国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Border region is an important national security barrier and opening gateway. In the context of globalization and rapid development of information technology, research on border region has become a hot topic of geography, political science, and political economy internationally. In this article, by means of bibliometric measurement of the Citespace tool and using data from the Web of Science in 1990-2015, international frontiers and trends of border research have been reviewed systematically. The results of bibliometric statistical analysis show that, since 1990, most of the articles on border research were published in political geography and geopolitics journals. The fields of international border research include political geography, environment, ecology, business, economics, public administration, culture, among others. Geopolitical territory and state power have always been important parts of the border research frontier. Since the 21st century, critical geopolitics and humanism geopolitics have been applied to border research, including rethinking societal governance and other aspects of border areas. This article also reviews the key research trends, including economic and trade exchanges, border integration, border conflicts and security, cultural and social construction, as well as cross-border cooperation systems. Finally, it recommends that Chinese border research in the future should emphasize comprehensive strategic research of border areas; build cross-border cooperation platforms and mechanism; and integrate the international political science, ethnology, physical geography, and other multi-disciplinary approaches.

Key words: border research, geopolitics, scientific metrology, the Belt and Road Initiative

Tao SONG, Weidong LIU, Le LI. International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(3): 276-285.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Tab.2

References 69

1	陈才. 2001. 地缘关系与世界经济地理学科建设[J]. 世界地理研究, 10(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2001.03.001
	[Chen C.2001. Geo-relation and course construction of world economic geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 10(3): 1-7.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2001.03.001
2	杜德斌, 段德忠, 刘承良, 等. 2015. 1990 年以来中国地理学之地缘政治学研究进展[J]. 地理研究, 34(2): 199-212. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502001
	[Du D B, Duan D Z, Liu C L, et al.2015. Progress of geopolitics of Chinese geography since 1990[J]. Geographical Research, 34(2): 199-212.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502001
3	何跃, 高虹. 2011. 论云南跨境教育和跨境民族教育[J]. 云南民族大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 28(2): 5-9.
	[He Y, Gao H.2011. On the cross-border education and the cross-border ethnic education in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University: Social Sciences, 28(2): 5-9.]
4	胡志丁, 骆华松, 李灿松, 等. 2012. 地缘安全视角下国家边界的“三重功能”及其优化组合[J]. 人文地理, 27(3): 73-77.
	[Hu Z D, Luo H S, Li C S, et al.2012. Triple functions of country border and its concerning optimized combination under the perspective of geopolitical security[J]. Human Geography, 27(3): 73-77.]
5	李灿松, 胡志丁, 葛岳静, 等. 2014. 当前国外政治地理学边境安全研究进展[J]. 热带地理, 34(4): 454-462.
	[Li C S, Hu Z D, Ge Y J, et al.2014. Progress of foreign political geography in border security studies[J]. Tropical Geography, 34(4): 454-462.]
6	梁双陆, 程小军. 2007. 国际区域经济一体化理论综述[J]. 经济问题探索, (1): 40-46.
	[Liang S L, Cheng X J.2007. Guoji quyu jingji yitihua lilun zongshu[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, (1): 40-46.]
7	刘卫东. 2015. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 538-544. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
	[Liu W D.2015. Scientific understandingof the Belt and Road initiative of China and related research themes[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 538-544.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
8	刘志高, 王琛, 李二玲, 等. 2014. 中国经济地理研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 69(10): 1449-1458. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410005
	[Liu Z G, Wang C, Li E L, et al.2014. Research progress of economic geography in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(10): 1449-1458.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410005
9	陆大道, 杜德斌. 2013. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考[J]. 地理学报, 68(6): 723-727.
	[Lu D D, Du D B.2013. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(6): 723-727.]
10	毛汉英. 2013. 中国周边地缘政治与地缘经济格局和对策[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(3): 289-302. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.03.001
	[Mao H Y.2013. Geopolitical and geo-economic situation around and China's strategies[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(3): 289-302.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.03.001
11	汤建中, 张兵, 陈瑛. 2002. 边界效应与跨国界经济合作的地域模式: 以东亚地区为例[J]. 人文地理, 17(1): 8-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2002.01.003
	[Tang J Z, Zhang B, Chen Y.2002. The boundary effect and cross-border subregional economic cooperation: A case study of East Asia[J]. Human Geography, 17(1): 8-12.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2002.01.003
12	张金鹏, 保跃平. 2013. 云南边疆民族地区跨境婚姻与社会稳定研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 30(1): 47-54.
