珠三角村镇建成区的空间型态：特征、类型和产业影响因素

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.06.004

Abstract

Abstract:

During China's rural industrialization, land in villages and towns has been rapidly transformed into non-agricultural use. The Pearl River Delta in South China is the most representative of China's rural industrialization and urbanization. In the Pearl River Delta, the cities of Dongguan, Zhongshan, and Foshan are typical cases of both rural industrialization and land-use change. The dataset used in this study includes the land-use data of 2015 in Guangdong Province and the land-use data of the three cities between 2009 and 2015. This dataset provides valuable information on the post-2010 spatial structure of villages and towns in the Pearl River Delta. Based on this dataset, we examined the current (around the mid-2010s) spatial conditions of villages and towns in the Pearl River Delta. We first analyzed the spatial attributes of construction land. The analysis was based on eight indices or methods: land patch density index, spatial discrete index, spatial uniformity index, the mean of land patch area, fractal dimension index, landscape fragmentation index, buffer analysis, and Moran's I analysis. Then, we analyzed the spatial distribution relations between industrial and non-industrial land uses, and between construction land and transportation land through a statistical analysis. Finally, we discussed the industrial factors of the detected spatial pattern through the gray associative analysis. Our findings indicate a high fragmentation and even distribution pattern of village and town built-up areas in Dongguan, agglomerated and discrete pattern in Foshan, and medium level fragmentation and discreteness in Zhongshan. Diverse industrial development in the three cities had a major impact on the formation of the spatial patterns. In the future, the transformation of the spatial pattern of built-up areas in villages and towns in the Pearl River Delta must coordinate with the industrial development and the ongoing development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Great Bay Area. Approaches to facilitating the transformation include the modification of the industrial structure and an adjustment of land use and transportation across these villages and towns. This article aimed to reveal the current spatial patterns of crucial rural-to-urban transformation in a rapidly urbanizing region and to provide relevant policy recommendations. The results may contribute to our understanding of China's continuous rural urbanization and industrialization.

Key words: built-up area, spatial pattern, land use, industrial factor, villages and towns in the Pearl River Delta

Jiheng LI, Yue GONG, Guicai LI. Spatial patterns of village and town built areas in the Pearl River Delta:A land-use perspective[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 829-839.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Tab.1

Spatial pattern indices and methods"

类别	指标	计算公式	涵义说明
空间分布	斑块密度	$PD = n A 0 × 100 %$	$PD$ 为斑块密度指数,PD值越大斑块越密集;n为斑块数;A₀为市域总面积
	空间离散度	$F = D i Q i$ $其中 : D i = A / N i 2$ $Q i = A i A$	F为某一景观类型分离度,值越大分布越离散; $D i$ 为景观类型 $i$ 的距离指数; $Q i$ 为景观类型 $i$ 的面积指数; $A i$ 为景观类型 $i$ 的面积; $N i$ 为景观类型 $i$ 的斑块数; $A$ 为市域总面积
	空间均匀度	$y i = x i / S i ∑ i = 1 n x i / S i$ $I = ∑ i = 1 n y i / n$	$I$ 为区域空间均匀度指数, $I$ 值范围在 $1 n$ ~1之间, $I$ 越接近1,区域空间越均匀; $x i$ ( $i$ =1, 2, …, n) 为区域中某一政府单元的指标; $S i$ 为政府单元的辖区面积; $y i$ 为每个区域单元指标占区域总指标的比重
空间形态	平均斑块面积	$AREA - MN = ∑ i = 1 n a i n$	AREA-MN为某用地类型斑块的平均用地规模大小; $a i$ 为第 $i$ 个斑块的面积;n为斑块数
	分形维数	$S i = 2 ln P i 4 ln A i$	分形维数 $S i$ 反映空间形态复杂程度, $S i$ 值的理论值在1.0~2.0之间, $S i$ 值越大,表示图形形状越复杂,边界越不规则; $P i$ 和 $A i$ 分别表示斑块 $i$ 周长和面积
	景观破碎度	$FS = 1 - 1 ASI$ $其中 : ASI = ∑ i = 1 n A i SI i A$ $SI i = P i 4 A i$ $A = ∑ i = 1 n A i$	FS为某一景观类型斑块形状破碎化指数,FS值越大,景观越破碎;ASI为用面积加权的景观斑块平均形状指数; $SI i$ 为景观斑块 $i$ 的形状指数; $P i$ 为景观斑块 $i$ 的周长; $A i$ 为景观斑块 $i$ 的面积; $A$ 为该景观类型的总面积;n为该景观类型的斑块数
功能关系	缓冲区分析	$W = S i S 0 × 100 %$	以交通线路为中心线建立双侧多环缓冲区,统计各缓冲区内的用地面积,计算其占缓冲区面积的比重。 $S 0$ 为缓冲区面积; $S i$ 为在该缓冲区内i类型用地面积;W为i类型用地在该缓冲区的占地比重,W值的大小反映该用地与交通线路的空间分布的相关程度
功能关系	Moran's I指数	$I = n × ∑ i = 1 n ∑ j = 1 n w ij y i - y ˉ y j - y ˉ ∑ i = 1 n ∑ j = 1 n w ij × ∑ i = 1 n y i - y ˉ 2$	$I$ 即为Moran's I指数,反映2种地域类型之间空间分布的相关性,取值在-1~1之间,正值意味着正的空间相关,负值意味着负的空间相关; $n$ 为区域单元个数; $y i$ 以及 $y j$ 分别为第 $i$ 和第 $j$ 个区域内的属性值; $y ?$ 为所有区域属性值的平均值; $w ij$ 为区域单元之间的空间权重矩阵,用以衡量区域之间的相互邻近关系

