城镇滨水区游憩管理模式

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.10.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

滨水区是服务于人们游憩活动的综合性空间环境，其生态要素是滨水区游憩管理的重要内容之一。为了强化水体服务于滨水区的生态功能，提升城镇滨水区的景观生态价值，以丹东市城乡滨水区为例，提出了滨水区生态利益游憩管理模式(EBBM)，指导城镇滨水区景观生态的规划建设。采用结构方程验证了该模型中生态要素与活动、背景、体验及利益等要素之间的结构关系。在模型验证过程中，运用SPSS13.0 及AMOS6.0 软件测试了模型；拟合度检验表明，该模型具有较高的可靠性。

关键词: 滨水区, 结构方程模型, 利益管理模式, 生态利益游憩管理模式

Abstract:

Waterfront areas in the urban and the town areas provide easy opportunities to have access to the public space of good qualities for residents and visitors who are keen on a variety of recreational activities. The objective of this study is to offer a structural equation modeling which helps to identify the structural relationship among waterfront areas about ecological benefits-based management (EBBM). The structural equation model is invented to reliably and validly measure predictive relationships between the constructs of Activity, Setting, Experience, Benefits and Ecological Features. This approach represents a significant departure from the traditional planning model of waterfront areas. The findings indicate that the comprehensive uses of Activity, Setting, Experience, Benefits and Ecological features are applicable in waterfront areas. The EBBM approach recognizes the ecological benefits that waterfront areas contribute to the overall qualities of life in the community, and it contributes to help policymakers take new and emergent findings into account when designing recreation and activity services and initiatives for the 21st century. Waterfront areas perform valuable functions such as providing groundwater recharge areas, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, and filtering pollutants from storm water run-off and sediment control. The ecological benefits-based model acknowledges that there are multiple providers of waterfront areas. The most important benefits are to protect the natural surroundings and to have access to water and public lands. Data are collected by using a combination of on-site interview and questionnaires completed by 304 inhabitants and tourists of Dandong. The survey indicates that waterfront areas are needed in the urban and the town areas. The survey also requires respondents to rate the public benefits of waterfront areas. The fit indices show that the model fits the data accurately.

Key words: benefits-based management (BBM), ecological benefits-based management (EBBM), structural equation modeling (SEM), waterfront areas

郑辽吉,刘惠清. 城镇滨水区游憩管理模式[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(10): 1256-1262.

ZHENG Liaoji, LIU Huiqing. The Management Pattern of Waterfront Areas in Cities and Towns[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(10): 1256-1262.

参考文献

[1] 徐慧. 城市景观水系规划模式研究:以江苏省太仓市为例. 水资源保护, 2007, 23(5): 25-30.

[2] 陈太政. 城市滨水区旅游游憩功能的开发研究:以开封市为例. 河南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 34(4): 77-82.

[3] 方庆, 卜菁华. 城市滨水区游憩空间设计研究. 规划师, 2003, 19(9): 46-49.

[4] 冯维波. 我国城市游憩空间研究现状与重点发展领域. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(6): 585-592.

[5] Booms B H, Bitner M J. Marketing services by managing the environment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 1982, 23(5): 35-39.

[6] 郑辽吉. 生态体验景观构建: 以大梨树村为例. 辽东学院学报: 社会科学版, 2010, 12(1): 36-43.

[7] 赵彦伟, 杨志峰. 城市河流生态系统健康评价初探.水科学进展, 2005, 16(3): 349-355.

[8] 岳隽, 王仰麟, 彭建. 城市河流的景观生态学研究: 概念框架. 生态学报, 2005, 25(6): 1422-1429.

[9] 宋伟轩, 徐岩, 朱喜钢. 城市滨水空间公共性现状与规划思考. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16(7): 45-50.

[10] 蔡君. 略论游憩机会谱(Recreation Opportunity Spectrum, ROS)框架体系. 中国园林, 2006(7): 73-77.

[11] Driver B L, Bruns D H. Concepts and uses of the benefits approach to leisure//Jackson E L, Burton T L. Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty-first Century. State College, Pa: Venture Publishing, Inc., 1999: 349-369.

