全球化下的“生产消费者”——分布式生产系统研究评述

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.10.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

经济全球化背景下,日益精细的劳动分工和跨地域生产协作带来生产片段化和地方专业化集聚。这种生产模式加剧了生产与消费的割裂,并将消费主义作为驱动生产不断扩大的途径。近年来,基于智能电网、可再生能源、3D打印等新兴技术的应用,生产与消费活动紧密联系的分布式生产模式受到可持续发展领域的关注,其中分布式可再生能源的利用和推广成为最主要的驱动力。论文以“生产消费者(Prosumer)”这一概念为切入点,从地理条件、技术基础、市场协作关系和可持续性表现4个方面,探讨分布式生产系统中生产与消费关系的重构。结论指出：以分布式生产为特征的“产消一体”生产模式并非是一种全球化脱钩策略,而是在开放条件下,生产与消费更紧密联系的地方化过程,这种生产模式转型有可能为更多样化的可持续发展实践开辟空间,值得进一步开展以行动为导向的扎根研究和区域比较分析。

关键词: 生产消费者, 产消合一, 能源转型, 全球化, 地方化, 分布式生产系统

Abstract:

With globalization, increasing specialization and spatial division of labor created longer distance between production and consumption. Consumerism became the driving force for the growth of production, and hindered the sustainability transition of local production system. Recent technological advances in 3D printing, intelligent micro grid, renewable energy, and so on have been expected to improve the possibility for a more distributed organization of production, which involves dispersed individual decision makers who are both producers and consumers in the production system. A systematic literature review was conducted on recent research on the sustainability of the distributed production system. With a focus on the relation between consumption and production, selected articles addressing the role of prosumers in the distributed production system from three leading academic journals on this topic were studied. Four interrelated dimensions were identified, including geographical implications, technology transition, market/collaboration mechanism, and sustainability. In conclusion, the sustainability performance of the distributed production system will be highly dependent on the interactions between the other three dimensions. Especially, a more close relation between consumption and production at the local level in the distributed production system can hardly be isolated from the global system. We call for more empirical studies on the restructuring of global-local relations within such sustainability transition.

Key words: prosumer, prosumption, energy transition, globalization, localization, distributed production system

童昕,蔡一帆. 全球化下的“生产消费者”——分布式生产系统研究评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(10): 1490-1500.

TONG Xin,CAI Yifan. Prosumer in globalization: A systematic review on the sustainability of distributed production system[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(10): 1490-1500.

