人口迁移空间格局模拟研究进展与展望

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.10.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Migration spatial structure refers to the distribution patterns of migration in space, including magnitude, direction, mode and spatial distribution of the origin-destination of migration. It plays a significant role in the evolvement of the regional spatial structure and population projection. Based on the dissimilarity of the fundamental theories on migration, this paper systematically analyses the evolvement of the western classical models on migration via 3 aspects: spatial physics, spatial sociology and spatial economy, and evaluates their advantages and shortages scientifically. Spatial physics models are based on the law of gravity in physics. These series models underwent a process from simpleness to complexity. The theory basis is simple and therefore can be easily used in metric analysis. Differential variables have been added to the models, such as unemployment and wage or migration stock. However, spatial physics theory limits the cause of migration to macroscopical economy, not considering that the migration is the outcome of individuals' decision. Spatial sociology theory is distinguished by its concern with the attributes of individuals and focus on the migratory behavior of individuals. It includes push-pull model, intervening opportunities models, cost-benefit model, and expected earnings models. This kind of models well explains the cause mechanism of migration, however, a lack of spatial factor and unsuitable assumption to the developing countries are their limitations. The spatial economy theory combines geographic space and economy elements to describe complicated migration phenomenon, which is a landmark process. The spatial information such as the cost of job commuting with certain distance from job location to inhabitancy, the ground rent with certain distance from CBD, and the transportation cost was taken into account while modeling. By systematically unscrambling past studies on the methodologies of spatial structure of migration, this paper generalizes three major methodologies and techniques widely used in this field: (1) Mathematical model. It was widely used in the previous studies on migration spatial structure; all of the models mentioned above can be applied directly or being modified through mathematical means. (2) GIS spatial analysis. Firstly it makes the geo-simulation and visualization of migration possible; then some spatial variables related to location or distance can be estimated and ameliorated, for instance the rational expression of distance and spatialization of variable elements affecting migration. (3)MAS/CA. It is one of the key technologies that simulation model matches the real process of migration, integrating the modeling method of multi-anent system with cellular automata. Whereas the application to migration is not so prevalent due to the complexity of the transition rule. Based on summarizing the classical models and research methodologies, the paper ended with the authors’ personal constructive suggestions to Chinese migration spatial structure studies in the future.

Key words: prospect, review, theoretic model, migration spatial structure

LI Yang, LIU Hui. Research Progresses on Migration Spatial Structure Modeling[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(10): 1162-1170.

References

[1] PetersenW. The Politics of Population, London: Gollancz, 1970.

[2] 张善余. 人口地理学概论. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社， 2004.

[3] 陆大道. 区域发展及其空间结构. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.

[4] 冯健, 周一星. 杭州市人口的空间变动与郊区化研究. 城市规划, 2002, 26(1): 58-65.

[5] 蔡昉, 王德文. 作为市场化的人口流动: 第五次全国人口普查数据分析. 中国人口科学, 2003(5): 11-19.

[6] 朱传耿, 马荣华, 甄峰, 等. 中国城市流动人口的空间结构. 人文地理, 2002, 17(1): 65-68.

[7] 朱传耿, 顾朝林, 马荣华, 等. 中国流动人口的影响要素与空间分布. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5): 549-560.

[8] Ravenstein E G. The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London，1885, 48(2): 167-235.

[9] Ravenstein E G. Census of the British Isles，1871: Birthplace and migration. Geographical Magazine, 1876, 16 (3): 173-177, 201-206, 229-233.

[10] Tolley G S. Population adjustment and economic activity: Three studies. Papers in Regional Science, 1963, 11(1): 85-97.

[11] Sjaastad L A. The cost and Returns of Human Migration. Journal of Political Economy,1962, 70(5): 80-93.

[12] Fields G S. Place-to-place migration in Colombia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1982, 30(3): 539-558.

[13] Fields G S. Place-to-place migration: Some new evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979, 61 (1): 21-32.

[14] Greenwood M J. An analysis of the determinants of geographic labor mobility in the United State. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1969, 51(2): 189-194.

[15] Greenwood M J. A regression analysis of migration to urban areas of a LDC. Journal of Regional Science, 11(2): 253-262.

[16] Fan C C. Modeling interprovincial migration in China, 1985-2000. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2005, 46(3): 165-184.

[17] Greenwood M J. Research on Internal Migration in the United States: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1975, 13(2): 397-433.

[18] Zipf G K. The P1P2/D Hypothesis: On intercity movement of persons, American Sociological Review, 1946, 11 (6): 677-686.

