ICT对城中村居民居住和就业迁移空间的影响——以北京5个城中村调查为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In recent years, China's Internet-based information and communication technology (ICT) has experienced rapid development, influencing the economic activities, lifestyle, and other aspects of daily life of rural and urban residents. In this study we surveyed five typical urban villages in Beijing with questionnaire and WeChat interviews, and used an unordered multi-class logistic regression model to verify the influence of information sources on housing and employment related migration space of residents in urban villages. The results show that due to the informal nature of housing market in urban villages that prevents residents from gathering housing information from the Internet, information source has no significant effect on housing related migration distance of residents in urban villages; due to "employment anchor point," "distance attenuation law," and the informal economy, information source has no significant effect on short-distance employment related migration of residents in urban villages, but in a larger spatial scope, residents in urban villages can get employment information through recruitment websites, social networks, and other online sources. The rapid development of ICT enriches their information source, enlarging employment space choices. This study extended our understanding about the influence of ICT on daily activity space of urban residents and the relationship between technology and equality. It also enriches research on spatial behavior of residents.

Key words: ICT, housing related migration space, employment related migration space, informal economy, searching space, urban village in Beijing

Wensheng LIN, Jian FENG, Ye LI. Influence of ICT on housing and employment related migration space of residents in urban villages: A case study of five urban villages in Beijing[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 276-286.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Fig.3

