生态文明背景下国土空间功能研究：过去、现在与未来

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.07.014

Abstract

Abstract:

Territorial space function is an important theoretical foundation for revealing the coupling relationship between human and the environment and for informing the practical framework of spatial planning. However, trapped in the parallel thinking of land use planning and urban planning for a long time, and the territorial space planning is still in the exploratory stage, the concept of territorial space function was rarely touched upon, let alone a systematic reporting of relevant studies. Based on a review of the literature, this research found that international studies on territorial space function tended to explain complex social problems by constructing theoretical models, while studies in China focused on innovating the existing knowledge framework to guide the phased planning practice. Moreover, a systematic review was conducted on the studies of territorial space function from the aspects of classification and evaluation, spatial-temporal evolution, dynamic trade-offs, and simulation optimization, and the results indicate that although attention has been paid to the topic, there is a general lack of exploration of localization under the current circumstances. It is urgent to carry out research on the theoretical breakthroughs and practical needs of optimizing territorial space development pattern and promoting the construction of ecological civilization. By summarizing the research results in China and abroad, we put forward the future direction of territorial space function research: 1) Theoretical research of territorial space function in the era of comprehensively advancing ecological civilization. 2) Trade-off mechanism of territorial space function research in the process of governance modernization. 3) Content expansion of territorial space function study under the new-type globalization perspective. 4) Technical revolution of territorial space function study supported by advanced artificial intelligence. 5) Transformation of thinking of territorial space function study under the orientation of humanization.

Key words: spatial planning, territorial space function, human-earth relationship, ecological civilization

ZOU Lilin, ZHANG Lijun, LIU Yansui. Territorial space function research in the context of ecological civilization: From the past into the future[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(7): 1312-1324.

Figures/Tables 3

Fig.1

Tab.1

Main classification systems of territorial space function in China and abroad

研究对象	分类体系	分类依据	参考文献
农业系统多功能性	食物生产、支持乡村景观、维持生物多样性、提供就业机会、提升乡村生存能力、农业文化遗产	农业系统的可持续性	OECD^[31];Gómez Sal等^[32]
农业系统多功能性	生产功能(如粮食生产、经济贡献)、生态功能(如生态调节、环境保育)、生活功能(如文化功能、社会保障)	耕地的多功能性,即耕地具有直接或间接为人类提供各类产品及服务的能力	姜广辉等^[33];蔡银莺等^[34];Song等^[35]
生态系统服务功能	供给服务(如食物、水、纤维、燃料)、调节服务(如气候调节、水文调节、授粉)、文化服务(如精神、美学、休闲和教育)、支持服务(如初级生产力、土壤形成)	生态系统服务包括来自自然资本存量的物质流、能量流和信息流,及其与制造业和人力资本服务相结合为人类提供福祉	MEA^[36];Costanza等^[37];谢高地等^[38];de Groot 等^[39]
景观功能	生产功能(如农产品、能源等)、调节功能(如气候调节、垃圾净化、生物防治)、栖息地功能(如适宜的生活空间、动植物的栖息地)信息功能(如休闲旅游、文化艺术)	基于专家经验与文献评析,判定特定的土地用途或其他环境属性是否对给定的景观功能具有支持或中立作用	Kienast等^[40]
土地利用系统	社会功能(如提供工作、人类健康与休闲)、经济功能(如居住、生产与运输)和环境功能(如提供非生物资源与生物资源、维持生态过程)	土地利用系统是一个复合系统,其功能分类必须与土地利用相关联,并且需要考虑人类活动的影响	Pérez-Soba等^[41]
	生产功能(如资源产品、生物产品、工业产品)、生活功能(如基地承载、社会保障、精神保障)、生态功能(如气候调节、水土保持、环境净化)	当前国土空间规划倡导以“三生”功能划分空间用途,并且该体系有助于简练表达可持续发展目标	Zhou等^[24];Zou等^[42];曲衍波等^[29]
	农业功能（如粮食生产、提供纤维）、城乡生活功能（如居住功能、商业活动）、生态功能（如水土保持、生物多样性保护）	国土空间规划“三区三线”的划定	Fan等^[43];李思楠等^[44]

