半城市化地区生态系统服务对土地利用/覆被变化的响应——以厦门市集美区为例

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.05.002

Abstract

Abstract: Peri-urban area emerged with the rapid urbanization and is a new transitional region between urbanand rural areas. The most important characteristics of the peri-urabn areas are the large rates of changes and conflictsbetween landuses. Through the change of ecosystem's internal structure and function, land use/coverchange (LUCC) has affected the values of ecosystem services and has been a major driving factor. Taking JimeiDistrict (a peri-urban area) in Xiamen City as an example, the authors examined the land use pattern from 1987to 2007 by integrating remote sensing data and evaluate the regional ecosystem services based on the revisedmethod of equivalent value per unit area of ecosystem services in China in 2007. The coupling changes betweenland systems and ecosystem services were used to identify the effects and mechanisms of LUCC on ecosystem services. Results showed that along with the promotion of land use intensity, the total ecosystem services valueshad shown a curved trend of change, with supplying and regulating service being main ecosystem service types;land use intensity was negative for supplying, regulating, and supporting cultural services. With the rapid urbanizationin Jimei District, there will be more land to be transformed to construction land. It can be predicted thatthe decreasing trend of ecosystem service value will continue in the future, and we should use the ecological comprehensive treatment to slow down that trend.

Key words: ecological effect, ecosystem service, Jimei District, land use/cover change, peri-urban area

HUANG Yunfeng, CUI Shenghui, SHI Longyu. Response of Ecosystem Services to Land Use/Cover Change in Peri-urban Area:A Case Study of Jimei District, Xiamen[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(5): 551-560.

References

[1] Douglas R W, Cai J M, Muller L, et al. Emerging ThirdStage Peri-Urbanization: Functional Specialization in theHangzhou Peri-Urban Region. Stanford: The Asia PacificResearch Center, 2003.

[2] Douglas RW. On the Edge: Shaping the Future of Peri-urbanEast Asia. Stanford: The Asia Pacific Research Center,2002.

[3] Simon D. Urban environments: Issues on the peri-urbanfringe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2008, 33: 167-185.

[4] Buxton M, Tieman G, Bekessy S. Change and continuityin peri-urban Australia, State of the peri-urban regions: AReview of the Literature. RMIT University, 2006.

[5] 刘盛和, 陈田, 蔡建明. 中国半城市化现象及其研究重点. 地理学报, 2003, 22(增刊): 101-108．

[6] 鲁春阳, 杨庆媛, 靳东晓, 等. 中国城市土地利用结构研究进展及展望. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(7): 861-867.

[7] 贾文臣, 王卷乐, 杜佳. 胶东地区主要土地利用变化类型与影响因子的关系. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(4):591-596.

[8] Turner ⅡB L, Skole D L, Sanderson S, et al. Land-useand Land-cover change/research plan. IGBP Report No.53, IHDP Report No.7. Stockholm: IGBP, 1995.

[9] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value ofthe world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature,1997, 387: 253-260.

[10] 李文楷, 李天宏, 钱征寒. 深圳市土地利用变化对生态服务功能的影响. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(3): 440-446.

[11] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196.

[12] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5):912-919.

[13] 石龙宇, 崔胜辉, 尹锴, 等. 厦门市土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务的影响. 地理学报, 2010, 65(6): 708-714.

[14] Feng L, Cheng S K, Su H, et al. A theoretical model forassessing the sustainability of ecosystem services. EcologicalEconomy, 2008, 4(3): 258-265.

[15] 李文华, 等. 生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 23-24.

[16] 蔡邦成, 陆根法, 宋莉娟, 等. 土地利用变化对昆山生态系统服务价值的影响. 生态学报, 2006, 26(9): 3005-3010.

[17] 黄云凤.半城市化地区结构与功能特征及其管理: 以厦门市集美区为例[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2009.

[18] 刘江, 崔胜辉, 唐立娜, 等. 半城市化地区住区形态及空间分布特征: 以厦门市集美区为例. 地理科学进展,2010, 29(5): 579-585.

