生态系统服务在土地利用规划研究和应用中的进展——基于文献计量和文本分析法

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.02.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Ecosystem services (ESs) are closely related to human well-being and regional sustainable development and play a fundamental role in regional land use planning. Therefore, this study used the bibliometric analysis and the textual analysis methods to examine the application of ES concepts, methods, and related key words in land use planning research and plans since 1997. The results show that in recent years, academic research has paid increasing attention to the application of ESs in land use planning. The number of publications and the citations of relevant papers have steadily increased over time. A total of 121 papers and 2252 citations were identified in Chinese literature for the period 1997-2017. Meanwhile, the total frequency of key words related to ESs is rising in the General Plan for Land Use (GPLU) texts from the national level to the provincial capital level. The frequency of key words related to ESs in the GPLU grew from 14630 in 1997-2010 to 25467 in 2006-2020, with a growth rate of 74%. In addition, the planning texts included more concerns on the provisioning and supporting services than the regulating and cultural services. In the future, we suggest that more effective methods should be developed to apply ESs to planning practice and more attention should be paid to the regulating and cultural services to serve the construction of ecological civilization.

Key words: ecosystem services, land use planning, urban sustainability, bibliometric analysis, textual analysis

Ziwen LIU, Dan YIN, Qingxu HUANG, Chunyang HE, Fei XUE. Research and application progress of ecosystem services in land use planning: A bibliometric and textual analysis[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 236-247.