Tab.1

Fig.2

References 90

[1]	严金明, 陈昊, 夏方舟. “多规合一”与空间规划: 认知、导向与路径[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(1): 21-27, 87.
	[ Yan Jinming, Chen Hao, Xia Fangzhou. Cognition, direction and path of future spatial planning based on the background of multiple planning integration. China Land Sciences, 2017, 31(1): 21-27, 87. ]
[2]	Liu Y S, Zhou Y. Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 102: 105288. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105288. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105288
[3]	张京祥, 夏天慈. 治理现代化目标下国家空间规划体系的变迁与重构[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2040-2050.
	[ Zhang Jingxiang, Xia Tianci. The change and reconstruction of spatial planning system under the goal of modern national governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10): 2040-2050. ]
[4]	陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 等. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912004
	[ Chen Mingxing, Liang Longwu, Wang Zhenbo, et al. Geographical thinking on the relationship between beautiful China and land spatial planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912004
[5]	曹小曙. 基于人地耦合系统的国土空间重塑[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2051-2059.
	[ Cao Xiaoshu. Geo-governance of national land use based on coupled human and natural systems. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10): 2051-2059. ]
[6]	刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001
	[ Liu Yansui. Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001
[7]	Hall P. Urban and regional planning[M]. London, UK: Pengnin Books, 1975.
[8]	Zhou G L, Li C G, Li M Y, et al. Agglomeration and diffusion of urban functions: An approach based on urban land use conversion[J]. Habitat International, 2016, 56: 20-30.
[9]	Browning M H E M, Rigolon A, McAnirlin O, et al. Where greenspace matters most: A systematic review of urbanicity, greenspace, and physical health[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2022, 217: 104233. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104233. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104233
[10]	Hölting L, Beckmann M, Volk M, et al. Multifunctionality assessments-More than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 103: 226-235.
[11]	Renting H, Rossing W A H, Groot J C J, et al. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90: S112-S123.
[12]	Argent N, Tonts M, Jones R, et al. A creativity-led rural renaissance? Amenity-led migration, the creative turn and the uneven development of rural Australia[J]. Applied Geography, 2013, 44: 88-98.
[13]	Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2): 142-160.
[14]	Willemen L, Hein L, van Mensvoort M E F, et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(1): 62-73.
[15]	吴次芳, 叶艳妹, 吴宇哲, 等. 国土空间规划[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2019.
	[ Wu Cifang, Ye Yanmei, Wu Yuzhe, et al. Spatial planning of national territory. Beijing, China: Geological Publishing House, 2019. ]
[16]	Eneqvist E, Karvonen A. Experimental governance and urban planning futures: Five strategic functions for municipalities in local innovation[J]. Urban Planning, 2021, 6(1): 183-194.
[17]	Meerow S, Newell J P. Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 159: 62-75.
[18]	Heijman W J M, Hagelaar J L F, van der Heide M.Rural resilience as a new development concept [C]// Tomic D, Sevarlic M M. Development of agriculture and rural areas in central and eastern Europe: 100th seminar of the EAAE, Serbia: Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists, 2007: 383-396.
[19]	Onsted J A, Chowdhury R R. Does zoning matter? A comparative analysis of landscape change in Redland, Florida using cellular automata[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 121: 1-18.
[20]	王铮, 乐群, 夏海斌, 等. 中国2050: 气候情景与胡焕庸线的稳定性[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(11): 1505-1514.
	[ Wang Zheng, Yue Qun, Xia Haibin, et al. Climate scenarios and stability of Hu-line. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2016, 46(11): 1505-1514. ]
[21]	Nguyen T T, Verdoodt A, van Y T, et al. Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 200: 1-11.
[22]	de Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75(3/4): 175-186.
[23]	Helming K. Impact assessment for multifunctional land use[M]//Mueller L, Saparov A, Lischeid G. Novel measurement and assessment tools for monitoring and management of land and water resources in agricultural landscapes of central Asia, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014: 223-234.
[24]	Zhou D, Xu J C, Lin Z L. Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 577: 136-147.
[25]	周建, 张凤荣, 徐艳, 等. 基于生态生产生活视角的北方农牧交错区土地宜耕性评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(6): 253-260.
	[ Zhou Jian, Zhang Fengrong, Xu Yan, et al. Land cultivation suitability evaluation of agro-pastoral ecotone in northern China based on aspects of ecology, production and life. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019, 35(6): 253-260. ]
[26]	张红旗, 许尔琪, 朱会义. 中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338.
	[ Zhang Hongqi, Xu Erqi, Zhu Huiyi. An ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338. ]
[27]	崔家兴, 顾江, 孙建伟, 等. 湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(8): 67-73.
	[ Cui Jia-xing, Gu Jiang, Sun Jianwei, et al. The Spatial Pattern and Evolution Characteristics of the Production, Living and Ecological Space in Hubei Provence. China Land Science, 2018, 32(8): 67-73. ]
[28]	樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 186-201. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502002