	[Zhang J P, Bao Y P.2013. Research on cross-border marriage and social stability in the minority borderland of Yunnan[J]. Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University: Social Sciences, 30(1): 47-54.]
13	Agamben G.1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life[M]. Heller-Roazen D, trans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14	Aker J C, Klein M W, O'Connell S A, et al.2014. Borders, ethnicity and trade[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 107: 1-16.
15	Aldenderfer M S, Blashfield R K.1984. Cluster analysis: Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences 07-044[M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16	Amoore L.2006. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror[J]. Political Geography, 25(3): 336-351. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
17	Anderson B.1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism[M]. London, UK: Verso.
18	Anderson M.1997. The political science of frontiers[M]//Ganster P, Scott J, Dieter-Eberwein W. Borders and border regions in Europe and North America. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
19	Appadurai A.1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions in globalization[M]. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
20	Arreola D D, Curtis J R.1993. The Mexican border cities: Landscape anatomy and place personality[M]. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
21	Bakker K.1999. The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong[J]. Political Geography, 18(2): 209-232. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(98)00085-7
22	Barter P A.2006. Multiple dimensions in negotiating the cross-border transportlinks that connect and divide Singapore and Johor, Malaysia[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47(2): 287-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2006.00306.x
23	Barth F.1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference[M]. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin.
24	Blatter J K.2001. Debordering the world of states: Towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from border regions[J]. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2): 175-209.
25	Brunet-Jailly E.2005. Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Geopolitics, 10(4): 633-649. doi: 10.1080/14650040500318449
26	Bunnell T, Muzaini H, Sidaway J D.2006. Global city frontiers: Singapore' shinterland and the contested socio-political geographies of Bintan, Indonesia[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1): 3-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00647.x
27	Butler E W, Pick J B, Hettrick W J.2001. Mexico and Mexico City in the world economy[M]. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28	Clark T.1994. National boundaries, border zones, and marketing strategy: A conceptual framework and theoretical model of secondary boundary effects[J]. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 67-80. doi: 10.2307/1252311
29	Docquier F, Lowell B L, Marfouk A.2009. A gendered assessment of highly skilled emigration[J]. Population and Development Review, 35(2): 297-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00277.x
30	EhlersN, BuursinkJ.2000. Binationalcities: Peoples, institutions, and structures[M]//van der Velde M, van Houtum H. Borders, regions, and people. London, UK: Pion.
31	Feitelson E.2002. Implications of shifts in the Israeli water discourse for Israeli-Palestinian water negotiations[J]. Political Geography, 21(3): 293-318. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00038-5
32	Fernandez L, Carson R T.2002. Both sides of the border: Transboundary environmental managementissues facing Mexico and the United States[M]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33	Fox C.1999. The fence and the river: Culture and politics at the U.S.-Mexico border[M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
34	Gao X, Long C X.2014. Cultural border, administrative border, and regional economicdevelopment: Evidence from Chinese cities[J]. China Economic Review, 31: 247-264. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2014.10.002
35	Garcıa J Z.2003. Directions in border research: An overview[J]. The Social Science Journal, 40(4): 523-533. doi: 10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00066-1
36	Globerman S, Paul S.2008. Theimpacts of 9/11 on Canada-U.S. trade[M]. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press: 45.
37	Grundy-Warr C, Peachey K, Perry M.1999. Fragmented integration in the Singapore-Indonesian border zone: Southeast Asia's 'growth triangle' againstthe global economy[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2): 304-328. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00197
38	Hanson G H.1998. Regional adjustment to trade liberalization[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28(4): 419-444. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00006-4
39	Hoover E M.1963. The location of economic activity[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40	Jiang H.2004. Cooperation, land use, and the environment in Uxin Ju: The changing landscape of a Mongolian-Chinese borderland in China[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1): 117-139. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401007.x
