地理区位因子对建设用地扩展的影响分析——以珠江三角洲为例

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.11.042

Abstract

Abstract:

In this study, we use three scenes of Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) images, including those of 1988, 1998 and 2006, to detect the expansion of construction land in the Pearl River Delta. And then we use the spatial analysis function of GIS to specify the impact of site factors on it, focusing on the effect of the landform and the distance from the city center, roads or coastlines. Firstly, we derived land cover maps from TM data by artificial visual interpretation method (AVIM). Then, we overlaid the distribution maps of construction land with the topographic map and analyzed the pattern of construction land expansion in the buffer zones around urban centers or along main roads and coastline. The results show that the site factors, such as the landform and the distance from the city center, roads or coastline, indeed have a prominent influence on the expansion of the construction land. Due to the centralization and diffusion of the city center, the expansion of construction land reaches its peaks at two spheres surrounding the city center. The inner one represents the development of suburbs, indicating the spilling over of the city center and the rapid development of the suburbs, while the outer one manifests the development of the industrial zones and the construction of the satellite cities in the outer suburbs, showing the pattern of urban expansion like leapfrog. Thus, suburb is the preferred location for construction land development and the construction land there expands most furiously, indicating the intense interaction between urban and rural areas and also reflecting the essence of the process of suburbanization in large cities. The influence of the distance from the roads or coastline reflects, in essence, the impact of the transportation accessibility on the expansion of construction land. From the quantitative analysis results, we can see the location close to roads or shoreline is the preferred location for construction land development, resulting in the distribution pattern of the construction land gathering along the roads or coastline. Landform also has an obvious influence on the expansion of construction land. Plain area is the preferred location for construction land development, and also the area for the high-quality farmland to agglomerate, therefore triggering the conflicts between the construction land developmet and farmland protection. In short, site factors act as the indicators for the expansion of construction land, leading it to expand to the location such as suburbs, plains as well as the areas nearby the roads or coastline. Site factors play an important role in indicating or restraining the expansion of construction land, determining the direction, scale, intensity and speed of the expansion of construction land.

Key words: construction land, site factors, The Pearl River Delta

YE Yuyao, ZHANG Hongou, LIU Kai, WU Qitao. Impact of Site Factors on Expansion of Construction Land: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(11): 1433-1441.

References

[1] Turner B L, Meyer W B. Global land-use and land-cover change: An overview//Meyer W B, Turner B L. Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1994: 3-10.

[2] Gong J Z, Liu Y S, Xia B C. Spatial heterogeneity of urban land-cover landscape in Guangzhou from 1990 to 2005. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2009, 19(2): 213-224.

[3] Hu Z L, Du P J, Guo D Z. Analysis of urban expansion and driving forces in Xuzhou city based on remote sensing. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2007, 17(2): 267-271.

[4] Adrián G A, Peter M W. Globalization, regional development, and mega-city expansion in Latin America: Analyzing Mexico City's periurban hinterland. Cities, 2003, 20 (1): 3-21.

[5] Adrián G A. Peri-urbanization, illegal settlements and environmental impact in Mexico City. Cities, 2008, 25(2): 133-145.

[6] Tian G J, Liu J Y, Xie Y C, et al. Analysis of spatio-temporal dynamic pattern and driving forces of urban land in China in 1990s using TM images and GIS. Cities, 2005, 22(6): 400-410.

[7] Xiao J Y, Shen Y J, Ge J F, et al. Evaluating urban expansion and land use change in Shijiazhuang, China, by using GIS and remote sensing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75(1): 69-80.

[8] Tan M H, Li X B, Xie H. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy, 2005, 22(3):187-196.

[9] Long H L, Gerhard K H, Li X B. Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the Transect of the Yangtse River, China. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1): 141-153.

[10] Hersperger A M, Bürgi M. Going beyond landscape change description: Quantifying the importance of driving forces of landscape change in a Central Europe case study. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(3): 640-648.

[11] Schneeberger N, Burgi M , Hersperger A M, et al. Driving forces and rates of landscape change as a promising combination for landscape change research-An application on the northern fringe of the Swiss Alps. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(2): 349-361.

[12] Quan B, Chen J F, Qiu H L, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern and driving forces of land use changes in Xiamen. Pedosphere, 2006, 16(4): 477-488.

[13] Liu Y S, Wang L J, Long H L. Spatio-temporal analysis of land-use conversion in the eastern coastal China during 1996-2005. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2008, 18(3): 274-282.

[14] Krausmann F, Haberl H, Schulz N B, et al. Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria-Part I: driving forces of land-use change: 1950-1995. Land Use Policy, 2003, 20(1): 1-20.

[15] Xie YC, Mei Y, Tian G J. Socio-economic driving forces of arable land conversion: A case study of Wuxian City, China. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(3): 238-252.

[16] 胡伟平, 何建邦. GIS 支持下珠江三角洲城镇建筑覆盖变化遥感监测分析. 遥感学报, 2003, 7(3): 201-206.