图/表 3

参考文献 93

[1]	毛熙彦, 贺灿飞 . 2016. “全球—国家—地方”尺度下的国际贸易环境效应研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(8):1027-1038.
	[ Mao X Y, He C F . 2016. Progress of environmental effects of International trade: A global-local perspective. Progress in Geography, 35(8):1027-1038. ]
[2]	孟庆春, 李慧慧 . 2015. 基于新产消合一考虑链间竞争的供应链价值最大化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 23(3):168-176. doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.020
	[ Meng Q C, Li H H . 2015. Study on supply chain value maximization based on new prosumer. China Journal of Management Science, 23(3):168-176. ] doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.020
[3]	彭慕兰 . 2004. 大分流: 欧洲、中国及现代世界经济的发展 [M]. 史建云, 译. 南京: 江苏人民出版社.
	[ Pomeranz K. 2004. The great division: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Translated by Shi J Y. Nanjing, China: Jiangsu People's Press. ]
[4]	童昕, 王涛, 李沫 . 2017. 无锡光伏产业链中的全球-本地联系[J]. 地理科学, 37(12):1823-1830.
	[ Tong X, Wang T, Li M . 2017. Global-local linkages in photovoltaic industry inWuxi, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(12):1823-1830. ]
[5]	王缉慈 . 1997. 关于企业规模科学性的思考[J]. 中国工业经济, ( 7):27-30.
	[ Wang J C . 1997. The reflection on firm's economy of scale. China Industrial Economy, ( 7):27-30. ]
[6]	王缉慈 . 1998. 简评关于新产业区的国际学术讨论[J]. 地理科学进展, 17(3):32-38. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1998.03.005
	[ Wang J C . 1998. On the international concern about new industrial district. Progress in Geography, 17(3):32-38. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1998.03.005
[7]	王缉慈, 童昕 . 2002. 论全球化背景下的地方产业群: 地方竞争优势的源泉[J]. 战略与管理, ( 6):28-36.
	[ Wang J, Tong X . 2002. Local industrial clusters in globalization: The source of local competitiveness. Strategy and Management, ( 6):28-36. ]
[8]	尹莉, 臧旭恒 . 2009. 消费需求升级、产消者与市场边界[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), ( 5):18-27.
	[ Yin L, Zang X H . 2009. Consumer demand upgrading, prosumer and market boundary. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), ( 5):18-27. ]
[9]	Adil A M, Ko Y . 2016. Socio-technical evolution of decentralized energy systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57:1025-1037.
[10]	Alarcón Ferrari C, Chartier C . 2018. Degrowth, energy democracy, technology and social-ecological relations: Discussing a localised energy system in Vaxjö, Sweden[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197:1754-1765.
[11]	Arnold M . 2017. Fostering sustainability by linking co-creation and relationship management concepts[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140:179-188.
[12]	Balta-Ozkan N, Le Gallo J . 2018. Spatial variation in energy attitudes and perceptions: Evidence from Europe[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81:2160-2180.
[13]	Barnes S J, Mattsson J . 2016. Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104:200-211.
[14]	Behrangrad M . 2015. A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47:270-283.
[15]	Bellido M H, Rosa L P, Pereira A O , et al. 2018. Barriers, challenges and opportunities for microgrid implementation: The case of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188:203-216.
[16]	Bogers M, Hadar R, Bilberg A . 2016. Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102:225-239.
[17]	Bompard E, Masera M, Nuttall W J . 2015. High tension electricity: New multi-scale complexities in the electricity system[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96:327-333.
[18]	Breyer C, Heinonen S, Ruotsalainen J . 2017. New consciousness: A societal and energetic vision for rebalancing humankind within the limits of planet Earth[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114:7-15.
[19]	Brock K, den Ouden E, van der Klauw K , et al. 2019. Light the way for smart cities: Lessons from Philips Lighting[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142:194-209.
[20]	Brummer V . 2018. Community energy - benefits and barriers: A comparative literature review of community energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94:187-196.
[21]	Bryant S T, Straker K, Wrigley C . 2018. The typologies of power: Energy utility business models in an increasingly renewable sector[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195:1032-1046.
[22]	Burger S, Chaves-Ávila J P, Batlle C , et al. 2017. A review of the value of aggregators in electricity systems[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77:395-405.
[23]	Camarinha-Matos L M . 2016. Collaborative smart grids: A survey on trends[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65:283-294.
[24]	Chen D, Heyer S, Ibbotson S , et al. 2015. Direct digital manufacturing: Definition, evolution, and sustainability implications[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107:615-625.
[25]	Clarke N, Barnett C, Cloke P , et al. 2007. Globalising the consumer: Doing politics in an ethical register[J]. Political Geography, 26(3):231-249.
[26]	Cruz M R M, Fitiwi D Z, Santos S F , et al. 2018. A comprehensive survey of flexibility options for supporting the low-carbon energy future[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 97:338-353.
[27]	Despeisse M, Baumers M, Brown P , et al. 2017. Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115:75-84.
[28]	Di Silvestre M L, Favuzza S, Riva Sanseverino E , et al. 2018. How decarbonization, digitalization and decentralization are changing key power infrastructures[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93:483-498.
[29]	D'Souza A, Bouw K, Velthuijsen H , et al. 2018. Designing viable multi-commodity energy business ecosystems: Corroborating the business model design framework for viability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182:124-138.