Figures/Tables 10

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Fig.2

Tab.6

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 42

[1]	阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 金晓斌, 王千, 等. 2011. 生态系统服务价值核算在土地利用规划上的应用: 以新疆库尔勒市为例[J]. 新疆农业科学, 48(10): 1948-1953.
	[Aytursun Shamxi, Jin X B, Wang Q, et al.2011. Analysis of ecosystem service value and its use in the land planning: A case study of Korla City. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 48(10): 1948-1953. ]
[2]	曹祺文, 卫晓梅, 吴健生. 2016. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 35(11): 3102-3111. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201611.020
	[Cao Q W, Wei X M, Wu J S.2016. A review on the tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 35(11): 3102-3111. ] doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201611.020
[3]	陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 2017. 基于“重要性—敏感性—连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 471-484. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
	[Chen X, Peng J, Liu Y X, et al.2017. Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu City based on the framework of "importance-sensitivity-connectivity". Geographical Research, 36(3): 471-484. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
[4]	戴菲, 章俊华. 2009. 规划设计学中的调查方法6: 内容分析法[J]. 中国园林, 25(4): 72-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2009.04.020
	[Dai F, Zhang J H.2009. The survey methods in planning and design 6: Content analysis. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 25(4): 72-77. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2009.04.020
[5]	房志, 徐卫华, 张晶晶, 等. 2017. 基于生物多样性与生态系统服务功能的秦岭山系自然保护体系规划[J]. 生态学报, 37(16): 5334-5341. doi: 10.5846/stxb201605230993
	[Fang Z, Xu W H, Zhang J J, et al.2017. Designing protected area systems in the Qinling Mountains based on biodiversity and ecosystem service evaluation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(16): 5334-5341. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201605230993
[6]	傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 等. 2013. 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局[J]. 生态学报, 33(3): 789-797. doi: 10.5846/stxb201203260410
	[Fu B, Xu P, Wang Y K, et al.2013. Spatial pattern of water retetnion in Dujiangyan County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 789-797. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201203260410
[7]	傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠. 2017. 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 37(2): 341-348. doi: 10.5846/stxb201611092273
	[Fu B J, Yu D D, Lv N.2017. An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(2): 341-348. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201611092273
[8]	傅伯杰, 张立伟. 2014. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(4): 441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
	[Fu B J, Zhang L W.2014. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 441-446. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[9]	何玲, 贾启建, 李超, 等. 2016. 基于生态系统服务价值和生态安全格局的土地利用格局模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 32(3): 275-284. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.03.040
	[He L, Jia Q J, Li C, et al.2016. Land use pattern simulation based on ecosystem service value and ecological security pattern. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(3): 275-284. ] doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.03.040
[10]	蒋晶, 田光进. 2010. 1988年至2005年北京生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 资源科学, 32(7): 1407-1416. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182000add
	[Jiang J, Tian G J.2010. Responses of ecosystem service value to land use change in Beijing from 1998 to 2005. Resources Science, 32(7): 1407-1416. ] doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182000add
[11]	李锋, 叶亚平, 宋博文, 等. 2011. 城市生态用地的空间结构及其生态系统服务动态演变: 以常州市为例[J]. 生态学报, 31(19): 5623-5631.
	[Li F, Ye Y P, Song B W, et al.2011. Spatial structure of urban ecological land and its dynamic development of ecosystem services: A case study in Changzhou City, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(19): 5623-5631. ]
[12]	马程, 王晓玥, 张雅昕, 等. 2017. 北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析[J]. 地理学报, 72(6): 974-985. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201706003
	[Ma C, Wang X Y, Zhang Y X, et al.2017. Emergy analysis of ecosystem services supply and flow in Beijing ecological conservation area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(6): 974-985. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201706003
[13]	毛齐正, 黄甘霖, 邬建国. 2015. 城市生态系统服务研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报, 26(4): 1023-1033.
	[Mao Q Z, Huang G L, Wu J G.2015. Urban ecosystem services: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26(4): 1023-1033. ]
[14]	欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 赵景柱, 等. 2004. 海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 15(8): 1395-1402.
	[Ouyang Z Y, Zhao T Q, Zhao J Z, et al.2004. Ecological regulation services of Hainan Island ecosystem and their valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15(8): 1395-1402. ]
[15]	彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 2017. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区[J]. 生态学报, 37(13): 4562-4572. doi: 10.5846/stxb201601020007
	[Peng J, Yang Y, Xie P, et al.2017. Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong Province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(13): 4562-4572. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201601020007
[16]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 2017. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 407-419. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703001
	[Peng J, Zhao H J, Liu Y X, et al.2017. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 36(3): 407-419. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703001
[17]	冉圣宏, 吕昌河, 贾克敬, 等. 2006. 基于生态服务价值的全国土地利用变化环境影响评价[J]. 环境科学, 27(10): 2139-2144. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2006.10.040
	[Ran S H, Lv C H, Jia K J, et al.2006. Environmental impact assessment of the land use change in China based on ecosystem service value. Environmental Science, 27(10): 2139-2144. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2006.10.040
[18]	田若敏, 张磊, 宋海泉, 等. 2017. 规划是公共政策还是公共愿景: 基于全国80个大中城市总体规划的环境议题的文本分析[J]. 规划师, 33(5): 83-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.05.013
	[Tian R M, Zhang L, Song H Q, et al.2017. Public policy or common vision: A textual analysis of environment issue in 80 major cities'master plans. Planners, 33(5): 83-87. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.05.013
[19]	唐弢, 朱坦, 徐鹤, 等. 2007. 基于生态系统服务功能价值评估的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 17(3): 45-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.03.010
	[Tang T, Zhu T, Xu H, et al.2007. Application of ecosystem services evaluation in environmental impact assessment on land-use master planning. China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(3): 45-49. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.03.010
[20]	王娟, 崔保山, 卢远, 等. 2006. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用规划中的应用[J]. 水土保持学报, 20(1): 160-163, 180. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.01.039
	[Wang J, Cui B S, Lu Y, et al.2006. Application of ecosystem services value in land use program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 20(1): 160-163, 180. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.01.039
[21]	王磊, 张晓峰, 周伟. 2008. 公路网规划生态服务价值损失估算方法研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 8(5): 76-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2008.05.021
	[Wang L, Zhang X F, Zhou W.2008. An innovated method for assessing the losses of ecological service value caused by roadway network construction. Journal of Safety and Environment, 8(5): 76-79. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2008.05.021
[22]	王淑强, 青秀玲, 王晶, 等. 2017. 基于文献计量方法的国际地理科学研究机构竞争力分析[J]. 地理学报, 72(9): 1702-1716. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201709014
	[Wang S Q, Qing X L, Wang J, et al.2017. Analysis of competitiveness of international geographic institutes based on bibliometrics. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(9): 1702-1716. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201709014
[23]	吴克宁, 赵珂, 赵举水, 等. 2008. 基于生态系统服务功能价值理论的土地利用规划环境影响评价: 以安阳市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 22(2): 23-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2008.02.004
	[Wu K N, Zhao K, Zhao J S, et al.2008. The environmental impact assessment of land use planning based on the theory of ecosystem services value: Taking Anyang as an example. China Land Science, 22(2): 23-28. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2008.02.004
[24]	肖燚, 陈圣宾, 张路, 等. 2011. 基于生态系统服务的海南岛自然保护区体系规划[J]. 生态学报, 31(24): 7357-7369.
	[Xiao Y, Chen S B, Zhang L, et al.2011. Designing nature reserve systems in Hainan Island based on ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(24): 7357-7369. ]
[25]	谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 2003. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 18(2): 189-195. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010
	[Xie G D, Lu C X, Leng Y F, et al.2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(2): 189-195. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010
[26]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 2015. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 37(9): 1740-1746.
	[Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang C S, et al.2015. The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 37(9): 1740-1746. ]
[27]	谢高地, 张钇锂, 鲁春霞, 等. 2001. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 16(1): 47-53. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2001.01.009
	[Xie G D, Zhang Y L, Lu C X, et al.2001. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1): 47-53. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2001.01.009
[28]	谢永俊, 彭霞, 黄舟, 等. 2017. 基于微博数据的北京市热点区域意象感知[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(9): 1099-1110. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.09.006
	[Xie Y J, Peng X, Huang Z, et al.2017. Image perception of Beijing's regional hotspots based on microblog data. Progress in Geography, 36(9): 1099-1110. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.09.006
[29]	薛飞. 2016. 面向生态系统服务的北京中心地区水系廊道研究 [D]. 北京: 清华大学.
	[Xue F.2016. Research on water system corridors in Beijing central area for ecosystem services. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University. ]
[30]	杨光梅, 李文华, 闵庆文, 等. 2007. 对我国生态系统服务研究局限性的思考及建议[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 17(1): 85-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.01.019
	[Yang G M, Li W H, Min Q W, et al.2007. Reflection on the limitation of ecological service studies in China and suggestion for future research. China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(1): 85-91. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.01.019
[31]	鄢一龙, 吕捷, 胡鞍钢, 等. 2014. 整体知识与公共事务治理: 理解市场经济条件下的五年规划[J]. 管理世界, (12): 70-78.
	[Yan Y L, Lv J, Hu A G, et al.2014. Holistic knowledge and public affairs governance: Understanding the Five-year Plan in market economy. Management World, (12): 70-78. ]
[32]	张立伟, 傅伯杰. 2014. 生态系统服务制图研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 34(2): 316-325. doi: 10.5846/stxb201303110391
	[Zhang L W, Fu B J.2014. The progress in ecosystem services mapping: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(2): 316-325. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201303110391
[33]	赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 等. 2018. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(1): 139-151. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015
	[Zhao W W, Liu Y, Feng Q, et al.2018. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems. Progress in Geography, 37(1): 139-151. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015
[34]	郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 等. 2013. 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 33(3): 702-710. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280786
	[Zheng H, Li Y F, Ouyang Z Y, et al.2013. Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 702-710. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280786
[35]	郑景明, 罗菊春, 曾德慧. 2002. 森林生态系统管理的研究进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 24(3): 103-109. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.03.022
	[Zheng J M, Luo J C, Zeng D H.2002. Review of researches in forest ecosystem management. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 24(3): 103-109. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.03.022
[36]	钟赛香, 曲波, 苏香燕, 等. 2014. 从《地理学报》看中国地理学研究的特点与趋势: 基于文献计量方法[J]. 地理学报, 69(8): 1077-1092. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408005
	[Zhong S X, Qu B, Su X Y, et al.2014. Progress in Chinese geography research reflected from Acta Geographica Sinica during 1934-2013: A bibliometrics analysis. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8): 1077-1092. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408005
[37]	Costanza R, D'Arge R, de Groot R, et al.1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem service and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387: 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[38]	Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, et al.2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go[J]. Ecosystem Services, 28: 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
[39]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.2005. Ecosystems and human well-being [M]. Washington, DC: Island Press.
[40]	Sapir E.2004. Language: An introduction to the study of speech[M]. New York: Courier Dover Publications: 58-76.
[41]	Sutherland W J, Armstrong B S, Armsworth P R, et al.2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(4): 617-627. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x
[42]	Whorf B L, Carroll J B.1956. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 134-159.

