中国城市LID技术设施的成本效益区域差异

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.11.009

Abstract

Abstract:

With accelerating urbanization, population growth, and urban expansion, modern urban stormwater management faces new challenges. Based on the scenario analysis method, this study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of China's urban low impact development (LID) technical facilities. We calculated the benefits of different facilities under 80% and 95% rainfall event control rate scenarios respectively in the 30-year service period. The results show that the cost of construction and maintenance in the northern cities are higher than those in the southern cities. Benefits of stormwater management in the southern cities are generally higher than those in the northern cities. In addition, within the northern cities, benefits of urban stormwater management are lower in Beijing, Tianjin, and northwest regions. For different facilities, the cost of stormwater management for in situ infiltration is between 6 and 188 yuan/m3, significantly higher than the technical facilities with confluence function. Due to their low cost and reasonable effectiveness, combined sunken green area and rainwater wetland are suggested for northern cities with low precipitation. In the southern cities with more rainfall and strong rainfall intensity, it is recommended to use biological retention facilities in combination with regulating ponds. These methods not only can increase the storage capacity to meet the requirements of rainfall control rate but also can increase the rainwater infiltration and help purifying rainwater on the ground.

Key words: urban stormwater management, low impact development (LID), cost-effectiveness, scenario analysis, China

Dalong LI, Shaofeng JIA, Aifeng LV, Wenbin ZHU. Regional difference of cost effectiveness of low impact development (LID) technical facilities in Chinese cities[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1402-1412.

