基于改进三维足迹模型的关中地区土地自然资本利用状况分析

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.08.009

Abstract

Abstract:

As a tool of natural capital accounting, ecological footprint models have been used to quantitatively estimate a region's sustainability. Three-dimensional ecological footprint is a new approach in the field of natural capital accounting around the world. Given the modern background of the Belt and Road initiative, the construction of ecological civilization, and the development of the western regions of China, it is significant for the Guanzhong region—an important area on the Silk Road—to choose a sustainable development path in the future. Based on the revised three-dimensional ecological footprint model, this study used three scales including product, land use type, and region to quantitatively calculate the land use ecological footprint size and footprint depth of the Guanzhong region and its respective municipalities from 1995 to 2015. Moreover, Gini coefficient of footprint size and other indicators were added to more clearly analyze the occupancy of natural capital flows and the consumption of natural capital stocks in the study area. Lastly, it evaluated the sustainability of natural capital use of the Guanzhong region and its municipalities. The main conclusions of the study are as follows: 1) From 1995 to 2015, the land use ecological footprint of the Guanzhong region showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The land carrying capacity decreased year by year and the ecological deficit increased year by year, which is not conducive to the sustainable development of the region. 2) The five large cities in the Guanzhong region were in the situation of ecological deficit, and their footprint depth were all more than 1. Consuming stock capital to make up for the shortage of flow capital has become a normal social development pattern in the region. 3) Cropland and construction land were the main land use types occupied by natural capital flows, while grassland, cropland, and construction land were the main land use types of natural capital stocks. 4) Inequality of natural capital flow occupation in the region was gradually increasing. If no reasonable measures are taken, it will reach a relatively unbalanced state in 2025 and a highly unbalanced state in 2030. This study focused on the "actual footprint", comprehensively revealed the land use benefits in the Guanzhong region, and provided a scientific reference for the sustainable development of the region.

Key words: three-dimensional ecological footprint, Guanzhong region, natural capital, sustainable development

WU Jiansheng, LI Kaiyang, ZHAO Yuhao. The use of land natural capital in the Guanzhong region based on a revised three-dimensional ecological footprint model[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1345-1355.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.2

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.3

Use of capital stock and flow in the Guanzhong region"

地区	年份	$U R flo sto$		$U E flo / %$
地区	年份	耕地	草地	林地	水域
西安	1995	5.42	5.80	0.37	51.96
	2000	6.33	7.79	0.69	51.46
	2005	6.90	9.71	2.22	50.10
	2010	7.78	10.03	6.50	60.74
	2015	7.10	10.95	8.92	70.64
铜川	1995	0.64	2.22	0.91	16.26
	2000	1.54	3.13	1.67	21.77
	2005	1.63	5.52	5.55	37.53
	2010	2.00	5.97	6.85	44.33
	2015	1.85	7.06	9.87	54.01
宝鸡	1995	2.24	0.68	1.01	18.03
	2000	2.90	1.24	0.90	23.40
	2005	3.54	3.18	2.78	34.14
	2010	4.31	3.52	2.25	30.79
	2015	3.87	4.25	7.53	33.05
咸阳	1995	0.91	4.01	0.72	27.45
	2000	2.45	5.22	1.64	60.48
	2005	2.95	9.86	1.29	62.64
	2010	3.60	10.28	6.51	68.41
	2015	3.38	11.01	7.79	76.40
渭南	1995	2.25	4.14	1.82	20.14
	2000	2.57	4.08	4.35	34.23
	2005	2.91	6.38	6.14	35.39
	2010	5.79	9.98	7.27	43.40
	2015	3.95	10.39	8.55	52.39

