交通拥堵对急救医疗服务时空可达性的影响——以广州市为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.04.004

地理科学进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 431-439.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.04.004

交通拥堵对急救医疗服务时空可达性的影响——以广州市为例

陈建国¹(), 周素红^1,³, 柳林^1,^2,*^*(), 肖露子¹, 宋广文¹

1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院/综合地理信息研究中心,广州 510275
2. 辛辛那提大学地理系,美国辛辛那提 OH45221-0131
3 广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室,广州 510275

出版日期:2016-04-27 发布日期:2016-04-27
通讯作者: 柳林 E-mail:chenjianguosysu@163.com;liulin2@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:
作者简介：陈建国(1980-),男,湖北松滋人,博士研究生,研究方向为时空可达性,E-mail: chenjianguosysu@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(41531178);国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(41522104)

Estimating the effect of traffic congestion on accessibility to emergency medical care services: Take Guangzhou as an example

Jianguo CHEN¹(), Suhong ZHOU^1,³, Lin LIU^1,^2,^*(), Luzi XIAO¹, Guangwen SONG¹

1. School of Geography Science and Planning/Center of Integrated Geographic Information Analysis, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2. Department of Geography, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Hamilton OH 45221-0131, USA
3. Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-Simulation, Guangzhou 510275, China

Online:2016-04-27 Published:2016-04-27
Contact: Lin LIU E-mail:chenjianguosysu@163.com;liulin2@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41531178;National Natural Science Foundation for Outstanding Youth, No.4152210]

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

时间是急救服务的敏感因素,急救服务设施可达性的时空差异对于评估急救设施的选址及急救服务调度的效率,解决公众急救医疗需求与供给之间的矛盾,辅助政府部门的决策都至关重要。交通拥堵是常见的城市问题,尤其是在城市中心区域更为明显,由于交通拥堵带来的时间滞后对急救服务产生的影响不容忽视。本文通过浮动车GPS大数据,分析交通拥堵对广州市中心城区急救医疗设施时空可达性的影响。结果表明：①在考虑道路实际通行状况的情况下,在交通高峰期,社区的急救医疗服务平均可达时间和最长可达时间分别比采用设计时速计算增加20%和25%。②可达性存在明显的时空差异。急救医疗服务可达性以急救医院为中心,沿着路网向四周呈现衰减趋势。急救医院布局较多、路网密集区域的可达性高,反之则低。交通拥堵对路网密集、行车规则设计复杂以及存在通过性交通流的地区影响显著。③对不同阻抗系数下可达性变化的敏感性分析,发现随着阻抗系数的增大,可达性变化的趋势有所放缓,紧急医疗服务可达性的分异变小;这一变化趋势在交通平峰期表现更为明显。因此,在研究城市中心区域急救医疗服务时,考虑交通拥堵对可达性的影响,需要构建基于实时交通状况的可达性评估模型,合理选择模型参数,优化实时急救医疗服务调度,提升急救服务的效率和质量。

关键词: 急救医疗服务, 时空可达性, 浮动车, 大数据, 交通拥堵, 广州市

Abstract:

Time is a sensitive factor in emergency medical service (EMS). The spatial and temporal differences of EMS accessibility are important for the assessment of siting of emergency facilities and the efficiency of emergency service dispatch. Traffic congestion is a common problem in the central areas of cities, and the impact of congestion on EMS accessibility cannot be ignored. In this study, the impact of traffic congestion on the temporal and spatial accessibility to EMS in the city of Guangzhou was analyzed by using the floating car data. The results show that: (1) During rush hours, the average and longest time between 120 hospitals and communities are 17% and 19% higher respectively than using standard road speed. (2) The accessibility of EMS to an emergency hospital as the center decays along the road network. The accessibility of EMS is high where the emergency hospital number is large and the road network is dense, and vice versa. The impact of traffic congestion on EMS accessibility is significant in areas where the road network and traffic rule are complex. (3) With the increase of time impedance, accessibility change slowed. This trend is more obvious in off-rush hours. Therefore, real-time traffic condition should be considered in research on EMS accessibility to optimize EMS scheduling and improve the efficiency.

Key words: Emergency Medical Service (EMS), spatial-temporal accessibility, floating car, big data, traffic congestion, Guangzhou City

陈建国, 周素红, 柳林, 肖露子, 宋广文. 交通拥堵对急救医疗服务时空可达性的影响——以广州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(4): 431-439.

