时空间行为视角下交通与社会排斥研究进展

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.01.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In the context of China's new-type urbanization, how to build more inclusive and equitable cities has become an important question for sustainable social development. Research on transportation-related social exclusion mainly includes theoretical research, socio-spatial analysis, and comparative research on transportation and social exclusion. Supported by a large number of theoretical and empirical studies, two paradigms have been formed: the research based on "space" and the research based on "classification" of specific social groups. However, there is still a lack of effective demonstration of the internal causal relationships between space and behavior. Therefore, it is urgent to clarify the concept and mechanism of transportation and social exclusion from the perspective of geographic space and spatiotemporal behavior of different social groups. This article reviewed the concepts, research paradigms, and measurement methods of transportation and social exclusion, and elaborated on the internal logic and empirical results of social exclusion research in transportation from the perspective of spatiotemporal behavior and activities. Then, a research framework of transportation and social exclusion based on space-time-behavior interaction was constructed based on China's reality. The article attempted to provide a practical and theoretical support for the elimination of social exclusion in transportation, the construction of multi-scale social integration, and the development of more inclusive, equitable, and just cities.

Key words: transportation and social exclusion, spatiotemporal behavior, accessibility, transport disadvantage, time geography

HUANG Xiaoyan, CAO Xiaoshu. Progress of research on transportation and social exclusion from the perspective of spatiotemporal behavior[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 107-117.