[19] Lowry I S. Migration and metropolitan growth: two analytical models. San Francisco: Chandler Pub. Co, 1966.

[20] 王桂新. 我国省际人口迁移与距离关系之探讨. 人口与经济, 1993(2): 3-8.

[21] 严善平. 中国九十年代地区间人口迁移的实态及其机制. 人口与经济, 1998(3): 3-13.

[22] 长江三角洲人口迁移空间格局、模式及启示. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(3): 353-361.

[23] 蔡建明. 中国省级人口迁移及其对城市化的影响. 地理研究, 1990, 9(2): 122-129.

[24] 李永浮, 鲁奇, 周成虎. 2010 年北京市流动人口预测. 地理研究, 2006, 25(1): 131-139.

[25] 王先进, 刘芳. 基于重力模型的交通对人口迁移影响分析. 交通发展, 2006(1): 14-17.

[26] Zipf G K. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Hafner, 1949.

[27] Kau J B, Sirmans C F. Urban land value functions and the price elasticity of demand for housing. Journal of Urban Economics, 1979, 6: 112-121.

[28] Fotheringham A S, O'Kelly M E. Spatial interaction models: Formulations and applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

[29] Wilson A G. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: London Pion, 1970.

[30] Stouffer S A. Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance, 1940, 5(6): 845-867.

[31] Stouffer S A. Intervening opportunities and competing migrants. Journal of Regional Science, 1960, 2(1):1-26.

[32] Bijak J. Forecasting international migration selected theories models and methods. Central European Forum for Migration Research.Working paper, 2006.

[33] Heberle R. The Causes of Rural-Urban Migration a Survey of German Theories. The American Journal of Sociology, 1938, 43(6): 932-950.

[34] Dorigo G, Tobler W. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1983, 73(1): 1-17.

[35] Schultz T W. Reflections on investment in man. The Journal of Political Economy, 1962, 70(5): 1-8.

[36] Todaro M P. Economic development in the Third World. London: Longman Publishing Group, 1977.

[37] Todaro M P. A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Un-employment in Less Development Countries. The America Economic Review, 1969, 59(1): 138-148.

[38] 张文忠. 新经济地理学的研究视角探析. 地理科学进展, 2003, 22(1): 94-101.

[39] Fujita M, Krugman P R, Venables A J. The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

[40] Shen Jianfa. Modelling regional migration in China: estimation and decomposition. Environment and Planning, 1999, 31: 1223-1238.

[41] Peeters L. Inter-State Migration in Mexico, 1995-2000: A Flexible Poisson Gravity-Modeling Approach. Working paper. Hasselt University, Belgium.

[42] 俞路. 20 世纪90 年代中国迁移人口分布格局及其空间极化效应
[D]. 华东师范大学, 2006.

[43] 陈楠, 王钦敏, 林宗坚. 中国人口经济压力与人口迁移的定量分析. 中国人口科学, 2005(6): 30-37.

[44] Levy M B, Wadycki W J. What is the Opportunity Cost of Moving? Reconsideration of the Effects of Distance on Migration. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1974, 22(2): 198-214.

[45] Wadycki W J, Walter J. Alternative opportunities and interstate migration: Some additional results. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1974, 56(2): 254-57.

[46] Denslow D A Jr, Eaton P J. Migration and Intervening Opportunities. Southern Economic Journal, 1984, 51(2): 369-387.

[47] Boothroyd G, Redford A H. Mechanized Assembly. London: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

[48] Engels F. La situación de la clase obrera en Inglaterra, Buenos Aires: Esencia, 1974.

[49] Jenkins J C. Push/pull in recent Mexican migration to the US. International Migration Review,1977,11(2): 178-189.

[50] Datta P. Push-Pull Factors of Undocumented Migration from Bangladesh to West Bengal: A Perception Study. The Qualitative Report, 2004.

[51] 李蓓. 中国城乡人口迁移的时空特征及其影响因素. 经济学家, 2009(1): 50-57.

[52] 范剑勇等. 产业聚集与农村劳动力的跨区域流动. 管理世界, 2004(4): 22-29.

[53] Johnson J H, Jr, Roseman C C. Increasing Black Outmigration from Los Angeles: The Role of Household Dynamics and Kinship Systems. Association of American Geographers, 1990, 80(2): 205-222.

[54] 郑明媚, 李满春, 毛亮, 等. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究: 以浙江省临安市为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281-286.

[55] 张敏, 顾朝林. 近期中国省际经济社会要素流动的空间特征. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 313-323.

