土地利用多功能性研究进展与展望

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Land use research has progressed from examining the change of land use patterns to the change of land use functions and the sustainable development of land resources. Multi-functionality of land use is of great significance to improving land use efficiency and promoting regional sustainable development, which has become one of the hot topics and new research directions in land science and geography. Based on an extensive review of related literature, this article systematically summarizes the concept and connotation, identification and classification, and evaluation of multi-functionality of land use and analyzes the current situation of multi-functionality of land use research. Currently, consensus exists on the understanding of the connotation and characteristics of multi-functionality of land use, but commonly accepted classification criteria of multi-functionality of land use are yet to be developed; analysis frameworks of multi-functionality of land use are basically formed, but the evaluation index system and evaluation methods need further improvement, and applied research is relatively weak; multi-functionality of land use are influenced by natural, social, economic, and policy factors. We propose some future research directions on the basis of the analysis, including developing an interdisciplinary research framework for multi-functionality of land use; constructing a classification system; improving evaluation study and applied study of multi-functionality of land use, with the hope to help promote in-depth studies in China on multi-functionality of land use, as well as provide references for the development of land use planning and land management.

Key words: land use, multi-functionalities, concept and classification, evaluation, research progress and prospect

Chao LIU, Yueqing XU, Piling SUN, Jia LIU. Progress and prospects of multi-functionality of land use research[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1087-1099.