[30]	Ertz M, Leblanc-Proulx S . 2018. Sustainability in the collaborative economy: A bibliometric analysis reveals emerging interest[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196:1073-1085.
[31]	Ertz M, Lecompte A, Durif F . 2018. "It's not my fault, I am in the right!" Exploration of neutralization in the justification of the support and use of a controversial technological collaborative consumption service[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134:254-264.
[32]	Ford R, Walton S, Stephenson J , et al. 2017. Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117:138-150.
[33]	Ford S, Mortara L, Minshall T . 2016. The emergence of additive manufacturing: Introduction to the special issue[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102:156-159.
[34]	Geels F W, McMeekin A, Pfluger B . 2018. Socio-technical scenarios as a methodological tool to explore social and political feasibility in low-carbon transitions: Bridging computer models and the multi-level perspective in UK electricity generation (2010-2050)[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.001.
[35]	Grabs J, Langen N, Maschkowski G , et al. 2016. Understanding role models for change: A multilevel analysis of success factors of grassroots initiatives for sustainable consumption[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134:98-111.
[36]	Gui E M, Diesendorf M, MacGill I . 2017. Distributed energy infrastructure paradigm: Community microgrids in a new institutional economics context[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72:1355-1365.
[37]	Hamalainen M, Mohajeri B, Nyberg T . 2018. Removing barriers to sustainability research on personal fabrication and social manufacturing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180:666-681.
[38]	Hankammer S, Kleer R . 2018. Degrowth and collaborative value creation: Reflections on concepts and technologies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197:1711-1718.
[39]	Heldeweg M A . 2017. Legal regimes for experimenting with cleaner production: Especially in sustainable energy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169:48-60.
[40]	Herrmann J K, Savin I . 2017. Optimal policy identification: Insights from the German electricity market[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122:71-90.
[41]	Higgins J, Green S . 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [M/OL]. The cochrane collaboration. 2011-03 [ 2019- 03- 22]. Available from .
[42]	Horváth D, Szabó R Z . 2018. Evolution of photovoltaic business models: Overcoming the main barriers of distributed energy deployment[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90:623-635.
[43]	Huang Z, Yu H, Peng Z , et al. 2017. Planning community energy system in the industry 4.0 era: Achievements, challenges and a potential solution[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78:710-721.
[44]	Hughes A, Wrigley N, Buttle M . 2008. Global production networks, ethical campaigning, and the embeddedness of responsible governance[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3):345-367.
[45]	Hyysalo S, Johnson M, Juntunen J K . 2017. The diffusion of consumer innovation in sustainable energy technologies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162:S70-S82.
[46]	Jaeger-Erben M, Rückert-John J, Schäfer M . 2015. Sustainable consumption through social innovation: A typology of innovations for sustainable consumption practices[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108:784-798.
[47]	Jiang R, Kleer R, Piller F T . 2017. Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117:84-97.
[48]	Johansson A, Kisch P, Mirata M . 2005. Distributed economies: A new engine for innovation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10):971-979.
[49]	Kästel P, Gilroy-Scott B . 2015. Economics of pooling small local electricity prosumers: LCOE & self-consumption[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51:718-729.
[50]	Kirchhoff H, Kebir N, Neumann K , et al. 2016. Developing mutual success factors and their application to swarm electrification: Microgrids with 100% renewable energies in the Global South and Germany[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128:190-200.
[51]	Kohtala C . 2015. Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: An integrated literature review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106:654-668.
[52]	Koirala B P, Koliou E, Friege J , et al. 2016. Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56:722-744.
[53]	Kolloch M, Dellermann D . 2018. Digital innovation in the energy industry: The impact of controversies on the evolution of innovation ecosystems[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136:254-264.
[54]	Korjonen-Kuusipuro K, Hujala M, Pätäri S , et al. 2017. The emergence and diffusion of grassroots energy innovations: Building an interdisciplinary approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140:1156-1164.
[55]	Kowalska-Pyzalska A . 2018. What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82:3570-3581.
[56]	Marsal-Llacuna M-L . 2018. Future living framework: Is blockchain the next enabling network?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128:226-234.
[57]	Martin CJ, Evans J, Karvonen A . 2018. Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133:269-278.
[58]	McLellan B C, Chapman A J, Aoki K . 2016. Geography, urbanization and lock-in: Considerations for sustainable transitions to decentralized energy systems[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128:77-96.
[59]	Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, Mohammadi-ivatloo B , et al. 2017. Energy hub: From a model to a concept: A review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80:1512-1527.
[60]	Newbery D, Pollitt M G, Ritz R A , et al. 2018. Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91:695-707.
