多尺度交通出行碳排放影响因素研究进展

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.11.016

地理科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 1814-1828.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.11.016

多尺度交通出行碳排放影响因素研究进展

杨文越¹, 曹小曙^2,^*()

^1. 华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院,广州 510642
^2. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275

收稿日期:2018-12-20 修回日期:2019-03-28 出版日期:2019-11-28 发布日期:2019-11-28
通讯作者: 曹小曙
作者简介:杨文越(1988— ),男,广东韶关人,博士,讲师,中国地理学会会员(S110012062M),主要研究方向为城市交通地理与土地利用。E-mail: yangwenyue900780@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41701169);国家自然科学基金项目(41671160);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD17YSH01)

Progress of research on influencing factors of CO₂ emissions from multi-scale transport

YANG Wenyue¹, CAO Xiaoshu^2,^*()

^1. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
^2. School of Geography Science and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2018-12-20 Revised:2019-03-28 Online:2019-11-28 Published:2019-11-28
Contact: CAO Xiaoshu
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No(41701169);National Natural Science Foundation of China, No(41671160);Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of Guangdong Province, No(GD17YSH01)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

减少交通出行碳排放是全球共同面对的重大议题之一,同时也是城市和交通可持续发展的重要目标。论文首先基于文献计量方法对近20年来的全球交通出行碳排放研究现状与趋势进行梳理与分析,在此基础上,分别从国家、城市和社区3个尺度对国家交通能源消耗及其碳排放的驱动力因素、城市形态对交通碳排放的影响以及社区建成环境对居民出行碳排放的影响研究进行了文献综述与归纳凝练。研究发现：① 国家尺度的研究早期大多基于时间序列数据,采用分解法探究交通能源消耗的主要驱动力;近年来,研究进一步根据能源消耗数据“自上而下”地测算交通碳排放,并通过构建面板数据模型探究社会经济、城市形态和交通发展因素对交通碳排放的影响。② 城市尺度的研究早期围绕紧凑城市是否一种低碳的城市形态而进行讨论,主要使用截面数据和相关分析方法;近年来,进一步拓展使用情景预测、GIS空间分析、空间回归、空间模拟等方法探究城市交通碳排放的空间差异及其与城市形态、城市中心分布形式之间的关系。③ 在社区尺度,研究多以截面、非集计的问卷调查数据为主,采用定量的数学模型探究居民社会经济属性和人口密度,土地利用混合度,与就业地、城市中心的距离,路网与交叉口密度、公共交通供给水平等建成环境要素对居民出行碳排放的影响。最后有针对性地提出了未来中国城市交通出行碳排放影响因素的研究趋势。

关键词: 交通, 出行, 碳排放, 影响因素, 多尺度分析

Abstract:

Reducing CO₂ emissions from transport is a major issue worldwide. It is also an important goal for sustainable urban and transport development. Using bibliometric methods, this article reviews and summarizes the current research situation and trends of global CO₂ emissions from transport over the past two decades. On this basis, the article reviews and analyzes the literature on the driving forces of energy consumption and its related CO₂ emissions, and the impacts of urban form and neighborhood built environments on CO₂ emissions from transport at the national, city, and neighborhood scales, respectively. Our study found that most of the early national-scale studies were based on time-series data, using decomposition methods to explore the main driving forces of transport energy consumption. In recent years, further studies calculated CO₂ emissions from transport with a "top-down" approach based on energy consumption data, and explored the impact of socioeconomic, urban form, and transportation development factors on CO₂ emissions from transport by constructing panel data models. Early city-scale studies focused on whether compact cities are a low-carbon urban form, mainly using cross-sectional data and correlation analysis methods. In recent years, scenario forecasting, GIS spatial analysis, spatial regression, spatial simulation, and other methods have been further developed to explore the spatial differences of urban transport carbon emissions and their relationships with urban morphology and urban center distribution. For the neighborhood-scale studies, mathematical models were used to examine the effects of residents’ demographics and built environments on CO₂ emissions, mainly based on cross-sectional and disaggregated questionnaire survey data. The built environment factors include population density, land-use mix, distance to employment sites or distance to urban centers, road network and intersection density, and the supply level of public transport. At the end of the article, research trends of influencing factors of CO₂ emissions from transport in urban China are analyzed with respect to the three aspects of study data, methodology, and research contents.

