基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Rural multifunctional values?in urban fringes are prominent at the current stage of urbanization in China. Therefore, it is urgent to delineate "production-living-ecological" space using the rural multifunction theory in order to carry out spatial reconstruction. This study developed a comprehensive method for delineating the "production-living-ecological" space in urban fringe based on rural multifunction evaluation, taking Tongshan District of Xuzhou City for empirical research. First, the spatial and temporal changes of rural multifunctions were evaluated from the aspects of production, living, and ecological functions. Second, suitability evaluation for "production-living-ecological" space was carried out at the grid scale, and then, the rural multifunctional "production-living-ecological" space suitability evaluation result was attained. Finally, the "production-living-ecological" space was delineated. The study revealed that: 1) With the overwhelming development of rural recreation and sightseeing agriculture in urban fringe, the application of rural multifunction theory to the reconstruction of multifunctional space can promote development transition. 2) Non-agricultural production function and living function are mainly distributed in the suburbs surrounding the main urban area, while agricultural production function is mainly distributed in the outer suburbs, and ecological function shows clear spatial heterogeneity. Agricultural, non-agricultural production, and living functions are improving, while ecological function is declining. 3) "Production-living-ecological" space delineation at county level needs multiscale combination, not only considering the multifunctional differences at the township scale, but also accounting for suitability at the vector or grid level. The proposed method of delineating "production-living-ecological" space based on rural multifunctional evaluation can provide a scientific basis for spatial planning.

Key words: rural multifunction, urban fringe, "production-living-ecological" space, Tongshan District of Xuzhou in Jiangsu Province

MA Xiaodong,LI Xin,HU Rui,KHUONG Manh Ha. Delineation of “production-living-ecological” space for urban fringe based on rural multifunction evaluation[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 32

