两广地区工业—资源—环境系统协调性分析

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.08.003

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper designed an indicator system of industry-resource-environment and calculated the evaluation index of industry-resource and environment for the 35 cities in Guangdong and Guangxi based on the projection pursuit method. The coordination of industry-resource-environment of those cities was analyzed and appraized based on the coordination degree calculation model. The obtained results included the following aspexts. (1) There was significant correlation and significant difference of industrial development, resources consumption and industrial pollution among the 35 cities in Guangdong and Guangxi. Also, industries in the cities of Guangdong were much more developed than those of Guangxi, and the intensity of industrial pollution and resources consumption in the cities of Guangdong was higher than those of Guangxi. (2) There was a negative correlation between industry-resource-environment coordination and economy development, that is to say, the higher the economy development level, the worse the industry-resource-environment coordination. The difference was evident in the coordination of the 35 cities. The coordination in Guangxi was better than that in Guangdong, with the Pearl River Delta having the worst coordination. The difference was not obvious in the city coordination in Guangxi, while that in Guangdong was distinct. (3) Coordination was relative, and there was no absolute standard for industry-resource-environment coordination. Coordination should be analyzed combined with the real situation in a certain region. Although the coordination in Guangxi was better, it was still at a relatively low level.

Key words: coordination, Guangdong, Guangxi, projection pursuit

YANG Wei,JIN Fengjun,WANG Chengjin. Research on Coordination Degrees of Industry-Resources-Environment in Guangdong and Guangxi[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(8): 913-919.

References

[1] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3): 1-5.

[2] 毛汉英. 县域经济和社会同人口、资源、环境协调发展研究. 地理学报, 1991, 46(4): 21-28.

[3] 张志强. 区域PRED的系统分析与决策制定方法. 地理研究, 1995, 14(4): 68-72.

[4] 刘彦随. 区域可持续发展系统原理与决策. 陕西师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 1996, 24(2): 98-102.

[5] 王黎明. 面向PRED地关系系统构型理论与方法研究. 地理研究, 1997, 16(2): 38-44.

[6] 邓明艳. 可持续发展与区域PRED系统. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 26(1): 98-101, 106.

[7] 申玉铭, 毛汉英. 区域可持续发展的若干理论问题研究. 地理科学进展, 1999, 18(4): 287-294.

[8] 毛汉英. 山东省可持续发展指标体系初步研究. 地理研究, 1996, 15(4): 69-75.

[9] 冯玉广, 王华东. 区域 P RE D系统协调发展的定量描述. 环境科学学报, 1997, 17(4): 87-92.

[10] 廖志杰, 刘岳. 中国区域可持续发展水平及其空间分布特征. 地理学报, 2000, 55(2): 20-25.

[11] 王云才, 郭焕成. PRED系统特征与可持续农业发展途径选择:以聊城市东昌府区为例. 干旱区地理, 2000, 23(4): 358-363.

[12] 熊黑钢, 周哲. 典型干旱区PRED系统生态环境指标的选择与实践: 以新疆民丰县为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21(8): 1-6.

[13] 杨士宏. 广州城市环境与经济协调发展预测及调控研究. 地理科学, 1994, 14(2): 136-143.

[14] 王长征, 刘毅. 经济与环境协调研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(1): 58-65.

[15] 张晓东, 池天河. 90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析. 地理研究, 2001, 20(4): 506-515.

[16] 白雪梅. 社会协调发展的测度方法. 统计与决策, 1998(1): 6-7.

[17] 曾珍香, 顾培亮. 可持续发展的系统分析与评价. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000: 154-155.

[18] 张雷, 沈叙建, 杨荫凯, 等. 中国区域发展的资源环境协调问题. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(6): 10-19.

[19] 李鹤, 张平宇, 刘文新. 1990年以来辽宁省环境与经济协调度评价. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4): 486-492.

[20] 李佳, 吴军年, 杜哲. 生态脆弱地区资源环境经济协调发展程度评价: 以民勤地区为例. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(1): 117-122.

[21] 刘晶, 敖浩翔, 张明举. 重庆市北碚区经济、社会和资源环境协调度分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 147-151.