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

References 38

[1]	丁俊, 王开泳. 2016. 珠江三角洲城市群工业生产空间格局、形态特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(5): 610-621.
	[Ding J, Wang K Y.2016. Spatial pattern and morphological characteristics of industrial production space and influential factors in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration. Progress in Geography, 35(5): 610-621. ]
[2]	古诗韵, 阎小培. 1999. 珠三角乡镇企业发展的时空变化特征[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 38(5): 92-97.
	[Gu S Y, Yan X P.1999. Temporal and spatial disparities of the township enterprises in the Pearl River Delta of China since the late 1970s. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatse, 38(5): 92-97. ]
[3]	顾朝林, 吴莉娅. 2008. 中国城市化研究主要成果综述[J]. 城市问题, (12): 2-12.
	[Gu C L, Wu L Y.2008. Summary of the main results of the research of China's urbanization. Urban Problems, (12): 2-12. ]
[4]	韩非, 蔡建明. 2011. 我国半城市化地区乡村聚落的形态演变与重建[J]. 地理研究, 30(7): 1271-1284.
	[Han F, Cai J M.2011. The evolution and reconstruction of peri-urban rural habitat in China. Geographical Research, 30(7): 1271-1284. ]
[5]	金红娜, 车震宇. 2015. 大理旅游村镇空间形态变化比较研究: 以大理沙溪镇、新华村为例[J]. 华中建筑, (7): 83-87.
	[Jin H N, Che Z Y.2015. Comparative study on space morphological changes of Dali tourist towns and villages: Taking Shaxi Town and Xinhua Village for example. Huazhong Architecture, (7): 83-87. ]
[6]	李立勋. 1997. 珠江三角洲乡镇企业发展的地域特征[J]. 热带地理, 17(1): 47-52.
	[Li L X.1997. The development features of the township enterprises in the Pearl River Delta. Tropical Geography, 17(1): 47-52.]
[7]	李珽, 符文颖. 2014. 珠江三角洲城市空间形态及其演化机制对比[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(5): 678-688. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.05.009
	[Li T, Fu W Y.2014. Inter-city comparative study of urban morphology and mechanisms in the Pearl River Delta. Progress in Geography, 33(5): 678-688. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.05.009
[8]	梁励韵, 刘晖. 2014. 工业化视角下的小城镇形态演变: 以顺德北滘镇为例[J]. 城市问题, (4): 48-52.
	[Liang L Y, Liu H.2014. The spatial form evolution of small towns under the perspective of industrialization: A case study of Beijiao Town in Shunde City. Urban Problems, (4): 48-52. ]
[9]	林媚珍, 许阳萍, 方碧真, 等. 2010. 中山市土地景观格局动态变化分析[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 9(3): 89-95.
	[Lin M Z, Xu Y P, Fang B Z, et al.2010. Analysis of dynamic land landscape pattern in Zhongshan. Journal of Guangzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 9(3): 89-95. ]
[10]	马荣华, 顾朝林, 蒲英霞, 等. 2007. 苏南沿江城镇扩展的空间模式及其测度[J]. 地理学报, 62(10): 1011-1022.
	[Ma R H, Gu C L, Pu Y X, et al.2007. Urban spatial sprawl pattern and metrics in south of Jiangsu Province along the Yangtze River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(10): 1011-1022. ]
[11]	马晓冬, 李全林, 沈一. 2012. 江苏省乡村聚落的形态分异及地域类型[J]. 地理学报, 67(4): 516-525.
	[Ma X D, Li Q L, Shen Y.2012. Morphological difference and regional types of rural settlements in Jiangsu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(4): 516-525. ]
[12]	唐常春, 陈烈, 王爱民, 等. 2007. 快速工业化区域土地利用变迁机制研究: 发展模式视角: 以佛山市南海区为例[J]. 热带地理, 27(1): 49-53.
	[Tang C C, Chen L, Wang A M, et al.2007. A study on land utilization change in rapid industrialization regions from the view of dexelopment patterm: A case study of Nanhai District, Foshan. Tropical Geography, 27(1): 49-53. ]
