PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 15-25.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.01.002
• Specical Column: Coordinated Development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lixin SU1,2(), Changchun FENG1,2,*(
)
Received:
2018-02-01
Revised:
2018-08-10
Online:
2019-01-28
Published:
2019-01-23
Contact:
Changchun FENG
E-mail:slx8910@163.com;fcc@urban.pku.edu.cn
Supported by:
Lixin SU, Changchun FENG. A comparative study on the regional governance models of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and several foreign metropolitans[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 15-25.
Tab.1
Comparison of governance models of foreign metropolis areas and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region"
比较内容 | 京津冀地区(现阶段) | 德国柏林—勃兰登堡地区 | 日本东京首都圈 | 法国巴黎大都市区 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
参与 主体 | 中央政府主导,地方政府参与 | 地方政权、地方部门代表、各类社会志愿者等 | 中央政府、都县政府、指定城市、市町村政府和团体、经济团体等 | 中央政府、各大区政府、各市镇政府、非政府组织等 | |
治理 手段 | 行政手段为主 | 行政手段、经济手段、法律手段相辅相成 | 行政手段、经济手段、法律手段相辅相成 | 行政手段、经济手段、法律手段相辅相成 | |
协调 机制 | 协调者 | 不固定(松散议事制) | 柏林—勃兰登堡联合规划部 | 首都圈广域地方计划协议会 | 巴黎大都市区(设固定行政层级) |
矛盾处理 | 不明确 | 分歧台阶制度 | 广域行政体内部相互监督 | 类似市场机制 | |
动态监管 | 缺乏 | 合署办公,相互监督与约束 | PDCA政策循环反馈模式 | 中央政府下放部门直接参与区域治理日常工作 |
[1] | 安树伟. 2017. 京津冀协同发展战略实施效果与展望[J]. 区域经济评论, (6): 48-53. |
[An S W.2017. The implementation effect and prospects of the strategic synergetic development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Regional Economic Review, (6): 48-53. ] | |
[2] | 白易彬. 2017. 京津冀区域政府协作治理模式研究 [M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社: 91-104. |
[Bai Y B.2017. Studies on cooperative governance models in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Beijing, China: China Economic Publishing House: 91-104. ] | |
[3] | 白智立. 2017. 日本广域行政的理论与实践: 以东京“首都圈”发展为例[J]. 日本研究, (1): 10-26. |
[Bai Z L.2017. The theory and practice of Japan's wide-area administration: An example from capital circle of Tokyo. Japan Studies, (1): 10-26. ] | |
[4] | 方创琳. 2017. 京津冀城市群协同发展的理论基础与规律性分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(1): 15-24. |
[Fang C L.2017. Theoretical foundation and patterns of coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration. Progress in Geography, 36(1): 15-24. ] | |
[5] | 洪世键. 2009. 大都市区治理: 理论演进与运作模式 [M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社: 52-59. |
[Hong S J.2009. Metropolitan area governance: Theory evolution and operational model. Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press: 52-59. ] | |
[6] | 梁晓林, 谢俊英. 2009. 京津冀区域经济一体化的演变、现状及发展对策[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 30(6): 66-69. |
[Liang X L, Xie J Y.2009. Integration of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei: Evolution, current status, and development. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Trade, 30(6): 66-69. ] | |
[7] | 刘瑞, 伍琴. 2015. 首都经济圈八大经济形态的比较与启示: 伦敦、巴黎、东京、首尔与北京[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, (1): 79-94. |
[Liu R, Wu Q.Comparison and inspiration of capital economic circle: Beijing, London, Paris, Seoul and Tokyo. Economic Theory and Business Management, (1): 79-94. ] | |
[8] | 毛汉英. 2017. 京津冀协同发展的机制创新与区域政策研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(1): 2-14. |
[Mao H Y.2017. Innovation of mechanism and regional policy for promoting coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Progress in Geography, 36(1): 2-14. ] | |
[9] | 孙久文, 原倩. 2014. 京津冀协同发展战略的比较和演进重点[J]. 经济社会体制比较, (5): 1-11. |
[Sun J W, Yuan Q.2014. Strategic comparison of joint development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, (5): 1-11. ] | |
[10] | 孙莹炜. 2015. 德国首都区域协同治理及对京津冀的启示[J]. 经济研究参考, (31): 62-70. |
[Sun Y W.2015. Regional cooperative governance in German capital and its enlightenment to Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. Review of Economic Research, (31): 62-70. ] | |
[11] | 唐燕. 2009. 柏林-勃兰登堡都市区: 跨区域规划合作及协调机制[J]. 城市发展研究, 16(1): 49-54. |
[Tang Y.2009. Inter-regional cooperation and planning coordination mechanism in metropolitan region of Berlin-Brandenburg. Urban Studies, 16(1): 49-54. ] | |
[12] | 王燕, 李想, 吕程. 2015. 基于分形模型的京津冀铁路网络协同发展: 与长江三角洲、珠江三角洲的比较分析[J]. 中国流通经济, (8): 47-54. |
[Wang Y, Li X, Lv C.2015. Study on the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei railway network based on fractal model: The comparative analysis with the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. China Business and Market, (8): 47-54. ] | |
[13] | 严涵, 聂梦遥, 沈璐. 2014. 巴黎区域规划和空间治理研究[J]. 上海城市规划, (5): 65-69. |
[Yan H, Nie M Y, Shen L.2014. Research on regional planning and metropolitan paradigm of Paris region area. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, (5): 65-69. ] | |
[14] | 尹来盛, 冯邦彦. 2014. 中美大都市区治理的比较研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 21(1): 102-107, 121. |
[Yin L S, Feng B Y.2014. Comparative study of Sino-US metropolitan governance. Urban Development Studies, 21(1): 102-107, 121. ] | |
[15] | 游宁龙, 沈振江, 马妍, 等. 2017. 日本首都圈整备开发和规划制度的变迁及其影响: 以广域规划为例[J]. 城乡规划, (2): 15-29. |
[You N L, Shen Z J, Ma Y, et al.2017. Changes in spatial development and planning system of capital-circle in Japan and its impacts: A case study of the wide- area planning. Urban and Rural Planning, (2): 15-29. ] | |
[16] | 张成福, 李昊城, 边晓慧. 2012. 跨域治理: 模式、机制与困境[J]. 中国行政管理, (3): 102-109. |
[Zhang F C, Li H C, Bian X H.2012. Inter-regional governance: Model, mechanism and dilemma. Chinese Public Administration, (3): 102-109. ] | |