[19] 郑艳婷, 刘盛和, 陈田. 试论半城市化现象及其特征: 以广东省东莞市为例. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 760-768.

[20] 刘盛和, 叶舜赞, 杜红亮, 等. 半城市化地区形成的动力机制与发展前景初探: 以浙江省绍兴县为例. 地理研究,2005, 24(4): 601-611.

[21] 刘盛和, 张擎. 杭州市半城市化地区空间分布变化. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 982-992.

[22] 黄靖, 蔡建明. 东莞半城市化地区发展透视. 地理与地理信息科学, 2007, 23(2): 65-69.

[23] 朱青, 赵瑾, 姜兆瑞, 等. 山东南部地区的半城市化现象及问题探讨: 以滕州市为例. 城市规划, 2006, 30(9):42-47.

[24] 张敏, 甄峰, 张晓明. 中国沿海欠发达地区半城市化特征与机制: 以福建莆田为例. 地理研究, 2008, 24(7):927-937.

[25] 王秀兰, 包玉海. 土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨. 地理科学进展, 1999,18(1):82-88.

[26] 庄大方, 刘纪远.中国土地利用的区域分异模型研究. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 105-111.

Response of Ecosystem Services to Land Use/Cover Change in Peri-urban Area:A Case Study of Jimei District, Xiamen

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	MA Enpu, CAI Jianming, HAN Yan, LIAO Liuwen, LIN Jing. Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of Human-Earth system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 310-326.
[2]	CHENG Chaonan, HU Yang, ZHAO Ming. Progress and prospect of the spatiotemporal change and ecosystem services evaluation of urban green space pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[3]	Ziwen LIU, Dan YIN, Qingxu HUANG, Chunyang HE, Fei XUE. Research and application progress of ecosystem services in land use planning: A bibliometric and textual analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 236-247.
[4]	Wenwu ZHAO, Yue LIU, Qiang FENG, Yaping WANG, Siqi YANG. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.
[5]	Chuanzhun SUN, Lin ZHEN, Chao WANG, Jie HU, Bingzhen DU. Assessment of the ecological effects of the first-phase natural forest protection project in the Xiaolongshan region, Gansu Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(6): 732-740.
[6]	Weihua XU, Yanying YANG, Lu ZHANG, Yi XIAO, Xiaoke WANG, Zhiyun OUYANG. Evaluation methods and case study of regional ecological carrying capacity for early-warning [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.
[7]	Wenhuan WU, Jian PENG, Yanxu LIU, Yi'na HU. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581.
[8]	Zhe FENG, Xuegong XU, Jian ZHOU, Yang GAO. Land sparing versus sharing framework from ecosystem service perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1100-1108.
[9]	Enpu MA, Tongsheng LI, Qianru WEI. Mechanism of change in spatial pattern of rural settlements in peri-urban areas of China:A case study of Kangdu Village in the college town of south Xi’an [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 816-828.
[10]	Yuchen DING, Changchun FENG, Liwei WANG. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe Town in Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 851-859.
[11]	LIU Lihua, YIN Changbin, QIAN Xiaoping. Calculation methods of paddy ecosystem service value and application: a case study of Suzhou City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(1): 92-99.
[12]	Honglie SUN, Yiyu CHEN, Guirui YU, Xiubo YU. Major international programs and prospects of ecosystem research in China:a review of the 100th lecture series/spring 2014 symposium of China Ecological Forum [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(7): 865-873.
[13]	FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services：concepts, methods and progress [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
[14]	MA Cheng, LI Shuangcheng, LIU Jinlong, GAO Yang, WANG Yang. Regionalization of ecosystem services of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area based on SOFM neural network [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(9): 1383-1393.
[15]	DENG Jing, TANG Wenwu, LIU Runrun, ZHENG Xinqi . FUTURES: A new regional urban growth simulation model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(1): 41-48.