[13]	田莉. 2015. 我国半城市化地区土地利用的区域比较: 时空模式与形成机制 [M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Tian L.2015. Regional comparison of land use in peri-urban areas of China: Spatio-temporal pattern and driving forces. Beijing, China: China Architecture& Building Press. ]
[14]	王爱民, 缪勃中, 陈树荣. 2007. 广州市工业用地空间分异及其影响因素分析[J]. 热带地理, 27(2): 132-138.
	[Wang A M, Mou B Z, Chen S R.2007. Spatial differentiation and impact factors of industrial land-use in Guangzhou. Tropical Geography, 27(2): 132-138. ]
[15]	王冠贤, 陈冰. 2002. 珠三角经济区村落形态的演变分析: 以中山冈东村为例[J]. 规划师, 18(8): 75-78.
	[Wang G X, Chen B.2002. Analysis on the evolution of village form in the Pearl River Delta: A cases tudy of Guangdong Village. Planers, 18(8): 75-78. ]
[16]	王介勇, 刘彦随, 陈玉福. 2010. 黄淮海平原农区典型村庄用地扩展及其动力机制[J]. 地理研究, 29(10): 1833-1840.
	[Wang J Y, Liu Y S, Chen Y F.2010. Spatial expansion pattern and its dynamic mechanism of typical rural settlements inin Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Geographical Research, 29(10): 1833-1840. ]
[17]	王镜均, 王勇, 李广斌. 2014. 苏南村落空间分异的三种典型模式及比较: 以蒋巷坞坻树山三村为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 29(12): 75-81.
	[Wang J J, Wang Y, Li G B.2014. Three typical models and comparison of the village space differentiation in southern Jiangsu: A case study of Jiangxiang, Wuqiu and Shushan. Modern Urban Research, 29(12): 75-81. ]
[18]	王开泳, 陈田. 2008. 珠江三角洲都市经济区地域构成的判别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 63(8): 820-828.
	[Wang K Y, Chen T.2008. The classification and analysis of areal topology in extended metropolitan area of Pearl River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(8): 820-828. ]
[19]	王跃, 陈亚莉. 2005. 苏州城郊村镇分布特征[J]. 地理学报, 60(2): 229-236.
	[Wang Y, Chen Y L.2005. Distribution characteristics of villages and towns in suburbs of Suzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(2): 229-236. ]
[20]	伍灵晶, 仝德, 李贵才. 2017. 地方政府驱动下的城市建成空间特征差异: 以广州、东莞为例[J]. 地理研究, 36(6): 1029-1041.
	[Wu L J, Tong D, Li G C.2017. Differences of the urban spatial structure driven by local governments: Cases study in Guangzhou and Dongguan. Geographical Research, 36(6): 1029-1041. ]
[21]	许学强, 张蓉. 1995. 珠江三角洲的工业化与城市化[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 11(1): 1-8.
	[Xu X Q, Zhang R.1995. Industrialization and urbanization in the Pearl River Delta. Geography and Territorial Research, 11(1): 1-8. ]
[22]	薛凤旋, 杨春. 1997. 外资: 发展中国家城市化的新动力: 珠江三角洲个案研究[J]. 地理学报, 52(3): 3-16.
	[Xue F X, Yang C.1997. Foreign capital: The new dynamic force of urbanization in the developing countries: Study on the example of the Pearl River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 52(3): 3-16. ]
[23]	闫小培, 毛蒋兴, 普军. 2006. 巨型城市区域土地利用变化的人文因素分析: 以珠江三角洲地区为例[J]. 地理学报, 61(6): 613-623.
	[Yan X P, Mao J X, Pu J.2006. Research on the human dimensions of land use changes in the megaurban region: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(6): 613-623. ]
[24]	杨宝龙, 方元, 冯徽徽, 等. 2009. 东莞市城镇用地扩张的时空特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 11(5): 5684-5690.
	[Yang B L, Fang Y, Feng H H, et al.2009. Construction land expansion in urbanization process in Dongguan. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 11(5): 5684-5690. ]
[25]	杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼, 等. 2015. 基于格网的农村居民点用地时空特征及空间指向性的地理要素识别: 以环渤海地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 34(6): 1077-1087.