Figures/Tables 4

References 71

1	陈婧, 史培军. 2005. 土地利用功能分类探讨[J]. 北京师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 41(5): 536-540. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0476-0301.2005.05.024
	[Chen J, Shi P J.2005. Discussion on functional land use classification system[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Natural Science, 41(5): 536-540.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0476-0301.2005.05.024
2	陈睿山, 蔡运龙, 严祥, 等. 2011. 土地系统功能及其可持续性评价[J]. 中国土地科学, 25(1): 8-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2011.01.002
	[Chen R S, Cai Y L, Yan X, et al.2011. The functions of land system and its sustainability assessment[J]. China Land Science, 25(1): 8-15.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2011.01.002
3	党丽娟, 徐勇, 高雅. 2014. 土地利用功能分类及空间结构评价方法: 以燕沟流域为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 21(5): 193-197, 203.
	[Dang L J, Xu Y, Gao Y.2014. Assessment method of functional land use classification and spatial system: A case study of Yangou Watershed[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 21(5): 193-197, 203.]
4	杜国明, 孙晓兵, 王介勇. 2016. 东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(2): 232-244.
	[Du G M, Sun X B, Wang J Y.2016. Spatiotemporal patterns of multi-functionality of land use in Northeast China[J]. Progress in Geography, 35(2): 232-244.]
5	李春晖, 崔嵬, 庞爱萍, 等. 2008. 流域生态健康评价理论与方法研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 27(1): 9-17. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.01.002
	[Li C H, Cui W, Pang A P, et al.2008. Progress on theories and methods of watershed eco-health assessment[J]. Progress in Geography, 27(1): 9-17.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.01.002
6	李德一, 张树文, 吕学军, 等. 2011. 基于栅格的土地利用功能变化监测方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 26(8): 1297-1305. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.08.007
	[Li D Y, Zhang S W, Lv X J, et al.2011. Changing detection method of land use functions based on geographical grid[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 26(8): 1297-1305.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.08.007
7	李芬, 甄霖, 黄河清, 等. 2009. 土地利用功能变化与利益相关者受偿意愿及经济补偿研究: 以鄱阳湖生态脆弱区为例[J]. 资源科学, 31(4): 580-589.
	[Li F, Zhen L, Huang H Q, et al.2009. Impacts of land use functional change on WTA and economic compensation for core stakeholders: A case study in Poyang Lake[J]. Resources Science, 31(4): 580-589.]
8	李广东, 方创琳. 2016. 城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 71(1): 49-65. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004
	[Li G D, Fang C L.2016. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(1): 49-65.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004
9	梁小英, 顾铮鸣, 雷敏, 等. 2014. 土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究: 以陕西省蓝田县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 29(7): 1127-1135. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.07.004
	[Liang X Y, Gu Z M, Lei M, et al.2014. The differences between land use function and land use to reflecting the change of land use system and their impacts on landscape pattern: A case study of Lantian County in Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(7): 1127-1135.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.07.004
10	刘沛, 段建南, 王伟, 等. 2010. 土地利用系统功能分类与评价体系研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 36(1): 113-118.
	[Liu P, Duan J N, Wang W, et al.2010. Study on systems of the land-use system functional classification and evaluation[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 36(1): 113-118.]
11	刘涛, 张静. 2013. 西北地区中小城市土地多功能利用研究: 以甘肃省天水市为例[J]. 宁夏师范学院学报: 自然科学版, 34(3): 65-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1331.2013.03.015
	[Liu T, Zhang J.2013. The study on multi-functional land use in small and medium-sized cities in Northwest China: A case study of Tianshui City in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Ningxia Teachers University: Natural Science, 34(3): 65-69.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1331.2013.03.015
12	刘彦随. 1999. 区域土地利用系统优化调控的机理与模式[J]. 资源科学, 21(4): 60-65.
	[Liu Y S.1999. Optimal regulation mechanism and models of regional land use system[J]. Resources Science, 21(4): 60-65.]
13	鲁春霞, 谢高地, 马蓓蓓, 等. 2009. 中国区域发展过程的空间多功能利用演变[J]. 资源科学, 31(4): 531-538.
	[Lu C X, Xie G D, Ma B B, et al.2009. The evolution of multifunctional use of space in the process of regional development in China[J]. Resources Science, 31(4): 531-538.]
14	彭建, 刘志聪, 刘焱序. 2014. 农业多功能性评价研究进展[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 35(6): 1-8. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.2014601
	[Peng J, Liu Z C, Liu Y X.2014. Research progress on assessing multi-functionality of agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 35(6): 1-8.] doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.2014601
15	彭建, 吕慧玲, 刘焱序, 等. 2015. 国内外多功能景观研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 30(4): 465-476. doi: 10.1167/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.04.0465
	[Peng J, Lv H L, Liu Y X, et al.2015. International research progress and perspectives on multifunctional landscape[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 30(4): 465-476.] doi: 10.1167/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.04.0465
16	彭建, 汪安, 刘焱序, 等. 2015. 城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 70(2): 333-346. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502013
	[Peng J, Wang A, Liu Y X, et al.2015. Research progress and prospect on measuring urban ecological land demand[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2): 333-346.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502013
17	彭建, 吴健生, 潘雅婧, 等. 2012. 基于PSR模型的区域生态持续性评价概念框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(7): 933-940. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.012
	[Peng J, Wu J S, Pan Y J, et al.2012. Evaluation for regional ecological sustainability based on PSR model: Conceptual framework[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(7): 933-940.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.012
18	唐弢, 朱坦, 徐鹤, 等. 2007. 基于生态系统服务功能价值评估的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 17(3): 45-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.03.010
