行为地理学理论与方法的跨学科应用研究

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.01.004

地理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 40-52.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.01.004

• “行为地理学理论与方法”专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

行为地理学理论与方法的跨学科应用研究

申悦¹^,²^,³(), 王德⁴

1. 华东师范大学中国行政区划研究中心,上海 200062
2. 华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心,上海 200062
3. 华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海 200062
4. 同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,上海 200093

收稿日期:2021-09-07 修回日期:2021-12-01 出版日期:2022-01-28 发布日期:2022-03-28
作者简介:申悦(1987— ),女,上海人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为城市社会地理学与行为地理学。E-mail: shenyue0519@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41871166);国家自然科学基金项目(41971206);上海市自然科学基金项目(21ZR1420600)

Interdisciplinary application of theories and methods of behavioral geography

SHEN Yue¹^,²^,³(), WANG De⁴

1. Research Center for China Administrative Division, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
2. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
3. School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
4. Collage of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200093, China

Received:2021-09-07 Revised:2021-12-01 Online:2022-01-28 Published:2022-03-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871166);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971206);Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(21ZR1420600)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

行为地理学围绕空间与行为间的关系这一学科核心,不断完善理论基础、深化研究方法、拓展研究议题,逐渐走向多元化和社会化,发展成为人文地理学的重要分支学科,其理论、方法以及相应的成果也被广泛应用于诸多领域的研究与实践中。论文首先对行为地理学研究在理论、方法和应用方面的跨学科基础进行梳理,进而从城市规划与设计、移动性规划与管理和社会可持续发展与治理3个方面阐述行为地理学与不同学科相结合的应用,试图探讨行为主义思想对于地理学和相邻学科产生的影响,厘清围绕行为地理学开展应用研究的学科交叉脉络,进一步推进行为地理学的跨学科发展,探索未来的研究与应用方向。

关键词: 行为主义, 时空间行为, 学科交叉, 以人为本, 生活质量

Abstract:

Behavioral geography focuses on the relationships between space and behavior. After decades of development, as well as the constant improvement of theoretical basis, the deepening of research methods, and the extension of research topics, behavioral geography has gradually moved towards diversification and socialization, and consequently become an important subdiscipline of human geography. Its theories, methods, and empirical research results have also been widely used in research and practice in many disciplines. This research expounds the interdisciplinary basis of behavioral geography in terms of theory, method, and application. With respect to theoretical basis, behavioral geography originated from the disciplines of geography and psychology, and then absorbed the closely related theories and methodologies, especially time geography and activity-based approach, which constitute the core theoretical basis of behavioral geography. The research methods of behavioral geography have become diversified in the process of interdisciplinary integration. Methods from disciplines such as computer science, geographic information science, sociology, statistics, and biology have been draw into behavioral geography in terms of collection of behavioral data, mining and visualization of behavioral pattern, as well as analysis and simulation of mechanism of behaviors. In regard of application research, behavioral geography has been deepening the integration with different disciplines, and our study elaborated the application research combined with behavioral geography from three aspects: urban planning and design, mobility planning and management, and sustainable social development and governance. This research aimed to explore the influence of behaviorism on geography and adjacent disciplines, clarify the interdisciplinary context of applied research around behavioral geography, further promote the interdisciplinary development of behavioral geography, and explore future research and application directions. Looking forward to the future, there is still much room for the interdisciplinary integration and application of behavioral geography. In terms of theoretical construction, further research and discussion on the space-behavior interaction theory by different disciplines are needed. For practical application, behavioral geography guided by the improvement of quality of life and sustainable social development has good interdisciplinary application prospects, and is expected to play a greater role in smart city planning and management, living space planning, living time planning, as well as residents' behavior guidance and service. In particular, how to arrange the dynamic spatial allocation of cities from the three dimensions of space, time, and individual behavior is the key direction of exploration of combined behavioral geography and planning practice.

Key words: behaviorism, spatiotemporal behavior, interdisciplinary, people oriented, quality of life

申悦, 王德. 行为地理学理论与方法的跨学科应用研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 40-52.

SHEN Yue, WANG De. Interdisciplinary application of theories and methods of behavioral geography[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 40-52.