Key words: transport, travel, CO₂ emissions, influencing factors, multi-scale analysis

杨文越, 曹小曙. 多尺度交通出行碳排放影响因素研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1814-1828.

YANG Wenyue, CAO Xiaoshu. Progress of research on influencing factors of CO₂ emissions from multi-scale transport[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1814-1828.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

表2

图5

图6

参考文献 89

1	曹小曙, 杨文越, 黄晓燕 . 2015. 基于智慧交通的可达性与交通出行碳排放: 理论与实证[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(4):418-429.
	[ Cao X S, Yang W Y, Huang X Y . 2015. Accessibility and CO₂ emissions from travel of smart transportation: Theory and empirical studies. Progress in Geography, 34(4):418-429. ]
2	柴彦威, 肖作鹏, 刘志林 . 2011. 基于空间行为约束的北京市居民家庭日常出行碳排放的比较分析[J]. 地理科学, 31(7):843-849.
	[ Chai Y W, Xiao Z P, Liu Z L . 2011. Comparative analysis on CO₂ emission per household in daily travel based on spatial behavior constraints. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(7):843-849. ]
3	柴彦威, 肖作鹏, 刘志林 . 2012. 居民家庭日常出行碳排放的发生机制与调控策略: 以北京市为例[J]. 地理研究, 31(2):334-344.
	[ Chai Y W, Xiao Z P, Liu Z L . 2012. Low-carbon optimization strategies based on CO₂ emission mechanism of household daily travels: A case study of Beijing. Geographical Research, 31(2):334-344. ]
4	郭洪旭, 黄莹, 赵黛青 , 等. 2016. 中国典型城市空间形态对居民出行能耗的影响[J]. 城市发展研究, 23(3):95-100.
	[ Guo H X, Huang Y, Zhao D Q , et al. 2016. Impact of urban form on private travel energy use of typical city in China. Urban Studies, 23(3):95-100. ]
5	黄经南, 杜宁睿, 刘沛 , 等. 2013. 住家周边土地混合度与家庭日常交通出行碳排放影响研究: 以武汉市为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 28(2):25-30.
	[ Huang J N, Du N R, Liu P , et al. 2013. An exploration of land use mix around residence and family commuting caused carbon emission: A case study of Wuhan city in China. Urban Planning International, 28(2):25-30. ]
6	黄经南, 高浩武, 韩笋生 . 2015. 道路交通设施便利度对家庭日常交通出行碳排放的影响: 以武汉市为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 30(3):97-105.
	[ Huang J N, Gao H W, Han S S . 2015. The effect of traffic facilities accessibility on household commuting caused carbon emission: A case study of Wuhan city, China. Urban Planning International, 30(3):97-105. ]
7	姜洋, 何东全 , Zegras C. 2011. 城市街区形态对居民出行能耗的影响研究[J]. 城市交通, 9(4):21-29.
	[ Jiang Y, He D Q, Zegras C . 2011. Impact of neighborhood land use on residents travel energy consumption. Urban Transport of China, 9(4):21-29. ]
8	刘清春, 张莹莹, 肖燕 , 等. 2018. 济南市主城区私家车日常出行碳排放特征及影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 40(2):262-272.
	[ Liu Q C, Zhang Y Y, Xiao Y , et al. 2018. Characteristics and determinants of carbon emissions from daily private cars travel in central area of Jinan. Resources Science, 40(2):262-272. ]
9	龙瀛, 毛其智, 杨东峰 , 等. 2011. 城市形态、交通能耗和环境影响集成的多智能体模型[J]. 地理学报, 66(8):1033-1044. doi: 10.11821/xb201108003
	[ Long Y, Mao Q Z, Yang D F , et al. 2011. A multi-agent model for urban form, transportation energy consumption and environmental impact integrated simulation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8):1033-1044. ] doi: 10.11821/xb201108003
10	马静, 柴彦威, 符婷婷 . 2017. 居民时空行为与环境污染暴露对健康影响的研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(10):1260-1269.
	[ Ma J, Chai Y W, Fu T T . 2017. Progress of research on the health impact of people's space-time behavior and environmental pollution exposure. Progress in Geography, 36(10):1260-1269. ]
11	马静, 柴彦威, 刘志林 . 2011. 基于居民出行行为的北京市交通碳排放影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 66(2):1023-1032.
	[ Ma J, Chai Y W, Liu Z L . 2011. The mechanism of CO₂ emissions from urban transport based on individuals' travel behavior in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(2):1023-1032. ]
12	满洲, 赵荣钦, 袁盈超 , 等. 2018. 城市居住区周边土地混合度对居民通勤交通碳排放的影响: 以南京市江宁区典型居住区为例[J]. 人文地理, 33(1):70-75.
	[ Man Z, Zhao R Q, Yuan Y C , et al. 2018. Impact of land-mixing degree of residential area on carbon emissions of commuting: A case study of typical residential district, Jiangning district, Nanjing. Human Geography, 33(1):70-75. ]
13	苏涛永, 张建慧, 李金良 , 等. 2011. 城市交通碳排放影响因素实证研究: 来自京津沪渝面板数据的证据[J]. 工业工程与管理, 16(5):134-138.
	[ Su T Y, Zhang J H, Li J L , et al. 2011. Influence factors of urban traffic carbon emission: An empirical study with panel data of big four city of China. Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(5):134-138. ]
14	童抗抗, 马克明 . 2012. 居住-就业距离对交通碳排放的影响[J]. 生态学报, 32(10):2975-2984. doi: 10.5846/stxb201104260551
