中亚阿姆河上游产流过程特征研究

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.03.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Amu Darya is the largest river in Central Asia that provides water resources to downstream water users and flows into the Aral Sea. Runoff of the Amu Darya River is dominated by snowmelt and glacier melt originating from the alpines. Quantification of snowmelt and glacier melt contribution to the runoff is important for understanding the dynamic characteristics of the streamflow. This study investigates the glacier and snow melt processes in the headwaters of Amu Darya by using a glacier-enhanced SWAT model. The simulations were run through 1951 to 2005. The results indicate that the SWAT-RSG model could well estimate the monthly streamflow process of the Amu Darya River Basin, and the efficiency coefficient and absolute value of PBIAS in the calibration period (1961-1975) and validation period (1976-1985) could be higher than 0.6 and lower than 25%, respectively. Snowmelt and glacier melt contributed 67% and 15% of the annual runoff. The Amu Darya River is mainly supplied by melting high-mountain snow and glaciers, which was concentrated in March to July and June to September, respectively. Owning to the combined effect of rainfall, snowmelt, and glacier melt, the runoff is concentrated in April to September, accounting for 83% to the total runoff, and the peak occurred in July. The results of Mann-Kendall trend analysis indicate that precipitation showed a significant decreasing trend and temperature showed a significant increasing trend from 1951 to 2005, and experienced a sudden jump in 1995. Due to the change of temperature and precipitation, snowmelt showed a decreasing trend and the value during 1996 to 2005 (Period Ⅱ) was 20% lower compared to that in 1951 to 1995 (Period Ⅰ). Due to the shrink of glacier area and reduction of precipitation, glacier melt showed a non-significant decreasing trend between 1951 and 2005 and the annual glacier melt in Period Ⅱ was 4% less than that in Period Ⅰ. Despite that the rainfall had slightly increased, the rain runoff was reduced by 35% as a result of the increased evapotranspiration. Consequently, the streamflow was reduced by about 260 million m³ each year from 1951 to 2005. The runoff showed a 21% reduction from Period Ⅰ to Period Ⅱ. The study of runoff generation characteristics in the headwaters of the Amu Darya River can provide references for the water resource management in the Amu Darya River Basin and Central Asia.

Key words: SWAT-RSG model, Amu Darya River, snow runoff, glacier runoff

Xiaolei WANG, Lin SUN, Yiqing ZHANG, Yi LUO. Runoff generation in the headwater of Amu Darya, Central Asia[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(3): 364-372.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Fig.3

Tab.2

Calibrated and validated SWAT-RSG model parameters for simulating the headwaters of the Amu Darya River"

参数	定义	参数值变化范围	调整后参数值/范围
ALPHA_BF	基流衰退系数	0~1	0.02~0.8
RCHRG_DP	深层库下渗比例	0~1	0.4
CH_K2	河道导水系数/(mm/hr)	0~300	10~50
gmfmx	最大融冰度日因子/(mm/(℃ $?$ d))	1.4~16.0	3.0~14.5
gmfmn	最小融冰度日因子/(mm/(℃ $?$ d))	1.0~16.0	1.0~8.8
SMFMX	最大融雪度日因子/(mm/(℃ $?$ d))	1.4~6.7	2.5~3.5
SMFMN	最小融雪度日因子/(mm/(℃ $?$ d))	1.4~6.7	1.0~2.5

