世界城市中的跨国机构研究综述

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.10.003

Abstract

Abstract: With the impact of globalization, world political geographical pattern is changed by various cross-boundary actors or embedded actors. The role of transnational institutions, including International Organizations (IGOs), International Non-governmental Organizations (INGOs), Transnational Governmental Organizations (TGOs) and Transnational Non-governmental Organizations (TNGOs), is rising dramatically in global geopolitics. The research in western contemporary geography with a global dimension argues that various transnational institutions create complicated and diversified global political geographical structure, and also global cities system with political features. Moreover, researches with a local dimension argue the role of transnational institutions in the top world political cities. Transnational institutions embed international regulations into the city and also changes urban spatial formation, which becomes the significant influence factor for the development of world cities.
The summary and review on transnational institutions in western contemporary geography in this paper point out the weakness through geographical perspective, which reflects not only nowadays the essentiality of transnational institutions’research, but also some implication and revelation in contemporary political and urban geography in China.

Key words: geographical perspective, political geography, review, transnational institutions, world cities

MEI Lin, XUE Desheng. Review on Transnational Institutions in World Cities: A Geographical Perspective[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(10): 1264-1273.

References

[1] 薛德升, 黄耿志. 改革开放以来中国城市全球化的发展过程. 地理学报, 2010, 65(10): 1155-1162.

[2] Hall P. The global city. International Social Science Journal,1996, 48: 15-23.

[3] Sassen S. Global cities and developmentalist states: Howto derail what could be an interesting debate: A responseto Hill and Kim. Urban Studies, 2001, 38(13): 2537-2540.

[4] Sassen S. 全球城市: 纽约、伦敦、东京. 周振华, 译. 上海: 上海科学社会出版社, 2005: 21-58.

[5] Cohen R. The new international division of labor, multinationalcorporations and urban hierarchy//Brenner N.The Global Cities Reader. London and New York: Routledge,2006: 49-56.

[6] Taylor P J. World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis.London: Routledge, 2004: 71-100.

[7] Knox P L, Taylor P J. World Cities in a World-System.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[8] Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. World-city network:A new metageography? Annals of the Associationof American Geographers, 2000, 90(1): 123-134.

[9] Taylor P J, Aranya R. A global 'urban roller coaster'? Connectivitychanges in the world city network, 2000-2004.Regional Studies, 2008, 42(1): 1-16.

[10] 杨永春, 冷炳荣, 谭一洺. 世界城市网络研究理论与方法及其对城市体系研究的启示. 地理研究, 2011, 30(6):1009-1020.

[11] 谢守红, 宁越敏. 世界城市研究综述. 地理科学进展,2004, 23(5): 56-66.

[12] Gerhard U. Global city Washington, D.C.//Hahn B,Zwingenberger M. Global Cities-Metropolitan Cultures:A Transatlantic Perspective. Heidelberg: BayerischenAmerika-Akademie, 2011: 81-99.

[13] Smith M P. Looking for the global spaces in local politics.Political Geography, 1998, 17(1): 35-40.

[14] Brenner N. Cities in globalization: Practices, politics andtheories. Growth and Change, 2009, 40(1): 174-178.

[15] 李健. 世界城市研究的转型、反思与上海建设世界城市的探讨. 城市规划学刊, 2011(3): 20-26.

[16] Fincher R J J. Cities in Difference. New York: Guilford,1998.

[17] Keohane R O, Nye J, Joseph S. Globalization: What'snew? What's not? (And so what?) Foreign Policy, 2000,118: 104-119.

[18] Rosenau J N. Governance in the twenty-first century.Global Governance, 1995, 1(1): 13-43.

[19] Taylor P J. The new geography of global civil society:NGOs in the world city network. Globalizations, 2004, 1(2): 265-277.

[20] Friedmann J, Wolff G. World city formation: An agendafor research and action. International Journal of Urbanand Regional Research, 1982, 6(3): 309-344.

[21] Friedmann J. The world city hypothesis. Developmentand Change, 1986, 17: 69-83.

[22] Friedmann J. 规划全球城市: 内生式发展模式. 李泳,译. 城市规划汇刊, 2004(4): 3-9.

[23] Sellers J. Transnational urban associations and the state incontemporary Europe: A rebirth of the HanseaticLeague? Jahrbuch für europäische Verwaltungsgeschichte(Yearbook of European Administrative History), 2003(2): 1-19.

