土地利用变化与生态系统服务：概念、方法与进展

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态系统服务作为生态学与地理学的研究前沿和热点，受到众多学者与研究组织的关注。土地利用变化通过对生态系统格局与过程的影响，改变着生态系统产品与服务的提供能力。本文对土地利用变化与生态系统服务相关研究背景和概念进行了介绍，总结了生态系统服务评估方法的特点，对目前研究中存在的问题进行了分析，展望了未来的研究趋势。加强土地利用变化驱动下生态系统过程与服务的相互关系、生态系统服务之间的相互关系以及生态系统服务的区域集成与优化是生态系统服务研究的前沿科学问题，这些科学问题的解决将为生态系统管理提供重要的理论和方法支持。

关键词: 生态过程, 生态系统服务, 生态系统服务集成与优化, 生态系统管理, 土地利用

Abstract: As a frontier and hot topic in ecology and geography, the study of ecosystem services has attracted the interest of many scholars and research institutions. By changing the structure and processes of ecosystems, landuse change affects the provisioning capability of ecosystems for products and services. Study of the relationships between ecosystem processes and services, the relationships among multiple ecosystem services, and the integration and optimization of these services at the regional scale in the context of land-use change urgently needs to be enhanced. The results of such research will be critically important for informing and supporting activities of ecosystem management. This paper introduces the concepts and methods of the study of land- use change and ecosystem services and discusses the shortcomings of existing studies and future prospects of land-use change and ecosystem services research.

Key words: ecological process, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, integration and optimization of ecosystem services, land use

中图分类号:

F301

傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务：概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.

FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services：concepts, methods and progress[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.

参考文献

傅伯杰. 2013. 生态系统服务与生态安全. 北京: 高等教育出版社. [Fu B J. 2013. Ecosystem service and ecological security. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.]
李文华, 等. 2008. 生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论方法与应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. [Li W H, et al. 2008. Valuation of ecosystem services: theories, methods and applications. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.]
吕一河, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 2007. 景观格局与生态过程的耦合途径分析. 地理科学进展, 26(3): 1-10.[Lv Y H, Chen L D, Fu B J. 2007. Analysis of the integrating approach on landscape pattern and ecological processes. Progress in Geography, 26(3): 1-10.]
谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 2008. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 23(5): 911-919.[Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911-919.]
张立伟, 傅伯杰. 2014. 生态系统服务制图研究进展. 生态学报, 34(2): 316-325.[Zhang LW, Fu B J. 2014. The progress in ecosystem services mapping: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(2): 316-325.]
张舟, 吴次芳, 谭荣. 2013. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用变化研究中的应用: 瓶颈和展望. 应用生态学报, 24(2): 556-562.[Zhang Z, Wu C F, Tan R. 2013. Application of ecosystem service value in land use change research: bottlenecks and prospects. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2): 556-562.]
赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚. 2000. 生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析. 应用生态学报, 11(2): 290-292.[Zhao J Z, Xiao H, Wu G. 2000. Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 11(2): 290-292.]
Anderies J M, Cumming G, Janssen M, et al. 2001. A resilience centered approach for engaging stakeholders about regional sustainability: an example from the Goulburn Broken catchment in Southeastern Australia (Technical Report, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems). Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.
Ayanu Y Z, Conrad C, Nauss T, et al. 2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: a review of remote sensing applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(16): 8529-8541.
Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394-1404.
Braat L, Ten B P. 2008. The cost of policy inaction: the case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Brussels, Belgium: The COPI Project.
Briggs S V, Taws N. 2003. Impacts of salinity on biodiversity: clear understanding or muddy confusion? Australian Journal of Botany, 51(6): 609-617.
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21: 17-29.
Carreño L, Frank F C, Viglizzo E F. 2012. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154: 68-77.
Costanza R, D'arge R, Groot R D, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.
Crossman N D, Burkhard B, Nedkov S. 2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2): 1-4.
Daily G C. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems.Washington, DC: Island Press. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth P R, Anderson B J, et al. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(2): 377-385.
Farrington P, Salama R B. 1996. Controlling dryland salinity by planting trees in the best hydrogeological setting. Land Degradation & Development, 7(3): 183-204.
Feng X M, Fu B J, Yang X J, et al. 2010. Remote sensing of ecosystem services: an opportunity for spatially explicit assessment. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(6): 522- 535.
Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M, et al. 2000. The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, China. Catena, 39(1): 69-78.
Fu B J, Su C H, Wei Y P, et al. 2011. Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological Research, 26(1): 1-14.
Fu B J, Wang S, Su C H, et al. 2013. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 4-10.
Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al. 2012. Integrating ecosystem- service tradeoffs into land- use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (19): 7565-7570.
Greiner R, Cacho O. 2001. On the efficient use of a catchment's land and water resources: dryland salinization in Australia. Ecological Economics, 38(3): 441-458.
Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. 2012. Synergies, trade- offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17 (3): 22.
Hein L, Koppen K V, Groot R S D, et al. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209-228.
Hussain A M T, Tschirhart J. 2013. Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 93: 116-127.
Jia X Q, Fu B J, Feng X M, et al. 2014. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the grain-for-green areas in northern Shaanxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 43: 103-113.
Lamarque P, Quétier F, Lavorel S. 2011. The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334(5-6): 441-449.
Lautenbach S, Volk M, Gruber B, et al. 2010. Quantifying ecosystem service trade- offs. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment's Sake. Ottawa, Canada: July 5-8, 2010.
Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. 2012a. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 31-39.
Maes J, Paracchini M L, Zulian G, et al. 2012b. Synergies and trade- offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155: 1-12.
Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, et al. 2013. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: an analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Martínez- Harms M J, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2): 17-25.
MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being.Washington, DC: Island Press. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, et al. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28): 9495-9500.
Nedkov S, Burkhard B. 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem services: mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole Municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 21: 67-79.
Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4-11.
Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304: 1251-1252.
Rodríguez J P, Beard T D J, Bennett E M, et al. 2006. Tradeoffs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28. Schofield N J. 1992. Tree planting for dryland salinity control in Australia. Agroforestry Systems, 20(1-2): 1-23.
Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F V, et al. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3): 630-636.
Su S L, Xiao R, Jiang Z L, et al. 2012. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography, 34: 295-305.
Sutherland W J, Armstrong B S, Armsworth P R, et al. 2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43 (4): 617-627.

