基于智慧交通的可达性与交通出行碳排放——理论与实证

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.04.003

Abstract

Abstract:

The development of information and communication technologies (ICT) is promoting the construction of smart city, influencing urban transport and residents travel. Urban transport and residents travel are interdependent. Urban transport provides infrastructure services for residents travel, whereas the latter facilitates the development of urban transport through its feedbacks. Relative to urban transport, residents travel is subjective choices of individuals. Smart transportation and travel will improve accessibility, which includes place-based accessibility and individual accessibility. On the one hand, the improvement of place-based accessibility may change urban traffic environment. On the other hand, the improvement of individual-based accessibility may alter residents travel demand. These may change urban land use that in turn would have an impact on urban traffic environment and residents travel demand. Due to the complex relations of smart transport, accessibility, and travel and its related emissions, whether improved accessibility of smart transportation would increase or decrease CO₂ emissions from travel is hard to determine. A critical issue for smart transportation in China is to ease traffic congestion and ensure the effective operation of urban transport system, in the meantime, to enhance the efficiency of travel and reduce CO₂ emissions through improving accessibility. Therefore, this article proposes a theoretical framework for the study of accessibility and CO₂ emissions from travel of smart transportation, and presents some empirical studies by taking the city of Guangzhou as a case, in order to provide a reference for future research.

Key words: smart transportation, information and communication technologies (ICT), accessibility, travel, CO2 emissions

Xiaoshu CAO, Wenyue YANG, Xiaoyan HUANG. Aaccessibility and CO₂ emissions from travel of smart transportation: theory and empirical studies[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(4): 418-429.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig. 8