	[ Tong K K, Ma K M . 2012. Significant impact of job-housing distance on carbon emissions from transport: A scenario analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(10):2975-2984. ] doi: 10.5846/stxb201104260551
15	肖作鹏, 柴彦威, 刘志林 . 2011. 北京市居民家庭日常出行碳排放的量化分布与影响因素[J]. 城市发展研究, 18(9):104-112.
	[ Xiao Z P, Chai Y W, Liu Z L . 2011. Quantitative distribution and related factors for household daily. Urban Studies, 18(9):104-112. ]
16	谢守红, 蔡海亚, 夏刚祥 . 2016. 中国交通运输业碳排放的测算及影响因素[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 30(5):13-18.
	[ Xie S H, Cai H Y, Xia G X . 2016. Calculation of the carbon emissions of Chinese transportation industry and the driving factors. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 30(5):13-18. ]
17	杨上广, 王春兰, 刘淋 . 2014. 上海家庭出行碳排放基本特征、空间模式及影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 24(6):148-153.
	[ Yang S G, Wang C L, Liu L . 2014. Study on basic characteristics, spatial pattern and influence factors of Shanghai family commuting carbon emission. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(6):148-153. ]
18	杨文越, 曹小曙 . 2018. 居住自选择视角下的广州出行碳排放影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 73(2):346-361. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201802010
	[ Yang W Y, Cao X S . 2018. The influence mechanism of travel-related CO₂ emissions from the perspective of residential self-selection: A case study of Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(2):346-361. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201802010
19	杨文越, 李涛, 曹小曙 . 2015 a. 广州市社区出行低碳指数格局及其影响因素的空间异质性[J]. 地理研究, 34(8):1471-1480. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508006
	[ Yang W Y, Li T, Cao X S . 2015. The spatial pattern of Community Travel Low Carbon Index (CTLCI) and spatial heterogeneity of the relationship between CTLCI and influencing factors in Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 34(8):1471-1480. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508006
20	杨文越, 李涛, 曹小曙 . 2015 b. 基于碳排放-位置分配模型的公共中心规划支持系统设计与应用研究[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 47(5):119-125.
	[ Yang W Y, Li T, Cao X S . 2015. The Study of design and application of CO₂ emissions-location allocation model based public center planning support system. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 47(5):119-125. ]
21	张杰, 杨阳, 陈骁 , 等. 2013. 济南市住区建成环境对家庭出行能耗影响研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 20(7):83-89.
	[ Zhang J, Yang Y, Chen X , et al. 2013. A research on neighborhood built environment and household travel energy in Jinan. Urban Studies, 20(7):83-89. ]
22	张陶新, 曾熬志 . 2013. 中国交通碳排放空间计量分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 20(10):14-20.
	[ Zhang T X, Zeng A Z . 2013. Spatial econometrics on china transport carbon emissions. Urban Studies, 20(10):14-20. ]
23	郑思齐, 霍燚 . 2010. 低碳城市空间结构:从私家车出行角度的研究[J]. 世界经济文汇, ( 6):50-65.
	[ Zheng S Q, Huo Y . 2010. Low carbon urban spatial structure: Research from the angle of private cars. World Economic Papers, ( 6):50-65. ]
24	Alford G, Whiteman J . 2009. Macro-urban form and transport energy outcomes: Investigations for Melbourne[J]. Road & Transport Research, 18(1):53-67. doi: 10.1111/josh.12846 pmid: 31770813
25	Anderson W P, Kanaroglou P S, Miller E J . 1996. Urban form, energy and the environment: A review of issues, evidence and policy[J]. Urban Studies, 33(1):7-35. doi: 10.1080/00420989650012095
26	Banister D, Schwanen T, Anable J . 2012. Introduction to the special section on theoretical perspectives on climate change mitigation in transport[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 24:467-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.004
27	Barla P, Miranda-Moreno L F, Lee-Gosselin M . 2011. Urban travel CO₂ emissions and land use: A case study for Quebec City[J]. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 16(6):423-428. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.03.005
28	Brand C, Goodman A, Ogilvie D . 2014. Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: A controlled longitudinal study[J]. Applied Energy, 128:284-295. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.072
29	Brand C, Goodman A, Rutter H , et al. 2013. Associations of individual, household and environmental characteristics with carbon dioxide emissions from motorised passenger travel[J]. Applied Energy, 104:158-169. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.001