Tab.5

Fig.4

References 52

[1]	黄子懿. 2016. 北京禁限“低端”产业累计减就业岗约80万个[N/OL]. 财新传媒, 2016-12-09[2017-05-31]. .
	[Huang Z Y. 2016. Beijing jinxian "diduan" chanye leiji jian jiuye gangwei 800000 ge[N/OL]. Caixin Media, 2016-12-09[2017-05-31]. .]
[2]	兰宗敏, 冯健. 2010. 城中村流动人口的时间利用以及生活活动时空间结构: 对北京5个城中村的调查[J]. 地理研究, 29(6): 1092-1104.
	[Lan Z M, Feng J.2010. The time allocation and spatio-temporal structure of the activities of migrants in 'village in city': Surveys in five 'villages in city' in Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 29(6): 1092-1104.]
[3]	刘望保, 闫小培. 2007. 转型期广州市居住迁移影响因素于户籍之间的比较[J]. 地理研究, 26(5): 1055-1066. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2007.05.022
	[Liu W B, Yan X P.2007. Comparison of influencing factors for residential mobility between different household register types in transitional urban China: A case study of Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 26(5): 1055-1066.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2007.05.022
[4]	刘志林, 张艳, 柴彦威. 2009. 中国大城市职住分离现象及其特征: 以北京市为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 16(9): 110-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2009.09.020
	[Liu Z L, Zhang Y, Chai Y W.2009. Home-work separation in the context of institutional and spatial transformation in urban China: Evidence from Beijing household survey data[J]. Urban Studies, 16(9): 110-117.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2009.09.020
[5]	孟斌. 2009. 北京城市居民职住分离的空间组织特征[J]. 地理学报, 64(12): 1457-1466.
	[Meng B.2009. The spatial organization of the separation between jobs and residential locations in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(12): 1457-1466.]
[6]	秦萧, 甄峰. 2016. 信息渠道对城市居民迁居空间的影响: 以南京为例[J]. 地理研究, 35(10): 1846-1856. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201610004
	[Qin X, Zhen F.2016. The impacts of information channels on moving space: A case study on Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 35(10): 1846-1856.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201610004
[7]	申悦, 柴彦威, 王冬根. 2011. ICT对居民时空行为影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(6): 643-651. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.001
	[Shen Y, Chai Y W, Wang D G.2011. Reviews on impacts of information and communication technologies on human spatial-temporal behavior[J]. Progress in Geography, 30(6): 643-651.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.001
[8]	首都之窗. 2017. 北京市2017年棚户区改造和环境整治任务[EB/OL]. 2017-04-07[2017-05-11]. .
	[Capital Window. 2017. Beijingshi 2017nian penghuqu gaizao he huanjing zhengzhi renwu[EB/OL]. 2017-04-07[2017-05-11]. .]
[9]	孙中亚. 2014. 信息技术对城市居住空间变化影响研究: 以南京河西新城为例[D]. 南京: 南京大学.
	[Sun Z Y.2014. Research on the impact of information technology on the change of urban inhabitable space: A case study of Hexi new Town, Nanjing[D]. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University.]
[10]	王德, 朱查松, 谢栋灿. 2016. 上海市居民就业地迁移研究: 基于手机信令数据的分析[J]. 中国人口科学, (1): 80-89.
	[Wang D, Zhu C S, Xie D C.2016. Research on intra-city employment mobility in Shanghai: Based on cell phone data[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (1): 80-89.]
[11]	薛领, 王冰松, 杨开忠. 2007. 我国大都市居民通勤、就业与居住变迁的时空特征研究: 以北京市为例[J]. 学习与实践, (12): 32-39.
	[Xue L, Wang B S, Yang K Z.2007. Woguo dadushi jumin tongqin, jiuye yu juzhu bianqian de shikong tezheng yanjiu: Yi Beijingshi weili[J]. Study and Practice, (12): 32-39.]
[12]	余建辉, 董冠鹏, 张文忠, 等. 2014. 北京市居民居住—就业选择的协同性研究[J]. 地理学报, 69(2): 147-155.
	[Yu J H, Dong G P, Zhang W Z, et al.2014. The correlated decision process of house moving and job change and its heterogeneity: A case study of Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(2): 147-155.]
[13]	翟青, 甄峰, 康国定. 2012. 信息技术对南京市职住分离的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(10): 1282-1288. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.10.005
	[Zhai Q, Zhen F, Kang G D.2012. Research on urban home-work separation influenced by information and communication technologies: Taking Nanjing as an example[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(10): 1282-1288.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.10.005
[14]	张文奎. 1990. 行为地理学研究的基本理论问题[J]. 地理科学, 10(2): 159-167.
	[Zhang W K.1990. On some basic theoretical problems in behavioral geography[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 10(2): 159-167.]
[15]	张文忠, 刘旺, 李业锦. 2003. 北京城市内部居住空间分布与居民居住区位偏好[J]. 地理研究, 22(6): 751-759. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2003.06.010
	[Zhang W Z, Liu W, Li Y J.2003. Housings' spatial distribution and residents' preference on housing location in Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 22(6): 751-759.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2003.06.010
[16]	郑思齐, 符育明, 刘洪玉. 2005. 城市居民对居住区位的偏好: 支付意愿梯度模型的估计[J]. 地理科学进展, 24(1): 97-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2005.01.011
	[Zheng S Q, Fu Y M, Liu H Y.2005. Urban households' location preference: The estimation of willingness-to-pay gradient model[J]. Progress in Geography, 24(1): 97-104.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2005.01.011
[17]	周素红, 刘玉兰. 2010. 转型期广州城市居民居住与就业地区位选择的空间关系及其变迁[J]. 地理学报, 65(2): 191-201. doi: 10.11821/xb201002006
	[Zhou S H, Liu Y L.2010. The situation and transition of jobs-housing relocation in Guangzhou, China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 191-201.] doi: 10.11821/xb201002006
[18]	朱明熙, 代灵敏. 2014. 美国个人所得税对贫富差距的影响: 基于1913-2011年经验数据分析[J]. 财经科学, (4): 119-127.
	[Zhu M X, Dai L M.2014. Impact of American personal income tax on the wealth gap: Based on empirical data analysis from 1913 to 2011[J]. Finance & Economics, (4): 119-127.]
[19]	Adams J S.1969. Directional bias in intra-urban migration[J]. Economic Geography, 45(4): 302-323. doi: 10.2307/142667
[20]	Baker R G V.1982. Place utility fields[J]. Geographical Analysis, 14(1): 10-28.
[21]	Brown L A, Holmes J.1971. Search behavior in an intra-urban migration context: A spatial perspective[J]. Environment and Planning A, 3(3): 307-326. doi: 10.1068/a030307