Figures/Tables 2

References 90

[1]	Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M. Investigating the interplay between transport, land use and the environment: A review of the literature[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 11(8):2121-2132. doi: 10.1007/s13762-014-0691-z
[2]	Litman T. Evaluating transportation equity[J]. World Transport Policy & Practice, 2002, 8(2):50-65.
[3]	Hine J, Mitchell F. Transport disadvantage and social exclusion: Exclusionary mechanisms in transport in urban Scotland[M]. London, UK: Routledge, 2003: 66-70.
[4]	Social Exclusion Unit. Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion[R]. London, UK: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2003: 97-117.
[5]	Bantis T, Haworth J. Assessing transport related social exclusion using a capabilities approach to accessibility framework: A dynamic Bayesian network approach[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 84:102673. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102673. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102673
[6]	Church A, Frost M, Sullivan K. Transport and social exclusion in London[J]. Transport Policy, 2000, 7(3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00024-X
[7]	Shergold I, Parkhurst G. Transport-related social exclusion amongst older people in rural Southwest England and Wales[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28(4):412-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.010
[8]	Pyrialakou V D, Gkritza K, Fricker J D. Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 51:252-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.001
[9]	Carney F. Linking loyalty card data to public transport data to explore mobility and social exclusion in the older population[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(11):6217. doi: 10.3390/su13116217. doi: 10.3390/su13116217
[10]	Currie G, Richardson T, Smyth P, et al. Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne: Preliminary results[J]. Transport Policy, 2009, 16(3):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.002
[11]	Zhao P J. Sustainable urban expansion and transportation in a growing megacity: Consequences of urban sprawl for mobility on the urban fringe of Beijing[J]. Habitat International, 2010, 34(2):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.008
[12]	Duvarci Y, Yigitcanlar T, Alver Y, et al. Variant concept of transportation-disadvantaged: Evidence from Aydin, Turkey, and Yamaga, Japan[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2011, 137(1):82-90. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000044
[13]	李志刚, 吴缚龙, 薛德升. “后社会主义城市”社会空间分异研究述评[J]. 人文地理, 2006, 21(5):1-5.
	[ Li Zhigang, Wu Fulong, Xue Desheng. A review of sociospatial differentiation in 'post-socialist' cities. Human Geography, 2006, 21(5):1-5. ]
[14]	顾朝林, 刘佳燕. 城市社会学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2013: 1196-1205.
	[ Gu Chaolin, Liu Jiayan. Urban sociology. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 2013: 1196-1205. ]
[15]	Zhao Y, Chai Y W. Residents' activity-travel behavior variation by communities in Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(4):492-505. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0616-7
[16]	王世军. 中国城市机动性与社会排斥[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2011(4):87-92.
	[ Wang Shijun. Urban mobility and social exclusion in China. Urban Planning Forum, 2011(4):87-92. ]
[17]	郭玉坤. 交通在缓解社会排斥中的作用[J]. 城市问题, 2012(11):77-81.
	[ Guo Yukun. Role of the traffic in abating social exclusion. Urban Problems, 2012(11):77-81. ]
[18]	陈方, 吉选, 戢晓峰, 等. 城市交通中弱势群体的社会排斥及其对策[J]. 昆明理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2014, 14(1):24-29.
	[ Chen Fang, Ji Xuan, Ji Xiaofeng, et al. Social exclusion of vulnerable groups in urban transportation and countermeasures. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2014, 14(1):24-29. ]
[19]	周云洁. 中国大城市交通维度的社会排斥研究[C]// 中国城市规划学会. 规划60年: 成就与挑战: 2016中国城市规划年会论文集(05城市交通规划). 沈阳, 2016.
	[ Zhou Yunjie. Research on social exclusion in the transportation dimension of China's big cities // Urban Planning Society of China. 60 years of planning: Achievements and challenges: Proceedings of 2016 China urban planning annual conference (05 urban transportation planning).Shenyang, China: 2016. ]
[20]	周素红, 闫小培. 广州城市空间结构与交通需求关系[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1):131-142.
	[ Zhou Suhong, Yan Xiaopei. The relationship between urban structure and traffic demand in Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1):131-142. ]
[21]	柴彦威, 沈洁. 基于居民移动—活动行为的城市空间研究[J]. 人文地理, 2006, 21(5):108-112, 54.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Shen Jie. Travel-activity based research frame of urban spatial structure. Human Geography, 2006, 21(5):108-112, 54. ]
[22]	甄峰, 魏宗财, 杨山, 等. 信息技术对城市居民出行特征的影响: 以南京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5):1307-1317.
	[ Zhen Feng, Wei Zongcai, Yang Shan, et al. The impact of information technology on the characteristics of urban resident travel: Case of Nanjing. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(5):1307-1317. ]
[23]	申悦, 柴彦威. 基于日常活动空间的社会空间分异研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(6):853-862. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.06.012
	[ Shen Yue, Chai Yanwei. Progress of research on sociospatial differentiation based on daily activity space of urban residents. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(6):853-862. ]
[24]	Preston J, Rajé F. Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2007, 15(3):151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
[25]	Kenyon S, Lyons G, Rafferty J. Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2002, 10(3):207-219. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1
[26]	Gaffron P, Hine J P, Mitchell F. The role of transport on social exclusion in urban Scotland: Literature review[R]. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, 2001: 1-4.
[27]	Gordon D. Measuring poverty and social exclusion in Britain [R]. Conference of the dynamics of poverty: Social omnibus or underclass wagon. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University, 2002: 24-25.
[28]	Ureta S. To move or not to move? Social exclusion, accessibility and daily mobility among the low-income population in Santiago, Chile[J]. Mobilities, 2008, 3(2):269-289. doi: 10.1080/17450100802095338
[29]	Percy-Smith J. Policy responses to social exclusion: Towards inclusion?[M].Buckingham, USA: Open University Press, 2000: 216-240.
[30]	Currie G, Delbosc A. Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage[J]. Transportation, 2010, 37(6):953-966. doi: 10.1007/s11116-010-9280-2