41	Lau H F, Sin L Y M, Chan K K C.2005. Chinese cross-border shopping: An empirical study[J]. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 29(1): 110-133. doi: 10.1177/1096348004272178
42	Lee C K.2009. How does a cluster relocate across the border? The case of information technology cluster in the Taiwan-Suzhou region[J]. Technological Forecasting and SocialChange, 76(3): 371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.07.005
43	Löfgren O.2008. Regionauts: The transformation of cross-border regions in Scandinavia[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(3): 195-209. doi: 10.1177/0969776408090418
44	Martánez O J.1994. Border people: Life and society in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands[M]. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
45	Miller T.1985. Cited[M]//Hansen G M. Borders and frontiers I, the challenges of teaching about international borders, an overview. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University.
46	Nevins J.2002. Operation gatekeeper: The rise of the "illegal alien" and the remaking of the U.S.-Mexico boundary[M]. New York: Roultedge.
47	Newman D.2006. The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our 'borderless' world[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2): 143-161. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
48	Newman D, Paasi A.1998. Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2): 186-207.
49	Paasi A.1996. Territories, boundaries andconsciousness: The changing geographies of the Finnish-Russian border[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
50	Perkmann M.2003. Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2): 153-171. doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002004
51	Perkmann M.2007. Policy entrepreneurshipand multilevel governance: A comparativestudy of European cross-border regions[J]. Environment and Planning C: Governmentand Policy, 25(6): 861-79. doi: 10.1068/c60m
52	Pick J B, Butler E W.1990. Socioeconomic inequality in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands: Modernization and buffering[J]. Frontera Norte, 2(3): 31-62.
53	Prokkola E K.2007. Cross-border regionalization and tourism development at the Swedish-Finnish border: "Destination arctic circle"[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(2): 120-138. doi: 10.1080/15022250701226022
54	Ratti R, Reichman S.1993. Theory and practice of transborder cooperation[M]. Basel & Frankfurt: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
55	Saxena G, Ilbery B.2010. Developing integrated rural tourism: Actor practices in the English/Welsh border[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(3): 260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.001
56	Shen J F.2014. Not quite a twin city: Cross-boundary integration in Hong Kong and Shenzhen[J]. Habitat International, 42: 138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.003
57	Sit V F S.1998. Hong Kong's "transferred" industrialization and industrial geography[J]. Asian Survey, 38(9): 880-904. doi: 10.1525/as.1998.38.9.01p0387e
58	Sklair L.1993. Assembling for development: The maquila industry in Mexico and the United States[M]. San Diago, CA: Routledge.
59	Sparke M B.2005. In the space of theory: Post-foundational geographies of the nation-state[M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
60	Sparke M B.2006. A neoliberal nexus: Economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border[J]. Political Geography, 25(2): 151-180. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.10.002
61	Spierings M, van der Velde M.2013. Cross-border differences and unfamiliarity: Shopping mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion[J]. European Planning Studies, 21(1): 5-23. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.716236
62	Su X B.2013. From frontier to bridgehead: Cross-border regions and the experience of Yunnan, China[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4): 1213-1232. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01191.x
63	Tosun C, Temizkan S P, Timothy D J, et al.2007. Tourist shopping experiences and satisfaction[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 9(2): 87-102. doi: 10.1002/jtr.595
64	Truett S, Young E.2004. Continental crossroads: Remapping U.S.-Mexico borderlands history[M]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
65	van Houtum H.2005. The geopolitics of borders and boundaries[J]. Geopolitics, 10(4): 672-679. doi: 10.1080/14650040500318522
66	Venables A J.1996. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries[J]. International Economic Review, 37(2): 341-359.
67	Viswanathana N K, PickbJ B, Hettrickc W J, et al.2005. An analysis of commonality in the twin metropolitan areas of San Diego, California, and Tijuana, Mexico[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 39(1): 57-79. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2003.10.006
68	Vlassenroot K, Büscher K.2013. Borderlands, identity and urban development: The case of Goma (Democratic Republic of the Congo)[J]. Urban Studies, 50(15): 3168-3184. doi: 10.1163/187541100X00120
69	Wang D G.2004. Hong Kongers' cross-border consumption and shopping in Shenzhen: Patterns and motivations[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(3): 149-159. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6989(03)00014-6

