苏州城市游憩场点系统空间结构分形

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.05.011

Abstract

Abstract:

City recreation sites system is one kind of complex system combining nature with socio-culture, and it is also the core object of harmonious city development planning. The spatial structure of Suzhou recreation sites system is studied during the new period of China using fractal theories and methods. Suzhou recreation sites system is divided into three recreation subsystems located in the ancient city, new city and outer city areas, which are the three districts planned in the 2008 general planning of Suzhou city. Then, using the aggregation dimension, spatial correlation dimension and grid dimension as indexes, the spatial structures of Suzhou recreation sites system are studied thoroughly. Results and findings are as follows. Firstly, city recreation sites system is fractal, and it has good fractal characteristics. Secondly, the fractal indexes depict recreation system structure well. They are helpful to interpret the theory of ReBAM and can be used for recreation system optimization. Thirdly, the spatial structure of Suzhou recreation sites system exhibit a gradient tendency from a loose core to a compact extended structure, and the decentralization phenomenon of self-organization ability stands out. The distribution pattern of recreation sites system has a similar structure as the demand structure for recreation sites and it can depict the spatial development tendency of mature recreation sites system well. Accordingly, it is a kind of absolutely necessary work that guides and improves the self-organization ability of recreation sites system in our harmonious city development. Lastly, contrasting with the former research results, it shows that recreation sites system and tourism attractions system have different fractal structures, but it is reasonable and caters to the essence of recreation and tourism.

Key words: city recreation sites system, fractal, spatial structure, Suzhou city area

HUANG Tai1,2,3|BAO Jigang1|DAI Xuejun4. Fractal Study on Spatial Structure of City Recreation Sites System: A Case Study of Suzhou City Area[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 28(5): 735-743.

References

[1] Gregory D. Spatial structure//Johnstone R J, Gregory D, Smith D M. The Dictionary of Human Geography(2nd edn.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988, 450-451.

[2] Preobrazensky V S, Krivosheyev V M. Recreational Geography of the USSR. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1982, 31-42.

[3] Pearce D G. Tourist district in Paris: Structure and functions. Tourism Management, 1998, 19(1):49-65.

[4] 苏平, 党宁, 吴必虎. 北京环城游憩带旅游地类型与空间结构特征. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 403-410.

[5] 秦学. 城市游憩空间结构系统分析: 以宁波市为例. 经济地理, 2003, 23(2): 269-271.

[6] Benguigui L, Czamanski D, Marinov M,et al. When and where is a city fractal? Environment and Planning: Planning and Design, 2000, 27: 507-519.

[7] Allen P M. Cities and Regions as Self-organizing Systems (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam), 1997.

[8] Mandelbrot B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W H. Freeman and Company, 1983.

[9] Batty M. The fractal nature of geography. Geographical Magazine, 1992, 64(5): 34-36.

[10] 钱学森,等. 论系统工程. 长沙: 湖南科技出版社, 1982.

[11] 陈永红, 周桐, 何岱海,等. 研究多中心奇异吸引子混沌相位的新方法. 物理学报, 2002, 51(4): 731-735.

[12] Mandelbrot B B. Fractals: Form, Chance, and Dimension. San Francisco: Freeman, 1977.

[13] Batty M. Cities as fractal: Simulating growth and form. In: Crilly Tetal. Fractal and Chaos. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991: 43-69.

[14] 刘继生,陈彦光. 城镇系统等级结构的分形维数及其测算方法. 地理研究, 1998, 17(1): 82-89.

[15] 陈彦光,刘继生. 城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述: 从信息熵到分数维. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 146-152.

[16] Dekeersmaecker M L, Frankhauser P, Thomas I. Using fractal dimensions to characterize intra-urban diversity: The example of Brussels. Geographical Analysis, 2003, 35: 310-328.

[17] Batty M, Longley P. Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press, 1994.

[18] 陈彦光. 城市化: 相变与自组织临界性. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 302-312.

[19] 刘继生,陈彦光,刘志刚. 点-轴系统的分形结构及其空间复杂性探讨. 地理研究, 2003, 22(4): 447-454.

[20] Chen Yanguang, Zhou Yixing. Reinterpreting central place networks using ideas from fractals and self-organized criticality. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2006, 33: 345-364.

[21] Shen G. A Fractal dimension analysis of urban transportation networks. Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 1997, 1: 221-236.

[22] Lu Y, Tang J. Fractal dimension of a transportation network and its relationship with urban growth: A study of the Dallas-Fort Worth Area. Environment and Planning B, 2004, 31: 895-911.

[23] Beckmann M J. City hierarchies and distribution of city size. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1958, 6: 243-248.

[24] Chen Yanguang, Zhou Yixing. The rank-size rule and fractal hierarchies of cities: Mathematical models and empirical analyses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2003, 30: 799-818.

[25] 谈明洪, 范存会. Zipf维数和城市规模分布的分维值的关系探讨. 地理研究, 2004, 23(2): 243-248.

