耕地利用系统的理论解析与研究框架

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.07.012

Abstract

Abstract:

Cultivated land use system has a great impact on global change and human well-being. This study used the theories and methods of system science to explore the concept, composition, operation, functions, and characteristics of cultivated land use system and constructed the research framework of cultivated land use system, in order to promote the deepening of land system research and solve various problems. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) Cultivated land use system is a compound natural-human system in which agricultural producers and operators invest an appropriate amount of production factors in a certain amount and quality of cultivated land to plant crops, and obtain agricultural products and corresponding benefits. Cultivated land use system consists of cultivated land subsystem, economic subsystem, and social subsystem. It has explicit and implicit structures. 2) The operation and evolution of cultivated land use system is the result of natural ecological processes, economic development processes, and social evolution processes. It also has compound, open, resilient, and multi-level characteristics. 3) The study of cultivated land use system should follow the theoretical framework of element-structure-function-mechanism-regulation. This study revealed the action mechanism of different elements from the composition and influence relationship of various elements; analyzed the structure and transformation of cultivated land use from two aspects of explicit and implicit structure; revealed the impact of functions on structure from three aspects of economic, social, and ecological functions; analyzed the operation mechanism of cultivated land use system from the adaptation and adjustment mechanism of the system to the changes of external environment, the interaction and competition substitution mechanism of system elements, the information transmission mechanism of system operation, the coordination and organization operation mechanism of cultivated land use subjects at different levels, and the emergence mechanism of cultivated land use functions; and used scenario simulation method, multi-objective optimization method, and comprehensive regulation balance method to explore regulation strategies of cultivated land use.

Key words: cultivated land use system, element, structure, transformation, process, cultivated land use functions

DU Guoming, CHAI Lujia, LI Yuheng. Theoretical explanation and research framework of cultivated land use system[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(7): 1288-1299.