[1]	陈秧分, 黄修杰, 王丽娟 . 2018. 多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 39(6):201-209.
	[ Chen Y F, Huang X J, Wang L J . 2018. China's rural revitalization and its evaluation from the perspective of multifunctional theory. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 39(6):201-209. ]
[2]	房艳刚, 刘继生 . 2015. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式[J]. 地理学报, 70(2):257-270.
	[ Fang Y G, Liu J S . 2015. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2):257-270. ]
[3]	戈大专, 龙花楼, 李裕瑞 , 等. 2018. 城镇化进程中我国粮食生产系统多功能转型时空格局研究: 以黄淮海地区为例[J]. 经济地理, 38(4):147-156,182.
	[ Ge D Z, Long H L, Li Y R , et al. 2018. The spatio-temporal pattern of multifunctional transformation of China's grain production system in the process of urbanization: The case of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Economic Geography, 38(4):147-156, 182. ]
[4]	洪惠坤 . 2016. “三生”功能协调下的重庆市乡村空间优化研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学.
	[ Hong H K . 2016. Research on the rural space optimization of Chongqing City from a coordination of “Sansheng” function. Chongqing, China: Southwest University. ]
[5]	洪惠坤, 廖和平, 李涛 , 等. 2016. 基于熵值法和Dagum基尼系数分解的乡村空间功能时空演变分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 32(10):240-248.
	[ Hong H K, Liao H P, Li T , et al. 2016. Analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of rural space function based on entropy value method and Dagum Gini coefficient. Transactions of the CSAE, 32(10):240-248. ]
[6]	环境保护部. 2015. HJ/T 192—2015生态环境状况评价技术规范 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社.
	[ People's Republic of China Environmental Protection Department. 2015. HJ/T 192-2015 technical criterion for ecosystem status evaluation. Beijing,China: China Environmental Science Press. ]
[7]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇 . 2017. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(3):378-391.
	[ Huang J C, Lin H X, Qi X X . 2017. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space. Progress in Geography, 36(3):378-391. ]
[8]	李广东, 方创琳 . 2016. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 71(1):49-65.
	[ Li G D, Fang C L . 2016. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(1):49-65. ]
[9]	李平星, 陈诚, 陈江龙 . 2015. 乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究: 以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 35(7):845-851. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1997.01.005
	[ Li P X, Chen C, Chen J L . 2015. Temporal evolution and spatial differentiation of rural territorial multifunctions and the influencing factors: The case of Jiangsu Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(7):845-851. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1997.01.005
[10]	李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟 . 2014. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素: 以江苏省为例[J]. 地理学报, 69(6):797-807.
	[ Li P X, Chen W, Sun W . 2014. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(6):797-807. ]
[11]	李鑫 . 2013. 基于不确定性的区域土地利用结构与布局优化研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
	[ Li X . 2013. Study on optimize of regional land use structure and layout based on the uncertainty. Nanjing, China: Nanjing Agricultural University. ]
[12]	李智, 范琳芸, 张小林 . 2017. 基于村域的乡村多功能类型划分及评价研究: 以江苏省金坛市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 26(3):359-367.
	[ Li Z, Fan L Y, Zhang X L . 2017. Types division of rural multifunctions and their evaluation on village scale: A case of Jintan City, Jiangsu Province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 26(3):359-367. ]
[13]	林娇 . 2018. 川西高原地区的“三生”空间动态变化与优化研究: 以炉霍县为例[D]. 成都: 四川师范大学.
	[ Lin J . 2018. The research on the dynamic changes and optimization of "Production-Living-Ecological" space in western Sichuan Plateau: Take Luhuo County as an example. Chengdu, China: Sichuang Normal University. ]
[14]	刘玉, 刘彦随 . 2012. 乡村地域多功能的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 22(10):164-169.
	[ Liu Y, Liu Y S . 2012. Progress and prospect in the study of rural region multifunctions. China Population,Resources and Environment, 22(10):164-169. ]
[15]	刘玉, 刘彦随, 郭丽英 . 2011. 乡村地域多功能的内涵及其政策启示[J]. 人文地理, 26(6):103-106, 132.
	[ Liu Y, Liu Y S, Guo L Y . 2011. Connotations of rural regional multifunction and its policy implications in China. Human Geography, 26(6):103-106, 132. ]
[16]	刘祖云, 刘传俊 . 2018. 后生产主义乡村: 乡村振兴的一个理论视角[J]. 中国农村观察, (5):2-13.
	[ Liu Z Y, Liu C J . 2018. The post-productivist countryside: A theoretical perspective of rural revitalization. China Rural Survey, ( 5):2-13. ]
[17]	龙花楼, 屠爽爽 . 2018. 乡村重构的理论认知[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(5):581-590.
	[ Long H L, Tu S S . 2018. Theoretical thinking of rural restructuring. Progress in Geography, 37(5):581-590. ]
[18]	乔家君, 马玉玲 . 2016. 城乡界面的经济效应[J]. 经济地理, 36(9):1-9. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2016.09.001
	[ Qiao J J, Ma Y L . 2016. Economic effects of urban and rural interfaces. Economic Geography, 36(9):1-9. ] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2016.09.001
[19]	任国平, 刘黎明, 孙锦 , 等. 2018. 基于GRA和TOPSIS模型的都市郊区乡村景观多功能定位[J]. 地理研究, 37(2):263-280.
	[ Ren G P, Liu L M, Sun J , et al. 2018. Multifunction orientation of rural landscape in metropolitan suburbs based on GRA and TOPSIS models. Geographical Research, 37(2):263-280. ]
[20]	宋志军, 刘黎明 . 2012. 1988年以来北京郊区城乡一体化进程及启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(8):1071-1079. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.08.011
	[ Song Z J, Liu L M . 2012. The process and enlightenment of urban-rural integration in Beijing since 1988. Progress in Geography, 31(8):1071-1079. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.08.011
[21]	王婕, 魏朝富, 刘卫平 , 等. 2018. 基于“三生”视角的山地丘陵区土地整治功能分区:以重庆市綦江区为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 37(3):155-159, 171.
	[ Wang J, Wei C F, Liu W P , et al. 2018. Land consolidation zoning in hilly areas of Southwest China based on the function of production, living and ecology: A case study of Qijiang District of Chongqing City. Areal Research and Development, 37(3):155-159, 171. ]
[22]	魏小芳, 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬 , 等. 2019. 基于“三生功能”的长江上游城市群国土空间特征及其优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 28(5):1070-1079.
	[ Wei X F, Zhao Y L, Li X B , et al. 2019. Characteristics and optimization of geographical space in urban agglomeration in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River based on the function of "Production-Living-Ecological". Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 28(5):1070-1079. ]
[23]	邬建国 . 2007. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级 [M].2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社: 17-19.
	[ Wu J G. 2007. Landscape ecology: Pattern, process, scale and hierarchy. 2nd edition. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press: 17-19. ]
[24]	徐凯, 房艳刚 . 2019. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别: 以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):482-495.
	[ Xu K, Fang Y G . 2019. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province. Geographical Research, 38(3):482-495. ]
[25]	杨俊, 郭丽兰, 李争 . 2018. 基于空间功能值的矿粮复合区三生空间重构[J]. 农业工程学报, 34(24):247-255.
	[ Yang J, Guo L L, Li Z . 2018. Reconstruction of living, production and ecological space based on spatial functional value in mine-grain mixed zone. Transactions of the CSAE, 34(24):247-255. ]
[26]	张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷 , 等. 2019. 1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 34(4):689-706.
	[ Zhang X L, Jin X B, Fan Y T , et al. 2019. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination status of the land use function transition in Jiangsu Province from 1995 to 2015. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(4):689-706. ]
[27]	张英男, 龙花楼, 马历 , 等. 2019. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):578-594.
	[ Zhang Y N, Long H L, Ma L , et al. 2019. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 38(3):578-594. ]
[28]	张云路, 李雄, 孙松林 . 2019. 基于“三生”空间协调的乡村空间适宜性评价与优化: 以雄安新区北沙口乡为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 26(1):116-124.
	[ Zhang Y L, Li X, Sun S L . 2019. Evaluation and optimization of rural space suitability based on "the production, living and ecological space coordination": Take Beishakou Township, the Xiongan New Area as an example. Urban Development Studies, 26(1):116-124. ]
[29]	Holmes J . 2006. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 22:142-160.
[30]	Pyror R J . 1968. Defining the rural urban fringe[J]. Social Forces, 47:202-15.
[31]	Stola W . 1986. The functional classification of rural areas in the mountain regions of Poland[J]. Geographia Polonica, 52:235-248.
[32]	Wilson G A . 2001. From productivism to post-productivism and back again: Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26:77-102.