30	Brand C, Tran M, Anable J . 2012. The UK transport carbon model: An integrated life cycle approach to explore low carbon futures[J]. Energy Policy, 41:107-124. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.019
31	Breheny M . 1997. Urban compaction: Feasible and acceptable?[J]. Cities, 14(4):209-217. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00005-X
32	Brownstone D, Golob T F . 2009. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1):91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.002
33	Cai B, Guo H, Cao L , et al. 2018. Local strategies for China's carbon mitigation: An investigation of Chinese city-level CO₂ emissions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178:890-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.054
34	Cai B, Yang W, Cao D , et al. 2012. Estimates of China's national and regional transport sector CO₂ emissions in 2007[J]. Energy Policy, 41:474-483. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.008
35	Cao X J . 2017. Land use and transportation in China[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52:423-427. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00453-w pmid: 31768837
36	Cao X S, Yang W Y . 2017. Examining the effects of the built environment and residential self-selection on commuting trips and the related CO₂ emissions: An empirical study in Guangzhou, China[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52:480-494. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.003
37	Carty J, Ahern A . 2011. Introducing a transport carbon dioxide emissions vulnerability index for the Greater Dublin area[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6):1059-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.006
38	Cervero R, Murakami J . 2010. Effects of built environments on vehicle miles traveled: Evidence from 370 US urbanized areas[J]. Environment and Planning A, 42(2):400-418. doi: 10.1068/a4236
39	Chapman L . 2007. Transport and climate change: A review[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5):354-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008
40	Chow A S Y . 2016. Spatial-modal scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions from commuting in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 54:205-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.001
41	Ding C, Wang Y, Xie B , et al. 2014. Understanding the role of built environment in reducing vehicle miles traveled accounting for spatial heterogeneity[J]. Sustainability, 6(2):589-601. doi: 10.3390/su6020589
42	Dodman D . 2009. Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 21(1):185-201. doi: 10.1177/0956247809103016
43	Dulal H B, Brodnig G, Onoriose C G . 2011. Climate change mitigation in the transport sector through urban planning: A review[J]. Habitat International, 35(3):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.02.001
44	Ewing R . 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1):107-126. doi: 10.1080/01944369708975728
45	Gambhir A, Tse L K C, Tong D , et al. 2015. Reducing China's road transport sector CO₂ emissions to 2050: Technologies, costs and decomposition analysis[J]. Applied Energy, 157:905-917. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.018
46	Geels F W . 2012. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 24:471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021
47	Gordon P, Richardson H W . 1989. Gasoline consumption and cities: A reply[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(3):342-346. doi: 10.1080/01944368908975421
48	Gordon P, Richardson H W . 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1):95-106. doi: 10.1080/01944369708975727
49	Handy S, Cao X, Mokhtarian P . 2005. Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10:427-444. doi: 10.1002/jgm.3148 pmid: 31770816
50	Hankey S, Marshall J D . 2010. Impacts of urban form on future US passenger-vehicle greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Energy Policy, 38(9):4880-4887. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.005
51	He D, Liu H, He K , et al. 2013. Energy use of, and CO₂ emissions from China's urban passenger transportation sector:Carbon mitigation scenarios upon the transportation mode choices[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 53:53-67. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.06.004