[22]	Brown L A, Moore E G.1970. The intra-urban migration process: A perspective[J]. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 52(1): 1-13. doi: 10.2307/490436
[23]	Chen C, Lin H Y.2012. How far do people search for housing? Analyzing the roles of housing supply, intra-household dynamics, and the use of information channels[J]. Housing Studies, 27(7): 898-914. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.725827
[24]	Clark W A V, Burt J E.1980. The impact of workplace on residential relocation[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(1): 59-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01297.x
[25]	Clark W A V, Huang Y Q.2003. The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets[J]. Environment and Planning A, 35(2): 323-339. doi: 10.1068/a3542
[26]	Clark W A V, Smith T R.1982. Housing market search behavior and expected utility theory: 2. The process of search[J]. Environment and Planning A, 14(6): 717-737. doi: 10.1068/a140717
[27]	Colwell P F, Dehring C A, Turnbull G K.2002. Recreation demand and residential location[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(3): 418-428. doi: 10.1006/juec.2001.2251
[28]	Cooke T W.1978. Causality reconsidered: A note[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 5(4): 538-542. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(78)90009-8
[29]	Curran C, Carlson L A, Ford D A.1982. A theory of residential location decisions of two-worker households[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 12(1): 102-114. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(82)90007-9
[30]	Ermisch J F, Jenkins S P.1999. Retirement and housing adjustment in later life: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey[J]. Labour Economics, 6(2): 311-333. doi: 10.1016/S0927-5371(99)00018-4
[31]	Ettema D.2010. The impact of telecommuting on residential relocation and residential preferences: A latent class modelling approach[J]. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(1): 7-24. doi: 10.1590/S2179-83972009000100020
[32]	Golledge R G, Spector A N.1978. Comprehending the urban environment: Theory and practice[J]. Geographical Analysis, 10(4): 403-426. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1978.tb00667.x
[33]	Huff J O.1986. Geographic regularities in residential search behavior[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(2): 208-227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1986.tb00113.x
[34]	Krizek K, Waddell P.2002. Analysis of lifestyle choices: Neighborhood type, travel patterns, and activity participation[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1807): 119-128.
[35]	Li S M, Siu Y M.2001. Residential mobility and urban restructuring under market transition: A study of Guangzhou, China[J]. The Professional Geographer, 53(2): 219-229. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00281
[36]	Mokhtarian P L, Collantes G O, Gertz C.2004. Telecommuting, residential location, and commute-distance traveled: Evidence from state of California employees[J]. Environment and Planning A, 36(10): 1877-1897. doi: 10.1068/a36218
[37]	Mokhtarian P L, Salomon I.1997. Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 31(1): 35-50. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(96)00010-9
[38]	Montgomery M, Curtis C.2006. Housing mobility and location choice: A review of the literature[R]. Impacts of Transit Led Development in a New Rail Corridor, Working Paper No.2: 4-32.
[39]	Morrow-Jones H A, Irwin E G, Roe B.2004. Consumer preference for neotraditional neighborhood characteristics[J]. Housing Policy Debate, 15(1): 171-202. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2004.9521498
[40]	Muhammad S, Ottens H F L, de Jong T.2008. Modelling the impact of telecommuting on future urbanisation in the Netherlands[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(2): 160-177. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00452.x
[41]	Nilles J M.1991. Telecommuting and urban sprawl: Mitigator or inciter[J]. Transportation, 18(4): 411-432. doi: 10.1007/BF00186567
[42]	Norris P.2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 56-61.
[43]	Ory D T, Mokhtarian P L.2006. Which came first, the telecommuting or the residential relocation? An empirical analysis of causality[J]. Urban Geography, 27(7): 590-609. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.27.7.590
[44]	Palm R, Danis M A.2001. Residential mobility: The impacts of web-based information on the search process and spatial housing choice patterns[J]. Urban Geography, 22(7): 641-655. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.22.7.641
[45]	Palm R, Danis M.2002. The internet and home purchase[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(5): 537-547. doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00224
[46]	Potoglou D, Susilo Y.2008. Comparison of vehicle-ownership models[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2076): 97-105. doi: 10.3141/2076-11
[47]	Roseman C C.1971. Migration as a spatial and temporal process[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61(3): 589-598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1971.tb00809.x
[48]	Rossi P H.1955. Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility[M]. New York: The Free Press, 14-35.
[49]	Sanchez T W, Dawkins C J.2001. Distinguishing city and suburban movers: Evidence from the American housing survey[J]. Housing Policy Debate, 12(3): 607-631. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521420
[50]	Shen Q.2000. New telecommunications and residential location flexibility[J]. Environment and Planning A, 32(8): 1445-1463. doi: 10.1068/a3292
[51]	Steinnes D N.1977. Causality and intraurban iocation[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 4(1): 69-79. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(77)90031-6
[52]	Tang W, Mokhtarian P L, Handy S L.2011. The impact of the residential built environment on work at home adoption and frequency: An example from northern California[J]. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(3): 3-22.