Figures/Tables 10

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.4

References 32

[1]	北京市质量技术监督局. 2003. DB11/T 213-2003 城市园林绿化养护管理标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Beijing Municipal Administration of Quality and Technology Supervision. 2003. DB11/T 213-2003 code for management of landscape greening in city and town[S]. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
[2]	北京市住房和城乡建设委员会. 2013. 2012年北京市建设工程预算定额[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban Rural Development. 2013. 2012nian Beijingshi jianshe gongcheng yusuan dinge[M]. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
[3]	车伍, 李俊奇. 2006. 城市雨水利用技术与管理[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Che W, Li J Q.2006. Chengshi yushui liyong jishu yu guanli[M]. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
[4]	车伍, 闫攀, 赵杨, 等. 2014. 国际现代雨洪管理体系的发展及剖析[J]. 中国给水排水, 30(18): 45-51.
	[Che W, Yan P, Zhao Y, et al.2014. Development and analysis of international updated stormwater management systems[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 30(18): 45-51.]
[5]	陈韬, 李业伟, 张雅君. 2014. 典型城市雨水低影响开发(LID)措施的成本—效益分析[J]. 西南给排水, 36(2): 41-46.
	[Chen T, Li Y W, Zhang Y J.2014. Dianxing chengshi yushui diyingxiang kaifa (LID) cuoshi de chengben-x iaoyi fenxi][J]. Southwest Water & Wastewater, 36(2): 41-46.]
[6]	贺斌. 2015. 李俊奇: 算好海绵城市这本经济账[N]. 中国财经报, 2015-02-14(003).
	[He B.2015. Li Junqi: Suanhao haimian chengshi zheben jingjizhang[N]. China Financial and Economic News, 2015-02-14(003).]
[7]	户园凌. 2012. 低影响开发雨水系统综合效益的分析研究[D]. 北京: 北京建筑工程学院.
	[Hu Y L.2012. Analytical study on the overall benefits of LID stormwater system[D]. Beijing, China: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture.]
[8]	匡文慧, 陈利军, 刘纪远, 等. 2016. 亚洲人造地表覆盖遥感精细化分类与分布特征分析[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 46(9): 1162-1179.
	[Kuang W H, Chen L J, Liu J Y, et al.2016. Remote sensing-based artificial surface cover classification in Asia and spatial pattern analysis[J]. Science China : Earth Sciences, 59(9): 1720-1737.]
[9]	李俊奇, 车伍, 池莲, 等. 2004. 住区低势绿地设计的关键参数及其影响因素分析[J]. 给水排水, 30(9): 41-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8471.2004.09.011
	[Li J Q, Che W, Chi L.2004. Critical parameters and influencing factors analysis on low elevation greenbelt in residential area[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 30(9): 41-46.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8471.2004.09.011
[10]	林小鹃. 2009. 中国降雨特性分析与模拟[D]. 北京: 北京师范大学.
	[Lin X J.2009. Characterization and simulation of precipitation in China[D]. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University.]
[11]	刘文, 陈卫平, 彭驰. 2015. 城市雨洪管理低影响开发技术研究与利用进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 26(6): 1901-1912.
	[Liu W, Chen W P, Peng C.2015. Advances in low impact development technology for urban stormwater management[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26(6): 1901-1912.]
[12]	刘勇, 张韶月, 柳林, 等. 2015. 智慧城市视角下城市洪涝模拟研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(4): 494-504.
	[Liu Y, Zhang S Y, Liu L, et al.2015. Research on urban flood simulation: A review from the smart city perspective[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(4): 494-504.]
[13]	宁静, 李田. 2006. 上海市降雨特性统计与雨水存储池容积计算[J]. 中国给水排水, 22(4): 48-51.
	[Ning J, Li T.2006. Statistics on rainfall properties and capacity calculation of rainwater storage tank in Shanghai[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 22(4): 48-51.]
[14]	王虹, 丁留谦, 程晓陶, 等. 2015. 美国城市雨洪管理水文控制指标体系及其借鉴意义[J]. 水利学报, 46(11): 1261-1271, 1279. doi: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20150670
	[Wang H, Ding L Q, Cheng X T, et al.2015. Hydrologic control criteria framework in the United States and its referential significance to China[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 46(11): 1261-1271, 1279.] doi: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20150670
[15]	伍海兵, 方海兰. 2015. 绿地土壤入渗及其对城市生态安全的重要性[J]. 生态学杂志, 34(3): 894-900.
	[Wu H B, Fang H L.2015. Research progress on soil infiltration of green space and its importance for municipal ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34(3): 894-900.]
[16]	殷水清, 王杨, 谢云, 等. 2014. 中国降雨过程时程分型特征[J]. 水科学进展, 25(5): 617-624.
	[Yin S Q, Wang Y, Xie Y, et al.2014. Characteristics of intra-storm temporal pattern over China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 25(5): 617-624.]
[17]	中国建设造价工程信息网. 2016a. 城市住宅建安工程造价指标数据[EB/OL]. 2016-07-01[2017-04-19] .
	[China Engineering Cost Network. 2016-07-01. Chengshi zhuzhai jianan gongcheng zaojia zhibiao shuju[EB/OL]. 2016-07-01[2017-04-19] .]
[18]	中国建设造价工程信息网. 2016b. 建筑实物工程量人工成本信息表[EB/OL]. 2016-07-01[2017-04-19] .
	[China Engineering Cost Network. 2016b. Jianzhu shiwu gongchengliang rengong chengben xinxibiao[EB/OL]. 2016-07-01[2017-04-19] .]
[19]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 2013. GB 50500-2013 建设工程工程量清单计价规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社.
	[Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China,General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. 2013. GB 50500-2013 code of valuation with bill quantity of construction works[S]. Beijing,China:China Planning Press.]
[20]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2006.GB50400-2006 建筑与小区雨水利用工程技术规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社.
	[Ministry of Housing and rban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2006. GB50400-2006 engineering technical code for rain utilization in building and sub-district[S]. Beijing, China: China Planning Press.]
[21]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2010. GB/T 50596-2010 雨水集蓄利用工程技术规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社.
	[Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2010. GB/T 50596-2010 technical code for rainwater collection, storage and utilization[S]. Beijing,China: China Planning Press.]
[22]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2012. CJJ/T 188-2012 透水砖路面技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2012. CJJ/T 188-2012 technical specification for pavement of water permeable brick[S]. Beijing,China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
[23]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2013.JGJ 155-2013 种植屋面工程技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2013. JGJ 155-2013 Technical specification for planted roof[S]. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
[24]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2014. 海绵城市建设技术指南: 低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社
	[Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2014. Haimian chengshi jianshe jishu zhinan: Diyingxiang kaifa yushui xitong goujian[S]. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
[25]	Ashley R, Lundy L, Ward S, et al.2013. Water-sensitive urban design: Opportunities for the UK[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 166(2): 65-76. doi: 10.1680/muen.12.00046
[26]	Cipolla S S, Maglionico M, Stojkov I.2016. A long-term hydrological modelling of an extensive green roof by means of SWMM[J]. Ecological Engineering, 95: 876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.07.009
[27]	Entry J A.2014. The impact of stormwater treatment and best management practices on nutrient concentration in the Florida everglades[J]. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 225(1): 1758. doi: 10.1007/s11270-013-1758-z
[28]	Hapuarachchi H A P, Wang Q J, Pagano T C.2011. A review of advances in flash flood forecasting[J]. Hydrological Processes, 25(18): 2771-2784. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8040
[29]	Lee J M, Hyun K H, Choi J S.2013. Analysis of the impact of low impact development on runoff from a new district in Korea[J]. Water Science & Technology, 68(6): 1315-1321. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.346 pmid: 24056429
[30]	Sang Y F, Yang M Y.2017. Urban waterlogs control in China: More effective strategies and actions are needed[J]. Natural Hazards, 85(2): 1291-1294. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2614-4
[31]	United States Environmental Protection Agency.2000. Low impact development (LID): A literature review[R]. EPA-841-B-00-005. Washington D C: Office of Water.
[32]	Wang M, Zhang D Q, Adhityan A, et al.2016. Assessing cost-effectiveness of bioretention on stormwater in response to climate change and urbanization for future scenarios[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 543: 423-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.019

