特大城市“三线冲突”空间格局及影响因素

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.009

Abstract

Abstract:

Delimiting ecological protection redlines, basic farmland protection zones, and urban growth boundaries is particularly crucial in coordinating urban land use and implementing the "integration of multi-planning." The purpose of this article is to explore the concept, spatial pattern, and influencing factors of "three lines" conflict at land parcel level, and to improve the theoretical framework and analytical methods of "multiple plans conflict" and "multiple plans integration." First, the connotation of "three lines" and "three lines" conflict are clarified by analyzing the essence of land use conflict and the three lines conflict index (TLCI) was constructed to characterize the intensity of the "three lines" conflict. A spatial overlay operation is performed on the "three lines" using ArcGIS software to produce the spatial distributions of "three lines" conflict of Wuhan City. Then we analyze the spatial pattern of three "three lines" conflict using a host of spatial pattern analysis methods (including spatial autocorrelation analysis, gradient analysis, and landscape pattern analysis). Finally, we identify the influencing factors of "three lines" conflict from the perspectives of socioeconomic status, natural environment conditions, and location factors using correlation analysis. The results indicate that: (1) Conflicts between ecological protection redlines and basic farmland protection zones, and conflicts between ecological protection redlines and urban growth boundaries are the main types of "three lines" conflict, accounting for 6.57% and 5.77% of the regional land areas, respectively in the Wuhan metropolitan area, and conflicts between farmland protection zones and urban growth boundaries are relatively few. (2) Spatial distributions of the three types of "three lines" conflict are different. Conflicts between ecological protection redlines and basic farmland protection zones are mainly distributed in the periphery of the Wuhan metropolitan area. Conflicts between ecological protection redlines and urban growth boundaries are mainly distributed in the core of the Wuhan metropolitan area. Conflicts between basic farmland protection zones and urban growth boundaries are mainly distributed in the transitional zone between the urban and rural ecotones. (3) The six indicators representing regional conditions have different effects on the intensity of the three types of conflicts. In conclusion, TLCI is a good measurement of regional comprehensive "three lines" conflict intensity. The spatial pattern analysis methods can well describe the characteristics of the "three lines" conflict. (3) The research on the formation mechanism and driving factors of "three lines" conflict needs to be further explored. This study can provide a systematic framework for analyzing "three lines" conflict and guidance to landscape planning for avoiding "multiple plans conflict."

Key words: spatial planning, "multiple planning integration", "three-lines" conflict, driving factors, Wuhan City

Yaolin LIU, Yang ZHANG, Yan ZHANG, Yi LIU, Haofeng WANG, Yanfang LIU. Conflicts between three land management red lines in Wuhan City: Spatial patterns and driving factors[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1672-1681.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.1