[31]	Lucas K. Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?[J]. Transport Policy, 2012, 20:105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
[32]	Kushairi R, Yigitcanlar T. A methodological exploration to determine transportation disadvantage variables: The partial least square approach[J]. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 2015, 5(3):221-239. doi: 10.1504/WRITR.2015.069223
[33]	Ma L, Kent J, Mulley C. Transport disadvantage, social exclusion, and subjective well-being: The role of the neighborhood environment: Evidence from Sydney, Australia[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2018, 11(1):31-47.
[34]	Dodson J, Gleeson B, Evans R, et al. Investigating the social dimensions of transport disadvantage II: From Concepts to methods through an empirical case study[J]. Urban Policy & Research, 2007, 25(1):63-89.
[35]	Yigitcanlar T, Rashid K, Dur F. Sustainable urban and transport development for transportation disadvantaged: A review[J]. The Open Transportation Journal, 2010, 4:1-8. doi: 10.2174/1874447801004010001
[36]	Allen J, Farber S. Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 78:102212. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.102212. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.102212
[37]	Loader C, Stanley J. Growing bus patronage and addressing transport disadvantage: The Melbourne experience[J]. Transport Policy, 2009, 16(3):106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.001
[38]	Blair N, Hine J, Bukhari S M A. Analysing the impact of network change on transport disadvantage: A GIS-based case study of Belfast[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013, 31:192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.015
[39]	Delbosc A, Currie G. Transport problems that matter-social and psychological links to transport disadvantage[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(1):170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.003
[40]	Kamruzzaman M, Yigitcanlar T, Yang J, et al. Measures of transport-related social exclusion: A critical review of the literature[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(7):696. doi: 10.3390/su8070696. doi: 10.3390/su8070696
[41]	Lucas K, van Wee B, Maat K. A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches[J]. Transportation, 2016, 43:473-490. doi: 10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
[42]	Kenyon S, Rafferty J, Lyons G. Social exclusion and transport in the UK: A role for virtual accessibility in the alleviation of mobility-related social exclusion[J]. Journal of Social Policy, 2003, 32(3):317-338. doi: 10.1017/S0047279403007037
[43]	Ricciardi A M, Xia J H, Currie G. Exploring public transport equity between separate disadvantaged cohorts case study in Perth, Australia[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 43:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.01.011
[44]	Yigitcanlar T, Mohamed A, Kamruzzaman M, et al. Understanding transport-related social exclusion: A multidimensional approach[J]. Urban Policy and Research, 2019, 37(1):97-110. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2018.1533461
[45]	Lucas K. Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006, 40(10):801-809. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.005
[46]	Jones P, Lucas K. The social consequences of transport decision-making: Clarifying concepts, synjournaling knowledge and assessing implications[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, 21:4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.012
[47]	Fan Y L, Guthrie A E, Levinson D M. Impact of light rail implementation on labor market accessibility: A transportation equity perspective[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2012, 5(3):28-39.
[48]	Manaugh K, El-Geneidy A. Who benefits from new transportation infrastructure? Using accessibility measures to evaluate social equity in public transport provision[M]// Geurs K T,Krizek K J, Reggiani A. Accessibility and transport planning: Challenges for Europe and North America. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2012.
[49]	Welch T F. Equity in transport: The distribution of transit access and connectivity among affordable housing units[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 30:283-293. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.020
[50]	Mishra S, Welch T F, Jha M K. Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012, 46(7):1066-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.006
[51]	Kaplan S, Popoks D, Prato C G, et al. Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 37:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.016
[52]	Dodson J, Buchanan N, Gleeson B, et al. Investigating the social dimensions of transport disadvantage: I. Towards new concepts and methods[J]. Urban Policy and Research, 2006, 24(4):433-453. doi: 10.1080/08111140601035317
[53]	Hurni A. Marginalised groups in Western Sydney: The experience of sole parents and unemployed young people[M]// Currie G, Stanley J. No way to go: Transport and Social Disadvantage in Australian Communities. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Press, 2007.
[54]	Adeel M, Yeh A G O, Zhang F. Transportation disadvantage and activity participation in the cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan[J]. Transport Policy, 2016, 47:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.12.001
[55]	Zhang X, Wang J, Kwan M-P, et al. Reside nearby, behave apart? Activity-space-based segregation among residents of various types of housing in Beijing, China[J]. Cities, 2019, 88:166-180. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.009
[56]	Tao S, He S Y, Kwan M P, et al. Does low income translate into lower mobility? An investigation of activity space in Hong Kong between 2002 and 2011[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 82:102583. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102583. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102583
[57]	Xia J H, Nesbitt J, Daley R, et al. A multi-dimensional view of transport-related social exclusion: A comparative study of Greater Perth and Sydney[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 2016, 94:205-221.
[58]	De Vos J, Witlox F. Transportation policy as spatial planning tool, reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013, 33:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.014
[59]	Bocarejo J P, Escobar D, Hernandez D O, et al. Accessibility analysis of the integrated transit system of Bogotá[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2016, 10(4):308-320. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2014.926435
