流域水资源开发阈值模型及其在黄河流域的应用

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.02.006

Abstract

Abstract:

Threshold of water resources exploitation is the basis for reasonable use of water resources and guarantee of ecosystem health in a basin. With the shortage of water resources becoming increasingly obvious a problem, the understandings on threshold of water resources exploitation are more and more deep, developing from the concept of "total water resources", "useful water resources" and "available water resources" to available water quantity considering the ecological water demand and water quality protection. In the paper, based on the concepts on water resource use, a new threshold theory and model of water resource exploitation in a basin is developed, which includes runoff, non - useful flood, water pollution, ecological water demand and repetitive calculation of water quantity. With the model, the threshold of water resource exploitation in a basin can be obtained. The Yellow River Basin is one of the serious water shortage regions in China, and it is at the risk of serious challenges of water scarcity. As one example, the threshold of water resource exploitation in the Yellow River Basin is preliminarily calculated by the model. The result shows that the average threshold is 23.8 billion m3, accounting for about 40% of the total natural runoff, which is accordant with the internationally recognized standards on water resource exploitation within a basin. The threshold of water resource exploitation can be increased by the ways of water diversion, decreasing water pollution, increasing pondage of reservoirs and increasing water use efficiency.

Key words: basin, the Yellow River Basin, threshold mode, water resources exploitation

LI Chunhui,YANG Zhifeng,ZHENG Xiaokang,PANG Aiping. Thr eshold Model of Water Resour ce Exploitation and Its Application in the Yellow River Basin[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 27(2): 39-46.

References

[1] 刘昌明. 二十一世纪中国水资源若干问题. 水利水电技术, 2002, 33(1):15~19.

[2] 夏军. 水资源安全的度量: 水资源承载力的研究与挑战(一). 海河水利, 2002, (2):5~7.

[3] 夏军. 水资源安全的度量: 水资源承载力的研究与挑战(二). 海河水利, 2002, (3):3~7.

[4] 刘作荣. 区域地表水资源可利用量计算方法的探讨. 黑龙江水专学报, 1995, (1):47~49.

[5] 郭周亭. 水资源可利用量估算初步分析. 水文, 2001, 21 (5):23~26.

[6] 王煜, 杨立彬, 张新海等. 西北地区水资源可利用量及承载力分析. 人民黄河, 2002, 24(6):10~12.

[7] 杜晓舜, 夏自强. 洛阳市水资源可利用量研究. 水文, 2003, (1):14~17.

[8] 姚荣, 张娜, 唐德善. 湿润区域水资源可利用量研究初探. 人民长江, 2004, 35(4); 32~35.

[9] 钟华平, 王建生, 徐澎波等. 地表水资源可利用量计算原则. 水利水电技术, 2004, 35(2):9~11.

[10] 杨志峰, 沈珍瑶, 夏星辉等. 水资源可再生性基本理论及其在黄河流域的应用. 中国基础科学, 2002, (5): 4~7.

[11] 沈珍瑶, 杨志峰, 刘昌明. 水资源的天然可再生能力及其与更新速率之间的关系. 地理科学, 2002, 22(2): 162~ 165.

[12] 夏星辉,杨志峰,沈珍瑶等. 从水质水量相结合的角度再论黄河的水资源. 环境科学学报, 2005, 25(5):595~600.

[13] 夏星辉, 张曦, 杨志峰等. 从水质水量相结合的角度评价黄河的水资源. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(3): 293~299.

[14] 沈珍瑶. 黄河流域水资源开发利用阈值的情景分析( 研究报告) . 北京师范大学, 2004.

[15] 刘昌明. 关于生态需水量的概念和重要性. 科学对社会的影响, 2002, 2:24~28.

[16] 夏军. 可持续水资源系统管理研究与展望. 水科学进展, 1998, 4(3)190~197.

[17] 夏军, 郑冬燕, 刘青娥. 西北地区生态环境需水量估算的几个问题研讨. 水文, 2002, 22(5):12~17.

[18] Armbruster J T. An infiltration index useful in estimating low- flow characteristics of drainage basins. J Res USGS, 1976, 4(5):533~538.

[19] McMahon T A, Arenas A D. Methods of computations of low streamflow. Paris,UNESCO studies and reports in Hydrology, 1982, 36,107.

[20] Geoffrey E P. Water allocation to protect river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1996, 12: 353~365.

[21] 王西琴, 刘昌明, 杨志峰. 生态及环境需水量研究进展与前瞻. 水科学进展, 2002, 13(4):507~514.

[22] 王西琴, 张远, 刘昌明. 河道生态及环境需水量理论探讨. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(1):58~67.

[23] 赵文智, 程国栋. 干旱区生态水文过程研究若干问题评述. 科学通报, 2001, 46(22):1851~1857.

[24] 王芳, 梁瑞驹, 杨小柳. . 中国西北地区生态需水研究 (1): 干旱半干旱区生态需水理论分析. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(1):1~8.