	[Yang R, Liu Y S, Long H L, et al.2015. Spatial-temporal characteristics of rural residential land use change and spatial directivity identification based on grid in the Bohai Rim in China. Geographical Research, 34(6): 1077-1087. ]
[26]	叶嘉安, 黎夏. 1999. 珠江三角洲经济发展、城市扩张与农田流失研究: 以东莞市为例[J]. 经济地理, 19(1): 68-73.
	[Ye J A, Li X.1999. Economic development, urban sprawl, and agricultural land loss in the Pearl River Delta. China. Economic Geography, 19(1): 68-73. ]
[27]	叶玉瑶, 张虹鸥. 2007. 珠江三角洲城市群空间集聚与扩散[J]. 经济地理, 27(5): 773-776.
	[Ye Y Y, Zhang H O.2007. The Spatial agglomeration and dispersion in the Pearl River Delta. Economic Geography, 27(5): 773-776. ]
[28]	叶玉瑶, 张虹鸥, 刘凯, 等. 2010. 地理区位因子对建设用地扩展的影响分析: 以珠江三角洲为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 29(11): 1433-1441. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.11.042
	[Ye Y Y, Zhang H O, Liu K, et al.2010. Impact of site factors on expansion of construction land: A case study in the Pearl River Delta. Progress in Geography, 29(11): 1433-1441. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.11.042
[29]	叶玉瑶, 张虹鸥, 许学强, 等. 2011. 珠江三角洲建设用地扩展与经济增长模式的关系[J]. 地理研究, 30(12): 2259-2271.
	[Ye Y Y, Zhang H O, Xu X Q, et al.2011. Study on the relationship between construction land expansion and economic growth pattern in the Pearl River Delta. Geographical Research, 30(12): 2259-2271. ]
[30]	赵鹏军, 刘迪. 2018. 中国小城镇基础设施与社会经济发展的关联分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(9): 1245-1256.
	[Zhao P J, Liu D.2018. Analysis of the relationships between infrastructure and socioeconomic development in towns of China. Progress in Geography, 37(9): 1245-1256. ]
[31]	郑艳婷, 刘盛和, 陈田. 2003. 试论半城市化现象及其特征: 以广东省东莞市为例[J]. 地理研究, 22(6): 760-768.
	[Zheng Y T, Liu S H, Chen T.2003. The characteristics of peri-urbanization region: A case study of Dongguan Municipality in Guangdong Province. Geographical Research, 22(6): 760-768. ]
[32]	Chen M N, Wang D D. Yu K P, et al.2013. Urbanization effect of highways in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Landscape Research, 5(11): 8-12, 15.
[33]	Chen Y, Wen Y, Li Z G.2017. From blueprint to action: The transformation of the planning paradigm for desakota in China[J]. Cities, 60: 454-465. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.04.010
[34]	Dai J, Wang K, Gao X.2010. Spatial structure and land use control in extended metropolitan region of Zhujiang River Delta, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(4): 298-308. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0402-8
[35]	Fan F, Wang Y, Qiu M, et al.2009. Evaluating the temporal and spatial urban expansion patterns of Guangzhou from 1979 to 2003 by remote sensing and GIS methods[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(11): 1371-1388. doi: 10.1080/13658810802443432
[36]	Sui D Z, Hui Z.2001. Modeling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia's emerging desakota regions: A case study in Shenzhen[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 53(1): 37-52. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00136-5
[37]	van Wee B.2002. Land use and transport: research and policy challenges[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(4): 259-271. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00041-8
[38]	Weng Q.2002. Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 64(3): 273-284.