[17] 胡伟平, 杨国清, 吴志峰, 等. 珠江三角洲城镇建筑覆盖近期变化研究. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 781-788.

[18] 黎夏, 叶嘉安. 利用遥感监测和分析珠江三角洲的城市扩张过程: 以东莞市为例. 地理研究, 1997, 16(4): 56-62.

[19] 黎夏. 珠江三角洲发展走廊1988-1997 年土地利用变化特征的空间分析. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(3): 307-315.

[20] 史培军, 陈晋, 潘耀忠. 深圳市土地利用变化机制分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55(2): 151-160.

[21] 叶嘉安, 黎夏. 珠江三角洲经济发展、城市扩张与农田流失研究: 以东莞市为例. 经济地理, 1999, 19(1): 67-72.

[22] 闫小培, 毛蒋兴, 普军. 巨型城市区域土地利用变化的人文因素分析: 以珠江三角洲地区为例. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 613-623.

[23] 张文忠, 王传胜, 吕昕, 等. 珠江三角洲土地利用变化与工业化和城市化的耦合关系. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5): 677-685.

[24] 张文忠, 王传胜, 薛东前. 珠江三角洲城镇用地扩展的城市化背景研究. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(5): 575-582.

[25] 毛蒋兴, 闫小培. 城市交通系统对土地利用的影响作用研究: 以广州为例. 地理科学, 2005, 25(3): 353-360.

[26] 毛蒋兴, 阎小培. 高密度开发城市交通系统对土地利用的影响作用研究: 以广州为例. 经济地理, 2005, 25(2): 185-210.

[27] 毛蒋兴, 闫小培. 城市交通干道对土地利用的廊道效应研究: 以广州大道为例. 地理与地理信息科学, 2004, 20 (5): 58-61.

[28] 朱述龙, 张占睦, 著. 遥感图像获取与分析. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.

[29] 周锐波. 珠江三角洲经济发展模式评析. 中国发展, 2004(3): 11-16.

Impact of Site Factors on Expansion of Construction Land: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XU Xiaoren, WANG Liang, XU Yong, DUAN Jian. Evaluation of reserve available land resources based on three types of territorial space: A case study of Jiexiu City in Shanxi Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 272-282.
[2]	YANG Ren, ZHANG Jing, XU Qian, LUO Xiuli. Capitalization effect of rural land reclamation from the perspective of rural-urban integration: A case study of Guangdong Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 114-123.
[3]	GONG Jianzhou, JIANG Chao, HU Yueming, YANG Hao. A review and prospect of research on the dike-pond system in the Pearl River Delta [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1236-1246.
[4]	HU Xu, NIE Yong, XU Xia, JIANG Sheng, ZHANG Yili. Monitoring land-use change in Hetian Tarim Basin, China using satellite remote sensing observation between 1990 and 2016 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 577-590.
[5]	LIU Hanchu, FAN Jie, ZHANG Haipeng, Wang Fuyuan. Dynamics of manufacturing industry and change of its spatial pattern in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 195-206.
[6]	NIU Qiang, SHEN Yingjie, ZHOU Yi, HUANG Jingnan, WANG Pan. Effect and lag period of urban agglomeration construction land growth on economic growth based on lagged variable model:A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[7]	Jiheng LI, Yue GONG, Guicai LI. Spatial patterns of village and town built areas in the Pearl River Delta:A land-use perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 829-839.
[8]	Min TAN, Kai LIU, Lin LIU, Yuanhui ZHU, Dashan WANG. Spatialization of population in the Pearl River Delta in 30 m grids using random forest model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(10): 1304-1312.
[9]	Zhonglei YU, Wenxin ZHANG, Jinshe LIANG, Li ZHUANG. Progress in evaluating suitability of spatial development and construction land [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(9): 1107-1122.
[10]	LI Ting, FU Wenying. Inter-city comparative study of urban morphology and mechanisms in the Pearl River Delta [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(5): 678-688.
[11]	LI Yan, HE Canfei. Characteristics and mechanism of manufacturing industry shift in the Pearl River Delta during 1998-2009 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(5): 777-787.
[12]	ZHANG Leqin, CHEN Suping, WANG Wenqin, XU Xinwang. Research on the Driving Factor Measurement of the Construction Land Expansion in Chizhou City, Anhui Province: Based on the STIRPAT Model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(9): 1235-1242.
[13]	CHEN Yufu, XIE Qingheng, LIU Yansui. Construction Land Area Changes and Their Influencing Factors of China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(8): 1050-1054.
[14]	CAO Yingui, ZHOUWei, QIAO Luyin, XU Duo. Research on Urban Construction Land Changes and Using Benefit in Eastern China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(7): 869-877.
[15]	WEN Feng, LU Chunyang, YANG Qingyuan, ZHOU Guifang, WANG Cheng. Progress and Prospect of the Research on Transfer of the Collectively Owned Rural Construction Land [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 30(9): 1193-1200.