雨型	降雨历时分配/%	雨量分配/%
I型	0~40	72
	40~60	14
	60~100	14
II型	0~40	33
	40~60	39
	60~100	28
III型	0~40	24
	40~60	16
	60~100	60
IV型	0~40	42
	40~60	21
	60~100	37

分区	雨型	雨型百分比/%	平均降雨历时/h	(0%~40%)/h	(40%~60%)/h	(60%~100%)/h
松花江区	I型	43.6	21.8	8.72	4.36	8.72
	II型	20.8	22.9	9.16	4.58	9.16
	III型	19.3	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	IV型	16.4	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
黄河区	I型	46.2	15.7	6.28	3.14	6.28
	II型	22.0	17.7	7.08	3.54	7.08
	III型	14.7	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	IV型	17.2	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
长江1区	I型	52.5	17.7	7.08	3.54	7.08
	II型	20.0	17.2	6.88	3.44	6.88
	III型	11.8	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	IV型	15.6	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
长江2区	I型	44.2	19.4	7.76	3.88	7.76
	II型	23.0	20.0	8.00	4.00	8.00
	III型	15.3	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	IV型	17.5	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
东南诸河区	I型	42.9	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	II型	21.5	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	III型	19.3	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60
	IV型	16.3	24.0	9.60	4.80	9.60

技术设施	透水铺装	屋顶种植	下沉式绿地	生物滞留设施	雨水湿地	调节塘
设施结构层渗透系数/(mm/h)	360	40	40	40	40	40
容积/(m3/m²)	0.095	0.105	0.21	0.55	0.68	1.62
表面蓄水层高度/mm	无	无	150	250	400	1500
TSS去除率/%	85	75	60	85	70	60
寿命周期/a	10	15	15	15	30	30
维护成本/(%/a)	5	8	5	8.5	5	5

城市	降雨场次控制率/mm	径流总量控制率/mm
长春	16.2~35.3	21.4~26.6
北京	23.1~51.3	22.8~33.6
郑州	20.4~47.0	23.1~34.3
武汉	23.6~55.1	24.5~43.3
上海	20.3~44.0	22.2~33.0
长沙	21.7~45.1	21.8~31.6
福州	22.7~48.5	24.1~35.7
南宁	23.2~51.4	23.5~40.4
乌鲁木齐	10.0~19.5	13.0~15.0
拉萨	12.7~21.4	12.3~14.7

Regional difference of cost effectiveness of low impact development (LID) technical facilities in Chinese cities

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHEN Zhuo, LIANG Yi, JIN Fengjun. Simulation of city network accessibility and its influence on regional development pattern in China based on integrated land transport system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 183-193.
[2]	JIANG Wanbei, LIU Weidong, LIU Zhigao, HAN Mengyao. Inequality and driving forces of energy-related CO₂ emissions intensity in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1425-1435.
[3]	HUANG Yingze, QIU Bingwen, HE Yuhua, ZHANG Ke, ZOU Fengli. Optimal elevation interval of rice expansion in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1557-1564.
[4]	HU Guojian, LU Yuqi. Progress, thoughts, and prospect of urban network research based on enterprise perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596.
[5]	FU Zhanhui, MEI Lin, ZHENG Rumin, WANG Tongtong. Spatial differentiation mechanism of urban female employment rate in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318.
[6]	ZHU Shengjun, HUANG Yongyuan, HU Xiaohui. Research framework and prospect of industrial value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading based on a multiple scale perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1367-1384.
[7]	DU Xinru, LU Zi, LI Renjie, DONG Yaqing, GAO Wei. Estimation of time delay cost of hub airports in China, air routes effect and comparison with the United States [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1160-1171.
[8]	LIU Xiaopeng, CHENG Jing, ZHAO Xiaoyong, MIAO Hong, WEI Jingyi, ZENG Duan, MA Cunxia. Sustainable poverty reduction of China in a view of development geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 892-901.
[9]	ZHOU Guohua, ZHANG Rujiao, HE Yanhua, DAI Liuyan, ZHANG Li. Optimization of rural settlements and the governance of rural relative poverty [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 902-912.
[10]	TAN Xuelan, JIANG Lingxiao, WANG Zhenkai, AN Yue, CHEN Min, REN Hui. Rural poverty in China from the perspective of geography: Origin, progress, and prospect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 913-923.
[11]	GUO Jianke, HOU Yajie, HE Yao. Characteristics of change of the China-Europe port shipping network under the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 716-726.
[12]	SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737.
[13]	DU Delin, WANG Jiaoe, WANG Yi. Market structure and competition of the three major airlines in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 367-376.
[14]	DUAN Qianwen, TAN Minghong. Temporal and spatial changes of urban forests in major cities in China and abroad [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 410-419.
[15]	ZHOU Meijun, LI Fei, SHAO Jiaqi, YANG Haijuan. Change characteristics of maize production potential under the background of climate change in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 443-453.