[60]	Schwanen T, Lucas K, Akyelken N, et al. Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 74:123-135. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.012
[61]	Liu Y F, Dijst M, Geertman S. Residential segregation and well-being inequality over time: A study on the local and migrant elderly people in Shanghai[J]. Cities, 2015, 49:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.012
[62]	Casas I, Delmelle E C. Identifying dimensions of exclusion from a BRT system in a developing country: A content analysis approach[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 39:228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.013
[63]	Cass N, Shove E, Urry J. Social exclusion, mobility and access[J]. The Sociological Review, 2005, 53(3):539-555. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00565.x
[64]	Urry J. Social networks, mobile lives and social inequalities[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, 21:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.003
[65]	Murray A T, Davis R. Equity in regional service provision[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2001, 41(4):557-600. doi: 10.1111/jors.2001.41.issue-4
[66]	Oviedo D, Sabogal O. Unpacking the connections between transport and well-being in socially disadvantaged communities: Structural equations approach to low-income neighbourhoods in Nigeria[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2020, 19:100966. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100966. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100966
[67]	Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 1970, 24:6-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01936872
[68]	Miller H J. Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1999, 31(1):187-212. doi: 10.1111/gean.1999.31.issue-2
[69]	Neutens T, Versichele M, Schwanen T. Arranging place and time: A GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities[J]. Applied Geography, 2010, 30:561-575. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.006
[70]	Tsevreni I. Children's social and spatial exclusion in the city[J]. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 2015, 6(2):122-127.
[71]	Kim S, Ulfarsson G F. Activity space of older and working- age adults in the Puget Sound Region, Washington[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015, 2494(1):37-44. doi: 10.3141/2494-05
[72]	Miller H J. Social exclusion in space and time[C]// Axhausen K W. Moving through nets: The physical and social dimensions of travel. Selected papers from the 10th International Conference of Travel Behaviour Research H. Amsterdam, Nederland: Elsevier, 2006: 353-380.
[73]	Schönfelder S, Axhausen K W. Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion?[J]. Transport Policy, 2003, 10(4):273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.07.002
[74]	Lu X D, Pas E I. Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1999, 33(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00020-2
[75]	Chapple K. Time to work: Job search strategies and commute time for women on welfare in San Francisco[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2001, 23(2):155-173. doi: 10.1111/0735-2166.00081
[76]	Izumiyama H, Ohmori N, Harata N. Space-time accessibility measures for evaluating mobility related social exclusion of the elderly[C]// The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine of USA. Proceedings of 11th international conference on mobility and transport for elderly and disabled people. Montreal, Canada, 2007.
[77]	柴彦威, 申悦, 肖作鹏, 等. 时空间行为研究动态及其实践应用前景[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6):667-675.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Shen Yue, Xiao Zuopeng, et al. Review for space-time behavior research: Theory frontiers and application in the future. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(6):667-675. ]
[78]	黄潇婷, 柴彦威. 面向LBS使用者的时间地理学研究评介[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(6):962-969.
	[ Huang Xiaoting, Chai Yanwei. The introduction and comment on the study of user-centered time geography for LBS. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(6):962-969. ]
[79]	Dharmowijoyo D B E, Susilo Y O, Syabri I. Time use and spatial influence on transport-related social exclusion, and mental and social health[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2020, 21:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.05.006
[80]	Warschauer M. Social capital and access[J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2003, 2(4):315-330. doi: 10.1007/s10209-002-0040-8
[81]	Kim H M, Kwan M-P. Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2003, 5(1):71-91. doi: 10.1007/s101090300104
[82]	Miller H J. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1991, 5:287-301. doi: 10.1080/02693799108927856
[83]	Kwan M-P. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures[J]. The Professional Geographer, 1999, 51(2):211-227. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00158
[84]	Newsome T H, Walcott W A, Smith P D. Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions[J]. Transportation, 1998, 25:357-377. doi: 10.1023/A:1005082827030
[85]	Ashiru O, Polak J W, Noland R B. Space-time user benefit and utility accessibility measures for individual activity schedules[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003(1):62-73.
[86]	Kwan M-P. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2002, 92(4):645-661. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309
[87]	柴彦威, 申悦, 陈梓烽. 基于时空间行为的人本导向的智慧城市规划与管理[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014, 29(6):31-37, 50.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Shen Yue, Chen Zifeng. Towards smarter cities: Human- oriented urban planning and management based on space- time behavior research. Urban Planning International, 2014, 29(6):31-37, 50. ]
[88]	柴彦威, 谭一洺, 申悦, 等. 空间—行为互动理论构建的基本思路[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710012
	[ Chai Yanwei, Tan Yiming, Shen Yue, et al. Space-behavior interaction theory: Basic thinking of general construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. ]
[89]	Martens K. Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer's 'Spheres of justice' to the transport sector[J]. Transportation, 2012, 39(6):1035-1053. doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7
[90]	Wang D G, Li F, Chai Y W. Activity spaces and sociospatial segregation in Beijing[J]. Urban Geography, 2012, 33(2):256-277. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.2.256

