从治理到城乡治理：国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

治理已经成为多学科关注的重要理论与现实问题。在快速城镇化和城乡差距居高不下的背景下,城乡治理对中国而言尤为重要。论文通过梳理国内外治理理论,概括治理的要点为开放系统、自组织、权力与权利的交织3个方面。国际研究强调社会生态系统的治理,城市治理增势显著,乡村治理研究开始兴起。中国在顶层设计上经历了从管理到治理的全面转型,城乡治理逐渐成为研究和政策实践的关键议题。未来中国城乡治理的主要路径在于：从权力导向转向权利导向;从只注重社会维度、一元化的、城市偏向的治理模式转向生态环境与社会治理并重,形成多元主体参与的城乡共治体系;积极开展城乡弱势群体的扶持救助工作。城乡共治将会成为新的理论增长点,需要进行多学科、多主体、多部门的协同工作。

关键词: 治理, 城市, 乡村, 城乡共治, 城镇化

Abstract:

Governance has become an important theoretical and practical issue of multi-disciplinary concern. In the context of rapid urbanization and wide rural-urban disparity, rural-urban governance is particularly important for China. Based on the Chinese and international governance theories, the key aspects of governance include: an open system, self-organization, and the interactive relationship between power and rights. Internationally the research frontier focuses on the governance of social-ecological systems, while urban governance has grown significantly, and rural governance has also risen in recent years. The research trend and policy evolution of governance in China indicate that China has undergone a comprehensive transformation from management to governance by top-level design, and rural-urban governance is becoming a key issue. The main path of China's rural-urban governance in the future lies in three aspects. First, it is necessary to shift from power-oriented to rights-oriented governance. Second, equal attention needs to be paid to both ecological environment and social governance instead of focusing only on social, single-dimensional, and urban governance systems, and form a rural-urban co-governance system with the participation of multiple subjects. Third, it should be launched to assist rural and urban vulnerable groups actively. Rural-urban co-governance will become a new growth point for theories, and multi-disciplinary, multi-subject, and multi-department collaboration is much needed.

Key words: governance, urban, rural, rural-urban co-governance, urbanization

叶超, 于洁, 张清源, 朱晓丹. 从治理到城乡治理：国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 15-27.

YE Chao, YU Jie, ZHANG Qingyuan, ZHU Xiaodan. From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 15-27.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

