国家地缘脆弱性探索——缅甸案例及对中国地缘战略启示

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.06.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当今国际地缘政治经济格局正处于剧烈变动中,并对缅甸地缘环境的复杂性及地缘脆弱性产生深刻影响。缅甸所在的大湄公河次区域日益成为世界重要地缘政治力量博弈前沿和焦点。系统研究缅甸国家地缘脆弱性,对于中国西部大开发、“一带一路”及周边地缘环境建设具有重要战略意义。本文基于地缘政治及人地关系地域系统等学科理论,规范分析与实证分析相结合,从暴露性、敏感性和适应性等方面构建了国家地缘脆弱性研究框架,系统探索了缅甸典型的国家地缘脆弱性特征。资源环境禀赋、内部地域结构等引致的经济政治体系、社会文化传承等方面是缅甸脆弱性的本底特征,而缅甸与中国的地缘关系及决策则从根本上影响其地缘战略位态。缅甸地缘政治脆弱性及其与中国的相互依赖使之成为西方“U型封堵大陆战略”的薄弱点和今后角逐的着力点,也是中国解围破局重要的地缘战略出口。近期中国应通过“一带一路”孟中印缅经济走廊建设,大力加强中缅之间政治、经济、文化等各方面友好关系。

关键词: 国家地缘脆弱性, 风险性, 敏感性, 适应性, 地缘政治, 缅甸

Abstract:

At present international geopolitical pattern is drastically changing, which may have a profound influence on the complexity of Myanmar’s geopolitical context and vulnerability. Myanmar and the Greater Mekong Sub-region are becoming the world's major forefront and focus of geopolitical power game. Consequently, research on Myanmar geopolitical vulnerability would have great theoretical and practical significance for the development of western China and the “Belt and Road” initiative, as well as China’s surrounding geopolitical environment. National geopolitical vulnerability is a geopolitical concept, especially related with traditional implication of “small country.” Based on theories and methodologies of geopolitics and human-environment system research, this study defines national geopolitical vulnerability with regard to exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability, combining normative analysis with empirical study, and then systematically explores the structural effects and typical characteristics of national geopolitical vulnerability of Myanmar. With regard to internal vulnerability (sensitivity and adaptability), Myanmar has a vulnerable geopolitical location with the narrow shaped territory surrounded by multi-national powers, traditional agriculture-based economy and widespread poverty conditions, complex regional structure with multi-ethnic and multi-cultural conflicts, and long-term instability of government system. All these geopolitical factors and their succession mechanism determine its national geopolitical vulnerability. Significantly, China-Myanmar geopolitical relations fundamentally affect the geostrategic position of Myanmar. Myanmar’s geopolitical vulnerability and the corresponding dependence on China make it a weak point of the Western U-shaped besieging strategy and future critical point of the power competition, also an important geostrategic opening to China for breaking the geopolitical siege. It would be indispensable to continue to strengthen interdependence between China and Myanmar, and to maintain sound friendly bilateral relations. Myanmar is being faced with parliamentary election changes at present. Its political orientation will determine the future national development process and the corresponding geopolitical landscape of Southeast Asia, South Asia, and even the Asia-Pacific region for decades.

Key words: national geopolitical vulnerability, exposure, sensitivity, resilience, geopolitical policy, Myanmar

李飞, 成升魁, 于会录, 秦奇, 刘晓洁, 徐增让, 吴良, 张丹, 李欣, 初冬梅. 国家地缘脆弱性探索——缅甸案例及对中国地缘战略启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(6): 737-746.

Fei LI, Shengkui CHENG, Huilu YU, Qi QIN, Xiaojie LIU, Zengrang XU, Liang WU, Dan ZHANG, Xin LI, Dongmei CHU. National geopolitical vulnerability: A Myanmar case and implications for China’s geopolitical policy[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(6): 737-746.