[12] 刘明丽, 张玉钧. 游憩机会谱(ROS)在游憩资源管理中的应用. 世界林业研究, 2008, 21(3): 28-33.

[13] 王传伟, 郭锋, 江泽平, 等. 美国的户外游憩资源管理. 世界林业研究, 2008, 21(2)：63-67.

[14] McCool S F, Clark R N, Stankey G H. Assessment of Frameworks Useful for Public Land Recreation Planning. Darby: DIANE Publishing, 2008,102.

[15] Aukerman R, Haas G. Water recreation opportunity spectrum users' guidebook. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Program and Policy Services, Colorado, Lakewood,2007-7-25

[2010-05-28]. http://www. usbr.gov/pmts/planning/wros/wros_report.pdf.

[16] Butler R, Waldbrook L. A new planning tool: the tourism opportunity spectrum. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2003, 14(1): 25-36.

[17] 王晓文. 欧美城市滨水区研究的新视角: 政治生态学转向. 地理科学, 2009, 29(4): 601-606.

[18] 李琛, 成升魁, 陈远生. 25 年来中国旅游容量研究的回顾与反思. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 235-245.

[19] 俞孔坚, 李海龙, 李迪华.“反规划”与生态基础设施: 城市化过程中对自然系统的精明保护. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(6): 937-958.

[20] 王晓鸣, 李国敏. 城市滨水区开发利用保护政策法规研究: 以汉口沿江地区再开发为例.城市规划, 2000, 24 (4): 48-52.

[21] Evans B M, Sheeder S A, Lehing D W. A spatial technique for estimating streambank erosion based on watershed characteristics. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 2003, 13(1): 1-13.

[22] 刘啸. 旅游产品交换过程中的价格与价值关系探讨. 人文地理, 2009, 24(5): 126-128.

[23] Steina T V, Anderson D H. Combining benefits-based management with ecosystem management for landscape planning: Leech Lake watershed, Minnesota. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 60(3): 151-161.

[24] Leask A. Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management. Tourism Management, 2010, 31(2): 155-166.

[25] Norris R H, Thoms M C. What is river health? Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2): 197-209.

[26] 孙雪岚, 胡春宏. 河流健康评价指标体系初探. 泥沙研究, 2008(4): 21-27.

[27] Kliskey A D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: A spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 52(5): 33-43.

[28] Higgs G. Integrating multi-criteria techniques with geographical information systems in waste facility location to enhance public participation. Waste Management & Research, 2006, 24(2): 105-117.

[29] Qiu Zeyuan. Using multi-criteria decision models to assess the economic and environmental impacts of farming decisions in an agricultural watershed. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2005, 27(2): 229-244.

[30] Gross M J, Brown G. An empirical structural model of tourists and places: Progressing involvement and place at-tachment into tourism. Tourism Management, 2008, 29 (6): 1141-1151.

[31] Nusair K, Hua N. Comparative assessment of structural equation modeling and multiple regression research methodologies: E-commerce context. Tourism Management, 2010, 31(3): 314-324.

[32] 韩静, 胡绍学. 温故而知新：使用后评价(POE)方法简介. 建筑学报, 2006(1): 80-82.

[33] 郑辽吉. 乡村生态体验营销策略研究:以丹东为例. 旅游论坛, 2009, 2(5): 717-721.

[34] 郑辽吉. 鸭绿江国家级风景名胜区进一步开发的几个问题. 地域研究与开发, 2004, 23(1): 42-46.

[35] 杨馥, 曾光明, 刘鸿亮, 等. 城市河流健康评价指标体系的不确定性研究. 湖南大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 35 (5): 63-66.

[36] Wharton G. 河流环境管理: 提倡的方式. 郑辽吉, 译. 地理译报, 1996(4): 57-59.

[37] 吴阿娜, 车越, 徐启新, 等. 上海地区河流健康评价方法探讨. 生态与农村环境学报, 2007, 23(4): 90-94.

[38] 季永兴, 刘水芹, 张勇, 等. 城镇河道整治中生态型护坡结构探讨. 水土保持研究, 2001, 8(4): 25-29.

[39] Meyer J L. Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1997, 16: 439-447.

[40] 易丹辉. 结构方程模型方法与应用. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 48.

[41] 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2004: 167-177.