图/表 1

参考文献 99

[1]	Golledge R G, Brown L A, Williamson F. Behavioural approaches in geography: An overview[J]. Australian Geographer, 1972, 12(1):59-79. doi: 10.1080/00049187208702613
[2]	Golledge R G, Stimson R J. Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective[M]. New York, USA: Guilford Press, 1997.
[3]	柴彦威, 颜亚宁, 冈本耕平. 西方行为地理学的研究历程及最新进展[J]. 人文地理, 2008, 23(6):1-6, 59.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Yan Yaning, Okamoto Kohei. Development of behavioral geographic research in western countries and its recent progress. Human Geography, 2008, 23(6):1-6, 59. ]
[4]	Cox K R, Golledge R. Behavioral problems in geography revisited[M]. London, UK: Routledge, 1981.
[5]	柴彦威. 空间行为与行为空间[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2014.
	[ Chai Yanwei. Space behavior and behavior space. Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press, 2014. ]
[6]	柴彦威, 申悦, 肖作鹏, 等. 时空间行为研究动态及其实践应用前景[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6):667-675.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Shen Yue, Xiao Zuopeng, et al. Review for space-time behavior research: Theory frontiers and application in the future. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(6):667-675. ]
[7]	柴彦威, 塔娜. 行为地理学[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2021.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Ta Na. Behavioral geography. Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press, 2021. ]
[8]	Gold J R. An introduction to behavioral geography[M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1980.
[9]	Golledge R G. Behavioral geography and the theoretical/quantitative revolution[J]. Geographical Analysis, 2008, 40(3):239-257. doi: 10.1111/gean.2008.40.issue-3
[10]	Hägerstraand T. What about people in regional science?[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 1970, 24(1):7-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x
[11]	Lenntorp B, Törnqvist G, Wärneryd O, et al. Torsten Hägerstrand 1916-2004[J]. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 2004, 86:325-326. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00171.x
[12]	Chapin F S. Human activity patterns in the city: Things people do in time and in space[M]. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
[13]	Kitamura R. An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis[J]. Transportation, 1988, 15(1):9-34.
[14]	Timmermans H, Arentze T, Joh C H. Analysing space-time behaviour: New approaches to old problems[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2002, 26(2):175-190. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph363ra
[15]	Kitchin R M. Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: Investigating configurational knowledge[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1996, 16(3):163-185. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0015
[16]	Mark D M, Frank A U. Experiential and formal models of geographic space[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1996, 23(1):3-24. doi: 10.1068/b230003
[17]	Giddens A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration[M]. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1984.
[18]	Argent N M, Walmsley D J. From the inside looking out and the outside looking in: Whatever happened to 'behavioural geography'?[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 47(2):192-203. doi: 10.1111/ages.2009.47.issue-2
[19]	Argent N M. Behavioral geography[M]// Richardson D, Castree N, Goodchild M F, et al. International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2017.
[20]	秦萧, 甄峰, 熊丽芳, 等. 大数据时代城市时空间行为研究方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(9):1352-1361.
	[ Qin Xiao, Zhen Feng, Xiong Lifang, et al. Methods in urban temporal and spatial behavior research in the big data era. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(9):1352-1361. ]
[21]	柴彦威, 刘伯初, 刘瑜, 等. 基于多源大数据的城市体征诊断指数构建与计算: 以上海市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1):1-10. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.001
	[ Chai Yanwei, Liu Bochu, Liu Yu, et al. Construction and calculation of diagnostic index of urban signs based on multi-source big data: Case of Shanghai. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(1):1-10. ]
[22]	Wilson W C. Activity pattern analysis by means of sequence-alignment methods[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1998, 30(6):1017-1038. doi: 10.1068/a301017
[23]	Kwan M-P, Ding G X. Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2008, 60(4):443-465. doi: 10.1080/00330120802211752
[24]	Zhang W J, Thill J-C. Detecting and visualizing cohesive activity-travel patterns: A network analysis approach[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2017, 66:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.08.004
[25]	Arentze T A, Timmermans H J P. A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(7):613-633. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2002.10.001