References 61

1	黄晓燕, 张爽, 曹小曙. 2013. 广州市地铁可达性时空演化及其对公交可达性的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(8): 1078-1089.
	[Huang X Y, Zhang S, Cao X S.Spatial-temporal evolution of Guangzhou subway accessibility and its effects on the accessibility of public transportation services[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(8): 1078-1089.]
2	刘露. 2013. 城市交通低碳发展的智能化选择[J]. 中国科技论坛, (6): 105-108.
	[Liu L.2013. Urban transportation intelligent options of low-carbon development[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (6): 105-108.]
3	孙中亚, 甄峰. 2013. 智慧城市研究与规划实践述评[J]. 规划师, 29(2): 32-36.
	[Sun Z Y, Zhen F.2013. Intelligent city development and planning practice research review[J]. Planners, 29(2): 32-36.]
4	尹罡, 甄峰, 席广亮. 2014. 信息技术影响下城市休闲空间生产机理及特征演变研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 30(6): 121-124.
	[Yin G, Zhen F, Xi G L.2014. A study on production mechanism and evolution characteristics of urban leisure space affected by information and communication technologies[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 30(6): 121-124.]
5	赵霖, 甄峰, 龙萨金. 2013. 信息技术对南京城市居民休闲活动与出行的影响[J]. 人文地理, 28(1): 56-61.
	[Zhao L, Zhen F, Long S J.The impacts of information technology on leisure activities and travel in Nanjing: a structural equations modelling approach[J]. Human Geography, 28(1): 56-61.]
6	赵渺希, 王世福, 李璐颖. 2014. 信息社会的城市空间策略: 智慧城市热潮的冷思考[J]. 城市规划, 38(1): 91-96.
	[Zhao M X, Wang S F, Li L Y.2014. Spatial strategy for the information society: rethinking smart city[J]. City Planning Review, 38(1): 91-96.]
7	赵鹏军, 李铠. 2014. 大数据方法对于缓解城市交通拥堵的作用的理论分析[J]. 现代城市研究, (10): 25-30.
	[Zhao P J, Li K.2014. A theoretical analysis for the applications of big-data methods for traffic congestion relief[J]. Modern Urban Research, (10): 25-30.]
8	甄峰, 秦萧. 2014. 智慧城市顶层设计总体框架研究[J]. 现代城市研究, (10): 7-12.
	[Zhen F, Qin X.Study on comprehensive framework of top design of smart city[J]. Modern Urban Research, (10): 7-12.]
9	甄峰, 魏宗财, 杨山, 等. 2009. 信息技术对城市居民出行特征的影响: 以南京为例[J]. 地理研究, 28(5): 1307-1317.
	[Zhen F, Wei Z C,Yang S, et al.2009. The impact of information technology on the characteristics of urban resident travel: case of Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 28(5): 1307-1317.]
10	Alexander B, Dijst M, Ettema D.2010. Working from 9 to 6: an analysis of in-home and out-of-home working schedules[J]. Transportation, 37(3): 505-523.
11	Avineri E, Prashker J N.2006. The impact of travel time information on travelers' learning under uncertainty[J]. Transportation, 33(4): 393-408.
12	Banister D.2011. Cities, mobility and climate change[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6): 1538-1546.
13	Banister D, Stead D.2004. Impact of information and communications technology on transport[J]. Transport Reviews, 24(5): 611-632.
14	Ben-Elia E, Alexander B, Hubers C, et al.2014. Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: an exploratory path analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 68: 56-74.
15	Ben-Elia E, Erev I, Shiftan Y.2008. The combined effect of information and experience on drivers’ route-choice behavior[J]. Transportation, 35(2): 165-177.
16	Cao X J.2012. The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(7): 993-1002.
17	Couclelis H.2003. Housing and the new geography of accessibility in the information age[J]. Open House International, 28(4): 7-13.
18	Dal Fiore F, Mokhtarian P L, Salomon I, et al.2014. Nomads at last: a set of perspectives on how mobile technology may affect travel[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 41: 97-106.
19	De Graaff T, Rietveld P.2007. Substitution between working at home and out-of-home: the role of ICT and commuting costs[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(2): 142-160.
20	Dulal H B, Brodnig G, Onoriose C G.2011. Climate change mitigation in the transport sector through urban planning: a review[J]. Habitat International, 35(3): 494-500.
21	Geerlings H, Stead D.2003. The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research[J]. Transport policy, 10(3): 187-196.
22	Geurs K T, Van Wee B.2004. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions[J]. Journal of Transport geography, 12(2): 127-140.
23	Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, et al.2007. Smart cities-Ranking of European medium-sized cities[R]. Vienna, Austria: Vienna University of Technology.
24	Haddad H, Lyons G, Chatterjee K.2009. An examination of determinants influencing the desire for and frequency of part-day and whole-day homeworking[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(2): 124-133.
25	Hamer R, Kroes E, Van Ooststroom H.1991. Teleworking in the Netherlands: an evaluation of changes in travel behaviour[J]. Transportation, 18(4): 365-382.
26	Hancke G P, Hancke Jr G P.2012. The role of advanced sensing in smart cities[J]. Sensors, 13(1): 393-425.
27	Handy S, Weston L, Mokhtarian P L.2005. Driving by choice or necessity[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2): 183-203.
28	Hanson S, Giuliano G.2004. The geography of urban transportation[M]. New York: Guilford Press.
29	Harvey A S, Taylor M E.2000. Activity settings and travel behaviour: a social contact perspective[J]. Transportation, 27(1): 53-73.