调研地	问卷发放/份
西半壁店—史各庄村	104
圆明园—朱房社区	92
费家村	79
小武基村	70
东关街—沙岗村	62
总计	407

	居住迁移	就业迁移
因变量	居住迁移距离：百度地图上一次居住地与现居住地最短路径距离	就业迁移距离：百度地图上一次就业地与现就业地最短路径距离
解释变量	信息渠道	信息渠道
控制变量	性别	性别
	年龄	年龄
	户籍	户籍
	受教育程度	受教育程度
	个人月收入	个人月收入
	行业	行业
	家庭规模	企业规模
	婚育状况	婚育状况
	居住形式	居住形式
	迁居原因	—
模型	多元无序logistic回归模型

	住房信息来源			就业信息来源
	人数/人		比例/%	人数/人	比例/%
老乡亲戚朋友介绍	79	39.90		68	43.59
报纸电视	0	0.00		7	4.49
广告、宣传单	6	3.03		4	2.56
中介机构	0	0.00		0	0.00
自己实地探查	89	44.95		40	25.64
网上查询	19	9.60		30	19.23
其他	5	2.52		7	4.49

	住房信息渠道/%			就业信息渠道/%
	传统渠道		网络渠道	传统渠道	网络渠道
男性	87.74	12.26		76.06	23.94
女性	93.48	6.52		88.37	11.63
18岁以下	100.00	0.00		-	-
18~44岁	86.86	13.14		75.56	24.44
45~60岁	98.08	1.92		100.00	0.00
60岁及以上	100.00	0.00		100.00	0.00
本地户籍	87.50	12.50		75.00	25.00
外地户籍	90.53	9.47		80.91	19.09
初中及以下	97.00	3.00		93.88	6.12
高中(中专及技校)	91.49	8.51		95.65	4.35
大学及以上	76.47	23.53		57.14	42.86
没有工作	97.22	2.78		100.00	0.00
个体	94.12	5.88		100.00	0.00
第二产业	93.10	6.90		100.00	0.00
第三产业	85.86	14.14		70.67	29.33
低收入	100.00	0.00		100.00	0.00
中低收入	88.37	11.63		89.53	10.47
中高收入	93.33	6.67		54.55	45.45
高收入	81.25	18.75		38.46	61.54

	居住迁移				就业迁移
	0~5 km		5~10 km		0~5 km		5~10 km
	系数β	Exp(β)	系数β	Exp(β)	系数β	Exp(β)	系数β	Exp(β)
截距	6.236^***	510.811	5.726^***	306.739	6.770^***	871.312	7.380^***	1603.589
性别(女性#)	-1.603^***	0.201	-0.805^*	0.447	0.500	1.650	-0.040	0.960
年龄	-0.178	0.837	-0.410	0.664	-	-	-	-
户籍(外地户口#)	1.028	2.797	-1.256	0.285	-11.200	0.000	-0.480	0.620
受教育程度(大专及以上#)
初中及以下	-1.162	0.313	-0.193	0.824	-0.870	0.420	-0.970	0.380
高中、中专及技校	-1.207^*	0.299	-1.060^*	0.347	-0.170	0.850	0.770	2.150
个人月收入	-1.441^**	0.237	-1.573^***	0.207	-3.270^*	0.040	-2.020^*	0.130
行业(第三产业#)
没有工作	0.051	1.052	-0.803	0.448	14.420	2.860	-0.050	0.950
个体	1.312^*	3.715	1.219^*	3.384	1.980^**	7.220	0.810	2.250
第二产业	-0.114	0.892	0.151	1.163	-0.900	0.410	-0.240	0.790
家庭规模	-0.483^*	0.617	-0.329	0.720	-	-	-	-
企业规模/人	-	-	-	-	1.480	2.760	0.40	1.270
婚育状况(已婚已育#)
未婚	-1.004^*	0.366	-0.959	0.383	-0.070	0.930	0.010	1.010
已婚未育	-1.342^**	0.261	-0.952	0.386	-1.460	0.230	-1.490^*	0.230
居住形式(自有住房#)	-15.660^***	1.58E-07	-14.57^***	4.69E-07	-16.4^***	7.74E-08	-16.07^***	1.04E-07
迁居原因(其他#)
拆迁迁居	0.983^*	2.672	0.746	2.109	-	-	-	-
工作迁居	-1.635^***	0.195	-0.465	0.628	-	-	-	-
信息渠道(传统渠道#)	-0.359	0.698	-0.189	0.827	-4.770	0.010	-1.840^**	0.160
样本数量	198				125
-2倍对数似然值	335.138				125.300
P值	0.001				0.010
考克斯—斯奈尔	0.289				0.440
内戈尔科	0.332				0.500
麦克法登	0.168				0.280