	[ Fan Jie. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 186-201. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502002
[29]	曲衍波, 王世磊, 朱伟亚, 等. 黄河三角洲国土空间演变的时空分异特征与驱动力分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(6): 252-263, 309.
	[ Qu Yanbo, Wang Shilei, Zhu Weiya, et al. Spatial-temporal differentiation characteristics and driving force of territorial space evolution in the Yellow River Delta. Transactions of the CSAE, 2021, 37(6): 252-263, 309. ]
[30]	Fan Y T, Jin X B, Gan L, et al. Spatial identification and dynamic analysis of land use functions reveals distinct zones of multiple functions in eastern China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 642: 33-44.
[31]	Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Multifunctionality:Towards an analytical framework. directorate for food, agriculture and fisheries[M]. Paris, France: OECD, 2001.
[32]	Gómez Sal A, González García A. A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007, 120(1): 82-91.
[33]	姜广辉, 张凤荣, 孔祥斌, 等. 耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(8): 42-47.
	[ Jiang Guanghui, Zhang Fengrong, Kong Xiangbin, et al. The different levels and the protection of multi-functions of cultivated land. China Land Science, 2011, 25(8): 42-47. ]
[34]	蔡银莺, 王亚运, 朱兰兰. 城市边缘区农户耕地利用功能对土地转出的影响: 武汉、成都、苏州1022户农民的典型实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(10): 1648-1661.
	[ Cai Yinying, Wang Yayun, Zhu Lanlan. The effect of farmer households' farmland use function on their land rental decision in urban fringe: A case study of 1022 farmer households in Suzhou, Chengdu and Wuhan. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(10): 1648-1661. ]
[35]	Song X Q, Huang Y A, Wu Z F, et al. Does cultivated land function transition occur in China?[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015, 25(7): 817-835.
[36]	MEA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and human well-being[M]. Washington D C, USA: Island Press, 2005.
[37]	Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
[38]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746
	[ Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Changshun, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746. ]
[39]	de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 50-61.
[40]	Kienast F, Bolliger J, Potschin M, et al. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe[J]. Environmental Management, 2009, 44(6): 1099-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9384-7 pmid: 19856022
[41]	Pérez- Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land use functions: A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[M]//Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2008: 375-404.
[42]	Zou L L, Liu Y S, Wang J Y, et al. An analysis of land use conflict potentials based on ecological-production-living function in the southeast coastal area of China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122: 107297. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107297. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107297
[43]	Fan Y T, Gan L, Hong C Q, et al. Spatial identification and determinants of trade-offs among multiple land use functions in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 772: 145022. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145022. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145022
[44]	李思楠, 赵筱青, 普军伟, 等. 西南喀斯特典型区国土空间功能质量评价及耦合协调分析: 以广南县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2350-2367.
	[ Li Sinan, Zhao Xiaoqing, Pu Junwei, et al. Territorial space function quality evaluation and coupling coordination analysis in typical Karst areas of Southwest China: A case study of Guangnan County. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(9): 2350-2367. ]
[45]	Zhang Y N, Long H L, Tu S S, et al. Spatial identification of land use functions and their tradeoffs/synergies in China: Implications for sustainable land management[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 107: 105550. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105550. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105550
[46]	Peng J, Hu X X, Qiu S J, et al. Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 660: 765-775.
[47]	龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.
	[ Long Hualou. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028. ]
[48]	Seto K C, Golden J S, Alberti M, et al. Sustainability in an urbanizing planet[J]. PNAS, 2017, 114(34): 8935-8938.
[49]	Fuseini I, Kemp J. A review of spatial planning in Ghana's socio-economic development trajectory: A sustainable development perspective[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 47: 309-320.
[50]	Brown G, Sanders S, Reed P. Using public participatory mapping to inform general land use planning and zoning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 177: 64-74.
[51]	Locke C M, Rissman A R. Factors influencing zoning ordinance adoption in rural and exurban townships[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 134: 167-176.
[52]	姜棪峰, 龙花楼, 唐郁婷. 土地整治与乡村振兴: 土地利用多功能性视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 487-497. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.012
	[ Jiang Yanfeng, Long Hualou, Tang Yuting. Land consolidation and rural vitalization: A perspective of land use multifunctionality. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 487-497. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.012
[53]	杜国明, 孙晓兵, 王介勇. 东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(2): 232-244. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.02.010
