京津冀城市群高科技园区协同发展动力机制与合作共建模式——以中关村科技园为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.06.001

Abstract

Abstract:

In the process of promoting the coordinated development of high-tech parks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, the extent of integration of high-tech parks in this region decides the quality and depth of collaborative development. In the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, 10 high-tech parks in Tianjin and Hebei have signed intergovernmental cooperation agreements with the Zhongguancun Science Park. The cooperative industries are primarily electronic information industry, advanced manufacturing industry, new energy and energy saving industry, environmental protection industry, and biological medicine industry, which are also the five leading industries of the Zhongguancun Science Park in terms of revenue and share. The dynamic mechanism of coordinated development of high-tech parks in the region can be divided into hierarchical industrial transfer mechanism, market demand driven mechanism, science and technology industry incubation and transformation mechanism, government guidance driven mechanism, and market cooperation driven mechanism. The collaborative development models can be divided into the Zhongguancun Haidian-Qinhuangdao High-tech Park model that was mostly driven by the government, the Gu'an Industrial Park’s industrial town model that was mostly driven by market cooperation, and the Baoding-Zhongguancun Innovation Center model that was mostly driven by science and technology industry incubation and transformation.

Key words: collaborative development mechanism, collaborative development model, high-tech parks, Zhongguancun Science Park, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration

Wensong SU, Chuanglin FANG. Dynamic mechanism of coordinated development and collaborative development models of high-tech parks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: A case study of Zhongguancun Science Park[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(6): 657-666.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Direction of industrial development of provincial and national level high-tech parks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration"

	序号	园区名称	产业规划方向
北京市	1	中关村国家自主创新示范区(海淀、朝阳、丰台等一区16园,含北京经济技术开发区)	电子信息、生物医药、新材料、先进制造、新能源与节能、环境保护、现代服务业
天津市	2	天津国家自主创新示范区(华苑、北辰、南开、武清、塘沽海洋、西青、东丽等一区21园)	电子信息、生物医药、新能源、先进制造、现代服务业4大主导产业;文化创意、航空航天、黄金珠宝、总部经济4个优势产业
天津市	3	天津经济技术开发区(东区、西区、中区、南港工业区、现代产业区、逸仙科学工业园、微电子工业区、泰达慧谷、南部新兴产业区以及北塘企业总部园区)	电子信息、生物医药、新能源新材料、汽车和零部件、装备制造、食品及粮油加工、石油化工、现代服务业、航天产业
河北省	4	石家庄高新技术产业开发区(一区三园,含省级经济技术开发区、省级良村经济开发区)	电子信息、生物医药、先进装备制造
	5	保定高新技术产业开发区	以新能源与能源装备产业为特色,以软件、新材料、生物制药等为补充
	6	唐山高新技术产业开发区	焊接、机器人、汽车零部件、新材料及生物医药、新型建材、智能仪器仪表
	7	燕郊高新技术产业开发区	电子信息、生物医药、新材料、装备制造、新能源、现代服务业
	8	承德高新技术产业开发区	生物医药、新材料、智能化仪器仪表、装备制造、绿色食品
	9	石家庄经济技术开发区	生物医药、机械制造、食品加工及优质烟草
	10	秦皇岛经济技术开发区(含山海关经济开发区)	电子信息、新材料、生物技术和环保技术、机电一体化
	11	廊坊经济技术开发区	电子信息、机械设备制造、新能源、现代服务业
	12	沧州临港经济技术开发区	石油化工、新材料、装备制造、电力能源、现代物流产业、节能环保
	13	唐山曹妃甸经济技术开发区	港口物流、钢铁、石油化工、盐化工
	14	邯郸经济技术开发区	电子信息、新能源和新材料、白色家电、智能制造、医药食品、生产性服务业