Figures/Tables 6

References 35

[1]	刘耀林. 土地信息系统[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
	[ Liu Yaolin. Land information system. 2nd Edition. Beijing, China: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2011. ]
[2]	Verburg P H, Erb K H, Mertz O, et al. Land system science: Between global challenges and local realities[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5): 433-437. pmid: 24851141
[3]	Verburg P H, Crossman N, Ellis E C, et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective[J]. Anthropocene, 2015, 12: 29-41.
[4]	Wu Y Z, Shan L P, Guo Z, et al. Cultivated land protection policies in China facing 2030: Dynamic balance system versus basic farmland zoning[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 69: 126-138.
[5]	戴尔阜, 马良, 杨微石, 等. 土地系统多主体模型的理论与应用[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2260-2272. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201911005
	[ Dai Erfu, Ma Liang, Yang Weishi, et al. Agent based model of land system: Theory, application and modelling framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(11): 2260-2272. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201911005
[6]	苏浩, 吴次芳. 东北黑土区耕地系统变化机理[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(6): 243-251.
	[ Su Hao, Wu Cifang. Mechanism of cultivated land system change in black soil areas of Northeast China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2021, 37(6): 243-251. ]
[7]	刘彦随, 周扬, 刘继来. 中国农村贫困化地域分异特征及其精准扶贫策略[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(3): 269-278.
	[ Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Liu Jilai. Regional differentiation characteristics of rural poverty and targeted poverty alleviation strategy in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016, 31(3): 269-278. ]
[8]	刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805001
	[ Liu Jiyuan, Ning Jia, Kuang Wenhui, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010-2015[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 789-802. ]
[9]	宋小青, 李心怡. 区域耕地利用功能转型的理论解释与实证[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 992-1010. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201905012
	[ Song Xiao-qing, Li Xinyi. Theoretical explanation and case study of regional cultivated land use function transition. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 992-1010. ]
[10]	姜棪峰, 龙花楼, 唐郁婷. 土地整治与乡村振兴: 土地利用多功能性视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 487-497. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.012
	[ Jiang Yanfeng, Long Hualou, Tang Yuting. Land consolidation and rural vitalization: A perspective of land use multifunctionality. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 487-497. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.012
[11]	H J 德伯里. 人文地理: 文化、社会与空间[M]. 王民, 王发曾, 程玉申, 等译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 1988.
	[ deBlij H J. Human geography-culture, society and space. Translated by Wang Min, Wang Fazeng, Cheng Yushen, et al. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press, 1988. ]
[12]	吴传钧. 法国人地学家维达尔·白兰士的思想贡献[J]. 国外人文地理, 1986(1): 12-16.
	[ Wu Chuanjun. The ideological contribution of Vidal Brandt, a French geologist. Foreign Human Geography, 1986(1): 12-16. ]
[13]	刘盛佳. 吴传钧院士的人文地理思想与人地关系地域系统学说[J]. 地理科学进展, 1998, 17(1): 12-18.
	[ Liu Shengjia. Academician Wu Chuanjun's human geographical thoughts and man-nature relationship system theory. Progress in Geography, 1998, 17(1): 12-18. ]
[14]	陆大道. 关于地理学的“人-地系统”理论研究[J]. 地理研究, 2002, 21(2): 135-145.
	[ Lu Dadao. Theoretical studies of man-land system as the core of geographical science. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(2): 135-145. ]
[15]	王万茂. 土地生态经济学[M]. 南京: 江苏科技文献出版社, 1994.
	[ Wang Wanmao. Land Ecological Economics. Nanjing, China: Jiangsu Science and Technology Literature Press, 1994. ]
[16]	王金新. 生态经济学原理[M]. 郑州: 河南人民出版社, 1998.
	[ Wang Jinxin. Principles of ecological economics. Zhengzhou, China: Henan People's Press, 1998. ]
[17]	刘彦随. 区域土地利用系统优化调控的机理与模式[J]. 资源科学, 1999, 17(4): 60-65.
	[ Liu Yansui. Optimal regulation mechanism and models of regional land use system. Resources Science, 1999, 17(4): 60-65. ]
[18]	Dubroeucq D, Livenais P. Land cover and land use changes in relation to social evolution: A case study from Northern Chile[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004, 56(2): 193-211.
[19]	刘希朝, 李效顺, 蒋冬梅. 基于土地利用变化的黄河流域景观格局及生态风险评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(4): 265-274.
	[ Liu Xizhao, Li Xiaoshun, Jiang Dongmei. Landscape pattern identification and ecological risk assessment using land-use change in the Yellow River Basin. Transactions of the CSAE, 2021, 37(4): 265-274. ]
[20]	宋戈, 王盼盼. 松嫩高平原县域土地利用空间格局地形梯度特征分析: 以巴彦县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(8): 1218-1225. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.08.012
	[ Song Ge, Wang Panpan. Spatial pattern of land use along the terrain gradient of county in Songnen High Plain: A case study of Bayan County. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 1218-1225. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.08.012
[21]	曹敏, 范广勤, 史照良. 基于MSVM-CA模型的区域土地利用演变模拟[J]. 中国土地科学, 2012, 26(6): 62-67, 1.
	[ Cao Min, Fan Guangqin, Shi Zhaoliang. Simulation of the regional land use evolution based on MSVM-CA model. China Land Sciences, 2012, 26(6): 62-67, 1. ]
[22]	张经度, 梅志雄, 吕佳慧, 等. 纳入空间自相关的FLUS模型在土地利用变化多情景模拟中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 531-542. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190359
	[ Zhang Jingdu, Mei Zhixiong, Lv Jiahui, et al. Simulating multiple land use scenarios based on the FLUS model considering spatial autocorrelation. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2020, 22(3): 531-542. ]
[23]	韩博, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, 等. 基于冲突-适配视角的土地利用可持续性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1763-1777. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202107014
	[ Han Bo, Jin Xiaobin, Sun Rui, et al. Land use sustainability evaluation based on conflict-adaptation perspective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(7): 1763-1777. ]
[24]	焦世泰, 王鹏, 陈景信. 滇黔桂省际边界民族地区土地资源可持续利用研究: 基于区域评价与空间区划视角[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(1): 172-181.
	[ Jiao Shitai, Wang Peng, Chen Jingxin. Sustainable utilization of land resources in the ethnic areas of inter-provincial boundary of Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi: From the perspectives of regional evaluation and spatial division. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(1): 172-181. ]
[25]	王静, 郭旭东. 我国县级尺度土地可持续利用的科学调控[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3): 216-222.
	[ Wang Jing, Guo Xudong. A study of scientific regulation of sustainable land use at county scale in China. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(3): 216-222. ]
[26]	李灿. 区域土地利用转型诊断与调控的分析路径[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(5): 1464-1477. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200457
	[ Li Can. Analysis path of diagnosis and regulation of regional land use transition. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(5): 1464-1477. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200457
[27]	冀正欣, 刘超, 许月卿, 等. 基于土地利用功能测度的“三生”空间识别与优化调控[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(18): 222-231, 315.
	[ Ji Zhengxin, Liu Chao, Xu Yue-qing, et al. Identification and optimal regulation of the production-living-ecological space based on quantitative land use functions. Transactions of the CSAE, 2020, 36(18): 222-231, 315. ]
[28]	龙花楼, 李秀彬. 中国耕地转型与土地整理: 研究进展与框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(5): 67-76.
	[ Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Cultivated-land transition and land consolidation and reclamation in China: Research progress and frame. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(5): 67-76. ]
[29]	宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 471-487. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201703009
	[ Song Xiaoqing. Discussion on land use transition research framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3): 471-487. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201703009
[30]	宋小青, 欧阳竹. 耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7): 859-868.
	[ Song Xiaoqing, Ouyang Zhu. Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land protection. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(7): 859-868. ]
[31]	谢金华, 杨钢桥, 汪箭, 等. 不同农地整治模式对耕地生产价值和生态价值的影响: 基于天门、潜江部分农户的实证分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2333-2347.
	[ Xie Jinhua, Yang Gangqiao, Wang Jian, et al. Impact of different rural land consolidation modes on cultivated land production value and ecological value based on an empirical analysis of some farmers in Tianmen and Qianjiang. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(11): 2333-2347. ]
[32]	Pendall R, Foster K A, Cowell M. Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor[J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010, 3(1): 71-84.
[33]	刘志敏, 叶超. 社会-生态韧性视角下城乡治理的逻辑框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 95-103. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.009
	[ Liu Zhi-min, Ye Chao. A logical framework of rural-urban governance from the perspective of social-ecological resilience. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 95-103. ]
[34]	冯广京. 关于土地科学学科视角下“土地(系统)”定义的讨论[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(12): 1-10.
	[ Feng Guangjing, Discussion on the definition of land (system) from the perspective of land science discipline. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(12): 1-10. ]
[35]	刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001
	[ Liu Yansui. Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001