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.4

Fig.7

Tab.5

References 27

1	白淑英, 王莉, 史建桥, 等. 2013. 基于SWAT模型的开都河流域径流模拟[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 27(9): 79-84.
	[Bai S Y, Wang L, Shi J Q, et al.2013. Runoff simulation for Kaidu River Basin based on SWAT model[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 27(9): 79-84.]
2	李慧, 靳晟, 雷晓云, 等. 2010. SWAT 模型参数敏感性分析与自动率定的重要性研究: 以玛纳斯河径流模拟为例[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 21(1): 79-82.
	[Li H, Jin S, Lei X Y, et al.2010. Study on the importance of sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration of SWAT model: taking the case study of Manasi Watershed[J]. Journal of Water resources and Water Engineering, 21(1): 79-82.]
3	芮孝芳. 2004. 水文学原理[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社.
	[Rui X F.2004. Principle of hydrology[M]. Beijing, China: China Water & Power Press.]
4	杨针娘. 1991. 中国冰川水资源[M]. 甘肃: 甘肃科学技术出版社.
	[Yang Z N.1991. Glacier water resources in China[M]. Gansu, China: Gansu Science and Technology Press.]
5	Agal'tseva N, Blogov M V, Spektorman T Y, et al.2011. Estimating hydrological characteristics in the Amu Darya River Basin under climate change conditions[J]. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 36(10): 681-689.
6	Arnold J G, Allen P M.1996. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 176: 57-77.
7	Arnold J G, Moriasi D N, Gassman P W, et al.2012. SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 55: 1491-1508.
8	Conrad C, Dech S, Hafeez M, et al.2007. Mapping and assessing water use in a Central Asian irrigation system by utilizing MODIS remote sensing products[J]. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 21: 197-218.
9	Froebrich J, Kayumov O.2004. Water management aspects of Amu Darya[M]//Nihoul J J, Zavialov P, Micklin P. Dying and dead seas climatic versus anthropic causes. Berlin, Germany: Springer Netherlands: 49-76.
10	Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H, et al.2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 50(4): 1211-1250.
11	Hagg W, Hoelzle M, Wagner S, et al.2013. Glacier and runoff changes in the Rukhk catchment, upper Amu Darya Basin until 2050[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 110: 62-73.
12	Kendall M G A.1938. New measure of rank correlation[J]. Biometrika, 30: 81-93.
13	Kure S, Jang S, Ohara N, et al.2013. Hydrologic impact of regional climate change for the snowfed and glacierfed river basins in the Republic of Tajikistan: hydrological response of flow to climate change[J]. Hydrological Processes, 27: 4057-4070.
14	Li Z L, Shao Q X, Xu Z X, et al.2010. Analysis of parameter uncertainty in semi-distributed hydrological models using bootstrap method: acase study of SWAT model applied to Yingluoxia watershed in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 385: 76-83.
15	Luo Y, Arnold J, Allen P, et al.2012. Baseflow simulation using SWAT model in an inland river basin in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(4): 1259-1267.
16	Luo Y, Arnold J, Liu S, et al.2013. Inclusion of glacier processes for distributed hydrological modeling at basin scale with application to a watershed in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 477: 72-85.
17	Mann H B.1945. Non-parametric test against trend[J]. Econometrica, 13: 245-259.
18	Moriasi D, Arnold J, Van Liew M, et al.2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 50: 885-900.
19	Nash J, Sutcliffe J.1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: adiscussion of principles[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 10: 282-290.
20	Nezlin N P, Kostianoy A G, Lebedev S A.2004. Interannual variations of the discharge of Amu Darya and Syr Darya estimated from global atmospheric precipitation[J]. Journal of marine systems, 47: 67-75.
21	Olsson O, Gassmann M, Wegerich K, et al.2010. Identification of the effective water availability from streamflows in the Zerafshan River Basin, Central Asia[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 390(3-4): 190-197.
22	Rakhmatullaev S, Huneau F, Kazbekov J, et al.2010. Groundwater resources use and management in the Amu Darya River Basin(Central Asia)[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59: 1183-1193.
23	Savitskiy A G, Schlüter M, Taryannikova R V, et al.2008. Current and future impacts of climate change on river runoff in the Central Asian river basins[M]//Claudia P, Pavel K, Geogr J. Adaptive and integrated water management. New York: Springer: 323-339.
24	Sheffield J, Goteti G, Wood E F.2006. Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling[J]. Journal of Climate, 19: 3088-3111.
25	Unger-Shayesteh K, Vorogushyn S, Farinotti D, et al.2013. What do we know about past changes in the water cycle of Central Asian headwaters: a review[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 110: 4-25.
26	Viviroli D, Weingartner R.2004. The hydrological significance of mountains: from regional to global scale[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8: 1017-1030.
27	Yatagai A, Kamiguchi K, Arakawa O, et al.2012. APHRODITE: constructing a long-term daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93: 1401-1415.

空间数据	比例尺/分辨率	格式	来源
DEM	90 m	ESRI Grid	国际农业研究咨询组织空间咨询团体(CGIAR-CSI)(http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/)
土壤图	1:100万	Arc/Info Coverage	世界粮食组织FAO的HWSD(http://www.fao.org/nr/land/soils/harmonized-world-soil-database/en/)
土地利用图	300 m	Arc/Info Coverage	欧洲航天局2009年最新版世界卫星地图
中亚冰川编目		Arc/Info Coverage	世界冰川监测机构(WGMS)于1989年发布的世界冰川目录(WGI),帕米尔冰川数据集 (Pamir Glaciers Dataset V.1)

流域	水文站	率定期				验证期
流域	水文站	NSE		PBIAS	R²	NSE	PBIAS	R²
喷赤河	Khorog	0.94	5.57	0.94		0.87	23.00	0.95
瓦赫什河	Garm	0.77	-6.68	0.80		0.74	-9.09	0.77
瓦赫什河	Nurek	0.88	-0.10	0.88		0.33		-4.61	0.61
卡菲尔尼甘河	Alibegi	0.88	-2.33	0.88		0.85	9.04	0.86
	Chinor	0.87	4.82	0.96	0.88		9.92	0.94
	Dagana	0.89	11.48	0.93	0.92		8.80	0.94
苏尔汉河	Karatog	0.89	6.49	0.90	0.82	16.11	0.86
	Dashnabad	0.74	-15.84	0.87	0.80		-11.26	0.82
	King-guzar	0.78	-4.50	0.79	0.89		-6.65	0.90

水量平衡分量	降水及产流组成	水量/mm	比例/%
降水		511
	降雨	195	38
	降雪	315	62
产流		360
	冰川产流	53	15
	融雪产流	240	67
	降雨产流	67	18
蒸散		168
平衡		-17

对比变量	降水及产流组成	1951-1995	1996-2005	相对变化
气温/^oC		-0.96	-0.30	0.66^oC
降水/mm		526	454	-14%
	降雨	191	194	2%
	降雪	334	261	-22%
产流/mm		376	297	-21%
	冰川产流	53	51	-4%
	融雪产流	250	200	-20%
	降雨产流	72	47	-35%
蒸散/mm		165	177	7%

Runoff generation in the headwater of Amu Darya, Central Asia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 27

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0