Tab.3

Fig.8

References 28

[1]	朱洪革, 蒋敏元. 国外自然资本研究综述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2006,28(2):1-6,14.
	[ Zhu Hongge, Jiang Minyuan. Review of foreign natural capital research. Foreign Economies & Management, 2006,28(2):1-6, 14. ]
[2]	Aronson J. Natural capital: The limiting factor[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006,28(1):1-5.
[3]	Alexander H. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[J]. Pacific Conservation Biology, 1997,6(2):220-221.
[4]	Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992,4(2):121-130.
[5]	靳相木, 柳乾坤. 自然资源核算的生态足迹模型演进及其评论[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(1):163-176.
	[ Jin Xiangmu, Liu Qiankun. Evolution of ecological footprint models for natural resources accounting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(1):163-176. ]
[6]	Wackernagel M. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth[J]. Population & Environment, 1995,1(3):171-174.
[7]	顾晓薇, 王青, 刘建兴, 等. 基于“国家公顷”计算城市生态足迹的新方法[J]. 东北大学学报, 2005,26(4):295-298.
	[ Gu Xiaowei, Wang Qing, Liu Jianxing. et al. New method of urban ecological footprint calculation based on "national hectare". Journal of Northeastern University, 2005,26(4):295-298. ]
[8]	Niccolucci V, Bastianoni S, Tiezzi E B P, et al. How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2009,220(20):2819-2823.
[9]	方恺. 1999—2008年G20国家自然资本利用的空间格局变化[J]. 资源科学, 2014,36(4):793-800.
	[ Fang Kai. Changes in the spatial distribution of natural capital use among G20 countries from 1999 to 2008. Resources Science, 2014,36(4):793-800. ]
[10]	方恺. 基于改进生态足迹三维模型的自然资本利用特征分析: 选取11个国家为数据源[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(11):3766-3777.
	[ Fang Kai. Assessing the natural capital use of eleven nations: An application of a revised three-dimensional model of ecological footprint. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(11):3766-3777. ]
[11]	方恺. 生态足迹深度和广度: 构建三维模型的新指标[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(1):267-274.
	[ Fang Kai. Ecological footprint depth and size: New indicators for a 3D model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(1):267-274. ]
[12]	方恺, 李焕承. 基于生态足迹深度和广度的中国自然资本利用省际格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012,27(12):1995-2005.
	[ Fang Kai, Li Huancheng. Provincial pattern of China's natural capital use: A modification and application of ecological footprint depth and size. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012,27(12):1995-2005. ]
[13]	杜悦悦, 彭建, 高阳, 等. 基于三维生态足迹的京津冀城市群自然资本可持续利用分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(10):1186-1196.
	[ Du Yue Yue, Peng Jian, Gao Yang, et al. Sustainability evaluation of natural capital utilization based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(10):1186-1196. ]
[14]	张星星, 曾辉. 珠江三角洲城市群三维生态足迹动态变化及驱动力分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017,37(2):771-778.
	[ Zhang Xingxing, Zeng Hui. Dynamic of three-dimensional ecological footprint in the Pearl River Delta and its driving factors. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017,37(2):771-778. ]
[15]	马维兢, 刘斌, 杨德伟, 等. 基于三维生态足迹模型的流域自然资本动态评估: 以福建省九龙江流域为例[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(5):871-880.
	[ Ma Weijing, Liu Bin, Yang Dewei, et al. Dynamic evaluation of natural capital using the three-dimension ecological footprint model: The Jiulong River Basin in Southeast China. Resources Science, 2017,39(5):871-880. ]
[16]	郑德凤, 刘晓星, 王燕燕, 等. 基于三维生态足迹的中国自然资本利用时空演变及驱动力分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(10):1328-1339.
	[ Zheng Defeng, Liu Xiaoxing, Wang Yanyan, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of natural capital utilization in China based on three-dimensional ecological footprint. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(10):1328-1339. ]
[17]	周涛, 王云鹏, 龚健周, 等. 生态足迹的模型修正与方法改进[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(14):4592-4603.
	[ Zhou Tao, Wang Yunpeng, Gong Jianzhou, et al. Ecological footprint model modification and method improvement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(14):4592-4603. ]
[18]	谢高地, 曹淑艳, 鲁春霞, 等. 中国的生态服务消费与生态债务研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(1):43-51.
	[ Xie Gaodi, Cao Shuyan, Lu Chunxia, et al. Human's consumption of ecosystem services and ecological debt in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010,25(1):43-51. ]
[19]	方恺, 吴次芳, 董亮. 城市化进程中的土地自然资本利用动态分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(1):1-13.
	[ Fang Kai, Wu Ci Fang, Dong Liang. The use of land natural capital in the context of urbanization. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018,33(1):1-13. ]
[20]	Niccolucci V, Galli A, Reed A, et al. Towards a 3D national ecological footprint geography[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2011,222(16):2939-2944.
[21]	方恺, Reinout H. 自然资本核算的生态足迹三维模型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(12):1700-1707.
	[ Fang Kai, Reinout H. A review on three-dimensional ecological footprint model for natural capital accounting. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(12):1700-1707.]
[22]	杨屹, 加涛. 21世纪以来陕西生态足迹和承载力变化[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(24):7987-7997.
	[ Yang Yi, Jia Tao. The 21st century ecological carrying capacity and footprint in Shannxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(24):7987-7997. ]
[23]	刘某承, 李文华. 基于净初级生产力的中国生态足迹均衡因子测算[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009,24(9):1550-1559.
	[ Liu Moucheng, Li Wenhua. The calculation of China's equivalence factor under ecological footprint mode based on net primary production. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009,24(9):1550-1559. ]
[24]	刘某承, 李文华, 谢高地. 基于净初级生产力的中国生态足迹产量因子测算[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010,29(3):592-597.
	[ Liu Moucheng, Li Wenhua, Xie Gaodi. Estimation of China ecological footprint production coefficient based on net primary productivity. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010,29(3):592-597. ]
[25]	方恺, 董德明, 沈万斌. 生态足迹理论在能源消费评价中的缺陷与改进探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(6):1013-1021.
	[ Fang Kai, Dong Deming, Shen Wanbin. Discussion on shortcomings and improvement of ecological footprint theory in energy consumption assessment. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010,25(6):1013-1021. ]
[26]	徐中民, 程国栋, 张志强. 生态足迹方法的理论解析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006,16(6):69-78.
	[ Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong, Zhang Zhiqiang. A resolution to the conception of ecological footprint. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2006,16(6):69-78. ]
[27]	Wiedmann T O, Schandl H, Lenzen M, et al. The material footprint of nations[J]. PNAS, 2015,112(20):6271-6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220362110 pmid: 24003158
[28]	樊胜岳, 麻亮亮. 中国大陆足迹家族的环境库兹涅茨曲线分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016,31(9):1452-1462.
	[ Fan Shengyue, Ma Liangliang. Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis of the footprints family in Mainland China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016,31(9):1452-1462. ]