Influence of ICT on housing and employment related migration space of residents in urban villages: A case study of five urban villages in Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 52

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LI Lingjie, WANG Yintang, HU Qingfang, LIU Yong, LIU Dingzhong, CUI Tingting. Mid- and long-term runoff prediction based on time-varying weight combination and Bayesian correction [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 643-650.
[2]	ZOU Lilin, LIU Yansui, WANG Yongsheng. Research progress and prospect of land-use conflicts in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 298-309.
[3]	LI Qunji, WANG Ling'en. Conflicts and coordination of tourism resource use in protected areas in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2105-2117.
[4]	LUO Jing,JIANG Liang,LUO Minghai,TIAN Lingling,CHEN Guolei,TIAN Ye,WU Yikun. Rural development level of villages in Wuhan City’s new urban districts and its hierarchical structure [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1370-1381.
[5]	MA Xiaodong,LI Xin,HU Rui,KHUONG Manh Ha. Delineation of “production-living-ecological” space for urban fringe based on rural multifunction evaluation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392.
[6]	Nanchen CHU, Pingyu ZHANG, He LI. High-speed rail impact on regional accessibility and its spatial effects:A case study of the Blagoveshchensk-Vladivostok railway [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 988-997.
[7]	Ning ZHANG, Dawei WANG. Drug-related crime risk assessment and predictive policing based on risk terrain modeling [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1131-1139.
[8]	Lin LIU, Wenjuan LIU, Weiwei LIAO, Hongjie YU, Chao JIANG, Rongping LIN, Jiakai JI, Zheng ZHANG. Comparison of random forest algorithm and space-time kernel density mapping for crime hotspot prediction [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(6): 761-771.
[9]	Qi HUANG, Hongzhi WANG, Xinliang XU. An empirical study on regional differences of the external environment of rural residential land exit: An analysis on 84 rural residential land spots of Dongxihu District, Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(3): 407-417.
[10]	Dadao LU. Significance of building the capital high-end financial and business district in Beijing and lessons from developing the Seashore New Area in Tianjin: A speech at the 2017 Chinese City Hundred People Forum, 2017/06/06 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 224-228.
[11]	Min CHENG, Yuejiao LIAN. Spatial accessibility of urban medical facilities based on improved potential model: A case study of Yangpu District in Shanghai [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 266-275.
[12]	Yaolin LIU, Yang ZHANG, Yan ZHANG, Yi LIU, Haofeng WANG, Yanfang LIU. Conflicts between three land management red lines in Wuhan City: Spatial patterns and driving factors [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1672-1681.
[13]	Zhengxian YANG, Zhifeng ZHANG, Jianbo HAN, Anning SUO, Zhendong ZHANG. Thresholds determination of marine resource and environmental carrying capacity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 313-319.
[14]	Xiaoyue WANG, Shuangcheng LI. Progress and prospects of diagnostic analysis and risk prediction of urban problems based on multiple perspectives [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(2): 231-243.
[15]	Hui CHEN, Feng ZHEN. Impact of ICT on community satisfaction among elderly:The case of Suojin Community in Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1167-1176.