[22] 王顺久, 杨志峰, 丁晶. 关中平原地下水资源承载力综合评价的投影寻踪方法. 资源科学, 2004, 26(6): 104-110.

[23] 刘仁涛, 付强, 盖兆梅, 等. 三江平原地下水脆弱性评价的投影寻踪模型. 东北农业大学学报, 2008, 39(2): 184-190.

[24] 涂正革. 环境、资源与工业增长的协调性. 经济研究, 2008(2): 93-105.

[25] 陈雯, Dietrich Soyez, 左文芳. 工业绿色化: 工业环境地理学研究动向. 地理研究, 2003, 22(5): 511-518.

[26] Reid W. Sustainable development: Lessons from success. Environment, 1989, 31: 7-9.

[27] Maclaren V M. Urban sustainability reporting.Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(2): 185-202.

[28] Friedman J H, Tukey J W. A projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis. IEEE Transaction on Computer, Part C, 1974, 23(9): 881-890.

[29] 付强, 赵小勇. 投影寻踪模型原理及其应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 47-48.

[30] 金菊良, 魏一鸣, 丁晶. 水质综合评价的投影寻踪模型. 环境科学学报, 200, 21(7): 431-434.

[31] 郝璐, 王静爱, 张化. 北方草地畜牧业生态系统健康综合评价与诊断. 生态学报, 2008, 28 (4): 1456-1465.

[32] 郑海霞, 封志明, 张陆彪, 等. 甘肃省县域农业资源利用效率综合评价: 基于遗传投影寻踪方法. 经济地理, 2006, 26(4): 632-635.

[33] 隋映辉. 协调发展论. 青岛: 青岛海洋大学出版社, 1990: 20-21.

Research on Coordination Degrees of Industry-Resources-Environment in Guangdong and Guangxi

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	FANG Fang, LI Yurui, HE Renwei. Village type identification and rural revitalization path based on the rank level appropriateness and coordination degree of housing-jobs [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 1060-1072.
[2]	LI Qunji, WANG Ling'en. Conflicts and coordination of tourism resource use in protected areas in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2105-2117.
[3]	WAN Hui, ZHU Hong. Gender, resources, and power of female cross-border marriage immigrants’ home space: A case of villages in Western Guangdong Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1909-1922.
[4]	WU Xuan, YANG Jiawen. City network by mobility and attention indices: A comparison of Guangzhou and Shenzhen [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1843-1853.
[5]	Dan CUI, Hao WU, Dianting WU. A review and prospect of regional governance in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 1-14.
[6]	Jiufeng LI, Huafei YU, Yingchun FU, Yaolong ZHAO. Spatial-temporal changes of population-economy-land-society-ecology coordination level of urbanization and clustering: A case of Guangdong Province, China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 287-298.
[7]	Hong'ou ZHANG, Yang WANG, Yuyao YE, Lixia JIN, Gengzhi HUANG. Key scientific issues and important topics in the joint development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1587-1596.
[8]	Simon Xiaobin ZHAO, Wei QIANG, David Waiho WONG, Shi XIAN. Theoretical framework and development strategy of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1597-1608.
[9]	Xun LI, Jinmiao ZHOU, Yaofu HUANG, Meiyu HUANG. Understanding the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from the perspective of mega-city region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1609-1622.
[10]	P. Y. LOO Becky, Bo WANG. The importance of integrated transport in fostering the formation of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1623-1632.
[11]	Ning AN, Ling MA, Hong ZHU. Reflections on the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A perspective from political geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1633-1643.
[12]	Hui LIN, Hongsheng ZHANG, Yinyi LIN, Shan WEI, Zhifeng WU. Spatiotemporal changes of gridded urban population in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area based on impervious surface-population correlation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1644-1652.
[13]	Jin LIU, Yinsheng TIAN. Mutual influencing mechanism of industry-population-space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in the context of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1653-1662.
[14]	Huixuan ZHANG, Qing LIU, Guicai LI. Spatial structure change and optimization strategies of innovation linkage among the cities in Guangdong Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(8): 952-962.
[15]	Yajuan SHI, Yongbin ZHU, Jinchuan HUANG. Relationship between infrastructure and socioeconomic development in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(4): 450-461.