52	Holz-Rau C, Scheiner J . 2019. Land-use and transport planning: A field of complex cause-impact relationships. Thoughts on transport growth, greenhouse gas emissions and the built environment[J]. Transport Policy, 74:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.004
53	Hong J . 2015. Non-linear influences of the built environment on transportation emissions: Focusing on densities[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1):229-240.
54	Hong J, Goodchild A . 2014. Land use policies and transport emissions: Modeling the impact of trip speed, vehicle characteristics and residential location[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 26:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.10.011
55	Hong J, Shen Q . 2013. Residential density and transportation emissions: Examining the connection by addressing spatial autocorrelation and self-selection[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 22:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.03.006
56	IEA. 2018. CO₂ Emissions from Fuel Combustion [R]. Paris, France: IEA.
57	Kenworthy J R, Laube F B . 1996. Automobile dependence in cities: An international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4-6):279-308. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00023-6
58	Kiang N, Schipper L . 1996. Energy trends in the Japanese transportation sector[J]. Transport Policy, 3(1-2):21-35. doi: 10.1021/es0716756 pmid: 18678034
59	Kwon T H . 2005. A scenario analysis of CO₂ emission trends from car travel: Great Britain 2000-2030[J]. Transport Policy, 12(2):175-184. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.004
60	Lakshmanan T R, Han X . 1997. Factors underlying transportation CO₂ emissions in the U.S.A.: A decomposition analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2:1-15. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00011-9
61	Li H, Qin Q . 2019. Challenges for China's carbon emissions peaking in 2030: A decomposition and decoupling analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207:857-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.043
62	Li P, Zhao P, Brand C . 2018. Future energy use and CO₂ emissions of urban passenger transport in China: A travel behavior and urban form based approach[J]. Applied Energy, 211:820-842. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.022
63	Liu Z, Ma J, Chai Y . 2017. Neighborhood-scale urban form, travel behavior, and CO₂ emissions in Beijing: Implications for low-carbon urban planning[J]. Urban Geography, 38(3):381-400. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1191796
64	Ma J, Liu Z, Chai Y . 2015. The impact of urban form on CO₂ emission from work and non-work trips: The case of Beijing, China[J]. Habitat International, 47:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.12.007
65	Ma J, Zhou S, Mitchell G , et al. 2018. CO₂ emission from passenger travel in Guangzhou, China: A small area simulation[J]. Applied Geography, 98:121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.015
66	Määttä-Juntunen H, Antikainen H, Kotavaara O , et al. 2011. Using GIS tools to estimate CO₂ emissions related to the accessibility of large retail stores in the Oulu region, Finland[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2):346-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.001
67	Mazzarino M . 2000. The economics of the greenhouse effect: Evaluating the climate change impact due to the transport sector in Italy[J]. Energy Policy, 28(13):957-966. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00078-1
68	Modarres A . 2013. Commuting and energy consumption: Toward an equitable transportation policy[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 33:240-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.005
69	Newman P W, Kenworthy J R . 1989. Gasoline consumption and cities: A comparison of US cities with a global survey[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(1):24-37. doi: 10.1080/01944368908975398
70	Newman P . 2006. The environmental impact of cities[J]. Environment & Urbanization, 18(2):275-295. doi: 10.1128/AAMCol.18Oct.2017 pmid: 31769941
71	Pan X, Wang H, Wang L , et al. 2018. Decarbonization of China's transportation sector: In light of national mitigation toward the Paris Agreement goals[J]. Energy, 155:853-864. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.144