功能类型		指标	权重	功能类型	指标	权重
生产功能	农业生产	农作物播种面积比重	0.074	生活功能	农民人均纯收入	0.051
		人均粮食总产量	0.065		建成区人口占比	0.062
		人均耕地面积	0.074		自来水普及率	0.011
		地均农业机械动力	0.025		楼房比重	0.008
		农用地面积比重	0.055		燃气普及率	0.007
		有效灌溉占耕地比重	0.034		医疗机构床位数	0.021
	非农业生产	固定资产投资	0.044		在校学生数	0.041
		工业企业从业人员	0.035	生态功能	森林覆盖率	0.051
		企业税收总额	0.041		水网密度	0.021
		财政收入	0.102		生境质量	0.071
		企业个数	0.042		人均生态服务价值	0.045
		外来从业人员	0.008		风景旅游区面积占比	0.012

影响因素	农业生产空间		非农生产空间		生活空间		生态空间
影响因素	评价因素	权重	评价因素	权重	评价因素	权重	评价因素	权重
坡度	√	0.2038	√	0.0107	√	0.0592
土地利用现状	√	0.3621	√	0.3911	√	0.3152	√	0.4685
土壤	√	0.1583
地貌	√	0.0096	√	0.0531	√	0.0838
与城市距离			√	0.1143	√	0.1697
与镇距离			√	0.1464	√	0.1307
与省级以上道路距离			√	0.1652
与公共服务设施距离					√	0.1329
生态管控区							√	0.3811
与水域距离							√	0.1504
与农村居民点距离	√	0.1545	√	0.1192	√	0.1085

功能	大彭镇	大许镇	单集镇	房村镇	汉王镇	何桥镇	黄集镇	利国镇	刘集镇
农业生产	0.0413	0.0066	0.0271	0.0043	0.0023	0.0403	-0.0079	0.0033	0.0239
非农生产	0.0427	0.0282	0.0132	0.0306	-0.0011	0.0308	0.0152	0.1124	0.0244
生活功能	0.0355	0.0671	0.0320	0.0421	0.0304	0.0414	0.0564	0.0719	0.0313
生态功能	-0.0026	-0.0006	-0.0007	-0.0012	0.0032	-0.0027	-0.0013	-0.0027	0.0006
功能	柳泉镇	柳新镇	马坡镇	茅村镇	棠张镇	徐庄镇	伊庄镇	张集镇	郑集镇
农业生产	0.0242	-0.0060	0.0093	0.0319	-0.0084	0.0182	0.0018	0.0072	0.0234
非农生产	0.0631	0.1029	0.0168	0.0648	0.0199	-0.0028	0.0023	0.0580	0.0243
生活功能	0.0237	0.0300	0.0279	0.0828	0.0054	0.0467	0.0295	0.0373	0.0759
生态功能	-0.0092	-0.0046	-0.0090	-0.0010	-0.0004	-0.0006	-0.0049	-0.0042	-0.0009

Delineation of “production-living-ecological” space for urban fringe based on rural multifunction evaluation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 32

Related Articles 4

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Jian PENG, Jing MA, Yuan YUAN. Research progress and prospect on the identification of urban fringe [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(8): 1068-1077.
[2]	TAN Minghong,RAN Shenghong,MA Suhua. The Environmental Problems in Urban Fringes of the Metropolitan Area and the Countermeasures:A Case Study of Fangshan District of Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(4): 422-426.
[3]	WANG Jing, YANG Shan, HE Ting, LU Haiying. Technological Methods of Information Interpretation and Analysis of Land Use Change in Urban Fringe Area —Taking Wuxi City as An Example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 23(2): 1-9.
[4]	CHEN Xiaojun, ZHANG Hongyie, LIU Shenghe. A Study on the Macro Mechanism of the Conversion of Land Use in the Urban Fringe of Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2003, 22(2): 149-157.