[26]	Torrens P M. Artificial intelligence and behavioral geography[M]// Montello D R. Handbook of behavioral and cognitive geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
[27]	朱玮, 王德, Timmermans H. 多代理人系统在商业街消费者行为模拟中的应用: 以上海南京东路为例[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4):445-455.
	[ Zhu Wei, Wang De, Timmermans H. Applying multi-agent systems in the simulation of consumer behavior in shopping streets: The Shanghai East Nanjing Road case. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4):445-455. ]
[28]	王灿, 王德, 朱玮, 等. 离散选择模型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(10):1275-1287. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.10.008
	[ Wang Can, Wang De, Zhu Wei, et al. Research progress of discrete choice models. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(10):1275-1287. ]
[29]	Golledge R G, Rushton G, Clark W A VG. Some spatial characteristics of Iowa's farm population and their implications for the grouping of central place functions[J]. Economic Geography, 1966, 42(3):261-272. doi: 10.1080/00130095.1966.11729852
[30]	柴彦威, 刘志林, 李峥嵘, 等. 中国城市的时空间结构[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Liu Zhilin, Li Zhengrong, et al. Time-space structure of Chinese cities. Beijing, China: Peking University Press, 2002. ]
[31]	Lenntorp B. Paths in space-time environments: A time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals[M]. Lund, Sweden: The Royal University of Lund, 1976.
[32]	Kamiya H. Day care services and activity patterns of women in Japan[J]. GeoJournal, 1999, 48:207-215. doi: 10.1023/A:1007083826157
[33]	申悦, 柴彦威. 基于性别比较的北京城市居民活动的时空弹性研究[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12):2214-2225. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201712007
	[ Shen Yue, Chai Yanwei. Space-time flexibility of daily activities and gender differences: A case study of Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12):2214-2225. ]
[34]	周素红, 彭伊侬, 柳林, 等. 日常活动地建成环境对老年人主观幸福感的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7):1625-1639. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180292
	[ Zhou Suhong, Peng Yinong, Liu Lin, et al. The impact of built environment on well-being of older adults under different geographic contexts. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7):1625-1639. ]
[35]	王茂军, 柴彦威, 高宜程. 认知地图空间分析的地理学研究进展[J]. 人文地理, 2007, 22(5):10-18.
	[ Wang Maojun, Chai Yanwei, Gao Yicheng. The progress of geographical study on the spatial analysis of cognitive map. Human Geography, 2007, 22(5):10-18. ]
[36]	刘晔, 肖童, 刘于琪, 等. 城市建成环境对广州市居民幸福感的影响: 基于15 min步行可达范围的分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8):1270-1282.
	[ Liu Ye, Xiao Tong, Liu Yuqi, et al. Impacts of urban built environments on residents' subjective well-being: An analysis based on 15-minute walking distance. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(8):1270-1282. ]
[37]	王德, 马力. 2010年上海世博会参观者时空分布模拟分析[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2009(5):64-70.
	[ Wang De, Ma Li. Simulation analysis of spatiotemporal distribution of visitors in Shanghai World EXPO 2010. Urban Planning Forum, 2009(5):64-70. ]
[38]	王德, 王灿, 朱玮, 等. 基于参观者行为模拟的空间规划与管理研究: 青岛世园会的案例[J]. 城市规划, 2015, 39(2):65-70.
	[ Wang De, Wang Can, Zhu Wei, et al. Large-scale exposition planning and management optimization based on visitors' behavior simulation: A case study of Qingdao international horticultural exposition 2014. City Planning Review, 2015, 39(2):65-70. ]
[39]	Ratti C, Frenchman D, Pulselli R M, et al. Mobile landscapes: Using location data from cell phones for urban analysis[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2006, 33(5):727-748. doi: 10.1068/b32047
[40]	钟炜菁, 王德. 上海市中心城区夜间活力的空间特征研究[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(6):97-106, 114.
	[ Zhong Weijing, Wang De. A study on the spatial characteristics of nighttime vitality in the city center of Shanghai. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(6):97-106, 114. ]
[41]	秦萧, 甄峰, 李亚奇, 等. 国土空间规划大数据应用方法框架探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10):2134-2149.
	[ Qin Xiao, Zhen Feng, Li Yaqi, et al. Discussion on the application framework of big data in territorial spatial planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10):2134-2149. ]
[42]	王德, 李丹, 傅英姿. 基于手机信令数据的上海市不同住宅区居民就业空间研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8):1585-1602. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008003
	[ Wang De, Li Dan, Fu Yingzi. Employment space of residential quarters in Shanghai: An exploration based on mobile signaling data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8):1585-1602. ]
[43]	陈洁, 陆锋, 翟瀚, 等. 面向活动地点推荐的个人时空可达性方法[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6):931-940. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201506007
	[ Chen Jie, Lu Feng, Zhai Han, et al. Making place recommendations: An individual accessibility measure to urban opportunities in space and time. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(6):931-940. ]
[44]	塔娜, 申悦. 基于共享度的上海郊区社区居民活动空间隔离及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4):849-859. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004013
