贵阳木本植物始花期对温度变化的敏感度

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.08.010

Abstract

Abstract:

Temperature sensitivity of phenophases can reflect how and to what degree plants could tract climate change, and is related to the ability of plants to adapt to climate change. Investigating the temperature sensitivity of phenophases of different plant species could help us to identify species that are sensitive to climate change. To date, the studies about temperature sensitivity of first flowering date (FFD) mainly focused on the temperate area, and fewer studies focused on the subtropical area. We selected Guiyang City, located in subtropical China, as the study area, and analyzed the temporal changes in FFD of plants and their temperature sensitivities based on phenological observation data of 60 typical woody plants from 1980 to 2014. In addition, we evaluated the impact of the length of time series on the stability of the estimates of temperature sensitivity. The results show that: (1) Guiyang City experienced notable climate change with significantly increased annual mean temperature during the study period. The warming of spring and autumn was stronger than summer and winter. (2) FFD of 53 species (88.3%) advanced during the study period with 13 species (21.7%) significantly advancing (P<0.05). Most trends of FFD were between -4 and -2 d/decade. The overall advancing trend for FFD of 60 species was 2.89 d/decade. (3) FFD was significantly and negatively correlated with mean temperature during the optimum period for most species (88.3%). Most temperature sensitivities of FFD ranged from -8 to -4 d/°C. The overall temperature sensitivity for FFD of all species was -5.75 d/°C. (4) Sample size clearly affected stability of the estimates of temperature sensitivity. The time series of 15 years could make the difference of estimates less than 2 d/°C with a probability of 99%. Thus, time series should be as long as possible to be used in estimating the temperature sensitivity of flowering phenology with a stability that is sufficient for interspecific comparisons.

Key words: climate change, phenology, woody plants, first flowering date, temperature sensitivity, Guiyang City

Wenjie HUANG, Quansheng GE, Junhu DAI, Huanjiong WANG. Sensitivity of first flowering dates to temperature change for typical woody plants in Guiyang City, China[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(8): 1015-1024.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Tab.1

Plant species investigated in this study"

学名	拉丁名	科	观测年数	平均始花期
侧柏	Platycladusorientalis	Cupressaceae	25	2-16
大叶早樱	Cerasus subhirtella	Rosaceae	27	2-19
金钟花	Forsythia viridissima	Oleaceae	26	2-19
毛叶木瓜	Chaenomeles cathayensis	Rosaceae	26	2-21
榆树	Ulmuspumila	Ulmaceae	28	2-21
澳洲合欢	Acacia decurrens	Leguminosae	23	2-22
杏	Armeniaca vulgaris	Rosaceae	28	2-28
贴梗海棠	Chaenomelesspeciosa	Rosaceae	27	2-28
窄叶蚊母树	Distylium dunnianum	Hamamelidaceae	25	2-29
响叶杨	Populus adenopoda	Salicaceae	23	3-2
垂柳	Salix babylonica	Salicaceae	26	3-3
李	Prunus salicina	Rosaceae	23	3-7
滇杨	Populus yunnanensis	Salicaceae	20	3-8
西府海棠	Malusmicromalus	Rosaceae	21	3-9
沙梨	Pyruspyrifolia	Rosaceae	24	3-11
紫玉兰	Magnolia liliflora	Magnoliaceae	22	3-12
紫荆	Cercischinensis	Leguminosae	33	3-12
木瓜	Chaenomeles sinensis	Rosaceae	26	3-14
枫杨	Pterocarya stenoptera	Juglandaceae	27	3-15
野花椒	Zanthoxylumsimulans	Rutaceae	24	3-16
白花泡桐	Paulowniafortunei	Scrophulariaceae	27	3-20
河柳	Salix chaenomeloides	Salicaceae	25	3-20
白蜡	Fraxinuschinensis	Oleaceae	24	3-21
二球悬铃木	Platanusacerifolia	Platanaceae	25	3-25
麻栎	Quercus acutissima	Fagaceae	24	3-27
东京樱花	Cerasus yedoensis	Rosaceae	27	3-28
马尾松	Pinus massoniana	Pinaceae	27	3-28
紫藤	Wisteria sinensis	Leguminosae	22	4-3
香叶树	Lindera communis	Lauraceae	24	4-4
构树	Broussonetia papyifera	Moraceae	25	4-4
云实	Caesalpinia decapetala	Leguminosae	27	4-9
小叶女贞	Ligustrum quihoui	Oleaceae	24	4-10
刺槐	Robiniapseudoacacia	Leguminosae	34	4-14
猴樟	Cinnamomum bodinieri	Lauraceae	23	4-14
楸树	Catalpa bungei	Bignoniaceae	25	4-15
香樟	Cinnamomumcamphora	Lauraceae	22	4-15
火棘	Pyracantha fortuneana	Rosaceae	25	4-15
楝树	Meliaazedarach	Meliaceae	23	4-20
皂荚	Gleditsia sinensis	Leguminosae	25	4-22
石榴	Punicagranatum	Punicaceae	28	5-4
梓树	Catalpa ovata	Bignoniaceae	28	5-15
线叶冬青	Ilex fargesiivar.angustifolia	Aquifoliaceae	23	5-18
枣树	Ziziphusjujuba	Rhamnaceae	26	5-20
小梾木	Swida paucinervis	Cornaceae	26	5-21
夹竹桃	Nerium indicum	Apocynaceae	25	5-22
华瓜木	Alangium chinense	Alangiaceae	21	5-27
木槿	Hibiscus syriacus	Malvaceae	17	6-7
女贞	Ligustrumlucidum	Oleaceae	28	6-13
六月雪	Serissa japonica	Rubiaceae	21	6-18
乌桕	Sapium sebiferum	Euphorbiaceae	24	6-19
梧桐	Firmiana simples	Sterculiaceae	33	6-23
海州常山	Clerodendrumtrichotomum	Verbenaceae	25	7-1
紫薇	Lagerstroemia indica	Lythraceae	27	7-12
槐树	Sophora japonica	Leguminosae	18	7-14
旱莲木	Camptothecaacuminata	Nyssaceae	26	7-17
白簕	Acanthopanax trifoliatus	Araliaceae	16	8-2
木犀	Osmanthus fragrans	Oleaceae	25	9-3
木芙蓉	Hibiscus mutabilis	Malvaceae	29	9-6
油茶	Camellia oleifera	Theaceae	20	9-16
枇杷	Eriobotrya japonica	Rosaceae	16	11-3