年份	人均土地足迹/(hm²/人)	地类/%
年份	人均土地足迹/(hm²/人)	耕地	草地	林地	水域	建设用地
1995	0.391	82.62	4.81	0.01	0.38	12.18
2000	0.460	84.45	4.66	0.01	0.46	10.41
2005	0.496	82.72	6.63	0.02	0.46	10.17
2010	0.596	85.09	6.17	0.03	0.41	8.30
2015	0.524	80.42	7.89	0.05	0.77	10.86

The use of land natural capital in the Guanzhong region based on a revised three-dimensional ecological footprint model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 28

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

地区	年份	人均足迹广度/(hm²/人)	地类/%
地区	年份	人均足迹广度/(hm²/人)	耕地	草地	林地	水域	建设用地
西安	1995	0.072	67.9	3.7	0	2.3	26.2
	2005	0.064	64.1	3.6	0	2.4	29.8
	2015	0.057	58.8	3.5	0.1	3.6	34.1
铜川	1995	0.152	83.6	2.2	0	0.5	13.6
	2005	0.146	82.2	2.3	0.1	0.9	14.6
	2015	0.153	76.8	2.1	0.4	1.3	19.4
宝鸡	1995	0.144	76.2	9.7	0	0.9	13.1
	2005	0.138	72.9	9.5	0.1	1.8	15.7
	2015	0.139	70.2	9.3	0.2	1.8	18.5
咸阳	1995	0.155	89.7	2.4	0	0.5	7.4
	2005	0.142	87.9	2.4	0	1.4	8.4
	2015	0.140	85.9	2.3	0	1.6	10.1
渭南	1995	0.145	80.9	2.4	0.1	1.5	15.1
	2005	0.142	78.1	2.3	0.2	2.5	16.8
	2015	0.151	72.5	2.2	0.3	6.3	18.6

[1]	CHEN Ruishan, ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Di, CHEN Yi. Progress of research on sustainable development index for cities and urban agglomerations [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[2]	LI Yuheng, SONG Chuanyao, YAN Jiayu, HUANG Huiqian. Change of rural regional system in deep poverty areas: A case study of Yangyuan County, Hebei Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 951-959.
[3]	ZHAO Ruidong, FANG Chuanglin, LIU Haimeng. Progress and prospect of urban resilience research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731.
[4]	Junze ZHANG, Shuai WANG, Wenwu ZHAO, Yanxu LIU, Bojie FU. Review on the conceptual framework of planetary boundaries and the development of its research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 465-476.
[5]	Cheng WANG, Haoying LI, Yanzhou HE, Xiaosu MA, Mingming ZHOU. Sustainable development ability and its spatiotemporal differentiations of rural human settlements in Chongqing Municipality from 1997 to 2015 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 556-566.
[6]	Yuheng LI, Jiayu YAN, Wenhao WU, Yansui LIU. The process of rural transformation in the world and prospects of sustainable development [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(5): 627-635.
[7]	Defeng ZHENG, Xiaoxing LIU, Yanyan WANG, Leting LV. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of natural capital utilization in China based on three-dimensional ecological footprint [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(10): 1328-1339.
[8]	Shushi PENG, Shilong PIAO, Jiashuo YU, Yongwen LIU, Tao WANG, Gaofeng ZHU, Jinwei DONG, Chiyuan MIAO. A review of geographical system models [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 109-120.
[9]	Yihe LV, Wei FU, Ting LI, Yuanxin LIU. Progress and prospects of research on integrated carrying capacity of regional resources and environment [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 130-136.
[10]	Yanxu LIU, Siqi YANG, Wenwu ZHAO, Bojie FU. Contemporary Chinese physical geography in the context of change:Review of the 2017 National Physical Geography Conference [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 163-171.
[11]	Yueyue DU, Jian PENG, Yang GAO, Huijuan ZHAO. Sustainability evaluation of natural capital utilization based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(10): 1186-1196.
[12]	Yang CAO, Feng ZHEN. The overall architecture of sustainable urban spatial development model based on the construction of smart cities [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(4): 430-437.
[13]	FAN Jie, JIANG Zilong. Trend of human-economic geography in relation to the Future Earth initiative for systemic solutions of regional sustainable development [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(1): 1-9.
[14]	WU Shaohong, ZHAO Yan, TANG Qiuhong, ZHENG Jingyun, GAO Jiangbo, LIANG Tao, GE Quansheng. Land surface pattern study under the framework of Future Earth [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(1): 10-17.
[15]	GUO Yongrui, ZHANG Jie. Research progress and themes of geography on community resilience [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(1): 100-109.