Jianguo CHEN, Suhong ZHOU, Lin LIU, Luzi XIAO, Guangwen SONG. Estimating the effect of traffic congestion on accessibility to emergency medical care services: Take Guangzhou as an example[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(4): 431-439.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

表2

参考文献 28

[1]	邓羽, 蔡建明, 杨振山, 等. 2012. 北京城区交通时间可达性测度及其空间特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 67(2): 169-178.
	[Deng Y, Cai J M, Yang Z S, et al.2012. Measuring time accessibility with its spatial characteristics in urban areas of Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(2): 169-178.]
[2]	樊立惠, 蔺雪芹, 王岱. 2015. 北京市公共服务设施供需协调发展的时空演化特征: 以教育医疗设施为例[J]. 人文地理, 30(1): 90-97.
	[Fan L H, Lin X Q, Wang D.2015. Spatial-temporal succession characteristics of public service facilities supplyand demand coordinated development in beijing: A case study of educational and medical facilities[J]. Human Geography, 30(1): 90-97.]
[3]	蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅, 等. 2010. 基于时间可达性与伽萨法则的大卖场区位探讨: 以上海市中心城区为例[J]. 地理研究, 29(6): 1056-1068.
	[Jiang H B, Xu J G, Qi Y, et al.2010. The quantitative analysis of large scale supermarkets location based on time accessibility and Gasa rules[J]. Geographical Research, 29(6): 1056-1068.]
[4]	靳诚, 陆玉麒, 张莉, 等. 2009. 基于路网结构的旅游景点可达性分析: 以南京市区为例[J]. 地理研究, 28(1): 246-258.
	[Jin C, Lu Y Q, Zhang L, et al.2009. An analysis of accessibility of scenic spots based on land traffic network: A case study of Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 28(1): 246-258.]
[5]	李小马, 刘常富. 2009. 基于网络分析的沈阳城市公园可达性和服务[J]. 生态学报, 29(3): 1554-1562.
	[Li X M, Liu C F.2009. Accessibility and service of Shenyang’s urban parks by network analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(3): 1554-1562.]
[6]	潘竟虎, 从忆波. 2012. 中国4A级及以上旅游景点(区)空间可达性测度[J]. 地理科学, 32(11): 1321-1327.
	[Pan J H, Cong Y B.2012. Spatial accessibility of scenic spot at 4A level and above in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(11): 1321-1327.]
[7]	宋正娜, 陈雯. 2009. 基于潜能模型的医疗设施空间可达性评价方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 28(6): 848-854. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.06.003
	[Song Z N, Chen W.Measuring spatial accessibility to health care facilities based on potential model[J]. Progress in Geography, 28(6): 848-854.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.06.003
[8]	王姣娥, 胡浩. 2012. 基于空间距离和时间成本的中小文化旅游城市可达性研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 27(11): 1951-1961. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.11.014
	[Wang J E, Hu H.2012. Accessibility of medium-and small-sized cultural tourist cities based on spatial distance and time cost[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(11): 1951-1961.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.11.014
[9]	尹海伟, 孔繁花, 宗跃光. 2008. 城市绿地可达性与公平性评价[J]. 生态学报, 28(7): 3375-3383.
	[Yin H W, Kong F H, Zong Y G.2008. Accessibility and equity assessment on urban green space[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(7): 3375-3383.]
[10]	曾伟良, 何兆成, 沙志仁, 等. 2013. 结合卡尔曼滤波的城市路段速度估计[J]. 测绘科学, 38(1): 96-99.
	[Zeng W L, He Z C, Sha Z R, et al.2013. Urban link speed estimation with Kalman filter[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 38(1): 96-99.]
[11]	Berkow M, Monsere C M, Koonce P, et al.2009. Prototype for data fusion using stationary and mobile data: Sources for improved arterial performance measurement[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2099: 102-112.
[12]	Blackwell T H, Kaufman J S.2002. Response time effectiveness: Comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system[J]. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(4): 288-295.
[13]	Burns L R, Wholey D R.1992. The impact of physician characteristics in conditional choice models for hospital care[J]. Journal of Health Economics, 11(1): 43-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.23889 pmid: 10119756
[14]	Ertugay K, Duzgun S.2011. GIS-based stochastic modeling of physical accessibility using GPS-based floating car data and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(9): 1491-1506. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.528419
[15]	Gao S, Wang Y, Gao Yet al.2013. Understanding urban traffic-flow characteristics: A rethinking of betweenness centrality[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(1): 135-153. doi: 10.1068/b38141
[16]	Jenelius E, Koutsopoulos H N.2013. Travel time estimation for urban road networks using low frequency probe vehicle data[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 53: 64-81. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.03.008
[17]	Joseph A E, Bantock P R.1982. Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: A method and case study[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 16(1): 85-90. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90428-2 pmid: 7100960
[18]	Liu H X, Ma W.2009. A virtual vehicle probe model for time-dependent travel time estimation on signalized arterials[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 17(1): 11-26. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2008.05.002
[19]	Liu L, Andris C, Ratti C.2010. Uncovering cabdrivers’ behavior patterns from their digital traces[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(6): 541-548. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.004
[20]	Liu Y, Kang C G, Gao S, et al.2012. Understanding intra- urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 14(4): 463-483.
[21]	McGrail M R, Humphreys J S.2009. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas: Improving the effectiveness of the two-step floating catchment area method[J]. Applied Geography, 29(4): 533-541. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.003
[22]	Phibbs C S, Mark D H, Luft H S, et al.1993. Choice of hospital for delivery: A comparison of high-risk and low-risk women[J]. Health Services Research, 28(2): 201-222. doi: 10.1093/heapol/8.2.184 pmid: 8514500
[23]	Pons P T, Haukoos J S, Bludworth W, et al.2005. Paramedic response time: Does it affect patient survival[J]. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(7): 594-600.
[24]	Shah M N.2006. The formation of the emergency medical services system[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3): 414-423. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.048793 pmid: 16449600
[25]	Shen Q.1998. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(3): 345-365. doi: 10.1068/b250345
[26]	Thomas N E.1998. Multi-state and multi-sensor incident detection systems for arterial streets[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 6(5-6): 337-357. doi: 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00003-0
[27]	Van Lint J W.2006. Reliable real-time framework for short-term freeway travel time prediction[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(12): 921-932. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:12(921)
[28]	Yiannakoulias N, Bland W, Svenson L W.2013. Estimating the effect of turn penalties and traffic congestion on measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care[J]. Applied Geography, 39: 172-182. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.003

