基于生态系统的适应(EBA)——概念、工具和案例

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.07.008

Abstract

Abstract:

The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defines Ecosystem-Based Adaptation (EBA) as "the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services as part of an overall adaptation strategy to help people to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change". Climate change is happening at an unprecedented rate and impacting a large number of people globally. The need for adaptation efforts has never been so urgent. In particular, ecosystem-based adaptation approaches have proved to provide flexible, cost effective and broadly applicable alternatives for reducing the impacts of climate change, and as such are a critical tool at the disposal of adaptation planners for tackling the threats that climate change poses to people's lives and livelihoods across the globe. In this paper, the evolution of the EBA concept is presented; EBA definition, advantages and principles are summarized; EBA tools and methods are introduced; and lessons learned from EBA case studies are explored. Furthermore, challenges of EBA are discussed.

Key words: ecosystem-based adaptation, climate change, ecosystem vulnerability, ecosystem management

CLC Number:

X826

Xiaowei LI, Chao FU, Jian LIU, Yu LIU, Zhiming FENG, Xiubo YU. Ecosystem-based adaptation: concept, tools and lessons learned from case studies[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(7): 931-937.

Figures/Tables 1

References 32

[1]	Adger W N.2003. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4): 387-404.
[2]	AdgerW N, Arnell N W, Tompkins E L.2005. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15: 77-86.
[3]	Adger W N, Brown K, Tompkins E L.2005. The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 10(2): 9.
[4]	Andrade A, Córdoba R, Dave R, et al. 2011. Draft principles and guidelines for integrating ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation in project and policy design: a discussion document[EB/OL]. 2011-12-07 [2014-05-16].
[5]	Bodino, Crona B I.2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: why relational patterns make a difference. Global Environmental Change, 19: 366-374.
[6]	Bourne A, Donatti C, Holness S, et al. 2012. Climate change vulnerability assessment for the Namakwa districtmunicipality[R/OL].
[7]	Campbell A, Kapos V, Scharlemann J P W, et al.2009. Review of the literature on the links between biodiversity and climate change: impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity,Montreal. Technical Series No. 42: 124 .
[8]	Chen Y Y, Jessel B, Fu B J, et al.2014. Ecosystem services and management strategy in China. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
[9]	CMP (Conservation Measures Partnership). 2007. Open standards for the practice of conservation[EB/OL]. .
[10]	Doswald N, Osti M. 2011. Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation and mitigation-good practice examples and lessons learned in Europe. BfN-Skripten: 306[EB/OL]. .
[11]	Floor C, 2010. Community-based adaptation approaches, training kit on wetland and climate changes adaptation[D]. the Netherlands: Wageningen University.
[12]	Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, et al.2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30(1): 441-473.
[13]	GEF. 2012. GEF Operational Guidelines on Ecosystem-Based Approaches to Adaptation. 2012-10-16[2013-6-20].
[14]	Hulme P E.2005. Adapting to climate change: is there scope for ecological management in the face of global threat? Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 784-794.
[15]	Koiman J.1999. Social-political governance: overview, reflections and design. Public Management, 1(1): 67-92.
[16]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, WA: Island Press.
[17]	Mumba M.2013. UNEP's Work on Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA). Presentation at the Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) workshop, Beijing, China, October 13, 2013.
[18]	Munang R, Thiaw I, Alverson K, et al.2013. Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: a new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 67-71.
[19]	Naumann S, Anzaldua G, Gerdes H, et al. 2011. Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe// Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. [R/OL]. 2011-11-23[2013-6-15].
[20]	Ostrom E.2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104(39): 15181-15187.
[21]	Patwardhan A, Semenov A, Schnieder S H S, et al.2007. Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change//Canziani O F, Parry M L, Palutikof J P, et al. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. UK: 779-810.
[22]	Pelling M, High C.2005. Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environmental Change, 15(4): 308-319.
[23]	Pérez Á A, Fernandez B H, Gatti R C. 2010. Building resilience to climate change: ecosystem-based adaptation and lessons from the field[EB/OL].
[24]	Pielke R, Prins G, Rayner S, et al.2007. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature, 445: 597-598.
[25]	Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2009. Connecting biodiversity and climate change mitigation and adaptation: report of the second ad hoc technical expert group on biodiversity and climate change//CBD Technical Series No. 41[R/OL].
[26]	Smit B,Wandel J.2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 282-292.
[27]	TEEB, 2011. TEEB manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management [EB/OL]. .
[28]	The Nature Conservancy.2009. Adapting to climate change: Ecosystem-based approaches for people and nature.
[29]	Uitto J L.1997. Environmental governance and the impending water crisis. Global Environmental Change, 7(2): 167-173.
[30]	UNEP, UNDP, ICUN. 2013. Building resilience to climate change-making the case for ecosystem-based adaptation [EB/OL]. .
[31]	UNFCCC. 2013. Report on the technical workshop on ecosystem- based approaches for adaptation to climate change. [R/OL]. 2013-03-21[2013-11-26].
[32]	Vignola R, McDaniels T L, Scholz R W.2013. Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environmental Sciences & Policy, 31: 71-84.