[56] 朱传耿, 顾朝林等. 中国城市流动人口的空间结构. 人文地理, 2002, 17(1): 65-68.

[57] 邓宏钟, 王军民, 谭跃进. 基于多智能体的整体建模仿真方法在经济系统中的应用研究. 计算机应用研究, 2001(4): 24-26.

[58] Parunak. Agent-based Modeling vs Equation-based Modelling: A Case Study and Users’Guide. Multi-agent Systems and Agent-based Simulation, Springerverlag, 1998, 54-66.

[59] 武晓波, 赵健. 细胞自动机模型用于城市发展模拟的方法初探: 以海口市为例. 城市规划, 2002(8): 69-73.

[60] Tobler W R. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic-Geography. 1970, 46: 234-240.

[61] Clarke K C, Gaydos L J, Hoppen S. A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisc. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1997, 24: 247-261.

[62] Wu F. SimLand: A prototype to Simulate Land Conversion Through the Integrated GIS and CA with AHP-Drived Transition Rules, Int. Geographical Information Science, 1998, 12 (1): 63-82.

[63] 杨亮洁, 王录仓, 等. 基于CA 模型的城市空间扩展研究: 义乌市为例. 测绘科学, 2009, 34(3): 142-144.

[64] Engelen, G, White R, Inge Ulgee, Paul Drazan. Using Cellular Automata for Integrated Modeling of Socio - environmental Systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1995, 34(2): 203-214.

[65] 牟磊. 基于GIS 和CA模型的土地利用变化研究
[D]. 新疆大学, 2007.

[66] Junji I, Toyoki H. A two-dimensional CA model for traffic flow with car origin and destination. Physica-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2007, 378(2): 485-497.

[67] 吴慧欣, 王峰, 苏锦旗. 行人交通微观动态元胞自动机仿真模型研究. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(4): 235-238.

[68] 樊彦国, 胡振琪. 面向对象的有限空间内人群流动CA 模型研究. 计算机工程, 2006, 32(22): 181-183.

[69] 马熙源, 高西宽. 基于CA/MAS理论的北京市人口发展仿真模型. 自动化技术与应用, 2007, 26(12): 76-79.

[70] 魏芳. 北京人口分布CA/MAS仿真模型
[D]. 哈尔滨理工大学, 2007. 1169

Research Progresses on Migration Spatial Structure Modeling

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Kun, ZHONG Linsheng. International research on national park management for public welfare and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 314-329.
[2]	REN Jiamin, MA Yanji. Research progress and prospects of green development from the perspective of geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1196-1209.
[3]	TAN Xuelan, JIANG Lingxiao, WANG Zhenkai, AN Yue, CHEN Min, REN Hui. Rural poverty in China from the perspective of geography: Origin, progress, and prospect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 913-923.
[4]	GAO Li, LI Hongbo, ZHANG Xiaolin. Historical development and prospect of rural living space research in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 660-669.
[5]	XIONG Chenran, WANG Limao, QU Qiushi, XIANG Ning, WANG Bo. Progress and prospect of geopolitical risk research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[6]	HUANG An, XU Yueqing, LU Longhui, LIU Chao, ZHANG Yibin, HAO Jinmin, WANG hui. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.
[7]	ZOU Lilin, LIU Yansui, WANG Yongsheng. Research progress and prospect of land-use conflicts in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 298-309.
[8]	TAN Ronghui, LIU Yaolin, LIU Yanfang, HE Qingsong. A literature review of urban growth boundary: Theory, modeling, and effectiveness evaluation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 327-338.
[9]	XUE Lan. A review and prospect of international studies on rural amenity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2129-2138.
[10]	ZHOU Kai, HE Linyi, ZHANG Yiwen. A review of literature on the concept, impacts, and spatial interactions of sharing short-term rental platform [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1934-1943.
[11]	ZHAO Ruidong, FANG Chuanglin, LIU Haimeng. Progress and prospect of urban resilience research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731.
[12]	DUAN Hongtao,LUO Juhua,CAO Zhigang,XUE Kun,XIAO Qitao,LIU Dong. Progress in remote sensing of aquatic environments at the watershed scale [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1182-1195.
[13]	Qing GAO, Huasong LUO, Zhenbo WANG, Jinping SONG. Research progress and prospect of Beautiful China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1021-1033.
[14]	Limin LIU, Linsheng ZHONG, Hu YU. Progress of glacier tourism research and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 533-545.
[15]	Manchun LI, Mengru YAO, Xia WANG, Xiaoqiang LIU, Yanming CHEN. A review of studies on the “pole-axis system” theory based on citation analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 164-174.