30	Hjorthol R, Gripsrud M.2009. Home as a communication hub: the domestic use of ICT[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(2): 115-123.
31	Hung J C.2012. The smart-travel system: utilising cloud services to aid traveller with personalised requirement[J]. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 8(3): 279-303.
32	IEA statistics. 2013. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights[EB/OL]. 2013[2015-04-10]. .
33	Jain J, Lyons G.2008. The gift of travel time[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(2): 81-89.
34	Kenyon S, Lyons G.2003. Social participation, personal travel and internet use[C]//Proceedings of the 10th international con-ference on travel behaviour research. Lucerne, Switzerland: IATBR: 10-15.
35	Khansari N, Mostashari A, Mansouri M.2014. Impacting sustainable behavior and planning in smart city[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 1(2): 46-61.
36	Khattak A J, Yim Y, Stalker L.1999. Does travel information influence commuter and noncommuter behavior: results from the San Francisco Bay Area travinfo project[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1694(1): 48-58.
37	Laurier E.2002. The region as a socio-technical accomplishment of mobile workers[M]//Brown B, Green N, Harper R. Wireless world. London, UK: Springer London: 46-61.
38	Line T, Jain J, Lyons G.2011. The role of ICTs in everyday mobile lives[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6): 1490-1499.
39	Lyons G, Urry J.2005. Travel time use in the information age[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2): 257-276.
40	Mascheroni G.2007. Global nomads' network and mobile sociality: exploring new media uses on the move[J]. Information, Community and Society, 10(4): 527-546.
41	Mingardo G.2008. Cities and innovative urban transport policies[J]. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2-3): 269-281.
42	Mokhtaria P L.1998. A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel[J]. Urban studies, 35(2): 215-241.
43	Mokhtarian P L.2002. Telecommunications and travel: the case for complementarity[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6(2): 43-57.
44	Mokhtarian P L, Salomon I, Choo S.2005. Measuring the Measurable: why can't we agree on the Number of Telecommuters in the US[J]. Quality and Quantity, 39(4): 423-452.
45	Mokhtarian P.2009. If telecommunication is such a good substitute for travel, why does congestion continue to get worse[J]. Transportation Letters, 1(1): 1-17.
46	Mostashari A, Arnold F, Maurer M, et al.2011. Citizens as sensors: the cognitive city paradigm[C]//Emerging Technologies for a Smarter World (CEWIT), 2011 8th International Conference & Expo on. IEEE: 1-5.
47	Nam T, Pardo T.2011. Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM: 185-194.
48	Nasar J, Hecht P, Wener R.2007. 'Call if you have trouble': mobile phones and safety among college students[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4): 863-873.
49	Ory D T, Mokhtarian P L.2006. Which came first, the telecommuting or the residential relocation? an empirical analysis of causality[J]. Urban Geography, 27(7): 590-609.
50	Pendyala R M, Goulias K G, Kitamura R.1991. Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel[J]. Transportation, 18(4): 383-409.
51	Robinson J P, Martin S.2010. IT use and declining social capital? More cold water from the General Social Survey (GSS) and the American Time-Use Survey (ATUS)[J]. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1): 45-63.
52	Salomon I.1986. Telecommunications and travel relationships: a review[J]. Transportation Research Part A: General, 20(3): 223-238.
53	Schwanen T, Kwan M P.2008. The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints[J]. Geoforum, 39(3): 1362-1377.
54	Vaa T, Penttinen M, Spyropoulou I.2007. Intelligent transport systems and effects on road traffic accidents: state of the art[J]. IET intelligent transport systems, 1(2): 81-88.
55	Van Wee B, Geurs K, Chorus C.2013. Information, communication, travel behavior and accessibility[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(3): 1-16.
56	Vana L N P, Bhat C R, Mokhtarian P.2007. On modeling the choices of work-hour arrangement, location, and frequency of telecommuting[D]. Austin, American: University of Texas at Austin.
57	Verplanken B, Knippenberg V A, Aarts H.1997. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices[J]. European journal of social psychology, 27(5): 539-560.
58	Vlassenroot S, Bellens R, Verstraeten D, et al.2012. The MOVE project: smartphones for smart travel-behaviour data analyses[C]//19th ITS world congress. Vienna, Austria: ITS America: 12.
59	White N R, White P B.2007. Home and away: tourists in a connected world[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1): 88-104.
60	Yeraguntla A, Bhat C R.2005. Classification taxonomy and empirical analysis of work arrangements[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926(1): 233-241.
61	Yigitcanlar T, Fabian L, Coiacetto E.2008. Challenges to urban transport sustainability and smart transport in a tourist city: the Gold Coast[J]. The Open Transportation Journal, 2: 29-46.