表2

参考文献 91

[1]	Vervoort J M, Rutting L, Kok K, et al. Exploring dimensions, scales, and cross-scale dynamics from the perspectives of change agents in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2012,17(4):24. doi: 10.5751/ES-05098-170424.
[2]	Ye C, Liu Z M. Rural-urban co-governance: Multi-scale practice[J]. Science Bulletin, 2020,65(10):778-780.
[3]	张京祥, 陈浩. 空间治理:中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学[J]. 城市规划, 2014,38(11):9-15.
	[ Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao. Spatial governance: Political economy of China's urban and rural planning transformation. City Planning Review, 2014,38(11):9-15. ]
[4]	Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008,18(4):543-571.
[5]	格里·斯托克. 作为理论的治理: 五个论点[J]. 华夏风, 译. 国际社会科学(中文版), 1999,16(1):19-30.
	[ Stoker G. Governance as a theory: Five arguments. Translated by Hua Xiafeng. International Social Science Journal (Chinese Edition), 1999,16(1):19-30. ]
[6]	Provan K G, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008,18(2):229-252.
[7]	The Commission on Global Governance. Our global neighborhood [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[8]	鲍勃·杰索普. 治理的兴起及其失败的风险: 以经济发展为例的论述[J]. 漆芜, 译. 国际社会科学(中文版), 1999,16(2):31-48.
	[ Jessop B. The rise of governance and its risks of failure: A case study of economic development. Translated by Qi Wu. International Social Science Journal (Chinese Edition), 1999,16(2):31-48. ]
[9]	陈进华. 治理体系现代化的国家逻辑[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019,40(5):23-39, 205.
	[ Chen Jinhua. The logic of the state in the modernization of the governance system. Social Sciences in China, 2019,40(5):23-39, 205. ]
[10]	夏志强. 国家治理现代化的逻辑转换[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(5):4-27, 204.
	[ Xia Zhiqiang. The conversion of logic in the modernization of national governance. Social Sciences in China, 2020(5):4-27, 204. ]
[11]	俞可平. 全球治理引论[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2002,13(1):20-32.
	[ Yu Keping. Introduction to global governance. Marxism & Reality, 2002,13(1):20-32. ]
[12]	Rosenau J N, Czempiel E-O. Governance without go-vernment: Order and change in world politics [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[13]	Rhodes R A W. The new governance: Governing without government[J]. Political Studies, 1996,44(4):652-667.
[14]	Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons[J]. Science, 1968,162:1243-1248.
[15]	Ostrom E, Burger J, Field C B, et al. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges[J]. Science, 1999,284:278-282.
[16]	Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institution for collective action [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[17]	Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern P C. The struggle to govern the commons[J]. Science, 2003,302:1907-1912. pmid: 14671286
[18]	Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 2009,325:419-422. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133 pmid: 19628857
[19]	Berkes F, Hughes T P, Steneck R S, et al. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources[J]. Science, 2006,311:1557-1558. pmid: 16543444
[20]	Crowder L B, Osherenko G, Young O R, et al. Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance[J]. Science, 2006,313:617-618.
[21]	Yandle T. Property rights and ocean governance[J]. Science, 2006,314:593-595.
[22]	Hering J G, Ingold K M. Water resources management: What should be integrated?[J]. Science, 2012,336:1234-1235.
[23]	Vörösmarty C J, Hoekstra A Y, Bunn S E, et al. Fresh water goes global[J]. Science, 2015,349:478-479. doi: 10.1126/science.349.6247.478-a pmid: 26228129
[24]	Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R. Changing governance of the world's forests[J]. Science, 2008,320:1460-1462. doi: 10.1126/science.1155369 pmid: 18556552
[25]	Berkman P A, Young O R. Governance and environmental change in the Arctic Ocean[J]. Science, 2009,324:339-340. doi: 10.1126/science.1173200 pmid: 19372415
[26]	Grimaldi A. Governance of both poles[J]. Science, 2009,326:1042. doi: 10.1126/science.1183953. doi: 10.1126/science.1183953 pmid: 19965391
[27]	DeFries R, Nagendra H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem[J]. Science, 2017,356:265-270. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1950 pmid: 28428392
[28]	Bodin Ö. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems [J]. Science, 2017, 357: eaan1114. doi: 10.1126/science. aan1114. doi: 10.1126/science.aan1114 pmid: 28818915
[29]	Brondizio E S, Le Tourneau F-M. Environmental governance for all[J]. Science, 2016,352:1272-1273. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5122 pmid: 27284179
[30]	Macleod G, Goodwin M. Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1999,23(4):503-527.
[31]	Peck J. Austerity urbanism[J]. City, 2012,16(6):626-655.
[32]	Harvey D. A brief history of neoliberalism [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[33]	Brenner N. New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[34]	Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V. Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2012,38(3):361-375.
[35]	Castán Broto V, Bulkeley H. A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(1):92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005 pmid: 23805029
[36]	Vanolo A. Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy[J]. Urban Studies, 2014,51(5):883-898.
[37]	Kitchin R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism[J]. GeoJournal, 2014,79(1):1-14.
[38]	Nevens F, Frantzeskaki N, Gorissen L, et al. Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013,50:111-122.
[39]	Hodson M, Marvin S. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?[J]. Research Policy, 2010,39(4):477-485.
[40]	俞可平. 治理和善治: 一种新的政治分析框架[J]. 南京社会科学, 2001(9):40-44.
	[ Yu Keping. Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2001(9):40-44. ]