	[ Ta Na, Shen Yue. Activity space-based segregation among neighbors and its influencing factors: An analysis based on shared activity spaces in suburban Shanghai. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4):849-859. ]
[45]	肖作鹏, 柴彦威, 张艳. 国内外生活圈规划研究与规划实践进展述评[J]. 规划师, 2014, 30(10):89-95.
	[ Xiao Zuopeng, Chai Yanwei, Zhang Yan. Overseas life circle planning and practice. Planners, 2014, 30(10):89-95. ]
[46]	孙道胜, 柴彦威. 城市社区生活圈体系及公共服务设施空间优化: 以北京市清河街道为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2017, 24(9): 7-14, 25, 2.
	[ Sun Daosheng, Chai Yanwei. Study on the urban community life sphere system and the optimization of public service facilities: A case study of Qinghe area in Beijing. 2017, 24(9): 7-14, 25, 2.]
[47]	李萌. 基于居民行为需求特征的“15分钟社区生活圈”规划对策研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(1):111-118.
	[ Li Meng. The planning strategies of a 15-minute community life circle based on behaviors of residents. Urban Planning Forum, 2017(1):111-118. ]
[48]	程蓉. 15分钟社区生活圈的空间治理对策[J]. 规划师, 2018, 34(5):115-121.
	[ Cheng Rong. Spatial governance measures of 15-minute life circle with a general perspective. Planners, 2018, 34(5):115-121. ]
[49]	于一凡. 从传统居住区规划到社区生活圈规划[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(5):17-22.
	[ Yu Yifan. From traditional residential area planning to neighborhood life circle planning. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(5):17-22. ]
[50]	吴秋晴. 生活圈构建视角下特大城市社区动态规划探索[J]. 上海城市规划, 2015(4):13-19.
	[ Wu Qiuqing. The exploration on the dynamic programming of community in megacities from the living circle perspective. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2015(4):13-19. ]
[51]	柴彦威, 张雪, 孙道胜. 基于时空间行为的城市生活圈规划研究: 以北京市为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2015(3):61-69.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Zhang Xue, Sun Daosheng. A study on life circle planning based on space time behavioural analysis: A case study of Beijing. Urban Planning Forum, 2015(3):61-69. ]
[52]	柴彦威, 李春江, 张艳. 社区生活圈的新时间地理学研究框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12):1961-1971. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.001
	[ Chai Yanwei, Li Chunjiang, Zhang Yan. A new time-geography research framework of community life circle. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(12):1961-1971. ]
[53]	Moore G T. New directions for environment-behavior research in architecture[M]// Snyder J C. Architectural research. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984: 95-112.
[54]	李斌. 环境行为学的环境行为理论及其拓展[J]. 建筑学报, 2008(2):30-33.
	[ Li Bin. Theory of environment-behavior and its development in environment-behavior studies. Architectural Journal, 2008(2):30-33. ]
[55]	李斌. 环境行为理论和设计方法论[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2017, 32(3):1-6.
	[ Li Bin. Environment-behavior theories and design methodology. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2017, 32(3):1-6. ]
[56]	苏珊·汉森, 吉纳维夫·朱利亚诺. 城市交通地理学[M]. 金凤君, 王姣娥, 王成金, 等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014.
	[ Hanson S Giuliano G. The geography of urban transportation. Translated by Jin Fengjun, Wang Jiao'e, Wang Chengjin, et al. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press, 2014. ]
[57]	Ben-Akiva M, Bowman J L. Integration of an activity: Based model system and a residential location model[J]. Urban Studies, 1998, 35(7):1131-1153. doi: 10.1080/0042098984529
[58]	Jones M, Pebley A R. Redefining neighborhoods using common destinations: Social characteristics of activity spaces and home census tracts compared[J]. Demography, 2014, 51(3):727-752. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0283-z
[59]	张文佳, 柴彦威. 时空制约下的城市居民活动—移动系统: 活动分析法的理论和模型进展[J]. 国际城市规划, 2009, 24(4):60-68.
	[ Zhang Wenjia, Chai Yanwei. Urban activity-travel systems in the condition of space-time: A review of activity-based theories and models. Urban Planning International, 2009, 24(4):60-68. ]
[60]	柴彦威, 肖作鹏. 面向“十二五”规划的中国城市交通发展转型[J]. 规划师, 2011, 27(4):21-25.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Xiao Zuopeng. Urban transportation development transition in 12th Five-year Plan. Planners, 2011, 27(4):21-25. ]
[61]	Pearce P L. Tourist behaviour: Themes and conceptual schemes[M]. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 2005.
[62]	林岚, 许志晖, 丁登山. 旅游者空间行为及其国内外研究综述[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(3):434-439. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2007.03.434
	[ Lin Lan, Xu Zhihui, Ding Dengshan. Spacial behavior of tourists research. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(3):434-439. ]
[63]	Shoval N. Tracking technologies and urban analysis[J]. Cities, 2008, 25(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2007.07.005
[64]	Ahas R, Aasa A, Roose A, et al. Evaluating passive mobile positioning data for tourism surveys: An Estonian case study[J]. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(3):469-486. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.014