因素	指标	尺度
本地可达性	人均公共交通网络	本地
	利用公共交通的满意度	全国
	公共交通质量的满意度	全国
全球可达性	全球可达性	区域
ICT技术的可用性	家庭电脑数	全国
ICT技术的可用性	家庭是否有上网	全国
交通系统的可持续性、创新性和安全性	绿色移动的比例(非机动化的个人出行)	本地
	交通安全性	本地
	经济小汽车的使用	全国

[1]	CHEN Zhuo, LIANG Yi, JIN Fengjun. Simulation of city network accessibility and its influence on regional development pattern in China based on integrated land transport system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 183-193.
[2]	WANG Cheng, XIE Bo. Research progress on the driving mechanism of traffic accidents from the perspective of land use [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1597-1606.
[3]	GE Yujuan, ZHAO Yuluan, LI Xiubin. Farmland fragmentation and land use intensity in mountain areas: A case study of Yayu Village, Guizhou Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1095-1105.
[4]	LV Minjuan, CAO Xiaoshu. Allometric scaling analysis of population and accessibility on the Loess Plateau from 1980 to 2016 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1884-1897.
[5]	ZHANG Chun, CHENG Zhihua, YU Xiaoping, WANG Yaqun, SHEN Chen. Impact of public transportation infrastructure on employment of the low-income group in Urumqi [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 111-119.
[6]	Nanchen CHU, Pingyu ZHANG, He LI. High-speed rail impact on regional accessibility and its spatial effects:A case study of the Blagoveshchensk-Vladivostok railway [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 988-997.
[7]	Dongsheng ZHAN, Wenzhong ZHANG, Li Chen, Xiaofen YU, Yunxiao DANG. Research progress and its enlightenment of urban public service facilities allocation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 506-519.
[8]	YIN Jiaojiao, WANG Xiaofang, JIA Yaoyan, LI Chunming, WANG Juan. Spatial accessibility distribution characteristics and influencing factors of the tourism poverty alleviation key villages in Wuling Mountain area, Hubei Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1865-1876.
[9]	YANG Wenyue, CAO Xiaoshu. Progress of research on influencing factors of CO₂ emissions from multi-scale transport [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1814-1828.
[10]	Lifan SHEN, Chun ZHANG, He LI, Ye WANG. Interaction between commuting modes and job-housing imbalance in metropolis: An empirical study by Bayesian-tobit analysis in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1277-1290.
[11]	Deyou MENG, Xiaojian LI. Spatial pattern of cost accessibility of provincial capital cities by high-speed rail and consumption in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1055-1065.
[12]	Tieshan SUN, Yingling FAN, Yunlei QI. Job accessibility by transit and variation among different population groups and in different regions in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1066-1074.
[13]	Yinhua TAO, Yue SHEN. Spatial difference of medical facility accessibility and influencing factors: A comparative study of registered and floating populations in Shanghai [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1075-1085.
[14]	Li CHEN, Wenzhong ZHANG, Qiao CHU, Peng WANG, Jiazhong LI. Impact of block size on residents’ travel appraisal in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 525-534.
[15]	Huimin YANG, Xiangling ZHANG, Li LI, Xiaojian LI, Bing WANG. Changing spatial pattern and accessibility of primary and secondary schools in a poor mountainous county: A case study of Song County, Henan Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 556-566.

Aaccessibility and CO₂ emissions from travel of smart transportation: theory and empirical studies

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 61

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Aaccessibility and CO2 emissions from travel of smart transportation: theory and empirical studies

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 61

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Aaccessibility and CO₂ emissions from travel of smart transportation: theory and empirical studies