[41]	Brenner N. Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union[J]. Urban Studies, 1999,36(3):431-451.
[42]	Bulkeley H, Betsill M M. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change[J]. Environmental Politics, 2013,22(1):136-154.
[43]	Bulkeley H. Cities and the governing of climate change[J]. Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 2010,35(1):229-253.
[44]	McCann E. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2011,101(1):107-130.
[45]	Caragliu A, del Bo C, Nijkamp P. Smart cities in Europe[J]. Journal of Urban Technology, 2011,18(2):65-82.
[46]	Swyngedouw E. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state[J]. Urban Studies, 2005,42(11):1991-2006.
[47]	Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. London, UK: Sage, 2002.
[48]	Roy A. Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization[J]. Planning Theory, 2009,8(1):76-87.
[49]	王梓懿, 沈正平, 杜明伟. 基于CiteSpace Ⅲ的国内新型城镇化研究进展与热点分析[J]. 经济地理, 2017,37(1):32-39.
	[ Wang Ziyi, Shen Zhengping, Du Mingwei. The research status and hotspots of new urbanization based on CiteSpace Ⅲ. Economic Geography, 2017,37(1):32-39. ]
[50]	席广亮, 甄峰, 傅行行, 等. 2019年智慧城市研究与实践热点回眸[J]. 科技导报, 2020,38(3):157-163.
	[ Xi Guangliang, Zhen Feng, Fu Xingxing, et al. Review of hot topics on research and practice of smart city in 2019. Science & Technology Review, 2020,38(3):157-163. ]
[51]	麻宝斌, 任晓春. 从社会管理到社会治理: 挑战与变革[J]. 学习与探索, 2011,33(3):95-99.
	[ Ma Baobin, Ren Xiaochun. From social management to social governance: Challenges and changes. Study & Exploration, 2011,33(3):95-99. ]
[52]	姚华松, 黄耿志, 陈昆仑, 等. 超越“星球城市化”: 中国城市研究的新方向[J]. 经济地理, 2020,40(4):119-124.
	[ Yao Huasong, Huang Gengzhi, Chen Kunlun, et al. Beyond "planetary urbanization": New directions of urban research in China. Economic Geography, 2020,40(4):119-124. ]
[53]	陈明星, 周园, 郭莎莎, 等. 新型城镇化研究的意义、目标与任务[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019,34(9):974-983.
	[ Chen Mingxing, Zhou Yuan, Guo Shasha, et al. Significance, progress and tasks of new-type urbanization research. Advances in Earth Science, 2019,34(9):974-983. ]
[54]	陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(2):221-235.
	[ Chen Kun-qiu, Long Hualou. Impacts of land market on urban-rural integrated development in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(2):221-235. ]
[55]	张海鹏. 中国城乡关系演变70年: 从分割到融合[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(3):2-18.
	[ Zhang Haipeng. The evolution of China's urban-rural relations in the past seven decades: From separation to integration. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(3):2-18. ]
[56]	肖育才. 中国式分权、基本公共品供给偏向与城乡居民收入差距[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(4):22-28.
	[ Xiao Yucai. Chinese decentralization, unba-lanced supply of basic public goods and income gap between urban and rural residents. Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition), 2017(4):22-28. ]
[57]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴(2019) [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019.
	[ National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical yearbook(2019). Beijing, China: China Statistics Press, 2019. ]
[58]	张英男, 龙花楼, 马历, 等. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):578-594.
	[ Zhang Yingnan, Long Hualou, Ma Li, et al. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):578-594. ]
[59]	国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2019年国民经济和社会发展统计公报 [EB/OL]. 2020-02-28 [2020-07-18]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html.
	[ National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical communique of the People's Republic of China on the 2019 national economic and social development. 2020-02-28[2020-07-18]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html.]
[60]	尹晓波, 王巧. 中国金融发展、城镇化与城乡居民收入差距问题分析[J]. 经济地理, 2020,40(3):84-91.
	[ Yin Xiaobo, Wang Qiao. The study on financial development, urbanization and urban & rural residents' income gap in China. Economic Geography, 2020,40(3):84-91. ]
[61]	戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020,75(6):1272-1286.
	[ Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(6):1272-1286. ]
[62]	方创琳, 刘海燕. 快速城市化进程中的区域剥夺行为与调控路径[J]. 地理学报, 2007,62(8):849-860.
	[ Fang Chuanglin, Liu Haiyan. The spatial privation and the corresponding controlling paths in China's urbanization process. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007,62(8):849-860. ]
[63]	刘彦随, 刘玉, 翟荣新. 中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践[J]. 地理学报, 2009,64(10):1193-1202.
	[ Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Zhai Rongxin. Geographical research and optimizing practice of rural hollowing in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009,64(10):1193-1202. ]
[64]	龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(4):563-576.
	[ Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(4):563-576. ]
[65]	陈玉福, 孙虎, 刘彦随. 中国典型农区空心村综合整治模式[J]. 地理学报, 2010,65(6):727-735.
	[ Chen Yufu, Sun Hu, Liu Yansui. Reconstruction models of hollowed villages in key agricultural regions of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(6):727-735. ]
[66]	韩俊. 中国城乡关系演变60年: 回顾与展望[J]. 改革, 2009(11):5-14.
	[ Han Jun. Evolution of the relationship between rural and urban areas in the past sixty years: Looking back and prospect. Reform, 2009(11):5-14. ]
[67]	李兰冰, 刘秉镰. “十四五”时期中国区域经济发展的重大问题展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(5):36-51, 8.
	[ Li Lanbing, Liu Binglian. Prospect for major issues of China's regional economic development during the 14th five-year plan period. Management World, 2020,36(5):36-51, 8. ]
[68]	叶超. 体国经野:中国城乡关系发展的理论与历史 [M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2014.
	[ Ye Chao. The theory and history on China's rural-urban relationship. Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press, 2014. ]
[69]	陆中伟, 张云宁, 王洁雨. 城市偏向政策视角下金融发展与城乡收入差距的关系研究[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2018,14(9):96-99, 146.