类型	千年生态系统评估中的表述(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005)	选取的相关高频特征词
生态系统服务	人类从生态系统中所获得的惠益	保护区、草场、草地、草原、防护林、风景、复垦、耕地、海洋、河流、红树林、洪水、湖泊、环保、环境、节能、节水、粮食、林地、林木、绿地、绿色、绿洲、牧草地、内涝、能源、农用地、侵蚀、森林、生态、生态环境、生物、湿地、树林、水土保持、水污染、水质、水资源、滩涂、梯田、土壤、退耕、退耕还林、文化、休憩、循环、园地、种树、自然保护区、自然灾害
供给服务	食物、淡水、纤维、观赏植物资源、遗传资源、生化药剂、天然药物	草场、复垦、耕地、粮食、林木、牧草地、农用地、水资源、梯田、园地
支持服务	生物多样性、养分循环、光合作用、初级生产	保护区、草地、草原、防护林、海洋、河流、红树林、湖泊、林地、绿地、绿色、牧草地、森林、生态环境、生物、湿地、树林、滩涂、土壤、园地、自然保护区
调节服务	空气质量调节、自然灾害、水量调节、气候调节、水质净化、废物处理、侵蚀调控、土壤形成、授粉、病虫害防治、人类疾病调节	草场、草地、草原、防护林、海洋、河流、红树林、洪水、湖泊、林地、绿地、绿色、绿洲、内涝、侵蚀、森林、湿地、树林、水土保持、水污染、水质、土壤、退耕、退耕还林、园地、种树、自然灾害
文化服务	游憩、生态旅游、美学价值、文化多样性、精神价值、宗教价值、知识系统、教育价值	风景、绿地、湿地、文化、休憩、园地、自然保护区