	[Tang T, Zhu T, Xu H, et al.2007. Application of ecosystem services evaluation in environmental impact assessment on land-use master planning[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(3): 45-49.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.03.010
19	王超. 1984. 试论土地的结构与功能[J]. 中原地理研究, (2): 12-21.
	[Wang C.1984. Shilun tudi de jiegou yu gongneng[J]. Zhongyuan Dili Yanjiu, (2): 12-21.]
20	王德光, 胡宝清, 饶映雪, 等. 2012. 基于网格法与ANN的县域喀斯特土地系统功能分区研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 19(2): 131-136.
	[Wang D G, Hu B Q, Rao Y X, et al.2012. Research on functional zoning of karst land system at county regional scale based on the methods of lattice and ANN[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 19(2): 131-136.]
21	王枫, 董玉祥. 2015a. 广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 37(11): 2179-2192.
	[Wang F, Dong Y X.2015a. Spatial differences and influencing factors of land use function in Guangzhou[J]. Resources Science, 37(11): 2179-2192.]
22	王枫, 董玉祥. 2015b. 基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断: 以广州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 30(10): 1698-1713. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.10.009
	[Wang F, Dong Y X.2015b. Dynamic evaluation of land use functions based on grey relation projection method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators: A case study of Guangzhou City[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(10): 1698-1713.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.10.009
23	王文刚, 庞笑笑, 宋玉祥, 等. 2012. 土地利用的区域问题与区域间功能置换[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 22(9): 68-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.09.011
	[Wang W G, Pang X X, Song Y X, et al.2012. Study on regional problem of land use and function replacement between regions[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 22(9): 68-75.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.09.011
24	谢高地, 鲁春霞, 甄霖, 等. 2009. 区域空间功能分区的目标、进展与方法[J]. 地理研究, 28(3): 561-570.
	[Xie G D, Lu C X, Zhen L, et al.2009. Objective, progress and methodology of spatial function zoning[J]. Geographical Research, 28(3): 561-570.]
25	徐玉婷, 黄贤金. 2015. 中国土地科学学科建设理论研究综述及展望[J]. 中国土地科学, 29(5): 22-30. doi: 10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2015.05.004
	[Xu Y T, Huang X J.2015. The study on the review and prospect of the disciplinary construction of China's land science theory[J]. China Land Science, 29(5): 22-30.] doi: 10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2015.05.004
26	易秋圆. 2013. 县域城市土地利用功能分类与评价: 以中方县为例[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学. [Yi Q Y. 2013. Study on classification and evaluation of urban land use function in county level: Taking Zhongfang County as an example[D]. Changsha, China: Hunan Agricultural University.]
27	张凤荣. 2000. 中国土地资源及其可持续利用[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社: 1-3, 174-199.
	[Zhang F R.2000. Zhongguo tudi ziyuan jiqi kechixu liyong[M]. Beijing, China: China Agricultural University Press: 1-3, 174-199.]
28	张洁瑕, 陈佑启, 姚艳敏, 等. 2008. 基于土地利用功能的土地利用分区研究: 以吉林省为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 13(3): 29-35. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4333.2008.03.006
	[Zhang J X, Chen Y Q, Yao Y M, et al.2008. Study on land use regionalization based on land-use function: Case study of Jilin Province[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 13(3): 29-35.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4333.2008.03.006
29	张乐敏. 2012. 青海省海晏县土地利用多功能评价[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学.
	[Zhang L M. 2012. Assessment on land use multifunction in Haiyan County, Qinghai Province[D]. Beijing, China: China University of Geosciences.]
30	张晓平, 朱道林, 许祖学. 2014. 西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 30(6): 185-194.
	[Zhang X P, Zhu D L, Xu Z X.2014. Assessment on multi-functionality of land use in Tibet[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(6): 185-194.]
31	赵文武, 房学宁. 2014. 景观可持续性与景观可持续性科学[J]. 生态学报, 34(10): 2453-2459. doi: 10.5846/stxb201312042884
	[Zhao W W, Fang X N.2014. Landscape sustainability and landscape sustainability science[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(10): 2453-2459.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201312042884
32	甄霖, 曹淑艳, 魏云洁, 等. 2009. 土地空间多功能利用: 理论框架及实证研究[J]. 资源科学, 31(4): 544-551.
	[Zhen L, Cao S Y, Wei Y J, et al.2009. Land use functions: Conceptual framework and application for China[J]. Resources Science, 31(4): 544-551.]
33	甄霖, 魏云洁, 谢高地, 等. 2010. 中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J]. 生态学报, 30(24): 6749-6761.
	[Zhen L, Wei Y J, Xie G D, et al.2010. Regional analysis of dynamic land use functions in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(24): 6749-6761.]
34	周宝同. 2004. 土地资源可持续利用基本理论探讨[J]. 西南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 29(2): 310-314. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2004.02.036
	[Zhou B T.2004. Study on basic theoretical concepts of sustainable land use[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 29(2): 310-314.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2004.02.036
35	周子英. 2012. 土地利用及其功能变化研究: 以湖南省醴陵市为例[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学.
	[Zhou Z Y. 2012. Research on changes of land use and its function: Taking Liling City, in Hunan Province, as an example[D]. Changsha, China: Hunan Agricultural University.]
36	Aubry C, Ramamonjisoa J, Dabat M H, et al.2012. Urban agriculture and land use in cities: An approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar)[J]. Land Use Policy, 29(2): 429-439. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.009
37	Barbier E B, Koch E W, Silliman B R, et al.2008. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values[J]. Science, 319: 321-323. doi: 10.1126/science.1150349 pmid: 18202288
38	Barthélemy D, Nieddu M.2007. Non-trade concerns in agricultural and environmental economics: How J.R. Commons and Karl Polanyi can help us[J]. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(2): 519-527. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2007.11507041
39	Bertrand N, Jones L, Hasler B, et al.2008. Limits and targets for a regional sustainability assessment: An interdisciplinary exploration of the threshold concept[M]//Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer: 405-424.