[65]	Versichele M, de Groote L, Claeys Bouuaert M, et al. Pattern mining in tourist attraction visits through association rule learning on Bluetooth tracking data: A case study of Ghent, Belgium[J]. Tourism Management, 2014, 44(13):67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.02.009
[66]	陈健昌, 保继刚. 旅游者的行为研究及其实践意义[J]. 地理研究, 1988, 7(3):44-51. doi: 10.11821/yj1988030006
	[ Chen Jianchang, Bao Jigang. A study of tourist behavior and its practical significance. Geographical Research, 1988, 7(3):44-51. ]
[67]	吴必虎, 唐俊雅, 黄安民, 等. 中国城市居民旅游目的地选择行为研究[J]. 地理学报, 1997, 52(2):97-103. doi: 10.11821/xb199702001
	[ Wu Bihu, Tang Junya, Huang Anmin, et al. A study on destination choice behavior of Chinese urban residents. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1997, 52(2):97-103. ]
[68]	黄潇婷. 旅游者时空行为研究[M]. 北京: 中国旅游出版社, 2011.
	[ Huang Xiaoting, Tourists spatial-temporal behavior study. Beijing, China: China Travel & Tourism Press, 2011. ]
[69]	李渊, 高小涵, 黄竞雄, 等. 基于摄影照片与眼动实验的旅游者视觉行为分析: 以厦门大学为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(9):41-52.
	[ Li Yuan, Gao Xiaohan, Huang Jingxiong, et al. Visual behavior analysis of tourists based on photography and eye-tracking experiment: A case of Xiamen University. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(9):41-52. ]
[70]	赵莹, 林家惠, 刘逸. 基于眼动实验的旅游地景观视觉评价研究: 以珠海市唐家古镇为例[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(5):130-140.
	[ Zhao Ying, Lin Jiahui, Liu Yi. Research on visual evaluation of tourism scenery based on eye movement experiment: A case of Tangjia ancient town in Zhuhai. Human Geography, 2020, 35(5):130-140. ]
[71]	赵莹, 梁锦鹏, 颜力祺, 等. 标识设置对游客寻路行为的影响研究: 基于眼动追踪的实验分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(9):63-73.
	[ Zhao Ying, Liang Jinpeng, Yan Liqi, et al. The influences of guidance system on tourists' wayfinding behaviour: A case study based on eye-tracking techniques. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(9):63-73. ]
[72]	李渊, 丁燕杰, 王德. 旅游者时间约束和空间行为特征的景区旅游线路设计方法研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2016, 31(9):50-60.
	[ Li Yuan, Ding Yanjie, Wang De. A new approach for designing tourist routes by considering travel time constraints and spatial behavior characteristics of tourists. Tourism Tribune, 2016, 31(9):50-60. ]
[73]	丁新军, 吴佳雨, 粟丽娟, 等. 国际基于时间地理学的旅游者行为研究探索与实践[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(8):183-188, 201.
	[ Ding Xinjun, Wu Jiayu, Su Lijuan, et al. A review on international research and practice of tourist behavior from the perspective of time geography. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(8):183-188, 201. ]
[74]	黄潇婷. 旅游时间规划概念框架研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(11):73-79.
	[ Huang Xiaoting. Study of conceptual framework of tourism temporal planning. Tourism Tribune, 2014, 29(11):73-79. ]
[75]	Campbell S. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(3):296-312. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975696
[76]	杨林生, 李海蓉, 李永华, 等. 医学地理和环境健康研究的主要领域与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(1):31-44.
	[ Yang Linsheng, Li Hairong, Li Yonghua, et al. Progress of medical geography and environmental health studies. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(1):31-44. ]
[77]	齐兰兰, 周素红, 闫小培, 等. 医学地理学发展趋势及当前热点[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(8):1276-1285. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.08.011
	[ Qi Lanlan, Zhou Suhong, Yan Xiaopei, et al. Trend and hot topics of medical geography. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(8):1276-1285. ]
[78]	周素红, 张琳, 林荣平. 地理环境暴露与公众健康研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(7):43-52.
	[ Zhou Suhong, Zhang Lin, Lin Rongping. Progress and prospect of the research on geographical environment exposure and public health. Science & Technology Review, 2020, 38(7):43-52. ]
[79]	Richardson D B, Volkow N D, Kwan M-P, et al. Spatial turn in health research[J]. Science, 2013, 339:1390-1392. doi: 10.1126/science.1232257 pmid: 23520099
[80]	周素红, 何嘉明. 郊区化背景下居民健身活动时空约束对心理健康影响: 以广州为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(10):1229-1238. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.10.005
	[ Zhou Suhong, He Jiaming. Effects of spatial-temporal constraints of suburban residents on fitness activities to mental health in the context of rapid suburbanization: A case study in Guangzhou, China. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(10):1229-1238. ]
[81]	Shen Y, Ta N, Liu Z L. Job-housing distance, neighborhood environment, and mental health in suburban Shanghai: A gender difference perspective[J]. Cities, 2021, 115:103214. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103214. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103214
[82]	Sun B D, Lin J, Yin C. How does commute duration affect subjective well-being? A case study of Chinese cities[J]. Transportation, 2021, 48:885-908. doi: 10.1007/s11116-020-10082-3
[83]	陶印华, 柴彦威, 杨婕. 城市居民健康生活方式研究的时空行为视角[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(1):22-29.