72	Qin B, Han S S . 2013. Planning parameters and household carbon emission: Evidence from high- and low-carbon neighborhoods in Beijing[J]. Habitat International, 37:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.017
73	Reichert A, Holz-Rau C, Scheiner J . 2016. GHG emissions in daily travel and long-distance travel in Germany: Social and spatial correlates[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49:25-43. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.029
74	Schafer A, Victor D G . 1999. Global passenger travel: Implications for carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Energy, 24(8):657-679. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00019-5
75	Schimek P . 1996. Household motor vehicle ownership and use: How much does residential density matter?[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1552:120-125. doi: 10.1177/0361198196155200117
76	Scholl L, Schipper L, Kiang N . 1996. CO₂ emissions from passenger transport: A comparison of international trends from 1973 to 1992[J]. Energy Policy, 24(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(95)00148-4
77	Schwanen T, Banister D, Anable J . 2011. Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10):993-1006. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12298 pmid: 25558084
78	Shim G E, Rhee S M, Ahn K H , et al. 2006. The relationship between the characteristics of transportation energy consumption and urban form[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(2):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s00168-005-0051-5
79	Song S, Diao M, Feng C . 2016. Individual transport emissions and the built environment: A structural equation modelling approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92:206-219. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.005
80	Timilsina G R, Shrestha A . 2009. Transport sector CO₂ emissions growth in Asia: Underlying factors and policy options[J]. Energy Policy, 37(11):4523-4539. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.009
81	Wang D, Lin T . 2014. Residential self-selection, built environment, and travel behavior in the Chinese context[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(3):5-14. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v7i3
82	Wang W W, Zhang M, Zhou M . 2011. Using LMDI method to analyze transport sector CO₂ emissions in China[J]. Energy, 36(10):5909-5915. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.031
83	Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhu L , et al. 2018. Influencing factors and decoupling elasticity of China's transportation carbon emissions[J]. Energies, 11(5):1157. doi: 10.3390/en11051157. doi: 10.3390/en11051157
84	Xu B, Lin B . 2015. Factors affecting carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions in China's transport sector: A dynamic nonparametric additive regression model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101:311-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.088
85	Yang W Y, Chen B Y, Cao X S , et al. 2017. The spatial characteristics and influencing factors of modal accessibility gaps: A case study for Guangzhou, China[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 60:21-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.02.005
86	Yang W Y, Li T, Cao X S . 2015. Examining the impacts of socio-economic factors, urban form and transportation development on CO₂ emissions from transportation in China: A panel data analysis of China's provinces[J]. Habitat International, 49:212-220. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.030
87	Yang W Y, Wang S J, Zhao X M . 2018. Measuring the direct and indirect effects of neighborhood-built environments on travel-related CO₂ Emissions: A structural equation modeling approach[J]. Sustainability, 10(5):1-14. doi: 10.3390/su10020001
88	Zahabi S A H, Miranda-Moreno L, Patterson Z , et al. 2012. Transportation greenhouse gas emissions and its relationship with urban form, transit accessibility and emerging green technologies: A Montreal case study[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54:966-978. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.812
89	Zhu X P, Li R R . 2017. An analysis of decoupling and influencing factors of carbon emissions from the transportation sector in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area, China[J]. Sustainability, 9(5):1-19. doi: 10.3390/su9010001