Progress of research on transportation and social exclusion from the perspective of spatiotemporal behavior

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References 90

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LU Haiyan, ZHAO Pengjun, DONG Yaning, HU Haoyu, ZENG Liang'en. Accessibility of high-speed rail stations and spatial disparity of urban-rural income gaps [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 131-142.
[2]	LI Rui, WANG Jun, LI Mengya. Fine-resolution evaluation of urban fire service accessibility under the impact of a 100-year pluvial flood [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 143-156.
[3]	SHEN Yue, WANG De. Interdisciplinary application of theories and methods of behavioral geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 40-52.
[4]	ZHANG Yan, CHAI Yanwei. Development of time geography based on the project-activity system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 53-63.
[5]	YIN Zhangcai, KANG Ziqiang. Advances in kernel density estimation supported by time geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 64-72.
[6]	LI Chunjiang, ZHANG Yan. The time geography response to the digital transition of everyday life [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 96-106.
[7]	TONG De, SUN Yiyu, XIE Miaomiao. Evaluation of green space accessibility based on improved Gaussian two-step floating catchment area method: A case study of Shenzhen City, China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(7): 1113-1126.
[8]	REN Jiayi, WANG Yun. Spatial accessibility of park green space in Huangpu District of Shanghai based on modified two-step floating catchment area method [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(5): 774-783.
[9]	ZOU Sicong, ZHANG Shanqi, ZHEN Feng. Measurement of community daily activity space and influencing factors of vitality based on residents’ spatiotemporal behavior: Taking Shazhou and Nanyuan streets in Nanjing as examples [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 580-596.
[10]	LI Yanxi, CHAI Yanwei, ZHANG Yan. Weekly spatiotemporal behavior of suburban residents in family context: A case study of the Shangdi-Qinghe area in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 597-606.
[11]	ZHAO Pengjun, LUO Jia, HU Haoyu. Spatial match between residents’ daily life circle and public service facilities using big data analytics: A case of Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 541-553.
[12]	CUI Can, MU Xueying, CHANG Heying, LI Jiayi, WANG Fenglong. Patterns and determinants of location choice in residential mobility: A case study of Shanghai [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(3): 422-432.
[13]	CHEN Zhuo, LIANG Yi, JIN Fengjun. Simulation of city network accessibility and its influence on regional development pattern in China based on integrated land transport system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 183-193.
[14]	YAN Meiyan, YU Bin, GUO Xinwei, ZHUO Rongrong. Adaptability of rural human settlements construction based on subjective and objective comparison: A case study of Gong’an County on the Jianghan Plain [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(11): 1876-1887.
[15]	SONG Zhengna, HUA Fuli, LIU Shaoli. Research progress and review of capitalization of compulsory educational resources [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(10): 1771-1787.