PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2008, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 134-140.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.03.019
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Kejian
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The so- called Shangri- la region is actually the main body of the Hengduan Mountains, administratively including eastern Tibet,northwestern and southwestern Sichuan. It is one of the few hotspots of biological and cultural diversity in the world. According to the nature of the tourist developer, this paper has summed up three models of tourist development in the Grand Shangri- la region, which are Mingyong Development Model, Hailuogou Development Model and Yulong Snow- covered Mountain Development Model, respectively. Then, the paper makes a concrete analysis of advantages and disadvantages of these models. It is shown that they overrun economic benefits and some serious problems exit in the management systems, e.g., the administrative power, managerial authority and ownership are in confusion; the government ownership is multi- separated; the status of the state, a representative of state- owned resources owner, is not clear. The paper suggests that the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress should strengthen legislation on national important landscape resources like the World Heritage sites, national nature reserves, national geoparks, national scenic spots, etc., so as to build a strict supervision and management system. It is also necessary to respect the traditional religious belief and taboo of the ethnic minorities and bring them into play in protecting environment; to encourage communities to participate in protection and supervision; to support and bring up environmental NGOs, to enhance the whole nation’s awareness of environmental protection, and finally to promote sustainable development in the Grand Shangri- la region.
Key words: Grand Shangri- la region, Hailuogou development model, Mingyong development model, Yulong snow- covered mountain development model
XU Kejian. Compar ison and Analysis of Tour ist Development Models in Gr and Shangr i- la Region[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 27(3): 134-140.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: http://www.progressingeography.com/EN/10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.03.019
http://www.progressingeography.com/EN/Y2008/V27/I3/134
[1] 彭德成. 中国旅游景区治理模式. 北京:中国旅游出版 社,2003. [2] 杨桂芳. 丽江古城旅游环境研究. 北京:民族出版社, 2005. [3] 徐柯健,殷继成,孙传敏. 四川海螺沟冰川公园可持续发 展模式探讨. 资源·产业,2002,(6):131~134. [4] 杨振之. 旅游经济:建设民族地区小康社会的经济发展 模式. http://www.venitour.com/expert,2005- 9- 22. [5] 谢茹. 国家风景名胜区经营权研究. 北京:人民出版社, 2006. [6] 张文. 中国旅游目的地发展研究报告2004. 北京:旅游 教育出版社,2005. [7] 钟勉. 试论旅游资源所有权与经营权相分离. 旅游管 理,2002,17(4):23~26.
Cited