40	Callo-Concha D, Denich M.2014. A participatory framework to assess multifunctional land-use systems with multicriteria and multivariate analyses: A case study on agrobiodiversity of agroforestry systems in Tomé Açú, Brazil[J]. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 1(1): 40-50. doi: 10.2478/cass-2014-0005
41	Costanza R, D'Arge R, de Groot R S, et al.1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387: 253-260.
42	de Groot R S.1992. Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making[M]. Groningen, the Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff: 211-213.
43	de Groot R S.2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(3-4): 175-186. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
44	de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J.2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393-408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
45	Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P, et al.2005. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science, 309: 570-574.
46	Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN/United Nations Environment Programme (FAO/UNEP). 1999. The future of our land: Facing the challenge[M]. Rome, Italy: FAO/UNEP: 72.
47	Gadjiev A D, Aral A, Aliev I A.2006. On behaviour of the Riesz and generalized Riesz potentials as order tends to zero[J]. Mathematical Inequalities and Applications, 10(4): 875-888.
48	Global Land Project(GLP). 2005. Global Land Project: Science plan and implementation strategy[R]. Stockholm, Sweden: IGBP Secretariat.
49	Hediger W.2006. Weak and strong sustainability, environmental conservation and economic growth[J]. Natural Resource Modeling, 19(3): 359-394. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2006.tb00185.x
50	Hein L, de Groot R S.2005. Analysis of landscape functions: Typology and sustainability indicators[Z]. Internal M3 SENSOR Document.
51	Helming K, Pérez-Soba M.2011. Landscape scenarios and multifunctionality: Making land use impact assessment operational[J]. Ecology and Society, 16(1): 50. doi: 10.1080/02757540.2010.547487
52	Helming K, Tscherning K, König B, et al.2008. Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions: the SENSOR approach[M]//Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer: 77-105.
53	Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R, et al.2001. Sustainability science[J]. Science, 292: 641-642.
54	Kienast F, Bolliger J, Potschin M, et al.2009. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe[J]. Environmental Management, 44(6): 1099-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9384-7
55	Knickel K, Renting H, van der Ploeg J D. 2004. Multifunctionality in European agriculture[M]//Brouwer J. Sustaining agriculture and the rural environment: Governance, policy and multifunctionality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 81-103.
56	König H J, Podhora A, Helming K, et al.2014. Confronting international research topics with stakeholders on multifunctional land use: The case of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 7(6): 403-413. doi: 10.3832/ifor1172-007
57	Kopeva D, Peneva M, Madjarova S.2010. Multifunctional land use: Is it a key factor for rural development[C]//118th EAAE seminar: Rural development: Governance, policy design and delivery. Ljubljana, Slovenia: EAAE: 25-27.
58	Mastrangelo M E, Weyland F, Villarino S H, et al.2014. Concepts and methods for landscape multi-functionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services[J]. Landscape Ecology, 29(2): 345-358. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
59	Munda G.2004. Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3): 662-677. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2
60	Paracchini M L, Pacini C, Jones M L M, et al.2011. An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J]. Ecological Indicators, 11(1): 71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.006
61	Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al.2008. Land use functions: A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[M]//Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer: 375-404.
62	Schößer B, Helming K, Wiggering H.2010. Assessing land use change impacts: A comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks[J]. Journal of Land Use Science, 5(2): 159-178. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2010.485727
63	Steffen W, Crutzen P J, McNeill J R.2007. The anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature[J]. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8): 614-621. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2 pmid: 18240674
64	van der Ploeg J D, Roep D.2003. Multifunctionality and rural development: The actual situation in Europe[M]//van Huylenbroek G, Durand G. Multifunctional agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate: 37-53.
65	Verburg P H, Mertz O, Erb K H, et al.2013. Land system change and food security: Towards multi-scale land system solutions[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5): 494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.003
66	Verburg P H, Overmars K P.2009. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: Exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model[J]. Landscape Ecology, 24(9): 1167-1181. doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9355-7
67	Verburg P H, van de Steeg J, Veldkamp A, et al.2009. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3): 1327-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005
68	Vereijken P H.2001. Multifunctionality: Applying the OECD framework, a review of literature in the Netherlands[R]. Paris, France: OECD: 27.
69	Wiggering H, Dalchow C, Glemnitz M, et al.2006. Indicators for multifunctional land use: Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials[J]. Ecological Indicators, 6(1): 238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.014
70	Wiggering H, Müller K, Werner A, et al.2003. The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development[M]//Helming K, Wiggering H. Sustainable development of multifunctional landscapes. Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer: 3-18.
71	Xie G D, Zhen L, Zhang C X, et al.2010. Assessing the multifunctionalities of land use in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 1(4): 311-318. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-764x.2010.04.003