	交通平峰期可达性				交通高峰期可达性
	等级升高		等级不变	等级降低	等级升高	等级不变	等级降低
β=1.0	85	189	86		77	205	78
β=1.5	80	201	79		80	204	76
β=2.0	79	206	75		80	206	74

交通拥堵对急救医疗服务时空可达性的影响——以广州市为例

Estimating the effect of traffic congestion on accessibility to emergency medical care services: Take Guangzhou as an example

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

		高峰时段可达性					平峰时段可达性
		Q1		Q2	Q3	Q4	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
设计速度可达性	Q1	58	26	6	0		62	20	7	1
	Q2	22	39	24	5		17	40	26	7
	Q3	8	20	43	19		9	23	40	18
	Q4	2	5	17	66		2	7	17	64

[1]	马明清, 袁武, 葛全胜, 袁文, 杨林生, 李汉青, 李萌. “一带一路”若干区域社会发展态势大数据分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 1009-1020.
[2]	申犁帆, 张纯, 李赫, 王烨, 王子甲. 城市轨道交通通勤与职住平衡状况的关系研究——基于大数据方法的北京实证分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 791-806.
[3]	赵文博, 刘洪杰, 田雪婷, 李宝林, 曹伟宏. 基于UCMap的城市环境气候空间格局分析——以广州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 452-464.
[4]	刘樱, 周春山, 黄婉玲, 朱倩琼. 大都市区农村土地非农化空间特征及机理——以广州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1119-1130.
[5]	杨喜平, 方志祥. 移动定位大数据视角下的人群移动模式及城市空间结构研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 880-889.
[6]	黄洁, 王姣娥, 靳海涛, 金凤君. 北京市地铁客流的时空分布格局及特征——基于智能交通卡数据[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(3): 397-406.
[7]	关雪峰, 曾宇媚. 时空大数据背景下并行数据处理分析挖掘的进展及趋势[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(10): 1314-1327.
[8]	王娟, 孟斌, 张景秋, 李琛, 邹柏贤. 感知技术在文化遗产研究中的应用与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(9): 1092-1098.
[9]	杨微石, 郭旦怀, 逯燕玲, 王德强, 朱映秋, 张宝秀. 基于大数据的文化遗产认知分析方法——以北京旧城中轴线为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(9): 1111-1118.
[10]	舒华, 宋辞, 裴韬. 室内定位数据分析与应用研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(5): 580-588.
[11]	高悦尔, 陈舒婷, 郑承于, 边经卫. 基于浮动车数据的旅游景点周边路网容量研究——以厦门岛为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(12): 1529-1537.
[12]	宋长青. 地理学研究范式的思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(1): 1-3.
[13]	杨振山, 龙瀛, DOUAY Nicolas. 大数据对人文—经济地理学研究的促进与局限[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(4): 410-417.
[14]	曹阳, 甄峰. 基于智慧城市的可持续城市空间发展模型总体架构[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(4): 430-437.
[15]	周淑丽, 陶海燕, 卓莉. 基于矢量的城市扩张多智能体模拟——以广州市番禺区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(2): 202-210.