[61]	Nielsen B F, Baer D, Lindkvist C . 2018. Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning: Key challenges from seven Norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142:142-153.
[62]	Nielsen K R, Reisch L A, Thøgersen J . 2016. Sustainable user innovation from a policy perspective: A systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133:65-77.
[63]	Niesten E, Alkemade F . 2016. How is value created and captured in smart grids? A review of the literature and an analysis of pilot projects[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53:629-638.
[64]	Nijhuis M, Gibescu M, Cobben J F G . 2015. Assessment of the impacts of the renewable energy and ICT driven energy transition on distribution networks[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52:1003-1014.
[65]	Osti G . 2018. The uncertain games of energy transition in the island of Sardinia (Italy)[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205:681-689.
[66]	Petticrew M, Roberts H . 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences[M]. Oxford, USA: Wiley Blackwell.
[67]	Ram M, Child M, Aghahosseini A , et al. 2018. A comparative analysis of electricity generation costs from renewable, fossil fuel and nuclear sources in G20 countries for the period 2015-2030[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199:687-704.
[68]	Rauch E, Dallasega P, Matt D T . 2016. Sustainable production in emerging markets through Distributed Manufacturing Systems (DMS)[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135:127-138.
[69]	Rayna T, Striukova L . 2016. From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102:214-224.
[70]	Ritzer G . 2015. Prosumer capitalism[J]. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3):413-445.
[71]	Ritzer G, Jurgenson N . 2010. Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital 'prosumer'[J]. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1):13-36.
[72]	Rommel J, Radtke J, von Jorck G , et al. 2018. Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197:1746-1753.
[73]	Sakah M, Diawuo F A, Katzenbach R , et al. 2017. Towards a sustainable electrification in Ghana: A review of renewable energy deployment policies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79:544-557.
[74]	Šćepanović S, Warnier M, Nurminen J K . 2017. The role of context in residential energy interventions: A meta review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77:1146-1168.
[75]	Schiller F . 2016. Urban transitions: Scaling complex cities down to human size[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112:4273-4282.
[76]	Scholten D, Bosman R . 2016. The geopolitics of renewables; exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103:273-283.
[77]	Scuotto V, Del Giudice M, della Peruta M R , et al. 2017. The performance implications of leveraging internal innovation through social media networks: An empirical verification of the smart fashion industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120:184-194.
[78]	Shaukat N, Ali S M, Mehmood C A , et al. 2018. A survey on consumers empowerment, communication technologies, and renewable generation penetration within Smart Grid[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 81:1453-1475.
[79]	Shomali A, Pinkse J . 2016. The consequences of smart grids for the business model of electricity firms[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112:3830-3841.
[80]	Soares N, Martins A G, Carvalho A L , et al. 2018. The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95:171-193.
[81]	Sommerfeld J, Buys L, Mengersen K , et al. 2017. Influence of demographic variables on uptake of domestic solar photovoltaic technology[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67:315-323.
[82]	Su W, Liu M, Zeng S , et al. 2018. Valuating renewable microgeneration technologies in Lithuanian households: A study on willingness to pay[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191:318-329.
[83]	Szabó S, Bódis K, Huld T , et al. 2013. Sustainable energy planning: Leapfrogging the energy poverty gap in Africa[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28:500-509.
[84]	Tascikaraoglu A . 2018. Evaluation of spatio-temporal forecasting methods in various smart city applications[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82:424-435.
[85]	Toffler A . 1980. The third wave[M]. New York, USA: Bantam Books.
[86]	Toffler A . 2006. Revolutionary wealth[M]. New York, USA: Knopf.
[87]	Turkson J, Wohlgemuth N . 2001. Power sector reform and distributed generation in sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Energy Policy, 29(2):135-145.
[88]	Urban F . 2018. China's rise: Challenging the North-South technology transfer paradigm for climate change mitigation and low carbon energy[J]. Energy Policy, 113:320-330.
[89]	van der Schoor T, Scholtens B . 2015. Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43:666-675.
[90]	Varho V, Rikkonen P, Rasi S . 2016. Futures of distributed small-scale renewable energy in Finland: A Delphi study of the opportunities and obstacles up to 2025[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104:30-37.
[91]	Vrontis D, Thrassou A, Amirkhanpour M . 2017. B2C smart retailing: A consumer-focused value-based analysis of interactions and synergies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124:271-282.
[92]	Watanabe C, Naveed K, Tou Y , et al. 2018. Measuring GDP in the digital economy: Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137:226-240.
[93]	Zehir M A, Batman A, Bagriyanik M . 2016. Review and comparison of demand response options for more effective use of renewable energy at consumer level[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56:631-642.