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig. 6

Fig.7

References 42

1	安静, 张宗田, 刘荣辉, 等. 2014. 贵阳市园林植物种类初步调查[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 33(4): 59-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2014.04.013
	[An J, Zhang Z T, Liu R H, et al.2014. Preliminary investigation on landscape greening plants in Guiyang City[J]. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 33(4): 59-62.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2014.04.013
2	白洁, 葛全胜, 戴君虎. 2009. 贵阳木本植物物候对气候变化的响应[J]. 地理研究, 28(6): 1606-1614. doi: 10.11821/yj2009060016
	[Bai J, Ge Q S, Dai J H.2009.Response of woody plant phenophases to climate change for recent 30 years in Guiyang[J]. Geographical Research, 28(6): 1606-1614.] doi: 10.11821/yj2009060016
3	范德芹, 赵学胜, 朱文泉, 等. 2016. 植物物候遥感监测精度影响因素研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(3): 304-319.
	[Fan D Q, Zhao X S, Zhu W Q, et al.2016. Review of influencing factors of accuracy of plant phenology monitoring based on remote sensing data[J]. Progress in Geography, 35(3): 304-319.]
4	刘玲玲, 刘良云, 胡勇. 2012. 1982-2006年欧亚大陆植被生长季开始时间遥感监测分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(11): 1433-1442. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.11.003
	[Liu L L, Liu L Y, Hu Y.2012. Assessment and intercomparison of satellite-derived Start-of-Season (SOS) measures in Eurasia for 1982-2006[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(11): 1433-1442.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.11.003
5	陶泽兴, 仲舒颖, 葛全胜, 等. 2017. 1963-2012年中国主要木本植物花期长度时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 72(1): 53-63.
	[Tao Z X, Zhong S Y, Ge Q S, et al.2017. Spatiotemporal variations in flowering duration of woody plants in China from 1963 to 2012[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 53-63.]
6	宛敏渭, 刘秀珍. 1979. 中国物候观测方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 51.
	[Wan M W, Liu X Z.1979. Zhongguo wuhou guance fangfa[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press: 51.]
7	徐韵佳, 仲舒颖, 戴君虎, 等. 2017. 1978-2014年牡丹江地区植物花期变化及模型模拟[J]. 地理研究, 36(4): 779-789.
	[Xu Y J, Zhong S Y, Dai J H, et al.2017. Changes in flowering phenology of plants and their model simulation in Mudanjiang, China[J]. Geographical Research, 36(4): 779-789.]
8	仲舒颖, 葛全胜, 郑景云, 等. 2012. 近30年北京自然历的主要物候期、物候季节变化及归因[J]. 植物生态学报, 36(12): 1217-1225. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01217
	[Zhong S Y, Ge Q S, Zheng J Y, et al.2012. Changes of main phenophases of natural calendar and phenological seasons in Beijing for the last 30 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36(12): 1217-1225.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01217
9	Bai J, Ge Q S, Dai J H.2011. The response of first flowering dates to abrupt climate change in Beijing[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 28(3): 564-572. doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9219-8
10	Bock A, Sparks T H, Estrella N, et al.2014. Changes in first flowering dates and flowering duration of 232 plant species on the island of Guernsey[J]. Global Change Biology, 20(11): 3508-3519. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12579 pmid: 24639048
11	Bolmgren K, Vanhoenacker D, Miller-Rushing A J.2013.One man, 73 years, and 25 species. Evaluating phenological responses using a lifelong study of first flowering dates[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(3): 367-375. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0560-8 pmid: 22744801
12	Chuine I, Morin X, Bugmann H.2010. Warming, photoperiods, and tree phenology[J]. Science, 329: 277-278.
13	Cleland E E, Allen J M, Crimmins T M, et al.2012. Phenological tracking enables positive species responses to climate change[J]. Ecology, 93(8): 1765-1771. doi: 10.1890/11-1912.1 pmid: 22928404
14	Cleland E E, Chuine I, Menzel A, et al.2007. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(7): 357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003 pmid: 17478009
15	Dai J H, Wang H J, Ge Q S.2013. Multiple phenological responses to climate change among 42 plant species in Xi'an, China[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(5): 749-758. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0602-2 pmid: 23114575
16	Dai J H, Wang H J, Ge Q S.2014. The spatial pattern of leaf phenology and its response to climate change in China[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 58(4): 521-528. doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0679-2 pmid: 23732443
17	Doi H.2012. Response of the Morusbombycis growing season to temperature and its latitudinal pattern in Japan[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 56(5): 895-902. doi: 10.1007/s00484-011-0495-5 pmid: 21947335
18	Ellwood E R, Temple S A, Primack R B, et al.2013. Record-breaking early flowering in the eastern United States[J]. PLoS One, 8(1): e53788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053788 pmid: 3547064
19	Fitter A H, Fitter R S R.2002. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants[J]. Science, 296: 1689-1691. doi: 10.1126/science.1071617 pmid: 12040195