Theoretical explanation and research framework of cultivated land use system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHANG Fan, ZHANG Yongyong, CHEN Junxu, ZHAI Xiaoyan, HU Qingfang. Performance of multiple machine learning model simulation of process characteristic indicators of different flood types [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(7): 1239-1250.
[2]	XING Qian, LI Renjie, GUO Fenghua, LI Xiaofeng. A new tourist source concentration index (tourCI) and empirical analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(7): 1261-1273.
[3]	ZHAO Yan, YUE Dapeng, ZHAO Jingbo, LIU Le, LIU Yiting, YANG Yuzhe. Holocene environmental change and its impact on human activities in Xi’an [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(7): 1274-1287.
[4]	WANG Hui, YUAN Feng. A review of urban employment polycentricity research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(6): 1053-1067.
[5]	TANG Yanan, LI Lin, HAN Lei, XIE Shuangyu. A review of international research on the transformation and development of urban waterfront space [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(6): 1123-1135.
[6]	LI Yuxin, XUE Dongqian, ZHANG Pingyu, SONG Yongyong. Spatial structure and accessibility mode of entertainment industries in Xi’an City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(5): 797-811.
[7]	ZHANG Jing, YU Haozhe, QIAO Wei, XU Zengrang, CHENG Shengkui. Progress of research on the transformation and restructuring of rural development in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(5): 896-904.
[8]	LU Xiaoxu, LUO Xi, LU Yuqi, ZHU Zheng, MI Xue, FAN Yali. Cognitive structure testing of the geographical synthetic thinking: Based on the samples of senior high school students [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(2): 277-288.
[9]	XUE Bing, ZHAO Bingyu, LI Jingzhong. Urban complexity studies from the perspective of geography:A review based on the literature in the past 20 years [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 157-172.
[10]	WANG Fenglong. On the unique features of behavioral geography and the potential avenues for its future research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 16-26.
[11]	FAN Bangkui, LI Yun, ZHANG Ruiyu. Initial analysis of low-altitude internet of intelligences (IOI) and the applications of unmanned aerial vehicle industry [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(9): 1441-1450.
[12]	DU Guoming, LIU Mei. A factor-based theoretical analysis of urban-rural relationship change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(8): 1298-1309.
[13]	WANG Hui, YUAN Feng, ZHAO Yan. Changes of employment spatial structure and location pattern of Nanjing metropolitan area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(7): 1154-1166.
[14]	CHENG Xuelan, FANG Yelin, SU Xueqing, LI Jinglong. Spatial distribution characteristics of network structure of tourism flow in five major urban agglomerations of coastal China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(6): 948-957.
[15]	ZHANG Rong, PAN Jinghu, LAI Jianbo. Characteristics of intercity trip network structure of residents under different traffic modes: A case study of Spring Festival travel rush [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(5): 759-773.