	[ Lu Zhongwei, Zhang Yunning, Wang Jieyu. A study on the relationship between financial development and urban-rural income gap from the perspective of urban bias policy. Economic Research Guide, 2018,14(9):96-99, 146. ]
[70]	Ye C, Ma X Y, Cai Y L, et al. The countryside under multiple high-tension lines: A perspective on the rural construction of Heping Village, Shanghai[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018,62:53-61.
[71]	Ye C, Ma X Y, Gao Y, et al. The lost countryside: Spatial production of rural culture in Tangwan Village in Shanghai[J]. Habitat International, 2020,98:102137. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102137.
[72]	程哲, 欧阳如琳, 杨振山, 等. 中国城镇化进程中基础设施投融资时空格局与发展特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(4):440-449.
	[ Cheng Zhe, Ouyang Rulin, Yang Zhenshan, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of urban infrastructure investment and financing during China's urbanization. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(4):440-449. ]
[73]	马慧强, 廉倩文, 韩增林, 等. 基本公共服务—城镇化—区域经济耦合协调发展时空演化[J]. 经济地理, 2020,40(5):19-28.
	[ Ma Huiqiang, Lian Qianwen, Han Zenglin, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of coupling and coordinated development of basic public services-urbanization-regional economy. Economic Geography, 2020,40(5):19-28. ]
[74]	俞可平. 中国治理变迁30年(1978—2008)[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2008,48(3):5-17, 159.
	[ Yu Keping. China's political reform towards good governance from 1978 to 2008. Jilin University Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2008,48(3):5-17, 159. ]
[75]	叶超, 于洁. 迈向城乡融合: 新型城镇化与乡村振兴结合研究的关键与趋势[J]. 地理科学, 2020,40(4):528-534.
	[ Ye Chao, Yu Jie. Towards rural-urban integration: Key issues and trends on linking new-type urbanization to rural revitalization. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(4):528-534. ]
[76]	王世福, 黎子铭. 强化应急治理能力的韧性社区营造策略: 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的启示[J]. 规划师, 2020,36(6):112-115.
	[ Wang Shifu, Li Ziming. Creating resilient communities with better emergency governance abilities: The enlightenment from COVID-19. Planners, 2020,36(6):112-115. ]
[77]	邹秀清, 钟骁勇, 肖泽干, 等. 征地冲突中地方政府、中央政府和农户行为的动态博弈分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2012,26(10):54-60.
	[ Zou Xiuqing, Zhong Xiao-yong, Xiao Zegan, et al. Dynamic game analysis among local government, central government, and peasants in the conflicts of farmland acquisition. China Land Sciences, 2012,26(10):54-60. ]
[78]	Ye C, Ma X Y, Chen R S, et al. Marginalised countryside in a globalised city: Production of rural space of Wujing Township in Shanghai, China[J]. International Development Planning Review, 2019,41(3):311-328.
[79]	吴毅. “权力—利益的结构之网”与农民群体性利益的表达困境: 对一起石场纠纷案例的分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2007,22(5):21-45, 243.
	[ Wu Yi. "Nets of the power-rights structure" and dilemma of peasants' group-rights expression: An analysis of a gravel pit dispute. Sociological Studies, 2007,22(5):21-45, 243. ]
[80]	杨新海, 殷辉礼. 城市规划实施过程中公众参与的体系构建初探[J]. 城市规划, 2009,33(9):52-57.
	[ Yang Xinhai, Yin Huili. On establishing public participation system in urban planning implementation. City Planning Review, 2009,33(9):52-57. ]
[81]	漆国生. 公共服务中的公众参与能力探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2010(3):56-58.
	[ Qi Guosheng. The study on capacity of public participation in public service. Chinese Public Administration, 2010(3):56-58. ]
[82]	叶超, 于洁. 模糊的边界: 城镇化与城市际性的演变 [J]. 探索与争鸣, 2020, 35(5): 96-101, 161, 159.
	[ Ye Chao, Yu Jie. Fuzzy boundary: Urbanization and the evolution of interurbanity. Exploration and Free Views, 2020, 35(5): 96-101, 161, 159. ]
[83]	李瑜. 我国统筹城乡户籍制度改革的理性思考[J]. 人口与经济, 2011,32(5):63-69, 105.
	[ Li Yu. On rational thinking of the coordination urban and rural household registration system reform. Population & Economics, 2011,32(5):63-69, 105. ]
[84]	叶裕民. 中国城市化的制度障碍与制度创新[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2001,15(5):32-38.
	[ Ye Yumin. System obstacles and improvement to urbanization in China. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2001,15(5):32-38. ]
[85]	尤琳, 陈世伟. 城乡一体化进程中的户籍制度改革研究[J]. 社会主义研究, 2015,37(6):84-91.
	[ You Lin, Chen Shiwei. A study on the reform of the household register system during the process of the rural-urban integration. Socialism Studies, 2015,37(6):84-91. ]
[86]	田明. 地方因素对流动人口城市融入的影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017,37(7):997-1005.
	[ Tian Ming. Local factors effects on the urban integration for the floating population. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(7):997-1005. ]
[87]	冯健, 叶竹. 基于个体生命历程视角的苏南城镇化路径转变与市民化进程[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(2):137-150.
	[ Feng Jian, Ye Zhu. Urban transformation and the progress of citizenization in Southern Jiangsu based on the perspective of life course. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(2):137-150. ]
[88]	李克强. 我们有把握完成今年决胜脱贫攻坚的任务 [EB/OL]. 2020-05-29 [2020-07-18]. http://www.cpad.gov.cn/art/2020/5/29/art_624_124864.html.
	[ Li Keqiang. We are confident of completing the decisive task of poverty alleviation this year. 2020-05-29 [2020-07-18]. http://www.cpad.gov.cn/art/2020/5/29/art_624_124864.html.]
[89]	国家统计局住户调查办公室. 中国住户调查年鉴(2019)2019 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019.
	[ Department of Household Survey National Bureau of Statistics of China. China yearbook of household survey(2019). Beijing, China: China Statistics Press, 2019. ]
[90]	陈明星, 叶超. 健康城市化: 新的发展理念及其政策含义[J]. 人文地理, 2011,26(2):56-61.
	[ Chen Mingxing, Ye Chao. Healthy urbanization: A new conception and policy explanation. Human Geography, 2011,26(2):56-61. ]
[91]	陈明星, 周园, 汤青, 等. 新型城镇化、居民福祉与国土空间规划应对[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(6):1273-1287.
	[ Chen Mingxing, Zhou Yuan, Tang Qing, et al. New-type urbanization, well-being of residents, and the response of land spatial planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(6):1273-1287. ]

