乡村振兴村庄类型识别与振兴策略研究——以山西省长子县为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

乡村振兴战略是新时代破解“三农”问题、实现农业农村现代化的重大战略部署。坚持乡村差异性与发展分化原则,科学识别乡村类型、明晰乡村振兴导向,对于编制区域乡村振兴规划与分类施策具有重要的现实意义。村域尺度是乡村振兴战略的基本尺度,但囿于微观尺度统计数据与基础资料的缺乏,亟需构建一套科学合理、简便易行的乡村类型识别方法体系。论文简要解析了影响村庄分布、演进与发展潜力的关键因素,据此构建乡村振兴村庄类型识别指标体系,并按照“自然因素→振兴潜力→发展现状→资源基础”的逻辑思路逐级识别乡村主导类型。结果表明：① 自然因子限制了村落的基本格局与演变方向,经济区位决定了村落的发展潜力与转型能力,二者在村落演进与乡村振兴中起到决定性作用;② 从农户视角看,村落的空间区位效能是否适应农户生产生活需求和生计方式,决定了农户居住场所是否发生空间迁移,并通过闲置废弃宅基地得到呈现;③ 将长子县村庄识别为城郊融合型、集聚提升型、传统农业型、特色保护型、搬迁撤并型5类,结合不同的乡村振兴模式提出相应的发展导向与振兴策略,以期为乡村振兴分类施策提供决策参考。

关键词: 乡村振兴, 类型识别, 自然因子, 闲置宅基地, 振兴策略, 资源型地区, 山西长子县

Abstract:

China's rural revitalization strategy is a long-term strategic deployment for agricultural and rural modernization by 2050. Given the differences of villages and the divergence of their development trends, it is important to identify village types scientifically and clarify their development directions in order to make sound rural revitalization plans and take differential measures. The village scale is a basic scale for implementing rural revitalization. However, limited by the lack of micro-scale statistical data and basic information, it is urgent to build a scientific, simple, and usable methodological framework for identifying village types. This study integrated geographic data and rural land use data to construct a village type identification system. Then natural factors, revitalize potential, development situation, and resource endowment were examined in turn to identify village types of Zhangzi County, Shanxi Province. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) Natural factors limit the basic pattern and direction of change of villages, location determines the development potential and transformation capability, and both play a decisive role in the evolution and revitalization of villages. 2) From the perspective of farmers, whether the location efficiency of a village is compatible to farmers' production and living needs and livelihood style determines whether a change takes place in the location of residence of farmers, and this trend can be reflected by idle and abandoned homesteads. 3) The villages of Zhangzi County can be divided into five types, including urban-suburban integration, agglomeration for improvement, traditional agricultural, protection due to special characteristics, and relocation and merging types. Combining with different modes of rural revitalization, corresponding development paths are proposed accordingly to provide a theoretical basis and decision references for differentiated rural revitalization strategies.

Key words: rural revitalization, village type identification, natural factors, vacant homestead, revitalization strategy, resource-based areas, Zhangzi County of Shanxi Province

乔陆印. 乡村振兴村庄类型识别与振兴策略研究——以山西省长子县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1340-1348.

QIAO Luyin. Village type identification and rural revitalization strategy: A case study of Zhangzi County of Shanxi Province[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1340-1348.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