	[ Tao Yinhua, Chai Yanwei, Yang Jie. Understanding healthy lifestyles for urban residents from the perspective of space-time behaviours. Human Geography, 2021, 36(1):22-29. ]
[84]	申悦, 李亮. 年龄分层视角下医疗设施可达性对居民就医行为的影响: 以上海市崇明岛为例[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(2):46-54.
	[ Shen Yue, Li Liang. The influence of medical facility accessibility on residents' health seeking behaviors from the perspective of age stratification: A case study of Shanghai Chongming island. Human Geography, 2021, 36(2):46-54. ]
[85]	马静, 柴彦威, 符婷婷. 居民时空行为与环境污染暴露对健康影响的研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(10):1260-1269. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.10.008
	[ Ma Jing, Chai Yanwei, Fu Tingting. Progress of research on the health impact of people's space-time behavior and environmental pollution exposure. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(10):1260-1269. ]
[86]	Kwan M-P. The uncertain geographic context problem[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012, 102(5):958-968. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.687349
[87]	Kwan M-P. The limits of the neighborhood effect: Contextual uncertainties in geographic, environmental health, and social science research[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2018, 108(6):1482-1490. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1453777
[88]	Ma J, Li C J, Kwan M-P, et al. Assessing personal noise exposure and its relationship with mental health in Beijing based on individuals' space-time behavior[J]. Environment International, 2020, 139:105737. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105737. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105737
[89]	Tao Y H, Chai Y W, Kou L R, et al. Understanding noise exposure, noise annoyance, and psychological stress: Incorporating individual mobility and the temporality of the exposure-effect relationship[J]. Applied Geography, 2020, 125:102283. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102283. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102283
[90]	Diez Roux A V, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2010, 1186:125-145. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05333.x pmid: 20201871
[91]	Tao Y H, Yang J, Chai Y W. The anatomy of health-supportive neighborhoods: A multilevel analysis of built environment, perceived disorder, social interaction and mental health in Beijing[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 17(1):13. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010013
[92]	孙斌栋, 阎宏, 张婷麟. 社区建成环境对健康的影响: 基于居民个体超重的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(10):1721-1730. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201610005
	[ Sun Bindong, Yan Hong, Zhang Tinglin. Impact of community built environment on residents' health: A case study on individual overweight. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(10):1721-1730. ]
[93]	于一凡, 胡玉婷. 社区建成环境健康影响的国际研究进展: 基于体力活动研究视角的文献综述和思考[J]. 建筑学报, 2017(2):33-38.
	[ Yu Yifan, Hu Yuting. Progress of international research on health impact of the built environment of communities literature review and reflections from a perspective of physical activities. Architectural Journal, 2017(2):33-38. ]
[94]	Ma J, Tao Y H, Kwan M-P, et al. Assessing mobility-based real-time air pollution exposure in space and time using smart sensors and GPS trajectories in Beijing[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2020, 110(2):434-448. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1653752
[95]	柴彦威, 许伟麟, 张文佳, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情精准防控的时空间行为地理学研究框架[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10):1585-1592. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.10.001
	[ Chai Yanwei, Xu Weilin, Zhang Wenjia, et al. A research framework of precise epidemic prevention and control from the perspective of space- time behavioral geography. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(10):1585-1592. ]
[96]	陈晋, 李强, 辜智慧, 等. 灾害避难行为的模拟模型研究(I): 基本模型的建立与计算机实现[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2000, 9(4):65-70.
	[ Chen Jin, Li Qiang, Gu Zhihui, et al. Study on simulation model for escape behavior in disaster(I): Model development and computer realization. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2000, 9(4):65-70. ]
[97]	柴彦威, 马静, 马修军, 等. 城市地理学思想与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Ma Jing, Ma Xiujun, et al. Thoughts and method on urban geography. Beijing, China: Science Press, 2012. ]
[98]	张文忠. 中国城市体检评估的理论基础和方法[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(10):1687-1696. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.10.001
	[ Zhang Wenzhong. Theoretical basis and methods of city health examination evaluation in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(10):1687-1696. ]
[99]	柴彦威, 谭一洺, 申悦, 等. 空间—行为互动理论构建的基本思路[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710012
	[ Chai Yanwei, Tan Yiming, Shen Yue, et al. Space-behavior interaction theory: Basic thinking of general construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. ]