图/表 2

参考文献 33

1	汉斯·摩根索. 2006. 国家间政治: 权力斗争与和平[M]. 7版. 徐昕, 郝望, 李保平, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	[Morgenthau H J.2006. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace[M]. 7th ed. Xu X, Hao W, Li B P, trans. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.]
2	何帆. 2012. 拂尘缅甸[J/OL]. 财经, 2012-03-31[2015-10-18]. .
	[He F. 2012. Fuchen Miandian[J/OL]. Caijing, 2012-03-31[2015-10-18]. .]
3	刘从德. 2010. 地缘政治学导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
	[Li C D.2010. Diyuan zhengzhixue daolun[M]. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.]
4	刘翔峰. 2014. 缅甸的产业发展及中缅贸易投资[J]. 全球化, (4): 111-123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0675.2014.04.013
	[Liu X F.2014. Burmese industry development and Sino-Myanmar relationship on trade and investment[J]. Globalization, (4): 111-123.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0675.2014.04.013
5	罗伯特·基欧汉, 约瑟夫·奈. 2012. 权力与相互依赖[M]. 4版. 门洪华, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	[Keohane R O, Nye J S.2012. Power and interdependence[M]. 4th ed. Men H H, trans. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.]
6	毛汉英. 2014. 中国周边地缘政治与地缘经济格局和对策[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(3): 289-302. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.03.001
	[Mao H Y.2014. Geopolitical and geoeconomic situation in the surrounding areas and China’s strategies[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(3): 289-302.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.03.001
7	缅甸国家计划与经济发展部. 2015. 缅甸国家计划与经济发展部统计数据[DB/OL]. 缅甸政府官方网站, 2015[2015-11-09]. .
	[Department of National Planning and Economic Development of Myanmar. 2015. Statistical data of department of national planning and economic development of Myanmar[DB/OL]. Myanmar government official website, [2015-11-09]. .]
8	纳西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布. 2014. 反脆弱: 从不确定性中获益[M]. 雨珂, 译. 北京: 中信出版社.
	[Taleb N N.2014. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder[M]. Yu K, trans. Beijing, China: China CITIC Press.]
9	邵建平. 2011. 缅甸和泰国领土争端的由来及解决前景[J]. 东南亚南亚研究, (4): 17-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6392.2011.04.005
	[Shao J P.2011. The origins of territorial disputes between Myanmar and Thailand and the prospects of its resolution[J]. Southeast Asian and South Asian Studies, (4): 17-22.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6392.2011.04.005
10	索尔·科恩. 2011. 地缘政治学: 国际关系的地理学[M]. 严春松, 译. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.
	[Cohen S B.2011. The geography of international relations[M]. Yan C S, trans. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.]
11	田亚平, 常昊. 2012. 中国生态脆弱性研究进展的文献计量分析[J]. 地理学报. 2012, 67(11): 1515-1525. doi: 10.11821/xb201211008
	[Tian Y P, Chang H.Bibliometric analysis of research progress on ecological vulnerability in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(11): 1515-1525.] doi: 10.11821/xb201211008
12	韦民. 2014. 小国与国际关系[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社. [Wei M. 2014. Small state and international relations[M]. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.]
13	徐广才, 康慕谊, 贺丽娜, 等. 2009. 生态脆弱性及其研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 29(5): 2578-2588. [Xu G C, Kang M Y, He L N, et al. 2009. Advances in research on ecological vulnerability[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(5): 2578-2588.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.047
	余中元, 李波, 张新时. 2014. 社会生态系统及脆弱性驱动机制分析[J]. 生态学报, 34(7): 1870-1879. [Yu Z Y, Li B, Zhang X S. 2014. Social ecological system and vulnerability driving mechanism analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(7): 1870-1879.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.047
14	张争胜, 孙武, 周永章. 2008. 热带滨海干旱地区生态环境脆弱性定量评价: 以雷州半岛为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 28(1): 125-130.
	[Zhang Z S, Sun W, Zhou Y Z.Quantitatively assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in tropic coastal arid area: A case study of Leizhou Peninsula[J] Journal of Desert Research, 28(1): 125-130.]
15	兹比格涅夫·布热津斯基. 1988. 竞赛方案: 进行美苏竞争的地缘战略纲领[M]. 刘晓明, 译. 北京: 中国对外翻译出版公司.
	[Brzezinski Z.1988. Jingsai fang’an: Jinxing Mei-Su jingzheng de diyuan zhanlue gangling[M]. Liu X M, trans. Beijing, China: China Translation & Publishing Corporation.]
16	Adger W N.2006. Vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 268-281. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
17	Adrianto L, Matsuda Y.2002. Developing economic vulnerability indices of environmental disasters in small island regions[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(4): 393-414. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00012-4
18	Bawa K S, Joseph G, Setty S.2007. Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the western ghats and eastern Himalaya Ranges of India[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121(3): 287-295.
19	Birkmann J.2006. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies[M]. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.
20	Brown D R.2010. Institutional development in small states: Evidence from the commonwealth Caribbean[J]. Administrative Culture, 11(1): 44-65.
21	Clarke C, Payne T.1987. Politics, security and development in small states[M]. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
22	Dow K.1992. Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change[J]. Geoforum, 23(3): 417-436. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90052-6
23	Eakin H, Luers A L.2006. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental system[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1): 365-394.
24	Fairgrieve J.1915. Geography and world power[M]. London, UK: University of London Press.
25	Füssel H M.2007. Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research[J]. Global Environmental Change, 17(2): 155-167. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002
26	Goetschel L.1998. Small states inside and outside the European Union: Interests and policies[M]. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27	IPCC. 2001. Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28	Janssen M A, Schoon M L, Ke W M, et al.2006. Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change[J]. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 240-252.
29	Myint-U T.2012. Where China meets India: Burma and the new crossroads of Asia[M]. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
30	Olsson O, Hansson G.2011. Country size and the rule of law: Resuscitating Montesquieu[J]. European Economic Review, 55(5): 613-629. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.09.008
31	Panam A, Zaw K M K, Caouette T, et al.2008. Migrant domestic workers: from Burma to Thailand[C]//Thaweesit S, Vail P, Sciortion R. Transborder issues in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand: The Mokong Sub-region Social Research Center, Ubon Ratchathani University.
32	Turner II B L H, Kasperson R E, Matson P A, et al.2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14): 8074-8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 pmid: 12792023
33	United Nations Development Programme(UNDP). 2014. Human development report summary 2014[R/OL]. 2014-07-24[2015-08-20]. .

