山东全新世典型气候事件的区域响应及其对海岱文明发展的影响

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.07.009

Abstract

Abstract: There were several climatic events in the Holocene, and the 8.2 ka BP, 5.5 ka BP and 4.0 ka BP events were significant ones of them. Based on the synthesis of the published Holocene climatic records and present archaeological materials, we find that these significant Holocene events show different climatic patterns and have different impact on the human activity in Shandong Province. Both the 8.2 ka BP and 5.5 ka BP events in this area have cold and dry climatic features. The former produced Houli Culture and the latter promoted the development of Dawenkou Culture. Flood and the following cold-dry climate featured the 4.0 ka BP event, and led to the collapse of Longshan Culture in Shandong Province.

Key words: Haidai culture, Holocene events, impact, Shandong

CHEN Dongdong, PENG Shuzhen, ZHANG Wei, HAN Junqing, DING Min. The Response to Holocene Climatic Events of Shandong and Their Impacts on Human Activity[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 30(7): 846-852.

References

[1] Denton G H, Karln W. Holocene climatic variations: Their pattern and cause. Quaternary Research, 1973, 3: 155-205.

[2] Alley R B, Agustsdottir A M. The 8 k event: Cause and consequences of a major Holocene abrupt climate change. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2004, 24(10-11): 1123-1149.

[3] Moros M, Emeis K C, Risebrobakken B, et al. Sea surface temperatures and ice rafting in the Holocene North Atlantic: climate influences on northern Europe and Greenland. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2004, 23 (20-22): 2113-2126.

[4] Magny M, Haas J N. A major widespread climatic change around 5300 cal. yr BP at the time of the Alpine Iceman. Journal of Quayernary Science, 2004, 19(5): 423-430.

[5] deMenocal P, Ortiz J, Guilderson T, et al. Abrupt onset and termination of the African humid period: Rapid climate responses to gradual insolation forcing. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2000, 19(1-5): 347-361.

[6] Perry C A, Hsu K J. Geophysical, archaeological, and historical evidence support solar-output model for climate change. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of USA, 2000, 97(23): 12433-12438.

[7] 吴文祥, 葛全胜. 全新世气候事件及其对古文化发展的影响. 华夏考古, 2005(3): 60-66.

[8] Carneiro R L. A theory of the origin of the state. Science, 1970, 169(3947): 733-738.

[9] 高广仁, 邵望平. 中华文明的发祥地之一: 海岱历史文化区. 史前研究, 1984(1): 7-25.

[10] Dansgaard W S, Jonesen H B, Clausen D, et al. Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250kyr ice-core records. Nature, 1993, 364(15): 218-220.

[11] 夏正楷, 邓辉, 武弘麟. 内蒙西拉木伦河流域考古文化演变的地貌背景分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55(3): 229-336.

[12] 姚檀栋. 古里雅冰芯中末次间冰期以来气候变化记录研究. 中国科学: D辑, 1997, 27(5): 447-452

[13] 施雅风, 孔昭宸, 王苏民, 等. 中国全新世大暖期的气候波动与重要事件. 中国科学: B 辑, 1992, 12: 1300-1308.

[14] 周卫建, 卢雪峰, 武振坤, 等. 若尔盖高原全新世气候变化的泥炭记录与加速器放射性碳测年. 科学通报, 2001, 46(12): 1040-1044.

[15] 庞奖励, 黄春长, 贾耀峰. 关中东部地区全新世土壤发育及记录的水文事件. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(2): 87-193.

[16] 许清海, 肖举乐, 中村俊夫, 等. 全新世以来岱海盆地植被演替和候变化的孢粉学证据. 冰川冻土, 2004, 26 (1): 73-80.

[17] 王永吉, 李善为. 青岛胶州湾地区20000 年以来的古植被与古气候. 植物学报, 1983, 25(4): 385-392.

[18] 夏敦胜, 马玉贞, 陈发虎, 等. 秦安大地湾高分辨率全新世植被演变与气候变迁初步研究. 兰州大学学报, 1998, 34(1): 119-127.

[19] 王绍武, 黄建斌. 全新世中期的旱涝变化与中华古文明的进程. 自然科学进展, 2006, 16(10): 1238-1244.

[20] 李永化, 尹怀宁, 张小勇, 等. 东北地区5000aBP ~ 4700aBP左右的降温事件及其对考古文化的影响. 云南地理环境研究, 2003, 15(1): 12-18.

[21] 朱艳, 陈发虎, 张家武, 等. 距今五千年左右环境恶化事件随我国新石器文化的影响极其原因的初步探讨. 地理科学进展, 2001, 20(2): 111-121.

[22] 方修琦, 孙宁. 降温事件: 4.3kaBP 岱海老虎山文化中断的可能原因. 人文地理, 1998, 13(1): 71-76.

[23] 安成邦, 冯兆东, 唐领余, 等. 甘肃东部4000 年前环境变化与古文化变迁. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 743-748.

[24] 高华中, 朱诚, 曹光杰. 山东沂沭河流域2000BC前后古文化兴衰的环境考古. 地理学报, 2006, 21(3): 255-261.

[25] 张强, 朱诚, 刘春玲. 长江三角洲7000 年来的环境变迁. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 534-542

[26] 吴文祥, 刘东生. 4000aB.P.前后降温事件与中华文明的诞生. 第四纪研究, 2001, 21(5): 443-451.

[27] 王绍武. 8.2 kaB.P 冷事件. 气候变化与研究进展, 2008, 4(3): 193-194.