行为地理学理论与方法的跨学科应用研究

Interdisciplinary application of theories and methods of behavioral geography

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 99

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	黄晓燕, 曹小曙. 时空间行为视角下交通与社会排斥研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 107-117.
[2]	肖作鹏. 数字社会下人类时空间行为的逻辑变化与研究展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 86-95.
[3]	李春江, 张艳. 日常生活数字化转向的时间地理学应对[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 96-106.
[4]	吴丹贤, 高晓路. 西方老年人长期照护研究的地理学回顾[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 132-142.
[5]	申悦, 柴彦威. 基于日常活动空间的社会空间分异研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(6): 853-862.
[6]	杨大文, 徐宗学, 李哲, 袁星, 王磊, 缪驰远, 田富强, 田立德, 龙笛, 汤秋鸿, 刘星才, 张学君. 水文学研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 36-45.
[7]	塔娜, 申悦, 柴彦威. 生活方式视角下的时空行为研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(10): 1279-1287.
[8]	柴彦威, 郭文伯. 中国城市社区管理与服务的智慧化路径[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(4): 466-472.
[9]	田永霞, 刘晓娜, 李红, 孙丹峰, 涂宏汉, 文化. 基于主客观生活质量评价的农村发展差异分析——以北京山区经济薄弱村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(2): 185-.
[10]	秦萧, 甄峰, 熊丽芳, 朱寿佳. 大数据时代城市时空间行为研究方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(9): 1352-1361.
[11]	柴彦威, 塔娜. 中国时空间行为研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(9): 1362-1373.
[12]	柴彦威, 申悦, 肖作鹏, 张艳, 赵莹, 塔娜. 时空间行为研究动态及其实践应用前景[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6): 667-675.
[13]	李小建, 乔家君. 居民对生活质量评估与区域经济发展的定量分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(5): 484-490.