[25] 王芳, 王浩, 陈建敏等. 中国西北地区生态需水研究 (2):基于遥感和地理信息系统技术的区域生态需水量计算及分析. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2):129~137.

[26] 王根绪, 程国栋. 干旱内陆区流域生态需水量估算:以黑河流域为例. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(2):129~134.

[27] 严登华, 何岩, 邓伟等. 东辽河流域坡面系统生态需水研究. 地理学报, 2002, 57(6):685~692.

[28] 左其亭, 周可法, 杨辽. 关于水资源规划中的水资源量与生态用水量的探讨. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25 (4):296~ 301.

[29] 杨志峰, 崔宝山, 刘静玲等. 生态环境需水量理论、方法与实践. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.

[30] 张远. 黄河流域坡高地与河道生态环境需水规律研究 (博士学位论文). 北京: 北京师范大学环境学院, 2003, 110~111.

[31] 朱晓原, 张学成. 黄河水资源变化研究. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 1999, 173~174.

[32] 钱征寒, 倪晋仁, 薛安. 黄河断流严重程度分级与判别方法. 地理学报, 2001, 56(6):691~699.

[33] 李国英. 黄河治理的终极目标是“维持黄河健康生命”. 人民黄河, 2004, 26(1):1~2.

[34] 李国英. 建立“维持河流生命的基本水量”概念.人民黄河, 2003, 25(2):1.

[35] 倪晋仁, 王裕东, 钱征寒, 李天宏,赵业安. 黄河下游水资源转化结构及其变化规律. 中国科学(E 辑), 2004, 34(增刊I):103~116.

[36] 王裕东, 倪晋仁, 李天宏, 罗华铭. 不同用水原则下的黄河下游水资源转化结构. 水利学报, 2004.

Thr eshold Model of Water Resour ce Exploitation and Its Application in the Yellow River Basin

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	RONG Xiaoqing, PANG Jiangli, HUANG Chunchang, ZHOU Yali, WANG Zhaoduo, ZHANG Yuzhu, GUO Yongqiang, ZHAO Hui, CHUI Yuda. Prehistoric catastrophic surface processes and their impacts in the Guanting Basin, Qinghai Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1319-1332.
[2]	TANG Chengli, GUO Xiashuang, ZHOU Guohua, WU Jiamin, CHEN Weiyang. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of innovation platforms in urban agglomerations of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Basin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 531-541.
[3]	HU Xu, NIE Yong, XU Xia, JIANG Sheng, ZHANG Yili. Monitoring land-use change in Hetian Tarim Basin, China using satellite remote sensing observation between 1990 and 2016 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 577-590.
[4]	ZHANG Yongyong, CHEN Qiutan. Characteristics of main flood event types and their temporal-spatial variations in the upper and middle reaches of the Huai River Basin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 627-635.
[5]	HU Qingfang, CAO Shiyi, YANG Huibin, WANG Yintang, LI Linjie, WANG Lihui. Daily runoff predication using LSTM at the Ankang Station, Hanjing River [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 636-642.
[6]	WANG Xiaonan, SUN Wei. Transformation efficiency of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin and its influencing factors [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1643-1655.
[7]	JIANG Kaisi,LIU Zhengjia,LI Yurui,WANG Yongsheng,WANG Yu. Land use change of typical villages in the loess hilly and gully region and implications for regional rural transformation and development [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1305-1315.
[8]	GAO Jungfeng,GAO Yongnian,ZHANG Zhiming. Theory and application of aquatic ecoregion delineation in lake-basin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1159-1170.
[9]	DUAN Xuejun,ZOU Hui,CHEN Weixiao,WANG Yazhu,YE Lei. Formation and change of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a geographical perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1217-1226.
[10]	Jun LI, Yu YE, Xueqiong WEI. Reconstruction of cropland change in the southern area of the Daqing River Basin over the past 300 years [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 883-895.
[11]	Caishan ZHAO, Gang ZENG, Lijuan ZHANG, Xuezhen ZHANG. Effects of cropland and woodland conversion on land surface temperature based on Google Earth and MODIS land data: A case study of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin and its adjacent areas [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 698-708.
[12]	XUE Tianyi, WU Xutong, ZHU Chenyi, WANG Hongya. Change of sediment load and its influencing factors in the Hongshui River Basin in Southwestern China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 772-782.
[13]	Yang LIU, Jianshu LV, Jun BI. Characterizing water purification services and quantifying their driving factors in watershed terrestrial ecosystems [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 588-599.
[14]	Qian SUN, BAIDOURELA·Aliya. Mathematical fitting of influencing factors and measured groundwater level: Take Keriya River Basin in Hetian area as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(7): 912-922.
[15]	Kaihua LIAO, Ligang LV. Advances in research of hillslope soil hydrological processes in the humid region of Southeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 476-484.