参考文献 26

[1]	陈丹, 张越 . 2019. 乡村振兴战略下城乡融合的逻辑、关键与路径[J]. 宏观经济管理, ( 1):57-64.
	[ Chen D, Zhang Y . 2019. The logic, key and path of urban-rural integration under rural revitalization background. Macroeconomic Management, ( 1):57-64. ]
[2]	何仁伟 . 2018. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径[J]. 地理研究, 37(11):2127-2140.
	[ He R W . 2018. Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 37(11):2127-2140. ]
[3]	黄祖辉 . 2018. 准确把握中国乡村振兴战略[J]. 中国农村经济, ( 4):2-12.
	[ Huang Z H . 2018. On the strategy of rural revitalization in China. Chinese Rural Economy, ( 4):2-12. ]
[4]	胡守庚, 吴思, 刘彦随 . 2019. 乡村振兴规划体系与关键技术初探[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):550-562.
	[ Hu S G, Wu S, Liu Y S . 2019. A preliminary study of rural revitalization planning and its key technologies. Geographical Research, 38(3):550-562. ]
[5]	李红波, 张小林, 吴江国 , 等. 2014. 苏南地区乡村聚落空间格局及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学, 34(4):438-446.
	[ Li H B, Zhang X L, Wu J G , et al. 2014. Spatial pattern and its driving mechanism of rural settlements in southern Jiangsu. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(4):438-446. ]
[6]	李小建, 许家伟, 海贝贝 . 2015. 县域聚落分布格局演变分析: 基于1929—2013年河南巩义的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 70(12):1870-1883.
	[ Li X J, Xu J W, Hai B B . 2015. The changing distribution patterns of rural settlements during the process of urbanization: The case of Gongyi (1929-2013), China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(12):1870-1883. ]
[7]	李阳兵, 刘亚香, 罗光杰 . 2018. 贵州中部峰丛洼地区乡村聚落演化多元路径研究: 以普定后寨河聚落为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 33(1):99-113.
	[ Li Y B, Liu Y X, Luo G J . 2018. The multiple paths of the rural settlement evolution in the peak-cluster-depression area of central Guizhou Province: A case study in Houzhaihe, Puding County. Journal of Natural Resources, 33(1):99-113. ]
[8]	廖柳文, 高晓路 . 2018. 人口老龄化对乡村发展影响研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(5):617-626.
	[ Liao L W, Gao X L . 2018. Progress and prospect of research on the impact of population aging on rural development. Progress in Geography, 37(5):617-626. ]
[9]	刘春芳, 张志英 . 2018. 从城乡一体化到城乡融合: 新型城乡关系的思考[J]. 地理科学, 38(10):1624-1633.
	[ Liu C F, Zhang Z Y . 2018. From town-country integration to urban-rural integration: New thinking on the relationship between urban and rural Areas. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(10):1624-1633. ]
[10]	刘彦随 . 2018. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 73(4):637-650.
	[ Liu Y S . 2018. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4):637-650. ]
[11]	龙花楼, 李婷婷 . 2012. 中国耕地和农村宅基地利用转型耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 67(2):201-210.
	[ Long H L, Li T T . 2012. Analysis of the coupling of farmland and rural housing land transition in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(2):201-210. ]
[12]	龙花楼, 屠爽爽 . 2018. 乡村重构的理论认知[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(5):581-590.
	[ Long H L, Tu S S . 2018. Theoretical thinking of rural restructuring. Progress in Geography, 37(5):581-590. ]
[13]	马晓冬, 李全林, 沈一 . 2012. 江苏省乡村聚落的形态分异及地域类型[J]. 地理学报, 67(4):516-525.
	[ Ma X D, Li Q L, Shen Y . 2012. Morphological difference and regional types of rural settlements in Jiangsu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(4):516-525. ]
[14]	马艳梅, 吴玉鸣, 吴柏钧 . 2015. 长三角地区城镇化可持续发展综合评价: 基于熵值法和象限图法[J]. 经济地理, 35(6):47-53.
	[ Ma Y M, Wu Y M, Wu B J . 2015. Comprehensive evaluation of sustainable urban development of Yangtze River Delta based on entropy method and quadrant method. Economic Geography, 35(6):47-53. ]