[17] | 张衔春, 胡映洁, 单卓然, 等. 2015. 焦点地域·创新机制·历时动因: 法国复合区域治理模式转型及启示[J]. 经济地理, 35(4): 9-18. |
[Zhang X C, Hu Y J, Shan X R, et al.2015. Core area·innovation mechanism·diachronic motivation: The transformation enlightenment of French compound regional governance pattern. Economic Geography, 35(4): 9-18. ] | |
[18] | 张衔春, 赵勇健, 单卓然, 等. 2015. 比较视野下的大都市区治理: 概念辨析、理论演进与进展[J]. 经济地理, 35(7): 6-13. |
[Zhang X C, Zhao Y J, Shan Z R, et al.2015. City-regional governance from the perspective of comparison: Conception clarification, theory development and research progress. Economic Geography, 35(7): 6-13. ] | |
[19] | 赵国钦, 宁静. 2015. 京津冀协同发展的财政体制: 一个框架设计[J]. 改革, (8): 77-83. |
[Zhao G Q, Ning J.2015. The financial system of the collaborative development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei: A framework design. Reform, (8): 77-83. ] | |
[20] |
Albrechts L, Healey P, Kunzmann K R.2003. Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2): 113-129.
doi: 10.1080/01944360308976301 |
[21] |
Alden J D.1984. Metropolitan planning in Japan[J]. The Town Planning Review, 55(1): 55-74.
doi: 10.3828/tpr.55.1.j425426w42h47lr5 |
[22] |
Allen J, Cochrane A.2010. Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics[J]. Antipode, 42(5): 1071-1089.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x |
[23] |
Amin A.2004. Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place[J]. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography, 86(1): 33-44.
doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x |
[24] |
Ancien D.2005. Local and regional development policy in France: Of changing conditions and forms, and enduring state centrality[J]. Space and Policy, 9(3): 217-236.
doi: 10.1080/13562570500509877 |
[25] |
Brenner N.2009. Open questions on state rescaling[J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 2(1): 123-139.
doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsp002 |
[26] | Castells M.2000. The rise of the network society[M]. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. |
[27] |
Cole A, John P.1995. Local policy networks in France and Britain: Policy co-ordination in fragmented political sub-systems[J]. Western European Politics, 18(4): 89-109.
doi: 10.1080/01402389508425108 |
[28] |
Cowell R, Murdoch J.1999. Land use and the limits to (regional) governance: Some lessons from planning for housing and minerals in England[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(4): 654-669.
doi: 10.1111/ijur.1999.23.issue-4 |
[29] |
Elinbaum P, Galland D.2016. Analysing contemporary metropolitan spatial plans in Europe through their institutional context, instrumental content and planning process[J]. European Planning Studies, 24(1): 181-206.
doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1036843 |
[30] |
Evers D, Vries J.2013. Explaining governance in five mega-city regions: Rethinking the role of hierarchy and government[J]. European Planning Studies, 21(4): 536-555.
doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722944 |
[31] |
Fricke C.2015. Spatial governance across borders revisited: Organizational forms and spatial planning in metropolitan cross-border regions[J]. European Planning Studies, 23(5): 849-870.
doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.887661 |
[32] | Harrison J, Growe A.2012. From places to flows? Planning for the new 'regional world' in Germany[J]. European Urban & Regional Studies, 21(1): 21-41. |
[33] |
Hauswirth I, Herrschel T, Newman P.2003. Incentives and disincentives to city-regional cooperation in the Berlin-Brandenburg conurbation[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2): 119-134.
doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002002 |
[34] |
Kwon S W, Park S C.2014. Metropolitan governance: How regional organization influence interlocal land use coordination[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(5): 925-940.
doi: 10.1111/juaf.12093 |
[35] |
Lackowska M, Zimmermann K.2011. New forms of territorial governance in metropolitan regions? A Polish-German comparison[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(2): 156-169.
doi: 10.1177/0969776410390746 |
[36] | Nelles J, Durand F.2014. Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: Comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg[J]. European Urban & Regional Studies, 21(1): 104-122. |
[37] |
Nicholls W J.2005. Power and governance: Metropolitan governance in France[J]. Urban Studies, 42(4): 783-800.
doi: 10.1080/00420980500060426 |
[38] |
Vega H L, Penne L.2008. Governance and institutions of transportation investments in US mega-regions[J]. Transport, 23(3): 279-286.
doi: 10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.279-286 |
[39] | Watanabe K, Takeuchi Y.2010. Peripheries and future urban spatial structures of the Tokyo metropolitan area: Correspondence of regional planning[J]. DISP, 46: 60-68. |
[40] |
Wear A.2012. Collaborative approaches to regional governance: Lessons from Victoria[J]. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(4): 469-474.
doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12002 |
[41] |
Westerink J, Kempenaar A, Lierop M, et al.2017. The participating government: Shifting boundaries in collaborative spatial planning of urban regions[J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(1): 147-168.
doi: 10.1177/0263774X16646770 |