Tab.2

References 31

[1]	蔡云楠. 2009. 新时期城市四种主要规划协调统筹的思考与探索[J]. 规划师, 25(1): 22-25.
	[Cai Y N.2009. Exploration on coordination of four types of planning in the new era[J]. Planners, 25(1): 22-25.]
[2]	顾朝林. 2015. 论中国"多规"分立及其演化与融合问题[J]. 地理研究, 34(4): 601-613.
	[Gu C L.2009. On the separation of China's spatial plans and their evolution and integration[J] .Geography research, 34(4): 601-613.]
[3]	焦利民, 肖丰涛, 许刚, 等. 2015. 武汉都市区绿地破碎化格局对城市扩张的时空响应[J]. 资源科学, 37(8): 1650-1660.
	[Jiao L M, Xiao F T, Xu G, et al.2015. Spatial-temporal response of green land fragmentation patterns to urban expansion in Wuhan metropolitan area[J]. Resources Science, 37(8): 1650-1660.]
[4]	焦利民, 张博恩, 许刚. 2016. 气溶胶光学厚度与PM2.5浓度相关关系的时空变异[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 30(12): 34-39.
	[Jiao L M, Zhang B E, Xu G.2016. Spatio-temporal variability of correlation between aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 concentra[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 30(12): 34-39.]
[5]	林坚, 陈诗弘, 许超诣, 等. 2015. 空间规划的博弈分析[J]. 城市规划学刊, (1): 10-14.
	[Lin J, Chen S H, Xu C Y, et al.2015. Game analysis of spatial planning[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (1): 10-14.]
[6]	刘彦随, 王介勇. 2016. 转型发展期"多规合一"理论认知与技术方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(5): 529-536.
	[Liu Y S, Wang J Y.2016. Theoretical analysis and technical methods of "multiple planning integration" in the rural to urban transition period in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 35(5): 529-536.]
[7]	马文涵, 郑振华. 2016. 以"三线"约束支撑城市空间优化: 武汉市"三线"划定的实践及思考[J]. 中国土地, (6): 31-33.
	[Ma W H, Zheng Z H.2016. Optimizing the layout of urban space using "three lines": Review on the demarcation of "three lines" in Wuhan[J]. China Land, (6): 31-33.]
[8]	孟鹏, 冯广京, 吴大放, 等. 2015. "多规冲突"根源与"多规融合"原则: 基于"土地利用冲突与'多规融合'研讨会"的思考[J]. 中国土地科学, (8): 3-9.
	[Meng P, Feng G J, Wu D F, et al.2015. Causes of the multiple-planning conflict and principle of multiple-planning integration: Reviews of the workshop "land use conflicts and multiple planning integration"[J]. China Land Sciences, (8): 3-9.]
[9]	钱慧, 罗震东. 2011. 欧盟"空间规划"的兴起、理念及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 26(3): 66-71.
	[Qian H, Luo Z D.2011. Understanding the "spatial planning" approach in recent EU and the implications for China[J]. Urban Planning International, 26(3): 66-71.]
[10]	钦国华. 2016. 近十年来国内"多规合一"问题研究进展[J]. 现代城市研究, (9): 2-8.
	[Qin G H.2016. Progress on Research of the multiple planning integration over the past 10 years in China[J]. Modern Urban Research, (9): 2-8.]
[11]	沈迟, 许景权. 2015. "多规合一"的目标体系与接口设计研究: 从"三标脱节"到"三标衔接"的创新探索[J]. 规划师, 31(2):12-16.
	[Shen C, Xu J Q.2015. A review on spatial planning coordination and China's "coordinated planning"[J]. Planners, 31(2): 12-16.]
[12]	宋亚男. 2017. 基于用地竞争力评价的潜在土地利用冲突研究[D]. 硕士, 武汉: 武汉大学.
	[Song Y N.2017. Research on identification of potential land use conflict based on competitiveness of different land use types: A case study on Nanjing City[D]. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University.]
[13]	王琦, 杜永怡, 席酉民. 2004. 组织冲突研究回顾与展望[J]. 预测, 23(3): 74-80.
	[Wang Q, Du Y Y, Xi Y M.2004. Research review and prospect of organizational conflict[J]. Forecasting, 23(3): 74-80.]
[14]	王向东, 刘卫东. 2012. 中国空间规划体系: 现状、问题与重构[J]. 经济地理, 32(5): 7-15.
	[Wang X D, Liu W D.2012. Spatial planning system in China: Status, problems and reconstruction[J]. Economic Geography, 32(5): 7-15.]
[15]	邬建国. 2007. 景观生态学: 格局、过程、尺度与等级. 2版.[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
	[Wu J G.2007. Landscape ecology: Pattern, process, scale and grade. 2nd ed.[M]. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.]
[16]	武汉市城市规划设计研究院. 2006. 武汉市都发展区用地布局规划说明书[R]. 武汉: 武汉市城市规划设计研究院.
	[Wuhan Planning & Design Institute.2006. Land layout planning manual of Wuhan urban development area[R]. Wuhan, China: Wuhan Planning & Design Institute.]
[17]	谢英挺, 王伟. 2015. 从"多规合一"到空间规划体系重构[J]. 城市规划学刊, (3): 15-21.
	[Xie Y T, Wang W.2015. From "multiple-plan coordination" to the reform of the spatial planning system[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (3): 15-21.]
[18]	许景权, 沈迟, 胡天新, 等. 2017. 构建我国空间规划体系的总体思路和主要任务[J]. 规划师, 33(2): 5-11.
	[Xu J Q, Shen C, Hu T X, et al.2017. General concept and main tasks of building spatial planning system in China[J]. Planners, 33(2): 5-11.]
[19]	严金明, 陈昊, 夏方舟. 2017. "多规合一"与空间规划: 认知、导向与路径[J]. 中国土地科学, 31(1): 21-27.
	[Yan J M, Chen H, Xia F Z.2017. Cognition, direction and path of future spatial planning based on the background of multiple planning integration[J]. China Land Sciences, 31(1): 21-27.]
[20]	杨洪涛. 2016. "多规合一"空间规划体系的构建探索[J]. 城乡建设, (5): 36-38.
	[Yang H T.2016. Exploration on the construction of space planning system of multiple planning integration[J]. Urban and Rural Development, (5): 36-38.]
[21]	杨荫凯. 2014. 国家空间规划体系的背景和框架[J]. 改革, (8): 125-130.
	[Yang Y K.2014. The background and framework of the national spatial planning system[J]. Reform, (8): 125-130.]
[22]	于伯华, 吕昌河. 2006. 土地利用冲突分析: 概念与方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 25(3): 106-115.
	[Yu B H, Lu C H.2006. The progress and prospect of land use conflicts[J]. Progress in Geography, 25(3): 106-115.]
[23]	张叶笑, 冯广京. 2017. 基于时空锥理论的"多规冲突"和"多规合一"机理研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 31(5): 3-11.
	[Zhang Y X, Feng G J.2017. Study on the mechanism of "multiple plans conflicts" and "multiple plans integration" based on the spatiotemporal cone theory[J]. China Land Sciences, 31(5): 3-11.]
[24]	张永姣, 方创琳. 2016. 空间规划协调与多规合一研究: 评述与展望[J]. 城市规划学刊, (2): 78-87.
	[Zhang Y J, Fang C L.2016. Review on spatial planning coordination and china's "coordinated planning"[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (2): 78-87.]
[25]	郑娟尔, 周伟, 袁国华. 2016. "三线"体系及划定技术研究: 以贵州省为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济, (6): 21-26.
	[Zheng J E, Zhou W, Yuan G H.2016. Research on "three lines" system and its delineation technology: A case study of Guizhou Province[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, (6): 21-26.]
[26]	Getis A, Ord J K.1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics[J]. Geographical Analysis, 24: 189-206.
[27]	Fan J, Sun W, Yang Z S, et al.2012. Focusing on the major function-oriented zone: A new spatial planning approach and practice in China and its 12th Five-Year Plan[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53(1): 86-96.
[28]	Healey P.2008. The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe[J]. Urban Planning International, 28(1): 45-67.
[29]	Wang F H.2006. Quantitative methods and applications in GIS[M]. Boca Raton, Fl: Crc Press.
[30]	Wang L, Shen J F.2016. Spatial planning and its implementation in provincial China: A case study of the Jiangsu region along the Yangtze River plan[J]. Journal of Contemporary China, 101: 1-17.
[31]	Zhou X P, Lu X, Lian H P, et al.2017. Construction of a spatial planning system at city-level: Case study of "integration of multi-planning" in Yulin City, China[J]. Habitat International, 65: 32-48.