[1]	CHEN Ruishan, ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Di, CHEN Yi. Progress of research on sustainable development index for cities and urban agglomerations [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[2]	QIAN Jiacheng, ZHANG Bailin, LIU Hongwu, GAO Yang, WANG Zhaoying, LIAN Xiaoyun. Development differentiation of rural areas with tourism characteristics in eastern mountainous areas and its driving forces: A case study of Pingyang County, Zhejiang Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1460-1472.
[3]	WANG Cheng, XIE Bo. Research progress on the driving mechanism of traffic accidents from the perspective of land use [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1597-1606.
[4]	SHI Xiao, WANG Guojie, SUN Ming, LI Yvtao, WANG Boni, SHEN Jie. Evaluation of the long-term high-resolution infrared radiation sounder land surface temperature during 1980-2009 in Jiangsu Province, China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1283-1295.
[5]	ZHUO Yunxia, LIU Tao. Polycentric city and region: A review and appraisal [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1385-1396.
[6]	GE Yujuan, ZHAO Yuluan, LI Xiubin. Farmland fragmentation and land use intensity in mountain areas: A case study of Yayu Village, Guizhou Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1095-1105.
[7]	QI Wenping, WANG Yanhui, WAN Yuan, HUANG Tao. Multi-objective development evaluation of poverty-stricken households based on G-TOPSIS model: A case study from Fugong County, Yunnan Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 1024-1036.
[8]	WU Kongsen, RUI Yang, CHEN Jia, ZHANG Liqiong, YANG Xinjun, ZHANG Baigang. Micro-scale study on rural transformation and development driven by tourism:Taking Shangwang Village in Xi’an City as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 1047-1059.
[9]	LIU Yimeng, LI Weihong, WANG Xin. Spatiotemporal distribution of drug crimes at micro-scale: Taking NH and DM residential communities in SZ City as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 841-852.
[10]	HU Tian, WU Jiansheng, PENG Jian, LI Weifeng. Development and prospect of the land-sparing versus land-sharing framework [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 880-888.
[11]	LIU Cai, ZHANG Haiyan, LI Qian. Spatiotemporal characteristics of human activity intensity and its driving mechanism in Hainan Island from 1980 to 2018 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 567-576.
[12]	SONG Zhouying, YU Yang. Development pattern of trade facilitation of the countries along the Belt and Road [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 355-366.
[13]	HUANG An, XU Yueqing, LU Longhui, LIU Chao, ZHANG Yibin, HAO Jinmin, WANG hui. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.
[14]	TAN Ronghui, LIU Yaolin, LIU Yanfang, HE Qingsong. A literature review of urban growth boundary: Theory, modeling, and effectiveness evaluation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 327-338.
[15]	FU Hui, LIU Yanjun, SUN Hongri, ZHOU Guolei. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.

Progress and prospects of multi-functionality of land use research

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 71

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0