[24] Huntington S. Transnational organizations in world politics.World Politics, 1973, 25(3): 333-368.

[25] Beckfield J. The social structure of the world polity.American Journal of Sociology, 2010, 115(4): 1018-1068.

[26] Keohane R O. International institutions: Two approaches.International Studies Quarterly, 1988, 32(4): 379-396.

[27] Shanks C, Jacobson H K, Kaplan J H. Inertia and changein the constellation of international governmental organizations,1981-1992. International Organization, 1996, 50 (4): 593-627.

[28] Chandhoke N. The limits of global civil society//GlasiusM, Kaldor M, Anheier H. Global Civil Society 2002. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2002: 1-12.

[29] Taylor P J. New political geographies: Global civil societyand global governance through world city networks.Political Geography, 2005, 24: 703-730.

[30] Faist T. The border-crossing expansion of social space:concepts, questions and topics//Faist T, Özveren. TransnationalSocial Spaces: Agents, Network And Institutions2004: 1-33.

[31] Faist T. Migrants as transnational development agents:An inquiry into the newest round of the migration-developmentnexus. Population, Space and Place, 2008, 14(1):21-42.

[32] Gottmann J. What Are Cities Becoming the Centers of? Sorting out the Possibilities. London and Delhi: Sage,1989.

[33] Taylor P J. World cities and territorial states under conditionsof contemporary globalization. Political Geography,2000, 19(1): 5-32.

[34] Taylor P J. Hierarchical tendencies amongst world cities:A global research proposal. Cities, 1997, 14(6): 323-332.

[35] Knox P L. World Cities and the Organization of GlobalSpace. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002: 232-247.

[36] Castells M. 网络社会的崛起. 夏铸九, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003: 119.

[37] Agnew J. Making Political Geography. London: HodderEducation Press, 2002: 138-156.

[38] Amin A. 欧盟: 超越国家经济空间的三角市场//Clark GL,Feldman M P, Gertler M S. 牛津经济地理学手册. 刘卫东等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005: 668-682.

[39] Brenner N, Jessop B, Jones M. State/Space: A Reader.Oxford: Blackwell, 2003: 1-16.

[40] Brenner N. Globalization as reterritorialization: There-scaling of urban governance in the European Union.Urban Studies, 1999, 36(3): 431-451.

[41] van der Wusten H. Political world cities: Where flowsthrough entwined multi-state and transnational networksmeet places//Taylor P, Derudder B. Cities in Globalization:Practices, Policies and Theories. London: Routledge,2007: 196-211.

[42] O'Loughlin J, van der Wusten H. Political geography ofpanregions. Geographical Review, 1990, 80(1): 1-20.

[43] Simon D. The world city hypothesis: reflections from theperiphery//Brenner N, Keil R. The Global Cities Reader.London and New York: Routledge, 2006: 203-209.

[44] Sassen S. Global cities and diasporic networks: Micrositesin global civil society//Glasius M, Kaldor M, AnheierH. Global Civil Society 2002. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2002: 214-217.

[45] Sassen S. Local actors in global politics. Current Sociology,2004, 52(4): 649-670.

[46] van der Wusten H. The distribution of political centralityin the European state system. Political Geography, 2004,23(6): 677-700.

[47] van der Wusten H. World city network: A global urbananalysis. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie(Journal of Economic and Social Geography),2005, 96(3): 344-345.

[48] Elmhorn C. Brussels: A Reflexive World City. Stockholm:Almqvist &Wiksell International, 2001: 271-282.

[49] Smith M P. Transnationalism, the state, and the extraterritorialcitizen. Politics & Society, 2003, 31(4): 467-502.

[50] Smith M P. Transnationalism from Below. New Brunswick:Transaction Publishers, 2006.

[51] Robinson J. Global and world cities: A view from off themap. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2002, 26(3): 531-554.

[52] Orum A M, Chen X. The World of Cities: Places in Comparativeand Historical Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell,2003.

[53] Shatkin G. Global cities of the South: Emerging perspectiveson growth and inequality. Cities, 2007, 24(1): 1-15.

[54] Townsend J. Are non-governmental organizations workingin development a transnational community? Journalof International Development,1999,11(4): 613-623.

[55] Smith M P. Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalization.Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell, 2001.

[56] Cohen R, Rai S M. Global Social Movements. London:Athlone Press, 2000: 62-82.