20	Ge Q S, Wang H J, Rutishauser T, et al.2015. Phenological response to climate change in China: A meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 21(1): 265-274. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12648 pmid: 24895088
21	Ge Q S, Wang H J, Zheng J Y, et al.2014. A 170 year spring phenology index of plants in Eastern China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 119(3): 301-311. doi: 10.1002/2013JG002565
22	Gonsamo A, Chen J M, Wu C Y.2013. Citizen Science: Linking the recent rapid advances of plant flowering in Canada with climate variability[J]. Scientific Reports, 3: 2239. doi: 10.1038/srep02239 pmid: 23867863
23	Ho C H, Lee E J, Lee I, et al.2006. Earlier spring in Seoul, Korea[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 26(14): 2117-2127. doi: 10.1002/joc.1356
24	IPCC. 2013. Summary for policymakers[M]//Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K, et al. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 3-29.
25	Körner C, Basler D.2010. Phenology under global warming[J]. Science, 327: 1461-1462.
26	Li Q X, Liu X N, Zhang H Z, et al.2004. Detecting and adjusting temporal inhomogeneity in Chinese mean surface air temperature data[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 21(2): 260-268. doi: 10.1007/BF02915712
27	Menzel A, Sparks T H, Estrella N, et al.2006. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern[J]. Global Change Biology, 12(10): 1969-1976. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x
28	Miller-Rushing A J, Katsuki T, Primack R B, et al.2007. Impact of global warming on a group of related species and their hybrids: Cherry tree (Rosaceae) flowering at Mt. Takao, Japan[J]. American Journal of Botany, 94(9): 1470-1478. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.9.1470 pmid: 21636514
29	Polgar C A, Primack R B.2011. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: From trees to ecosystems[J]. New Phytologist, 191(4): 926-941. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x pmid: 21762163
30	Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly D J, et al.2007. Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems[M]//Parry M L, Canziani O F, Palutikof J P, et al. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 79-131.
31	Rosenzweig C, Karoly D, Vicarelli M, et al.2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change[J]. Nature, 453: 353-357.
32	Rutishauser T, Luterbacher J, Defila C, et al.2008. Swiss spring plant phenology 2007: Extremes, a multi-century perspective, and changes in temperature sensitivity[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(5): L05703. doi: 10.1029/2007GL032545
33	Szabó B, Vincze E, Czúcz B.2016. Flowering phenological changes in relation to climate change in Hungary[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(9): 1347-1356. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1128-1 pmid: 26768142
34	Walther G R, Post E, Convey P, et al.2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change[J]. Nature, 416: 389-395.
35	Wang H J, Dai J H, Zheng J Y, et al.2015. Temperature sensitivity of plant phenology in temperate and subtropical regions of China from 1850-2009[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 35(6): 913-922. doi: 10.1002/joc.4026
36	Wang H J, Ge Q S, Dai J H, et al.2015. Geographical pattern in first bloom variability and its relation to temperature sensitivity in the USA and China[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 59(8): 961-969. doi: 10.1007/s00484-014-0909-2 pmid: 25312515
37	Wang T, Ottlé C, Peng S S, et al.2014. The influence of local spring temperature variance on temperature sensitivity of spring phenology[J]. Global Change Biology, 20(5): 1473-1480. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12509 pmid: 24357518
38	Way D A, Montgomery R A.2015. Photoperiod constraints on tree phenology, performance and migration in a warming world[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 38(9): 1725-1736. doi: 10.1111/pce.12431 pmid: 25142260
39	Willis C G, Ruhfel B, Primack R B, et al.2008. Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau's woods are driven by climate change[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(44): 17029-17033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806446105 pmid: 18955707
40	Willis C G, Ruhfel B R, Primack R B, et al.2010. Favorable climate change response explains non-native species' success in Thoreau's woods[J]. PLoS One, 5(1): e8878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008878 pmid: 2811191
41	Wolfe D W, Schwartz M D, Lakso A N, et al.2005. Climate change and shifts in spring phenology of three horticultural woody perennials in northeastern USA[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 49(5): 303-309. doi: 10.1007/s00484-004-0248-9
42	Wolkovich E M, Cook B I, Allen J M, et al.2012. Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change[J]. Nature, 485: 494-497. doi: 10.1038/nature11014 pmid: 22622576