EBA	效益
恢复破碎化或退化的自然区域	增强关键的生态系统服务,例如水供给、食品及水产品供给等
保护地下水补给区域、恢复泛洪平原	保护水资源以确保整个社区可以应对干旱和洪水
促进例如森林、草地、礁体等栖息地的连通	气候变化情况下,使人类和生物多样性得以更容易迁入更适宜的栖息地
保护或恢复自然基础设施,如海堤、红树林、珊瑚礁和森林等	保护人类社区免受自然灾害、侵蚀、及洪水等的侵害

Ecosystem-based adaptation: concept, tools and lessons learned from case studies

RichHTML

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 1

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	DENG Guofu, LI Mingqi. Advances of study on the relationship between tree-ring density and climate and climate reconstruction [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 343-356.
[2]	AO Xue, ZHAI Qingfei, CUI Yan, ZHOU Xiaoyu, SHEN Lidu, ZHAO Chunyu, Ning Xilong. Detection of urbanization effect on the climate change in Liaoning Province based on empirical orthogonal function methods [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1532-1543.
[3]	ZHOU Meijun, LI Fei, SHAO Jiaqi, YANG Haijuan. Change characteristics of maize production potential under the background of climate change in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 443-453.
[4]	SONG Zhen, SHI Xingmin. Path analysis of influencing factors of farmers’ adaptive behaviors to climate change in the rain-fed agricultural areas [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 461-473.
[5]	ZHANG Xuezhen, ZHENG Jingyun, HAO Zhixin. Climate change assessments for the main economic zones of China during recent decades [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1609-1618.
[6]	XIE Zhenghui, LIU Bin, YAN Xiaodong, MENG Chunlei, XU Xianli, LIU Yu, QIN Peihua, JIA Binghao, XIE Jinbo, LI Ruichao, WANG Longhuan, WANG Yan, CHEN Si. Effects of implementation of urban planning in response to climate change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 120-131.
[7]	Jiayi FANG, Peijun SHI. A review of coastal flood risk research under global climate change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
[8]	Yuke ZHOU. Detecting Granger effect of vegetation response to climatic factors on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 718-730.
[9]	Hui ZHANG, Cheng LI, Jiong CHENG, Zhifeng WU, Yanyan WU. A review of urban flood risk assessment based on the framework of hazard-exposure-vulnerability [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[10]	Yanxi ZHAO, Dengpan XIAO, Huizi BAI, Fulu TAO. Research progress on the response and adaptation of crop phenology to climate change in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 224-235.
[11]	Lingbo XIAO. Spatiotemporal distribution of high flood risk areas in China, 1736-1911 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 495-503.
[12]	Bojie FU. Thoughts on the recent development of physical geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 1-7.
[13]	Jingyun ZHENG, Xiuqi FANG, Shaohong WU. Recent progress of climate change research in physical geography studies from China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 16-27.
[14]	Shaohong WU, Jiangbo GAO, Haoyu DENG, Lulu LIU, Tao PAN. Climate change risk and methodology for its quantitative assessment [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 28-35.
[15]	Junhui YAN, Haolong LIU, Quansheng Ge, Jingyun ZHENG, Zhixin HAO, Yimin WANG. Reconstruction and analysis of annual mean temperature of Wuhan for the 1906-2015 period [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(9): 1176-1183.