地理科学进展 ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 441-446.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
• 本刊特稿 • 下一篇
傅伯杰, 张立伟
收稿日期:
2014-04-01
修回日期:
2014-04-01
出版日期:
2014-04-25
发布日期:
2014-04-25
作者简介:
傅伯杰(1958- ),研究员,博士生导师,主要从事自然地理和景观生态学研究,E-mail:bfu@rcees.ac.cn。
基金资助:
FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei
Received:
2014-04-01
Revised:
2014-04-01
Online:
2014-04-25
Published:
2014-04-25
摘要: 生态系统服务作为生态学与地理学的研究前沿和热点,受到众多学者与研究组织的关注。土地利用变化通过对生态系统格局与过程的影响,改变着生态系统产品与服务的提供能力。本文对土地利用变化与生态系统服务相关研究背景和概念进行了介绍,总结了生态系统服务评估方法的特点,对目前研究中存在的问题进行了分析,展望了未来的研究趋势。加强土地利用变化驱动下生态系统过程与服务的相互关系、生态系统服务之间的相互关系以及生态系统服务的区域集成与优化是生态系统服务研究的前沿科学问题,这些科学问题的解决将为生态系统管理提供重要的理论和方法支持。
中图分类号:
傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services:concepts, methods and progress[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
傅伯杰. 2013. 生态系统服务与生态安全. 北京: 高等教育出 版社. [Fu B J. 2013. Ecosystem service and ecological security. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.]李文华, 等. 2008. 生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论方法 与应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. [Li W H, et al. 2008. Valuation of ecosystem services: theories, methods and applications. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press.]吕一河, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 2007. 景观格局与生态过程的耦合 途径分析. 地理科学进展, 26(3): 1-10.[Lv Y H, Chen L D, Fu B J. 2007. Analysis of the integrating approach on landscape pattern and ecological processes. Progress in Geography, 26(3): 1-10.]谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 2008. 一个基于专家知识的生态 系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 23(5): 911-919.[Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911-919.]张立伟, 傅伯杰. 2014. 生态系统服务制图研究进展. 生态学 报, 34(2): 316-325.[Zhang LW, Fu B J. 2014. The progress in ecosystem services mapping: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(2): 316-325.]张舟, 吴次芳, 谭荣. 2013. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用变 化研究中的应用: 瓶颈和展望. 应用生态学报, 24(2): 556-562.[Zhang Z, Wu C F, Tan R. 2013. Application of ecosystem service value in land use change research: bottlenecks and prospects. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2): 556-562.]赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚. 2000. 生态系统服务的物质量与价值量 评价方法的比较分析. 应用生态学报, 11(2): 290-292.[Zhao J Z, Xiao H, Wu G. 2000. Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 11(2): 290-292.]Anderies J M, Cumming G, Janssen M, et al. 2001. A resilience centered approach for engaging stakeholders about regional sustainability: an example from the Goulburn Broken catchment in Southeastern Australia (Technical Report, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems). Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.Ayanu Y Z, Conrad C, Nauss T, et al. 2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: a review of remote sensing applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(16): 8529-8541.Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394-1404.Braat L, Ten B P. 2008. The cost of policy inaction: the case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Brussels, Belgium: The COPI Project.Briggs S V, Taws N. 2003. Impacts of salinity on biodiversity: clear understanding or muddy confusion? Australian Journal of Botany, 51(6): 609-617.Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21: 17-29.Carreño L, Frank F C, Viglizzo E F. 2012. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154: 68-77.Costanza R, D'arge R, Groot R D, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.Crossman N D, Burkhard B, Nedkov S. 2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2): 1-4.Daily G C. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems.Washington, DC: Island Press. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth P R, Anderson B J, et al. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(2): 377-385.Farrington P, Salama R B. 1996. Controlling dryland salinity by planting trees in the best hydrogeological setting. Land Degradation & Development, 7(3): 183-204.Feng X M, Fu B J, Yang X J, et al. 2010. Remote sensing of ecosystem services: an opportunity for spatially explicit assessment. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(6): 522- 535.Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M, et al. 2000. The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, China. Catena, 39(1): 69-78.Fu B J, Su C H, Wei Y P, et al. 2011. Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological Research, 26(1): 1-14.Fu B J, Wang S, Su C H, et al. 2013. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 4-10.Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al. 2012. Integrating ecosystem- service tradeoffs into land- use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (19): 7565-7570.Greiner R, Cacho O. 2001. On the efficient use of a catchment's land and water resources: dryland salinization in Australia. Ecological Economics, 38(3): 441-458.Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. 2012. Synergies, trade- offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17 (3): 22.Hein L, Koppen K V, Groot R S D, et al. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209-228.Hussain A M T, Tschirhart J. 2013. Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 93: 116-127.Jia X Q, Fu B J, Feng X M, et al. 2014. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the grain-for-green areas in northern Shaanxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 43: 103-113.Lamarque P, Quétier F, Lavorel S. 2011. The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334(5-6): 441-449.Lautenbach S, Volk M, Gruber B, et al. 2010. Quantifying ecosystem service trade- offs. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment's Sake. Ottawa, Canada: July 5-8, 2010.Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. 2012a. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 31-39.Maes J, Paracchini M L, Zulian G, et al. 2012b. Synergies and trade- offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155: 1-12.Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, et al. 2013. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: an analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Martínez- Harms M J, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2): 17-25.MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being.Washington, DC: Island Press. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, et al. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28): 9495-9500.Nedkov S, Burkhard B. 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem services: mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole Municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 21: 67-79.Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4-11.Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304: 1251-1252.Rodríguez J P, Beard T D J, Bennett E M, et al. 2006. Tradeoffs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28. Schofield N J. 1992. Tree planting for dryland salinity control in Australia. Agroforestry Systems, 20(1-2): 1-23.Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F V, et al. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3): 630-636.Su S L, Xiao R, Jiang Z L, et al. 2012. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography, 34: 295-305.Sutherland W J, Armstrong B S, Armsworth P R, et al. 2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43 (4): 617-627. |
[1] | 杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 王雅竹. 长三角地区城市土地利用与生态环境效应的交互作用机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 220-231. |
[2] | 钱家乘, 张佰林, 刘虹吾, 高阳, 王昭颖, 连小云. 东部旅游特色山区乡村发展分化及其驱动力——以浙江省平阳县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1460-1472. |
[3] | 王成, 谢波. 土地利用视角下城市交通事故驱动机理的研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1597-1606. |
[4] | 葛玉娟, 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬. 山区耕地细碎化对土地利用集约度影响——以贵州省亚鱼村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1095-1105. |
[5] | 吴孔森, 芮旸, 陈佳, 张丽琼, 杨新军, 张佰刚. 旅游驱动下乡村转型发展的微尺度研究——以西安市上王村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 1047-1059. |
[6] | 胡甜, 吴健生, 彭建, 李卫锋. 土地分离与共享框架的研究现状及应用拓展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(5): 880-888. |
[7] | 胡栩, 聂勇, 徐霞, 蒋盛, 张镱锂. 塔里木盆地南缘和田地区土地利用变化的遥感研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 577-590. |
[8] | 刘采, 张海燕, 李迁. 1980—2018年海南岛人类活动强度时空变化特征及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 567-576. |
[9] | 邹利林, 刘彦随, 王永生. 中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 298-309. |
[10] | 马恩朴, 蔡建明, 韩燕, 廖柳文, 林静. 人地系统远程耦合的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 310-326. |
[11] | 谭荣辉, 刘耀林, 刘艳芳, 何青松. 城市增长边界研究进展——理论模型、划定方法与实效评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 327-338. |
[12] | 张涵, 李阳兵. 城郊土地利用功能演变——以贵州省惠水县乡村旅游度假区好花红村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12): 1999-2012. |
[13] | 成超男, 胡杨, 赵鸣. 城市绿色空间格局时空演变及其生态系统服务评价的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782. |
[14] | 姜凯斯,刘正佳,李裕瑞,王永生,王昱. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型村域土地利用变化及对区域乡村转型发展的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1305-1315. |
[15] | 杨奎,张宇,赵小风,文琦,钟太洋. 乡村土地利用结构效率时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1393-1402. |
|