冲突类型	MPS	PAFRAC	PD	AI
生态—耕地冲突	0.07	1.29	14.71	57.79
生态—城市冲突	0.09	1.24	11.33	59.07
城市—耕地冲突	0.05	1.30	21.78	50.21

变量		生态—耕地冲突强度指数	生态—城市冲突强度指数	城市—耕地冲突强度指数
社会经济状况	GDP	-0.142^**	0.125^**	不显著
社会经济状况	人口数量	-0.145^**	0.108^**	不显著
自然环境条件	高程	-0.057^**	不显著	不显著
	坡度	-0.063^**	不显著	不显著
	距主要河流距离	0.097^**	0.073^**	0.085^**
区位条件	距主要公路距离	0.081^**	-0.111^**	0.064^**

Conflicts between three land management red lines in Wuhan City: Spatial patterns and driving factors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 31

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XU Xiaoren, WANG Liang, XU Yong, DUAN Jian. Evaluation of reserve available land resources based on three types of territorial space: A case study of Jiexiu City in Shanxi Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 272-282.
[2]	LU Xinhai, CAI Dawei, ZENG Chen. Influencing factors of housing price differentiation based on the spatial quantile model: A case study of Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 283-292.
[3]	CHENG Chaonan, HU Yang, ZHAO Ming. Progress and prospect of the spatiotemporal change and ecosystem services evaluation of urban green space pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[4]	WU Yan, LI Hongbo. Spatial change and correlations of desakota regions in a metropolitan area using NPP/VIIRS nighttime light data: A case study of Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 13-23.
[5]	LUO Jing,JIANG Liang,LUO Minghai,TIAN Lingling,CHEN Guolei,TIAN Ye,WU Yikun. Rural development level of villages in Wuhan City’s new urban districts and its hierarchical structure [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1370-1381.
[6]	Liang ZHOU, Qi ZHAO, Fan YANG. Identification of urban agglomeration boundary based on POI and NPP/VIIRS night light data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 840-850.
[7]	Jinting ZHANG, Yudan ZHAO, Yangge TIAN, Qingqing HE, Yanhua ZHUANG, Yunxi PENG, Song HONG. Spatial non-coupling of air pollutant emissions and particulate matter-related air quality: A case study in Wuhan City, China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 612-624.
[8]	Gang LI, Weiyu CHEN, Lan YANG, Qian LIU, Xiliang CHEN. Spatial pattern and agglomeration mode of parcel collection and delivery points in Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(3): 407-416.
[9]	MAO Shuaiyong, JIAO Limin, XU Gang, LI Zehui. Identification of the polycentric spatial structure in Wuhan City based on multisource data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1675-1683.
[10]	GAO Jing, GONG Jian, LI Jingye. Effects of source and sink landscape pattern on land surface temperature: An urban heat island study in Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1770-1782.
[11]	Shijin QU, Shougeng HU, Quanfeng LI, Shengfu YANG. Quantitative evaluation of the impacts of driving factors on urban residential land price and analysis of their spatio-temporal heterogeneity: A case study of Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(10): 1371-1380.
[12]	Juan WANG, Yajuan Li, Li LV, Jing HU, Xiang ZHANG. Hotel competitiveness evaluation and spatial pattern based on Internet data: A case study of high-end hotels of Wuhan urban area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(10): 1405-1415.
[13]	Junhui YAN, Haolong LIU, Quansheng Ge, Jingyun ZHENG, Zhixin HAO, Yimin WANG. Reconstruction and analysis of annual mean temperature of Wuhan for the 1906-2015 period [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(9): 1176-1183.
[14]	Kun QIN, Qing ZHOU, Yuanquan XU, Wenting XU, Ping LUO. Spatial interaction network analysis of urban traffic hotspots [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(9): 1149-1157.
[15]	Yuyao HAN, Limin JIAO, Gang XU. Correlation analysis of road structure and commercial agglomeration in Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1349-1358.