[1]	DENG Guofu, LI Mingqi. Advances of study on the relationship between tree-ring density and climate and climate reconstruction [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 343-356.
[2]	AO Xue, ZHAI Qingfei, CUI Yan, ZHOU Xiaoyu, SHEN Lidu, ZHAO Chunyu, Ning Xilong. Detection of urbanization effect on the climate change in Liaoning Province based on empirical orthogonal function methods [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1532-1543.
[3]	ZHOU Meijun, LI Fei, SHAO Jiaqi, YANG Haijuan. Change characteristics of maize production potential under the background of climate change in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 443-453.
[4]	SONG Zhen, SHI Xingmin. Path analysis of influencing factors of farmers’ adaptive behaviors to climate change in the rain-fed agricultural areas [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 461-473.
[5]	ZHANG Xuezhen, ZHENG Jingyun, HAO Zhixin. Climate change assessments for the main economic zones of China during recent decades [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1609-1618.
[6]	XIE Zhenghui, LIU Bin, YAN Xiaodong, MENG Chunlei, XU Xianli, LIU Yu, QIN Peihua, JIA Binghao, XIE Jinbo, LI Ruichao, WANG Longhuan, WANG Yan, CHEN Si. Effects of implementation of urban planning in response to climate change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 120-131.
[7]	DONG Xiaoyu, YAO Huarong, DAI Junhu, ZHU Mengyao. Phenological changes of desert steppe vegetation and its effect on net primary productivity in Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2017 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 24-35.
[8]	Shixi ZHANG, Junhu DAI, Quansheng GE. Progress of responses of first flowering date to climate change and the correlations of plant hormone regulation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1045-1055.
[9]	Jiayi FANG, Peijun SHI. A review of coastal flood risk research under global climate change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
[10]	Yuke ZHOU. Detecting Granger effect of vegetation response to climatic factors on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 718-730.
[11]	Hui ZHANG, Cheng LI, Jiong CHENG, Zhifeng WU, Yanyan WU. A review of urban flood risk assessment based on the framework of hazard-exposure-vulnerability [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[12]	Yanxi ZHAO, Dengpan XIAO, Huizi BAI, Fulu TAO. Research progress on the response and adaptation of crop phenology to climate change in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 224-235.
[13]	WU Qihui, LI Changyou, SUN Biao, SHI Xiaohong, ZHAO Shengnan, HAN Zhiming. Change of ice phenology in the Hulun Lake from 1986 to 2017 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1933-1943.
[14]	Yuke ZHOU. Comparative study of vegetation phenology extraction methods based on digital images [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1031-1044.
[15]	Lingbo XIAO. Spatiotemporal distribution of high flood risk areas in China, 1736-1911 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 495-503.

Sensitivity of first flowering dates to temperature change for typical woody plants in Guiyang City, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 42

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0