	[ Du Guoming, Sun Xiaobing, Wang Jieyong. Spatiotemporal patterns of multi-functionality of land use in Northeast China. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(2): 232-244. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.02.010
[54]	刘超, 许月卿, 孙丕苓, 等. 土地利用多功能性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(9): 1087-1099. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.004
	[ Liu Chao, Xu Yueqing, Sun Piling, et al. Progress and prospects of multi-functionality of land use research. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(9): 1087-1099. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.004
[55]	乔伟峰, 戈大专, 高金龙, 等. 江苏省乡村地域功能与振兴路径选择研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 522-534. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180919
	[ Qiao Weifeng, Ge Dazhuan, Gao Jinlong, et al. Detecting the pathways towards rural vitalization from the perspective of territorial functions in Jiangsu Province. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 522-534. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180919
[56]	唐常春, 李亚平, 杜也, 等. 1980-2018年粤港澳大湾区国土空间结构演变[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(4): 928-944. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200712
	[ Tang Changchun, Li Yaping, Du Ye, et al. The evolution of territorial spatial structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 1980 to 2018. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(4): 928-944. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200712
[57]	李玉恒, 黄惠倩, 王晟业. 基于乡村经济韧性的传统农区城乡融合发展路径研究: 以河北省典型县域为例[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(8): 28-33.
	[ Li Yuheng, Huang Huiqian, Wang Shengye. Path of urban-rural integrated development in traditional agricultural zones based on rural economic resilience: The study of typical counties of Hebei Province. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(8): 28-33. ]
[58]	朱琳, 黎磊, 刘素, 等. 大城市郊区村域土地利用功能演变及其对乡村振兴的启示: 以成都市江家堰村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 535-549. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181059
	[ Zhu Lin, Li Lei, Liu Su, et al. The evolution of village land-use function in the metropolitan suburbs and its inspiration to rural revitalization: A case study of Jiangjiayan Village in Chengdu City. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 535-549. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181059
[59]	石龙宇, 冯运双, 高莉洁. 长三角县域国土空间开发适宜性评价方法研究: 以长兴县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(18): 6495-6504.
	[ Shi Longyu, Feng Yunshuang, Gao Lijie. The method of territorial spatial development suitability evaluation in the Yangtze River Delta: A case study of Changxing County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(18): 6495-6504. ]
[60]	杨园园, 臧玉珠, 李进涛. 基于城乡转型功能分区的京津冀乡村振兴模式探析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 684-698. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180909
	[ Yang Yuanyuan, Zang Yuzhu, Li Jintao. Rural revitalization mode in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei from the perspective of urban-rural transformation functional zoning. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 684-698. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180909
[61]	杨忍, 陈燕纯, 龚建周. 转型视阈下珠三角地区乡村发展过程及地域模式梳理[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 725-740. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181092
	[ Yang Ren, Chen Yanchun, Gong Jianzhou. Evolution and regional model of rural development in the Pearl River delta region, China, under rapid transformation development. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 725-740. ]
[62]	Jin G, Deng X Z, Zhao X D, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(8): 1113-1126.
[63]	黄贤金, 陈逸, 赵雲泰, 等. 黄河流域国土空间开发格局优化研究: 基于国土开发强度视角[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(6): 1554-1564. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200546
	[ Huang Xianjin, Chen Yi, Zhao Yuntai, et al. Optimization on land spatial development pattern in the Yellow River Basin: From the perspective of land development intensity. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(6): 1554-1564. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200546
[64]	卓蓉蓉, 余斌, 曾菊新, 等. 中国重点农区乡村地域功能演变及其影响机理: 以江汉平原为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 56-68. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.01.006
	[ Zhuo Rongrong, Yu Bin, Zeng Juxin, et al. Change and mechanism of influence of rural territorial functions in major agricultural areas of China: A case study of the Jianghan Plain. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(1): 56-68. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.01.006
[65]	刘永强, 龙花楼. 长江中游经济带土地利用转型时空格局及其生态服务功能影响[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(11): 161-170.
	[ Liu Yongqiang, Long Hualou. Study on the spatio-temporal patterns of land use transition and its impact on ecological service function of the middle of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(11): 161-170. ]
[66]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[67]	吴思, 胡守庚, 熊婷, 等. 长江中游经济带主体功能区土地利用转型模式研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(11): 2213-2224. doi: 10.18402/resci.2018.11.08
	[ Wu Si, Hu Shougeng, Xiong Ting, et al. The pattern of land use transition in different major function zones in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Resources Science, 2018, 40(11): 2213-2224. ] doi: 10.18402/resci.2018.11.08