期刊名称	发文量	发文量占比/%	被引频次/次	被引频次占比/%	篇均被引频次/次	2016年综合影响因子^*
生态学报	14	11.57	380	16.87	27.14	2.32
水土保持研究	7	6.09	111	6.46	15.86	0.87
资源科学	5	4.35	135	7.85	27.00	2.46
中国土地科学	5	4.35	237	13.79	47.40	1.63
水土保持通报	5	4.03	32	1.09	6.40	0.74
中国人口·资源与环境	4	3.48	96	5.58	24.00	3.02
中南林业科技大学学报	4	3.48	24	1.40	6.00	1.37
合计	44	36.36	1015	45.07	23.07	—

排名	机构	论文数量
1 2	北京师范大学北京大学、南京大学	13 12
4	中国科学院生态环境研究中心	9
5	南开大学	6
6	北京林业大学、新疆大学、河南农业大学、中国土地勘测规划院	5
10	中国地质大学	4

分类	研究主题	规划阶段	主要方法	所需数据	空间显式	论文数量
Ⅰ	综述类	—	—	—	—	11
Ⅱ	基于价值量的规划评估	规划实施之前或之后	Costanza等(1997)和谢高地等(2001, 2003)的评估体系	土地利用数据	均可	90
Ⅲ	基于物质量的土地利用规划设计	规划实施之前	情景模拟、生态系统服务物质量测算、热点分析、空缺分析等	统计年鉴、气候数据、土地利用数据等	是	14
Ⅳ	基于其他指标的土地利用规划评估与设计	规划实施之前或之后	能值评估法、组合权重赋权法等	统计年鉴、土地利用数据等	均可	6