数量及比例	国有企业	集体企业	有限责任公司	外商投资	中外合资	中外合作	“三来一补”企业	私营企业	个体工商户	总计
数量/个	815	1471	11764	12279	476	91	1535	226499	456055	710985
比例/%	0.11	0.21	1.65	1.73	0.07	0.01	0.22	31.86	64.14	100.00

数量及比例	国有企业	集体企业	股份合作	联营企业	有限责任公司	股份有限公司	私营企业	其他内资	港澳台投资	外商投资	总计
数量/个	1620	2585	159	197	23419	806	49731	4261	2173	1107	86058
比例/%	1.88	3.00	0.18	0.23	27.21	0.94	57.79	4.95	2.53	1.29	100.00

企业类型			东莞	中山	佛山
全市规模以上工业企业数量/个			5869	3089	6627
全市规模以上工业企业比例/%			4.82	3.29	5.93^*
外资企业比例/%			49.07	31.01	20.54
按轻、重工业划分	轻工业	数量/个	2924	1887	2496
	轻工业	比例/%	49.82	61.09	37.66
	重工业	数量/个	2945	1202	4131
	重工业	比例/%	50.18	38.91	62.34
按规模划分	大型	数量/个	266	107	375
	大型	比例/%	4.53	3.46	5.66
	中型	数量/个	1638	573	1591
	中型	比例/%	27.91	18.55	24.01
	小型	数量/个	3760	2336	4366
	小型	比例/%	64.07	75.62	65.88
	微型	数量/个	205	73	295
	微型	比例/%	3.49	2.36	4.45

指标	外资比例	重工业比例	规模以上企业比例	关联度比较
斑块密度	0.669	0.543	0.544	外资比例>规模以上企业比例>重工业比例
空间离散度	0.546	0.678	0.652	重工业比例>规模以上企业比例>外资比例
空间均匀度	0.517	0.575	0.578	规模以上企业比例>重工业比例>外资比例
平均斑块面积	0.470	0.752	0.766	规模以上企业比例>重工业比例>外资比例
分形维数	0.496	0.654	0.607	重工业比例>规模以上企业比例>外资比例
景观破碎度	0.546	0.594	0.592	重工业比例>规模以上企业比例>外资比例

Spatial patterns of village and town built areas in the Pearl River Delta:A land-use perspective

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 38

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	QIAN Jiacheng, ZHANG Bailin, LIU Hongwu, GAO Yang, WANG Zhaoying, LIAN Xiaoyun. Development differentiation of rural areas with tourism characteristics in eastern mountainous areas and its driving forces: A case study of Pingyang County, Zhejiang Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1460-1472.
[2]	WANG Fan, LIN Yuexi, WANG Mingfeng. “Third space” or “infinite occasion”: Location choice and influencing factors of the new retail industry [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1522-1531.
[3]	WANG Cheng, XIE Bo. Research progress on the driving mechanism of traffic accidents from the perspective of land use [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1597-1606.
[4]	FU Zhanhui, MEI Lin, ZHENG Rumin, WANG Tongtong. Spatial differentiation mechanism of urban female employment rate in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318.
[5]	GE Yujuan, ZHAO Yuluan, LI Xiubin. Farmland fragmentation and land use intensity in mountain areas: A case study of Yayu Village, Guizhou Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1095-1105.
[6]	WU Kongsen, RUI Yang, CHEN Jia, ZHANG Liqiong, YANG Xinjun, ZHANG Baigang. Micro-scale study on rural transformation and development driven by tourism:Taking Shangwang Village in Xi’an City as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 1047-1059.
[7]	LIU Yimeng, LI Weihong, WANG Xin. Spatiotemporal distribution of drug crimes at micro-scale: Taking NH and DM residential communities in SZ City as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 841-852.
[8]	HU Tian, WU Jiansheng, PENG Jian, LI Weifeng. Development and prospect of the land-sparing versus land-sharing framework [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 880-888.
[9]	GUO Qingbin, LUO Kang, LIU Chengliang. A comparative study on the differences of factors aggregating ability among urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 542-552.
[10]	LIU Cai, ZHANG Haiyan, LI Qian. Spatiotemporal characteristics of human activity intensity and its driving mechanism in Hainan Island from 1980 to 2018 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 567-576.
[11]	ZHOU Meijun, LI Fei, SHAO Jiaqi, YANG Haijuan. Change characteristics of maize production potential under the background of climate change in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 443-453.
[12]	LIU Hanchu, FAN Jie, ZHANG Haipeng, Wang Fuyuan. Dynamics of manufacturing industry and change of its spatial pattern in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 195-206.
[13]	TAN Ronghui, LIU Yaolin, LIU Yanfang, HE Qingsong. A literature review of urban growth boundary: Theory, modeling, and effectiveness evaluation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 327-338.
[14]	FU Hui, LIU Yanjun, SUN Hongri, ZHOU Guolei. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.
[15]	ZHANG Han, LI Yangbing. Change of land-use functions in suburbs: A case study of Haohuahong Village in a rural tourist resort of Huishui County, Guizhou Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1999-2012.