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Tab.4

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 23

[1]	边慧夏. 2015a. 基于生产网络的上海市普陀区科技园区协同发展研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 24(4): 103-110.
	[Bian H X.2015b. Coordinative development of science and technology parks of Shanghai Putuo based on enterprise networks[J]. World Regional Studies, 24(4): 103-110.]
[2]	边慧夏. 2015b 科技园区地方协同发展影响机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 32(23): 43-48. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2015090481
	[Bian H X.2015a. Keji yuanqu defang xietong fazhan yingxiang jizhi yanjiu[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 32(23): 43-48.] doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2015090481
[3]	曹叔亮. 2014. 科教园区协同创新: 优势分析、模式比较与发展路径[J]. 高校教育管理, 8(2): 54-60. doi: 10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.2014.02.012
	[Cao S L.2014. Collaborative innovation of science and education parks: Advantage analysis, model comparison and development path[J]. Journal of Higher Education Management, 8(2): 54-60.] doi: 10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.2014.02.012
[4]	陈金丹, 黄晓. 2014. 基于子网络协同的集群企业网络演化机理分析: 兼论文化创意产业园区网络化发展路径[J]. 科技进步与对策, 31(16): 66-70. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2013120118
	[Chen J D, Huang X.2014. Jiyu ziwangluo xietong de jiqun qiye wangluo yanhua jili fenxi: Jianlun wenhua chuangyi chanye yuanqu wangluohua fazhan lujing[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 31(16): 66-70.] doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2013120118
[5]	陈雅兰, 雷德森. 1999. 海峡两岸高科技园区协同发展的前景与对策[J]. 中国软科学, (3): 42-49.
	[Chen Y L, Lei D S.1999. Haixia liangan gaokeji yuanqu xietong fazhan de qianjing yu duice[J]. China Soft Science, (3): 42-49.]
[6]	党兴华, 宋雪琪. 2016. 区域协同视角下科技园区的创新发展模式: 以陕西省科技园区为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 36(17): 36-40, 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2016.17.007
	[Dang X H, Song X Q.2016. The innovation model of science and technology park from the viewpoint of regional coordination: Taking Shaanxi science and technology park as an example[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 36(17): 36-40, 60.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2016.17.007
[7]	方创琳. 2017. 京津冀城市群协同发展的理论基础与规律性分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(1): 15-24.
	[Fang C L.2017. The oretical foundation and patterns of coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration[J]. Progress in Geography, 36(1): 15-24.]
[8]	郭洪. 2014. 跨区域创新合作模式研究: 以中关村为例[J]. 北京社会科学, (5): 124-128. doi: 10.13262/j.bjsshkxy.bjshkx.140517
	[Guo H.2014. Re-search on trans-regional innovation cooperation dynamic mechanism and model in Zhongguancun[J]. Social Sciences of Beijing, (5): 124-128.] doi: 10.13262/j.bjsshkxy.bjshkx.140517
[9]	郝茜茜. 2015. 京津冀协同发展视域下河北省国家级开发区竞争力培育策略[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, (5): 17-19.
	[Hao X X.2015. Competitive cultivation strategy of the national development zones in Hebei Province from the perspective of coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei[J]. Territory & Resources Study, (5): 17-19.]
[10]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 2017. 空间管治视角下京津冀协同发展类型区划[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(1): 46-57. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.005
	[Huang J C, Lin H X, Qi X X.2017. Spatial development regionalization of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from the perspective of spatial governance[J]. Progress in Geography, 36(1): 46-57.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.005
[11]	蒋海军. 2016. 科技园区推动区域协同创新研究: 以中关村科技园区为例[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 1(3): 36-41.
	[Jiang H J.2016. Keji yuanqu tuidong quyue xietong chuangxin yanjiu: Yi Zhongguancen keji yuanqu weili[J]. Studies on the Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 1(3): 36-41.]
[12]	李宏舟. 2008. 对国外产业集群经济效果及其形成机制的综述与评论[J]. 经济地理, 28(4): 607-611, 616.
	[Li H Z.2008. A critical review on the economic effects and forming mechanism of cluster[J]. Economic Geog-raphy, 28(4): 607-611, 616.]
[13]	李志启. 2015. 案例3 : 固安工业园区新型城镇化项目[J]. 中国工程咨询, (9): 27-30.
	[Li Z Q.2015. Case 3: New urbanization project of Guan industrial park[J]. Chinese Consulting Engineers, (9): 27-30.]
[14]	毛汉英. 2017. 京津冀协同发展的机制创新与区域政策研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(1): 2-14. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.001
	[Mao H Y.2017. Innovation of mechanism and regional policy for promoting coordinated development of the Bei-jing-Tianjin-Hebei[J]. Progress in Geography, 36(1): 2-14.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.001
[15]	王承云, 秦健, 杨随. 2013. 京津沪渝创新型城区研发产业集群研究[J]. 地理学报, 68(8): 1097-1109.
	[Wang C Y, Qin J, Yang S.2013. Analysis of the cluster mode of R&D industry in the innovative city districts: Taking Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing as examples[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(8): 1097-1109.]
[16]	吴文征, 鞠颂东. 2010. 基于非合作博弈的我国物流园区协同发展探讨[J]. 中国流通经济, 24(12): 26-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2010.12.007
	[Wu W Z, Ju S D.2010. The exploration on the collaborative development of logistics parks in China based on non-cooperative game[J]. China Business and Market, 24(12): 26-29.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2010.12.007
[17]	邹兵. 2001. 交易成本理论: 一个研究乡镇企业空间布局的新视角[J]. 城市规划汇刊, (4): 8-11.
	[Zou B.2001. Exchange costing theory: A new angle of study rural industry spatial pattern[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (4): 8-11.]
[18]	Weber A.1997. 工业区位论[M]. 李刚剑译. 北京: 商务印书馆.
	[Weber A.1997. Theory of the location of industries[M]. Li G J, trans. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.]
[19]	Krugman P.1991. Geography and trade[M]. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
[20]	Marshall A.1890. Principles of economics[M]. London, UK: Macmillan.
[21]	Porter M E.1990. The competitive advantage of nations[M]. New York: The Free Press.
[22]	Preer R W.1992. The emergence of technopolis: Knowledge-intensive technologies and regional develop-ment[M]. New York: Praeger.
[23]	Voyer R.1997. Knowledge-based industrial clustering: International comparisons[M]. Montreal, Canada: Nordicity Group.