[28] 吴文祥, 刘东生. 4000aB.P 前后东亚季风变迁与中原周围地区新石器文化的衰落. 第四纪研究, 2004, 24 (3): 278-284.

[29] 王青. 大汶口文化环境考古处论. 辽宁文物学刊, 1996, 22(2): 64-73.

[30] 卞学昌. 山东省全新世古气候变化序列及其与史前文化发展阶段的相关研究[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2004.

[31] 齐乌云, 袁靖. 胶东半岛新石器时代的自然环境演变. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 1999: 174-188.

[32] 施少华. 中国全新世高温期中的气候突变事件及其对人类的影响. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1993, 13(4): 65-73.

[33] 王绍武. 5.5 kaB.P 事件. 气候变化研究进展, 2009, 5 (5): 309-310.

[34] 齐乌云. 山东乳山市翁家埠遗址孢粉分析研究. 考古, 2001(6): 4-81.

[35] 王绍武. 4.2 kaB.P 事件. 气候变化与研究进展, 2010, 6 (1): 75-76.

[36] 孙天胜, 赵全科, 徐春堂, 等. 枣庄地区自然环境的历史演变. 地理学与国土研究, 1999, 15(3): 87-90.

[37] 夏正楷, 杨晓燕. 我国北方4kaB.P前后异常洪水事件的初步研究. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(6): 667-674.

[38] 俞伟超. 龙山文化与良渚文化衰变的奥秘. 文物天地. 1992(3): 27-28.

[39] 靳松安, 赵新平. 试论山东龙山文化的历史地位及其衰落原因. 郑州大学学报, 1994(4): 1-7.

[40] 施少华. 中国全新世高温期中的气候突变事件及其对人类的影响. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1993, 13(4): 65-73.

[41] Wigley T M L. Climatology: Impact of extreme event. Nature, 1985, 361: 106-107.

[42] 国家文物局. 中国文物地图集: 山东分册. 北京: 中国地图出版社, 2007.

[43] 栾丰实. 北辛文化研究. 考古学报, 1998(3): 265-288.

[44] 高广仁. 试论大汶口文化的分期. 考古学报, 1978(4): 399-420.

[45] 吴汝祚. 论大汶口文化的类型与分期. 考古学报, 1982 (3): 261-282.

[46] Liu L. The development and decline of social complexity in northern China: Some environmental and social factors. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association. Bulletin, 2000, 4: 14-34.

[47] 张国硕. 岳石文化来源初探. 郑州大学学报, 1989(1): 1-6.

[48] 田继宝. 试论海岱龙山文化消退的原因//西安半坡博物馆. 史前研究. 西安: 三秦出版社, 2000: 528-534.

[49] 郅田夫, 张启龙. 菏泽地区的堌堆遗存. 考古, 1987, 11: 1002-1008.

[50] 倪金生. 山东沭河上游流域考古遗址预测模型. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(4):489-493.

[51] 靳桂云. 海岱地区史前稻作农业初步研究. 农业考古, 2001(3): 91-93.

[52] 方辉. 岳石文化衰落原因蠡测. 文史哲, 2003, 276(3): 139-143.

The Response to Holocene Climatic Events of Shandong and Their Impacts on Human Activity

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	FENG Yingbin, LONG Hualou. Progress and prospect of research on spatial reconstruction of rural settlements in mountainous areas of China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 866-879.
[2]	Jiayi FANG, Peijun SHI. A review of coastal flood risk research under global climate change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
[3]	Shaoxing LI, Xianzhi WANG, Xiaole JI, Ye ZHANG. Spatial change and influencing factors of population aging in Shandong Province at the township scale [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 567-576.
[4]	Shuying ZHANG, Jiaming LIU, He ZHU, Tao LI. Review of progress in international research on ecotourism and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1201-1215.
[5]	Hualou LONG, Shuangshuang TU. Theoretical thinking of rural restructuring [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(5): 581-590.
[6]	Liang WU, Qi QIN, Dan ZHANG, Shengkui CHENG. Indian Ocean Passages and their geopolitical impacts on China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(11): 1510-1520.
[7]	Jingyun ZHENG, Xiuqi FANG, Shaohong WU. Recent progress of climate change research in physical geography studies from China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 16-27.
[8]	Fuqiang TIAN, Tao CHENG, You LU, Zongxue XU. A review on socio-hydrology and urban hydrology [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 46-56.
[9]	Shen ZHAO, Shaohui CHEN. Spatiotemporal variations of evapotranspiration and potential evapotranspiration in Shandong Province based on station observations and MOD16 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(8): 1040-1047.
[10]	Xiaodong SUN, Yating HOU. Research on negative impacts and responsibility of cruise tourism [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(5): 569-584.
[11]	Dalong LI, Shaofeng JIA, Aifeng LV, Wenbin ZHU. Regional difference of cost effectiveness of low impact development (LID) technical facilities in Chinese cities [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1402-1412.
[12]	Min TAN, Kai LIU, Lin LIU, Yuanhui ZHU, Dashan WANG. Spatialization of population in the Pearl River Delta in 30 m grids using random forest model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(10): 1304-1312.
[13]	Guoqing LI, Xiaobing LI. Research progress of wind farm impact on the environment [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(8): 1017-1026.
[14]	Aiqing FENG, Jiangbo GAO, Shaohong WU, Yanhua LIU, Xiaojia HE. A review of storm surge disaster risk research and adaptation in China under climate change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(11): 1411-1419.
[15]	Jing XI, Yang CHENG. Spatiotemporal evolution of residential care facilities in Beijing and policy impacts [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(9): 1187-1194.