排名	期刊名称	文献总数/篇	总被引次数/次	平均被引次数/次
1	Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment	724	2034	2.81
2	Transportation Research Record	571	629	1.10
3	Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal of Automobile Engineering	323	249	0.77
4	International Journal of Automotive Technology	207	239	1.15
5	Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice	207	726	3.51
6	Transport Policy	153	377	2.46
7	IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems	150	252	1.68
8	Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies	140	330	2.36
9	International Journal of Vehicle Design	136	51	0.38
10	Journal of Transport Geography	115	239	2.08

[1]	王博, 吴天航, 冯淑怡. 地方政府土地出让干预对区域工业碳排放影响的对比分析——以中国8大经济区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1436-1446.
[2]	王成, 谢波. 土地利用视角下城市交通事故驱动机理的研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1597-1606.
[3]	姜宛贝, 刘卫东, 刘志高, 韩梦瑶. 中国化石能源燃烧碳排放强度非均衡性及其演变的驱动力分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1425-1435.
[4]	付占辉, 梅林, 郑茹敏, 王彤彤. 东北地区城市女性就业水平空间分异机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318.
[5]	程晗蓓, 邹游, 林赛南, 李志刚. 居住迁移对居民健康的影响研究进展述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1210-1223.
[6]	丁建军, 王璋, 柳艳红, 余方薇. 中国连片特困区经济韧性测度及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 924-937.
[7]	侯超, 陈鹏, 曾昭龙, 石少冲, 原鹏辉, 沈兵. 不同主体特征的犯罪人空间出行行为分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 602-613.
[8]	胡小芳, 李小雅, 王天宇, 赵红敏, 杨铄, 邓磊, 李景旺. 民宿空间分布的集聚模式与影响因素研究——基于杭州、湖州、恩施的比较[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1698-1707.
[9]	张纯, 程志华, 于晓萍, 王亚群, 沈忱. 乌鲁木齐公共交通基础设施对低收入群体就业的影响研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 111-119.
[10]	许熳灵, 付晓, 汤君友, 刘志远. 天气因素对城市地铁客流时空分布的影响——基于智能交通卡数据的实证研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 45-55.
[11]	曹志宏, 郝晋珉, 邢红萍. 中国居民食物消费碳排放时空演变趋势及其驱动机制分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 91-99.
[12]	陈秧分, 刘玉, 王国刚. 大都市乡村发展比较及其对乡村振兴战略的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1403-1411.
[13]	杨奎,张宇,赵小风,文琦,钟太洋. 乡村土地利用结构效率时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1393-1402.
[14]	吴威,梁双波,曹有挥. 流域交通运输地理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1136-1149.
[15]	申犁帆, 张纯, 李赫, 王烨, 王子甲. 城市轨道交通通勤与职住平衡状况的关系研究——基于大数据方法的北京实证分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 791-806.

多尺度交通出行碳排放影响因素研究进展

Progress of research on influencing factors of CO₂ emissions from multi-scale transport

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 89

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

作者名	总被引用次数/次	文章总数/篇	第一作者文章总数/篇	第一作者文章被引次数/次	通信作者文章总数/篇	通信作者文章被引次数/次
H. Rakha	290	27	11	125	21	181
K. Ahn	264	23	11	140	5	111
M. Barth	175	23	7	99	7	99
A. Trani	168	4	0	0	0	0
K. Boriboonsomsin	160	21	10	67	10	71
N. M. Rouphail	144	25	0	0	0	0
D. Banister	123	16	5	25	4	20
T. Bektas	121	8	1	48	6	95
G. Laporte	121	8	0	0	1	0
H. C. Frey	119	29	7	34	21	60

多尺度交通出行碳排放影响因素研究进展

Progress of research on influencing factors of CO2 emissions from multi-scale transport

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 89

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

Progress of research on influencing factors of CO₂ emissions from multi-scale transport