[1]	熊理然, 刘保强, 武友德, 蒋梅英. 2010—2015年中东北非政局变动中的“政治性民意势力”及其影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 930-940.
[2]	侯璐璐, 刘云刚. 政治地理学中生存空间概念的演变[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 637-647.
[3]	胡伟, 胡志丁, 葛岳静. 中国地缘环境研究进展与思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 477-488.
[4]	叶滨鸿, 程杨, 王利, 杨林生. 北极地区地缘关系研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 489-505.
[5]	田璐, 邱思静, 彭建, 胡熠娜, 贾靖雷, 毛祺. 基于PSR框架的内蒙古自治区沙漠化敏感性评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1682-1692.
[6]	张小飞, 彭建, 王仰麟, 吴文斌, 杨鹏, 刘焱序, 宋治清, 薛怡珍. 全球变化背景下景观生态适应性特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(9): 1167-1175.
[7]	秦奇, 成升魁, 李飞, 吴良, 张丹, 陈晓鹏. 1992年以来国内外地缘政治比较研究——基于地理学视角的分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1475-1488.
[8]	黄宇, 葛岳静, 马腾, 刘晓凤. 中国高铁外交的地缘空间格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1489-1499.
[9]	苏晓波, 蔡晓梅. 领域陷阱与中国在缅甸北部的跨国禁毒实践[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1552-1561.
[10]	丁雨賝, 冯长春, 王利伟. 山地区域土地生态红线划定方法与实证研究——以重庆市涪陵区义和镇为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(7): 851-859.
[11]	宋涛, 刘卫东, 李玏. 国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(3): 276-285.
[12]	曹原, 葛岳静, 王淑芳, 胡志丁. 经济途径对地缘政治格局的影响机制及其空间表现研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(3): 265-275.
[13]	邓丽, 邵景安, 郭跃, 徐新良. 基于改进的两步移动搜索法的山区医疗服务空间可达性——以重庆市石柱县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(6): 716-725.
[14]	刘卫东. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(5): 538-544.
[15]	毛汉英. 中国周边地缘政治与地缘经济格局和对策[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(3): 289-302.