[26] 刘继生, 陈彦光. 基于GIS的细胞自动机模型与人地关系的复杂性探讨. 地理研究, 2002, 21(2): 155-162.

[27] White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 1993, 25: 1175-1199.

[28] 陈涛, 罗宏宇. 旅游行为本质的信息论探讨. 地理学与国土研究, 1996, 12(1): 35-39.

[29] 戴学军, 丁登山, 许志晖,等. 旅游景区(点)系统空间结构随机聚集分形研究: 以南京市旅游景区(点)系统为例. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(5): 706-713.

[30] 戴学军, 丁登山. 旅游景区(点)系统空间结构关联维数分形研究. 资源科学, 2006, 28(1): 180-185.

[31] 许志晖, 戴学军, 庄大昌,等. 南京市旅游景区景点系统空间结构分形研究. 地理研究, 2007, 26(1):132-140.

[32] 戴学军, 林岚, 丁登山,等. 基于分形方法的旅游景区(点)系统等级结构研究. 地理科学, 2006, 26(2): 244-250.

[33] 杨国良,游勇,李海燕. 旅游景区(点)系统空间分布的分形发育及演化特征. 自然资源学报,2007,22(6): 963-973.

[34] 高元衡, 王艳. 基于聚集分形的旅游景区空间结构演化研究. 旅游学刊, 2009, 24(2): 52-58.

[35] 杨国良, 张捷, 刘波,等. 旅游流流量位序-规模分布变化及其机理. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 662-672.

[36] 张振宇, 汪波. 旅游交通网络空间分析: 以浙江松阳县为例. 浙江理工大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 219-222.

[37] 朱晓华, 乌恩. 旅游系统网络空间分形研究的科学展望. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(1):133-142.

[38] 陈涛(陈彦光). 城镇体系随机聚集的分形研究. 科技通报, 1995, 11(2): 98-10.

[39] 刘继生, 陈彦光. 城镇体系空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法. 地理研究, 1999, 18(2):171-172.

[40] Kaye B H. A Random Walk through Fractal Dimensions. VCH Verlagsgesellshaft, Germany, 1989.

[41] 吴必虎, 董莉娜, 唐子颖. 公共游憩空间分类与属性研究. 中国园林, 2003, (4): 48-50.

[42] Chen Yanguang, Zhou Yixing. Multi-fractal measures of city-size distributions based on the three-parameter Zipf model. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2004, 22: 793-805.

Fractal Study on Spatial Structure of City Recreation Sites System: A Case Study of Suzhou City Area

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	DU Delin, WANG Jiaoe, WANG Yi. Market structure and competition of the three major airlines in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 367-376.
[2]	ZHANG Feng, CHEN Yanguang, LIU Peng. Spatiotemporal relationships between urban system and water system in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 377-388.
[3]	DUAN Xuejun,ZOU Hui,CHEN Weixiao,WANG Yazhu,YE Lei. Formation and change of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a geographical perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1217-1226.
[4]	DUAN Yaming, LIU Yong, LIU Xiuhua, HE Dong. Measuring polycentric urban structure using Easygo big data: A case study of Chongqing metropolitan area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1957-1967.
[5]	MAO Shuaiyong, JIAO Limin, XU Gang, LI Zehui. Identification of the polycentric spatial structure in Wuhan City based on multisource data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1675-1683.
[6]	Yanguang CHEN. Monofractal, multifractals, and self-affine fractals in urban studies [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 38-49.
[7]	Linshan HUANG, Yanguang CHEN, Shuangcheng LI. Multifractal spectral analysis of land use structure of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 50-64.
[8]	Feng ZHANG, Yanguang CHEN, Xiaosong LI. Radial dimension analysis of growth and form of cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 65-76.
[9]	Jingtian ZHAO, Yanguang CHEN, Shuangcheng LI. Bi-fractal structure and evolution of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region urban land-use patterns [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 77-87.
[10]	Yuqing LONG, Yanguang CHEN. Multi-scaling allometric analysis of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban system based on nighttime light data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 88-100.
[11]	Yinfeng XU, Degen WANG. Research progress and prospects of high-speed rail effects on urban spatial structure in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230.
[12]	Xiaomeng WANG, Jin WANG, Dianting WU. Spatial development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration from the perspective of traffic-industry coupling relation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1231-1244.
[13]	Qiong SONG, Xinzheng ZHAO, Tongsheng LI, Jingyu LIU. Spatial structures and influencing factors of multiple urban networks based on the perspective of directed-multivalued relation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1257-1267.
[14]	Yaling YE, Bofei YANG, Ziyun HE, Beini ZENG, Fenghua PAN, Cheng FANG. Spatial structure of urban network based on Chinese A-share listed medicine enterprise network [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1096-1105.
[15]	Xiping YANG, Zhixiang FANG. Recent progress in studying human mobility and urban spatial structure based on mobile location big data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(7): 880-889.