期刊名称	边境研究文章数量	2014年期刊影响因子	期刊所在国
《政治地理学》Political Geography	90	2.676	英国
《地缘政治学》Geopolitics	87	0.923	英国
《环境与规划D辑》Environment and Planning D	66	1.515	英国
《经济地理学与社会地理学期刊》Tijdschrift voor Economische enSociale Geografie	57	1.096	荷兰
《区域研究》Regional Studies	54	2.068	英国
《环境与规划A辑》Environment and Planning A	48	1.604	英国
《美国地理学会会刊》Annals of the Association of American Geographers	47	2.291	美国
《特兰西瓦尼亚评论》Transylvanian Review	47	0.012	罗马尼亚
《对极》Antipode	46	2.104	美国
《欧洲规划研究》European Planning Studies	46	1.228	比利时

排名	名称	类型	主题词	文献
1	领土,边界和意识：芬兰与俄罗斯边境的地理变化	专著	边境、领土、芬兰—俄罗斯、意识	Paasi, 1996
2	后现代主义世界中的阻隔和睦邻：政治地理学中的边界叙述	论文	边境叙述、多尺度、后现代、领土、去边境化	Newman et al, 1998
3	无边界世界中的边界：将我们分离的边境线	论文	边境地区、边境叙述、国际关系、跨学科	Newman, 2006
4	反恐中的移动性治理：生物识别边界	论文	恐怖袭击、边界、生物识别、国土安全、风险	Amoore, 2006
5	新自由主义关系：边境公民的经济、安全和生命政治	论文	边境、公民、安全、新自由主义、地缘经济、另类空间	Sparke, 2006
6	想象的社区：国家主义起源和传播的思考	专著	国家主义、政治学、东南亚、政权	Anderson, 1991
7	边境守护及其背后的故事：与非法移民的战争,美国墨西哥边境的重塑	专著	非法移民、边境守护、美国边境巡警、边境管制	Nevins, 2002
8	禁绝之人：主权权力和赤裸生命	专著	主权权力、传统政治理论、生命政治、政治民族学	Agamben, 1998
9	欧洲跨境区域的重要性及区域跨境合作机制	论文	跨境合作、跨境区域、欧盟、区域间合作	Perkmann, 2003
10	消失的现代性：全球化的文化维度	专著	全球化、后现代、文化问题、多元文化、当代消费格局	Appadurai, 1996

[1]	XIONG Chenran, WANG Limao, QU Qiushi, XIANG Ning, WANG Bo. Progress and prospect of geopolitical risk research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[2]	Zhi ZHENG, Weidong LIU, Zhouying SONG, WUZHATI Yeerken, Yi LIANG. The Belt and Road production networks and China’s participation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 951-962.
[3]	Fangye DU, Jiaoe WANG, Jiahao XIE, Delin DU. Spatial pattern and change of China’s international air transport network since the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 963-972.
[4]	Dezhong DUAN, Ying CHEN, Debin DU. Technology trade pattern and change in the Belt and Road region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 998-1008.
[5]	Mingqing MA, Wu YUAN, Quansheng GE, Wen YUAN, Linsheng YANG, Hanqing LI, Meng LI. Big data analysis of social development situation in regions along the Belt and Road [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1009-1020.
[6]	Lulu HOU, Yungang LIU. The evolving concept of lebensraum in political geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 637-647.
[7]	Wei HU, Zhiding HU, Yuejing GE. Review of geo-setting research in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 477-488.
[8]	Binhong YE, Yang CHENG, Li WANG, Linsheng YANG. A systematic review on geo-relations research in the Arctic [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 489-505.
[9]	LIU Xiaofeng, GE Yuejing, HU Wei, HUANG Yu, MA Teng. Spatial impacts of the geopolitics of non-state actors and their formation pathways [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1735-1746.
[10]	CHEN Yiwen,LI Erling. Spatial pattern and evolution of cereal trade networks among the Belt and Road countries [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(10): 1643-1654.
[11]	Xiaoshu CAO, Wang LIAO. Spatial pattern and classification of the worldwide multi-airport regions [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(11): 1473-1484.
[12]	Liang WU, Qi QIN, Dan ZHANG, Shengkui CHENG. Indian Ocean Passages and their geopolitical impacts on China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(11): 1510-1520.
[13]	Qi QIN, Shengkui CHENG, Fei LI, Liang WU, Dan ZHANG, Xiaopeng CHEN. A comparative study on foreign and Chinese geopolitical studies since 1992：An analysis from the viewpoint of geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1475-1488.
[14]	Yu HUANG, Yuejing GE, Teng MA, Xiaofeng LIU. Geopolitical space of China's high-speed railway diplomacy [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1489-1499.
[15]	Xiaobo SU, Xiaomei CAI. Territorial trap and China's transnational anti-drug practices in northern Myanmar [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1552-1561.

International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 69

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0