[57] Arts B. The global-local nexus: NGOs and the articulationof scale. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie(Journal of Economic and Social Geography),2004, 95(5): 498-510.

[58] An-Na'Im A. Religion and global civil society: Inherentincompatibility or synergy and interdependence?//GlasiusM, Kaldor M, Anheier H. Global Civil Society. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2002: 55-73.

[59] Soyez D. Anchored locally-liked globally. Transnationalsocial movement organizations in a (seemingly) borderlessworld. Geojournal, 2000, 52: 7-16.

[60] Marcuse P, Van Kempen R. Globalizing Cities: A NewSpatial Order? Oxford: Blackwell, 2008: 249-275.

[61] Kesteloot C. Brussels: Post-fordist polarization in a fordistspatial canvas//Marcuse P, Van Kempen R. GlobalizingCities: A New Spatial Order? Oxford: Blackwell,2000: 186-210.

[62] Swyngedouw E, Baeten G. Scaling the city: The politicaleconomy of "glocal" development-Brussels conundrum.European Planning Studies, 2001, 9(7): 827-849.

[63] Baeten G. The Europeanization of Brussels and the urbanizationof 'Europe'. European Urban and Regional Studies,2001, 8(2): 117-130.

[64] Knox P L. The Restless urban landscape: Economic andsociocultural change and the transformation of Washington,D C. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1991, 81(2): 181-205.

[65] Gerhard U. Global City Washington, D.C. Welzlar: Majuskel,2007: 189-198.

[66] Gerhard U. Local activity patterns in a global city: Analysingthe political sector inWashington, DC. 2003-01-20[2010-10-19]. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb99.html,2003.

[67] Doyle T, McEachern D. Environment and Politics. London/New York: Routledge, 1998: 258-262.

[68] 马润潮. 中国地理学研究的“全球转向”. 世界地理研究, 2011, 20(2): 1-7.

Review on Transnational Institutions in World Cities: A Geographical Perspective

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Kun, ZHONG Linsheng. International research on national park management for public welfare and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 314-329.
[2]	TAN Xuelan, JIANG Lingxiao, WANG Zhenkai, AN Yue, CHEN Min, REN Hui. Rural poverty in China from the perspective of geography: Origin, progress, and prospect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 913-923.
[3]	XUE Qian, XIE Miaomiao, GUO Qiang, WANG Yanan, WU Rongrong, LIU Qi. Research progress on urban heat wave vulnerability assessment: A geographical perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 685-694.
[4]	TAN Ronghui, LIU Yaolin, LIU Yanfang, HE Qingsong. A literature review of urban growth boundary: Theory, modeling, and effectiveness evaluation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 327-338.
[5]	XUE Lan. A review and prospect of international studies on rural amenity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2129-2138.
[6]	ZHOU Kai, HE Linyi, ZHANG Yiwen. A review of literature on the concept, impacts, and spatial interactions of sharing short-term rental platform [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1934-1943.
[7]	ZHAO Ruidong, FANG Chuanglin, LIU Haimeng. Progress and prospect of urban resilience research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731.
[8]	DUAN Hongtao,LUO Juhua,CAO Zhigang,XUE Kun,XIAO Qitao,LIU Dong. Progress in remote sensing of aquatic environments at the watershed scale [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1182-1195.
[9]	Qing GAO, Huasong LUO, Zhenbo WANG, Jinping SONG. Research progress and prospect of Beautiful China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1021-1033.
[10]	Lulu HOU, Yungang LIU. The evolving concept of lebensraum in political geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 637-647.
[11]	Limin LIU, Linsheng ZHONG, Hu YU. Progress of glacier tourism research and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 533-545.
[12]	Manchun LI, Mengru YAO, Xia WANG, Xiaoqiang LIU, Yanming CHEN. A review of studies on the “pole-axis system” theory based on citation analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 164-174.
[13]	Yingbiao CHEN, Zihao ZHENG, Zhifeng WU, Qinglan QIAN. Review and prospect of application of nighttime light remote sensing data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 205-223.
[14]	Ning AN, Ling MA, Hong ZHU. Reflections on the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A perspective from political geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1633-1643.
[15]	Xin XU, Yuan ZHAO, Xinlin ZHANG, Tonggang ZENG, Siyou XIA, Qianqian XIE, Qi SUN. Research progress and prospects of Chinese geriatric geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(10): 1416-1429.