[15]	乔陆印, 刘彦随 . 2019. 新时期乡村振兴战略与农村宅基地制度改革[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):655-666.
	[ Qiao L Y, Liu Y S . 2019. China's rural revitalization strategy and rural homestead system reform in the new period. Geographical Research, 38(3):655-666. ]
[16]	王恩琪, 韩冬青, 董亦楠 . 2016. 江苏镇江市村落物质空间形态的地貌关联解析[J]. 城市规划, 40(4):75-84.
	[ Wang E Q, Han D Q, Dong Y N . 2016. Landform correlation analysis on physical spatial forms of rural settlements in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu. City Planning Review, 40(4):75-84. ]
[17]	王媛, 程曦, 殷培红 , 等. 2013. 影响中国碳排放绩效的区域特征研究: 基于熵值法的聚类分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 28(7):1106-1116. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.003
	[ Wang Y, Cheng X, Yin P H , et al. 2013. Research of regional characteristics of China's carbon emission performance based on entropy method and cluster analysis. Journal of Natural Resources, 28(7):1106-1116. ] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.003
[18]	文琦, 郑殿元 . 2019. 西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):509-521.
	[ Wen Q, Zheng D Y . 2019. Identification and revitalization of rural poverty-stricken areas in northwest China. Geographical Research, 38(3):509-521. ]
[19]	杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼 , 等. 2015. 基于格网的农村居民点用地时空特征及空间指向性的地理要素识别: 以环渤海地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 34(6):1077-1087.
	[ Yang R, Liu Y S, Long H L , et al. 2015. Spatial-temporal characteristics of rural residential land use change and spatial directivity identification based on grid in the Bohai Rim in China. Geographical Research, 34(6):1077-1087. ]
[20]	严金明, 迪力沙提, 夏方舟 . 2019. 乡村振兴战略实施与宅基地“三权分置”改革的深化[J]. 改革, ( 1):5-18. 1):5-18.
	[ Yan J M, Di L S, Xia F Z . 2019. The implementation of the rural revitalization strategy and the deepening of the reform of the three rights separation of rural homesteads. Reform, ( 1):5-18. ]
[21]	叶敬忠 . 2018. 乡村振兴战略: 历史沿循、总体布局与路径省思[J]. 华南师范大学学报, ( 2):64-69.
	[ Ye J Z . 2018. Rural revitalization strategy: Historical evolution, overall layout and path reflection. Journal of South China Normal University, ( 2):64-69. ]
[22]	叶兴庆 . 2018. 新时代中国乡村振兴战略论纲[J]. 改革, ( 1):65-73.
	[ Ye X Q . 2018. The general principles of the China's rural vitalization strategy in the new era. Reform, ( 1):65-73. ]
[23]	张海鹏, 郜亮亮, 闫坤 . 2018. 乡村振兴战略思想的理论渊源、主要创新和实现路径[J]. 中国农村经济, ( 11):2-16.
	[ Zhang H P, Gao L L, Yan K . 2018. Strategic thinking on rural revitalization strategy: theoretical origin, main innovation and realization path. Chinese Rural Economy, ( 11):2-16. ]
[24]	张军 . 2018. 乡村价值定位与乡村振兴[J]. 中国农村经济, ( 1):2-10.
	[ Zhang J . 2018. Village value orientation and rural revitalization. Chinese Rural Economy, ( 1):2-10. ]
[25]	张英男, 龙花楼, 马历 , 等. 2019. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):578-594.
	[ Zhang Y N, Long H L, Ma L , et al. 2019. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 38(3):578-594. ]
[26]	周扬, 郭远智, 刘彦随 . 2019. 中国乡村地域类型及分区发展途径[J]. 地理研究, 38(3):467-481.
	[ Zhou Y, Guo Y Z, Liu Y S . 2019. Areal types and their development paths in rural China. Geographical Research, 38(3):467-481. ]

维度指标	单项指标	计算方法及指标说明	指标权重	功效性
自然本底(N)	平均高程	ArcGIS栅格统计	0.1536	逆向指标
	平均坡度	ArcGIS栅格统计	0.1993	逆向指标
区位条件(L)	距离干道	ArcGIS距离计算	0.0976	逆向指标
	距离县城	ArcGIS距离计算	0.1281	逆向指标
宅基地利用(H)	空心化比率	闲置废弃宅基地面积/村庄用地面积	0.1144	逆向指标
	人均宅基地	村庄用地面积/村庄总人数	0.1351	逆向指标
资源禀赋(R)	人均耕地面积	村庄耕地总面积/村庄总人数	0.0219	正向指标
	地均粮食产量	村庄粮食产量/村庄耕地总面积	0.1500	正向指标

高程/m	村庄面积比例/%	坡度/(°)	村庄面积比例/%	距干道/m	村庄面积比例/%	距县城/km	村庄面积比例/%
800~1000	80.71	0~6	67.69	50	13.17	2	0.65
1000~1200	18.37	6~15	30.49	100	24.25	5	12.81
1200~1400	0.89	15~25	1.67	200	41.70	10	47.40
>1400	0.02	>25	0.14	500	77.11	15	82.22