Measurement and determinants of labor market integration in Jing-Jin-Ji region. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(5): 94-100. ]
doi: 10.2307/142044 |
|
[49] | 李秦, 孟岭生. 方言、普通话与中国劳动力区域流动[J]. 经济学报, 2014, 1(4): 68-84. |
[ Li Qin, Meng Lingsheng. Dialect, mandarin and labor migration. China Journal of Economics, 2014, 1(4): 68-84. ] | |
[50] | 刘毓芸, 徐现祥, 肖泽凯. 劳动力跨方言流动的倒U型模式[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(10): 134-146, 162. |
[ Liu Yuyun, Xu Xianxiang, Xiao Zekai. The pattern of labor cross-dialects migration. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50(10): 134-146, 162. ] | |
[51] | 孟颖颖, 张孝栋, 王静. “锁定”与“回拉”: 医疗保险制度对流动人口居留意愿的影响[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 67-75. |
[ Meng Yingying, Zhang Xiao-dong, Wang Jing. "Lock-in" and "pull-back": The impact of medical insurance on the residence intention of floating population. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 2021, 23(4): 67-75. ] | |
[52] | 郭显超, 黄玲. 流动人口健康档案的建立状况及影响因素分析: 基于2014年流动人口动态监测调查四川流动人口数据[J]. 人口与发展, 2016, 22(3): 84-89, 53. |
[ Guo Xianchao, Huang Ling. The situation and influence factors of health records of floating population: Based on the national dynamic monitoring data of floating population survey of Sichuan Province in 2014. Population and Development, 2016, 22(3): 84-89, 53. ] | |
[53] |
Wang W W, Fan C C. Success or failure: Selectivity and reasons of return migration in Sichuan and Anhui, China[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2006, 38(5): 939-958.
doi: 10.1068/a37428 |
[54] |
Chunyu M D, Liang Z, Wu Y f. Interprovincial return migration in China: Individual and contextual determinants in Sichuan Province in the 1990s[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2013, 45(12): 2939-2958.
doi: 10.1068/a45360 |
[55] | 齐嘉楠, 于典, 王志理. 流动人口流动距离及影响因素研究[J]. 南方人口, 2021, 36(2): 31-41, 64. |
[ Qi Jianan, Yu Dian, Wang Zhili. The migration distance and influence factor of migrant population. South China Population, 2021, 36(2): 31-41, 64. ] | |
[56] | 许家云, 李淑云, 李平. 制度质量、制度距离与中国智力回流动机[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(3): 350-357, 385. |
[ Xu Jiayun, Li Shuyun, Li Ping. Institution quality, institution distance and the motivations of Chinese international intelligence return. Studies in Science of Science, 2013, 31(3): 350-357, 385. ] | |
[57] | 刘建娥. 乡-城移民(农民工)社会融入的实证研究: 基于五大城市的调查[J]. 人口研究, 2010, 34(4): 62-75. |
[ Liu Jian'e. Social inclusion for rural-urban migrants: A quantitative study of five big cities in China. Population Research, 2010, 34(4): 62-75. ] | |
[58] | 张红丽, 朱宇. 不同流迁意愿下流动人口的社会保险状况及其对策: 基于对福州市的调查[J]. 西北人口, 2010, 31(5): 91-96. |
[ Zhang Hongli, Zhu Yu. The situation of the floating population's social insurance and its measure under different migrating intention: A case study in Fuzhou. Northwest Population, 2010, 31(5): 91-96. ] | |
[59] | 陶树果, 高向东, 方中书. 乡-城、城-城流动人口社会保险参保率及其影响因素的比较研究: 基于2014年全国流动人口动态监测数据[J]. 西北人口, 2018, 39(2): 88-95. |
[ Tao Shuguo, Gao Xiangdong, Fang Zhongshu. A comparative study of factors influencing insurance participation between rural-urban floating population and urban-urban floating population: Based on the dynamic monitoring data of the floating population in 2014. Northwest Population, 2018, 39(2): 88-95. ] | |
[60] |
林赛南, 梁奇, 李志刚, 等. “家庭式迁移”对中小城市流动人口定居意愿的影响: 以温州为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1640-1650.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181078 |
[ Lin Sainan, Liang Qi, Li Zhigang, et al. Family migration and settlement intention in China's medium-sized city: A case study of Wenzhou. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7): 1640-1650. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181078 |
|
[61] |
Zhu Y, Lin L Y. Continuity and change in the transition from the first to the second generation of migrants in China: Insights from a survey in Fujian[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 42: 147-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.002 |
|