[68]	陆大道. “未来地球”框架文件与中国地理科学的发展: 从“未来地球”框架文件看黄秉维先生论断的前瞻性[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1043-1051. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408001
	[ Lu Dadao. The framework document of "Future Earth" and the development of Chinese geographical science: The foresight of Academician HUANG Bingwei's statement. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1043-1051. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408001
[69]	Bradford J B, D'Amato A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012, 10(4): 210-216.
[70]	王成, 彭清, 唐宁, 等. 2005-2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究: 以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(4): 590-599. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.04.013
	[ Wang Cheng, Peng Qing, Tang Ning, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and the synergy and trade-off relationship of cultivated land multi-function in 2005-2015: A case of Shapingba District, Chongqing City. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 590-599. ]
[71]	Wang Y, Li X M, Zhang Q, et al. Projections of future land use changes: Multiple scenarios-based impacts analysis on ecosystem services for Wuhan City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94: 430-445.
[72]	杨永芳, 朱连奇. 土地利用冲突的理论与诊断方法[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(6): 1134-1141.
	[ Yang Yongfang, Zhu Lianqi. The theory and diagnostic methods of land use conflicts. Resources Science, 2012, 34(6): 1134-1141. ]
[73]	Liang X, Liu X P, Li X, et al. Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 177: 47-63.
[74]	Verburg P H, Schot P P, Dijst M J, et al. Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities[J]. GeoJournal, 2004, 61(4): 309-324.
[75]	Costanza R, Ruth M. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus[J]. Environmental Management, 1998, 22(2): 183-195. pmid: 9465128
[76]	Schulp C J E, Nabuurs G J, Verburg P H. Future carbon sequestration in Europe: Effects of land use change[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2008, 127(3/4): 251-264.
[77]	张晓娟, 周启刚, 王兆林, 等. 基于MCE-CA-Markov的三峡库区土地利用演变模拟及预测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(19): 268-277.
	[ Zhang Xiaojuan, Zhou Qigang, Wang Zhaolin, et al. Simulation and prediction of land use change in Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on MCE-CA-Markov. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(19): 268-277. ]
[78]	Halmy M W A, Gessler P E, Hicke J A, et al. Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in the north-western coastal desert of Egypt using Markov-CA[J]. Applied Geography, 2015, 63: 101-112.
[79]	Liu X P, Liang X, Li X, et al. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 168: 94-116.
[80]	Hernik J, Gawroński K, Dixon-Gough R. Social and economic conflicts between cultural landscapes and rural communities in the English and Polish systems[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 30(1): 800-813.
[81]	Liang X, Guan Q F, Clarke K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021, 85: 101569. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569
[82]	樊杰. 我国“十四五”时期高质量发展的国土空间治理与区域经济布局[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(7): 796-805.
	[ Fan Jie. High-quality development of national territory space governance and regional economic layout during 14th Five-Year Plan in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(7): 796-805. ]
[83]	Liu W D. The belt and road initiative: A pathway towards inclusive globalization[M]. London, UK: Routledge, 2019.
[84]	袁源, 张小林, 李红波, 等. 基于位置大数据的村域尺度多功能性评价: 以苏州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 674-687.
	[ Zhang Xiaolin, Li Hongbo, et al. Evaluation of multifunctionality on village scale using location-based big data: A case study of Suzhou. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 674-687. ]
[85]	Eilola S, Käyhkö N, Fagerholm N. Lessons learned from participatory land use planning with high-resolution remote sensing images in Tanzania: Practitioners' and participants' perspectives[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 109: 105649. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105649. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105649
[86]	Long Y. Big/open data for urban management[J]. Journal of Urban Management, 2015, 4(2): 73. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2015.12.002. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2015.12.002
[87]	迈克尔·巴蒂. 未来的智慧城市[J]. 赵怡婷, 龙瀛, 译. 国际城市规划, 2014, 29(6): 12-30.
	[ Michael Batty.Smart cities of the future. Translated by ZhaoYiting, LongYing. Smart cities of the future. Translated by Zhao Yiting, Long Ying. Urban Planning International, 2014, 29(6): 12-30. ]
[88]	Huang J, Levinson D, Wang J E, et al. Tracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data[J]. PNAS, 2018, 115(50): 12710-12715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815928115 pmid: 30455293
[89]	汪晓春, 熊峰, 王振伟, 等. 基于POI大数据与机器学习的养老设施规划布局: 以武汉市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(6): 49-56.
	[ Wang Xiaochun, Xiong Feng, Wang Zhenwei, et al. Planning and layout of facilities for the elders based on POI and machine learning: A case study of Wuhan. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(6): 49-56. ]
[90]	王佳文, 叶裕民, 董珂. 从效率优先到以人为本: 基于“城市人理论”的国土空间规划价值取向思考[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020(6): 19-26.
	[ Wang Jiawen, Ye Yumin, Dong Ke. From efficiency-priority to human-centrality: The value orientation of the territorial spatial planning based on the homo urbanicus theory. Urban Planning Forum, 2020(6): 19-26. ]