版次	供给服务	支持服务	调节服务	文化服务
1997—2010	9392	4995	3470	1146
2006—2020	12928	5999	3515	2407

Research and application progress of ecosystem services in land use planning: A bibliometric and textual analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 42

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

排名	论文题目	被引频次	年份	作者	机构	期刊名称
1	海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究	309	2004	欧阳志云,赵同谦,赵景柱等	中国科学院生态环境研究中心	应用生态学报
2	基于生态服务价值的全国土地利用变化环境影响评价	204	2006	冉圣宏,吕昌河,贾克敬等	中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所	环境科学
3	森林生态系统管理的研究进展	118	2002	郑景明,罗菊春,曾德慧	北京林业大学	北京林业大学学报
4	基于生态系统服务功能价值理论的土地利用规划环境影响评价——以安阳市为例	107	2008	吴克宁,赵珂,赵举水等	中国地质大学	中国土地科学
5	基于生态系统服务功能价值评估的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究	86	2007	唐弢,朱坦,徐鹤等	南开大学	中国人口·资源与环境
6	城市生态用地的空间结构及其生态系统服务动态演变——以常州市为例	83	2011	李锋,叶亚平,宋博文等	中国科学院生态环境研究中心	生态学报
7	生态系统服务功能管理研究进展	79	2013	郑华,李屹峰,欧阳志云等	中国科学院生态环境研究中心	生态学报
8	生态系统服务价值在土地利用规划中的应用	65	2006	王娟,崔保山,卢远等	北京师范大学	水土保持学报
9	1988年至2005年北京生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应	65	2010	蒋晶,田光进	北京师范大学	资源科学
10	都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局	64	2013	傅斌,徐佩,王玉宽等	中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所	生态学报

[1]	YANG Yanjie, YIN Dan, LIU Ziwen, HUANG Qingxu, HE Chunyang, WU Kang. Research progress on the space of flow using big data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1397-1411.
[2]	MA Enpu, CAI Jianming, HAN Yan, LIAO Liuwen, LIN Jing. Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of Human-Earth system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 310-326.
[3]	CHENG Chaonan, HU Yang, ZHAO Ming. Progress and prospect of the spatiotemporal change and ecosystem services evaluation of urban green space pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[4]	Wenwu ZHAO, Yue LIU, Qiang FENG, Yaping WANG, Siqi YANG. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.
[5]	Chuanzhun SUN, Lin ZHEN, Chao WANG, Jie HU, Bingzhen DU. Assessment of the ecological effects of the first-phase natural forest protection project in the Xiaolongshan region, Gansu Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(6): 732-740.
[6]	Ting WANG. A bibliometric analysis of international research on Tibetan Plateau: Based on the databases of SCIE and ESI [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(4): 500-512.
[7]	Weihua XU, Yanying YANG, Lu ZHANG, Yi XIAO, Xiaoke WANG, Zhiyun OUYANG. Evaluation methods and case study of regional ecological carrying capacity for early-warning [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.
[8]	Wenhuan WU, Jian PENG, Yanxu LIU, Yi'na HU. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581.
[9]	Jinliao HE, Xianjin HUANG. Quantitative analysis and challenges of Chinese human geography in the international academia since 2000 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(1): 112-124.
[10]	Zhe FENG, Xuegong XU, Jian ZHOU, Yang GAO. Land sparing versus sharing framework from ecosystem service perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1100-1108.
[11]	Yuchen DING, Changchun FENG, Liwei WANG. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe Town in Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 851-859.
[12]	YANG Zhenshan, ZHANG Hui, DING Yue, SUN Yiyun. Progress and prospect on urban green space research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(1): 18-29.
[13]	FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services：concepts, methods and progress [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
[14]	ZHOU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Wenyan, YE Xinyue, GAN Tian, HAN Xiang. Bibliometric analysis of ecological footprint research during 1992-2012 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(3): 336-346.
[15]	WANG Xiangdong, LIU Weidong. Theoretical evolution of modern land use planning [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(10): 1490-1500.