[1]	姜凯斯,刘正佳,李裕瑞,王永生,王昱. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型村域土地利用变化及对区域乡村转型发展的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1305-1315.
[2]	杨奎,张宇,赵小风,文琦,钟太洋. 乡村土地利用结构效率时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1393-1402.
[3]	李极恒, 龚岳, 李贵才. 珠三角村镇建成区的空间型态：特征、类型和产业影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 829-839.
[4]	刘紫玟, 尹丹, 黄庆旭, 何春阳, 薛飞. 生态系统服务在土地利用规划研究和应用中的进展——基于文献计量和文本分析法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 236-247.
[5]	马冰滢, 黄姣, 李双成. 基于生态-经济权衡的京津冀城市群土地利用优化配置[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 26-37.
[6]	黄琳珊, 陈彦光, 李双成. 京津冀城镇用地空间结构的多分维谱分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 50-64.
[7]	赵静湉, 陈彦光, 李双成. 京津冀城市用地形态的双分形特征及其演化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 77-87.
[8]	崔学刚, 方创琳, 李君, 刘海猛, 张蔷. 城镇化与生态环境耦合动态模拟模型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 111-125.
[9]	张凤, 陈彦光, 李晓松. 京津冀城市生长和形态的径向维数分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 65-76.
[10]	任涵, 张静静, 朱文博, 王丽园, 张立娟, 朱连奇. 太行山淇河流域土地利用变化对生境的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1693-1704.
[11]	赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 王亚萍, 杨思琪. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.
[12]	戴尔阜, 马良. 土地变化模型方法综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 152-162.
[13]	孙传谆, 甄霖, 王超, 胡洁, 杜秉贞. 天然林资源保护一期工程生态成效评估——以甘肃小陇山地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(6): 732-740.
[14]	徐苏, 张永勇, 窦明, 花瑞祥, 周宇建. 长江流域土地利用时空变化特征及其径流效应[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(4): 426-436.
[15]	徐卫华, 杨琰瑛, 张路, 肖燚, 王效科, 欧阳志云. 区域生态承载力预警评估方法及案例研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.