序号	次数/次	中心性	关键词	序号	次数/次	中心性	关键词
1	4237	0.16	governance	11	599	0.07	participation
2	2052	0.05	city	12	537	0.01	China
3	1397	0.11	politics	13	530	0.07	space
4	1278	0.05	policy	14	503	0.10	geography
5	979	0.05	management	15	481	0.02	community
6	762	0.07	state	16	432	0.04	system
7	740	0.02	urban governance	17	411	<0.01	resilience
8	711	0.04	urban	18	408	0.05	government
9	670	0.03	sustainability	19	391	0.01	impact
10	641	0.01	climate change	20	382	<0.01	framework

年份	文件	治理政策取向	频次
2012	十八大报告	转变经济发展方式	管理44次
		政治体制改革
		文化管理
		社会管理
		生态文明建设
		党建管理
2013	中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定	推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化	治理24次
		企业治理
		政府职能转变
		财税体制改革
		发展基层民主
		文化治理
		创新社会治理体制
		生态文明制度建设
2017	十九大报告	乡村治理	治理44次
		发展民主政治
		文化治理
		打造共建共治共享的社会治理格局
		生态文明体制改革
		参与全球治理体系
		基层组织建设
2020	第十三届全国人大会三次会议政府工作报告	市场治理	治理8次
		生态环境治理
		社会治理
		全球治理