序号	合作共建园区名称	合作共建园区产业类型	合作共建园区地点	合作共建开发规模
1	宝坻京津中关村科技城	智慧环保、智慧能源、智慧装备、智慧物流	天津宝坻	14.5 km²
2	北京亦庄永清高新技术产业区	电子信息、生物医药、装备制造和汽车制造	廊坊永清开发区	90 km²
3	中关村昌平园怀来分园	电子信息、生物医药、食品	张家口沙城经济开发区	2 km²
4	滨海-中关村科技园	电子信息、先进制造、节能环保	天津滨海新区	20 km²
5	京津冀大数据走廊承德大数据存储、数据加工处理、云计算服务中心	大数据、节能环保、大健康	承德高新区	5 km²
6	保定中关村创新中心	新一代信息技术、智能电网、节能环保、新能源、智能装备	保定高新区	6.2万m²
7	中关村丰台园保定分园	新材料、新能源、高端纸制品、现代服务业	保定满城经济开发区	1.4 km²
8	中关村(曹妃甸)高新技术成果转化基地	互联网、海水淡化、激光显示、新材料、智能制造、新能源、通航	唐山曹妃甸经开区	0.127 km²
9	正定中关村集成电路产业基地	集成电路、智能硬件、智能制造	石家庄正定高新区	30 km²
10	中关村海淀园秦皇岛分园	电子信息、生物医药	秦皇岛开发区	128 km²

序号	协同发展机制名称	优点	缺点
1	产业梯度转移机制	受企业和产业的自身发展规律驱动,可长期稳定发展	速度慢,时间漫长
2	市场需求吸引机制	受市场引导,可快速布局	市场体量和机会有限,稳定性差,企业有可能再流失
3	科技产业孵化转化机制	平台资源的吸引力强,可集群化转移,辐射带动区域产业升级	单纯的科技产业孵化市场收益规模较小,整合园区配套资源的能力较弱,难以形成规模效应
4	市场合作驱动机制	市场导向,双方利益绑定,分期开发,整体规模大	土地收益让利较多,整体开发时间长
5	政府引导驱动机制	营造良好的协同发展软环境,实施快	见效慢,需进一步发展为市场合作驱动机制

Dynamic mechanism of coordinated development and collaborative development models of high-tech parks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: A case study of Zhongguancun Science Park

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 23

Related Articles 12

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

	京津冀	北京	天津	石家庄	唐山	秦皇岛	邯郸	邢台	保定	张家口	承德	沧州	廊坊	衡水
国家级园区	14	1	2	2	2	1	1	0	1	0	1	1	2	0
省级园区	40	0	0	3	6	2	4	2	3	3	0	5	8	4
园区总数	54	1	2	5	8	3	5	2	4	3	1	6	10	4

[1]	SU Wensong, GUO Yuchen, YUAN Dingbo, YANG Fan, LIU Shuang. Evolution process, dynamic factors, and agglomeration models of intelligent industrial clusters in the Zhongguancun Science Park [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1485-1497.
[2]	LU Minghua, ZHOU Yueyan, LIU Hanchu, XU Xin. Spatiotemporal dynamics and influencing factors of direct investment in Hebei Province by Beijing’s enterprises [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 389-401.
[3]	LUO Kui, LI Guangdong, LAO Xin. Spatial reconstruction and optimization of industrial development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 179-194.
[4]	Bingying MA, Jiao HUANG, Shuangcheng LI. Optimal allocation of land use types in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration based on ecological and economic benefits trade-offs [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 26-37.
[5]	Xiaomeng WANG, Jin WANG, Dianting WU. Spatial development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration from the perspective of traffic-industry coupling relation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1231-1244.
[6]	Qi WANG, Jinchuan HUANG. Atmospheric pollution control policies of the Tokyo metropolitan area as a reference for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(6): 790-800.
[7]	Mingxing CHEN, Shasha GUO, Dadao LU. Characteristics and spatial patterns of floating population in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration under the background of new urbanization [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(3): 363-372.
[8]	Dadao LU. Significance of building the capital high-end financial and business district in Beijing and lessons from developing the Seashore New Area in Tianjin: A speech at the 2017 Chinese City Hundred People Forum, 2017/06/06 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 224-228.
[9]	Chuanglin FANG. Theoretical foundation and patterns of coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(1): 15-24.
[10]	Chao BAO, Dongmei HE. Spatiotemporal characteristics of water resources exploitation and policy implications in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(1): 58-67.
[11]	Jiawen FANG, Haimeng LIU. How and why venture capital flows in the Beijing-Tianjin-HebeiUrban Agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(1): 68-77.
[12]	Yufei REN, Chuanglin FANG. Spatial pattern and evaluation of eco-efficiency in counties of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(1): 87-98.