Territorial space function research in the context of ecological civilization: From the past into the future

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 90

Related Articles 14

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XU Xiaoren, WANG Liang, XU Yong, DUAN Jian. Evaluation of reserve available land resources based on three types of territorial space: A case study of Jiexiu City in Shanxi Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 272-282.
[2]	CHENG Chaonan, HU Yang, ZHAO Ming. Progress and prospect of the spatiotemporal change and ecosystem services evaluation of urban green space pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[3]	Liang ZHOU, Qi ZHAO, Fan YANG. Identification of urban agglomeration boundary based on POI and NPP/VIIRS night light data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 840-850.
[4]	Yaolin LIU, Yang ZHANG, Yan ZHANG, Yi LIU, Haofeng WANG, Yanfang LIU. Conflicts between three land management red lines in Wuhan City: Spatial patterns and driving factors [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1672-1681.
[5]	SUN Feng,WANG Degen,NIU Yu. Influencing factors and innovation of tourism toilet development from the perspective of ecological civilization: Based on tourist satisfaction analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(6): 702-713.
[6]	LIU Yansui, WANG Jieyong. Theoretical analysis and technical methods of “multiple planning integration” in the rural to urban transition period in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(5): 529-536.
[7]	Xianchun ZHANG, Linchuan YANG, Qiaoyu XIANG, Shijian HONG. Content identification and optimization strategies of legal spatial planning system for airport-related economic zones [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(9): 1123-1134.
[8]	Xiaolu GAO, Danxian WU, Zening XU, Bingqiu YAN. A review and frame-work setting of geographical research on aging in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(12): 1480-1494.
[9]	Bingqiu YAN, Xiaolu GAO, Jue JI. Micro simulation and planning policies analysis for urban elderly care facilities： take Beijing as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(12): 1586-1597.
[10]	Guishan YANG, Xibao XU, Pingxing LI. Research on the construction of green ecological corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(11): 1356-1367.
[11]	WANG Lei, SHEN Jianfa. Evolution of spatial planning in the Five-Year Plan/Planning system of China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(8): 1195-1206.
[12]	FAN Jie, ZHOU Kan, SUN Wei, CHEN Dong. Scientific values and research innovations of Human-economic Geography in construction of ecological civilization [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(2): 147-160.
[13]	MENG Guangwen, Joachim VOGT. Spatial Planning as a Tool for Ecological and Environmental Protection: the German Experience and its Significance in Chin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 24(6): 21-30.
[14]	ZHANG Wei, LIU Yi, LIU Yang. The New Trends of Spatial Planning Research and Practice in Developed Countries and Their Inspirations to China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 24(3): 79-90.