洪水灾害脆弱性研究进展

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.01.006

地理科学进展 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 41-46.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.01.006

洪水灾害脆弱性研究进展

石勇,许世远,石纯,孙阿丽,王军

华东师范大学地理信息科学教育部重点实验室,上海200062

收稿日期:2008-11-01 修回日期:2009-01-01 出版日期:2009-01-24 发布日期:2009-01-24
通讯作者: 石纯,E-mail:shi_chun@163.com
作者简介:石勇(1980-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为环境科学与自然灾害.E-mail:shiyong@ecnu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学重点基金项目(40730526); 国家自然科学基金项目(40571006); 上海市重大科技攻关项目 (05DZ12007).

A Review on Development of Vulnerability Assessment of Floods

SHI Yong, XU Shiyuan, SHI Chun, SUN Ali, WANG Jun

Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science of Ministry of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062,China

Received:2008-11-01 Revised:2009-01-01 Online:2009-01-24 Published:2009-01-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

洪水灾害是当今世界最严重的自然灾害之一，洪灾经济损失及风险评估是防洪减灾领域的一项基础性工作，而脆弱性的确定是评估模型的关键。文章在对自然灾害脆弱性评估方法总结的基础上，着重对洪水情景模拟中代表脆弱性的灾损率曲线开展探讨，对灾损曲线的起源、建立方法和综合运用的趋势进行研究。国外保险业与政府开展此类工作较早，相比于国外已经取得的丰硕研究成果而言，国内灾损率研究远远不能为决策提供有效的指导，这与我国面临的巨大洪灾风险不相称。政府、保险等部门与科研工作急需结合起来，填补城市洪灾脆弱性研究空白，多参数综合调研、深入各种承灾体内部系统而细致地开展灾损率调查，对于减少未来洪灾影响，具有非常重要的实际意义。

关键词: 脆弱性, 风险, 洪水, 经济损失, 灾损曲线

Abstract:

Flood is one of the most serious natural disasters in the world. The evaluation on economic loss or risk from flood disasters is the basic task in the domain of flood prevention and disaster reduction, and the research on vulnerability is key to the evaluation. This paper briefly describes the methods of vulnerability assessment, emphasizing on stage-damage curves. The origin, the methods to structure them and the compositive application are discussed then. Compared to the rich research results overseas on the damage curves, the research on vulnerability is far from enough in China yet and the application at a lower level can neither satisfy the damands for decision- support, nor correspond to the high flood risks in China. At present, scientific research, insurance and government should cooperate in the vulnerability investigation in order to reduce the influence of floods.

Key words: economic loss, flood, risk, stage-damage curve, vulnerability

石勇,许世远,石纯,孙阿丽,王军. 洪水灾害脆弱性研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(1): 41-46.

SHI Yong, XU Shiyuan, SHI Chun, SUN Ali, WANG Jun. A Review on Development of Vulnerability Assessment of Floods[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 28(1): 41-46.

参考文献

[1] 黄大鹏，刘闯，彭顺风. 洪灾风险评价与区划研究进展. 地理科学进展， 2007，26(4)：11~22.

[2] Berning C. Loss functions for structural flood mitigation measures. Water SA, 2001,27(1):35~38.

[3] Kaplan S, Garrick B J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1981,1(1):11~27.

[4] Hall J W, Dawson R J. A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Water & Maritime Engineering, 2003,156(WM3):235~247.

[5] Grunthal G, Thieken A H, Schwarz J et al. Comparative risk assessment for the city of Cologne, Germany: Storms, foods, earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 2006,38(1/2):21~44.

[6] Pelling M, Maskrey A, Ruiz P. United Nations Development Programme. A Global Report Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development. New York: UNDP, 2004, 1~146.

[7] Pelling M. Visions of risk: A review of international indicators of disaster risk and its management. ISDR/UNDP: King's College, University of London, 2004, 1~56.

[8] Dilley M, Chen R S, Deichmann U, et al. Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis. Washington DC: Hazard Management Unit, World Bank, 2005, 1~132.

[9] Cardona O D, Hurtado J E, Chardon A C, et al. Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management Summary Report for WCDR. Program for Latin America and the Caribbean IADB~UNC/IDEA, 2005, 1~47.

[10] Davidson R. An Urban Earthquake Disaster Risk Index. California: Stanford University,1997.

[11] King D, MacGregor C. Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 2000,15(3):52~57.

[12] Lambert K. A Hurricane Disaster Risk Index. North Carolina: University of North Carolina, 2000.

[13] Penning -Rowsell E C, Chatterton J B. The benefits of flood alleviation: A manual of assessment techniques. Gower Aldershot,1977.

[14] Smith D I. Flood damage estimation?A review of urban stage -damage curves and loss functions. Water SA, 1994,20(3):231~238.

[15] KGS Group. Red River Basin Stage-damage Curves Update and Preparation of Flood Damage Maps. Final Report, Intermational Joint Comission,2000.

[16] USACE. Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basin, California. Post-Flood Assessment for 1983, 1986, 1995, and 1997.U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District， 1999.

[17] USACE. Economic Guidance Memorandum (EGM)01-03,Generic Depth-Damage Relationships, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Memorandum, CECW -PG4, Washington, DC， 2000.

[18] USACE. Economic Guidance Memorandum (EGM)04~01, Generic Depth -Damage Relationships,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Memorandum, CECW-PG10, Washington, DC， 2003.

[19] 苏明道，张龄方，林美君等.国科会专题研究计划成果报告———基隆河流域淹水损害评估模式与相关资料库建立之研究(二).台北，国立台湾大学生物环境系统工程学系暨研究所.2002. http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/ 246246/10732.

[20] Gissing A, Blong R. Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation. Australian Geographer, 2004,35(2):209~222.

[21] MOC (1996). Flood Damage Statistics in Japan. Japan, River Engineering Bureau, Ministry of Construction, 1996.

[22] Vrisou N, Kok M. Standard method for predicting damage and casualties as a result of floods. The Netherland Delft Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management， 2001，22~41.

[23] Experian. Great Britain MOSAIC Descriptions along with Separate Data Tables for Flood Damage. Experian, Nottingham, U.K., 2000.

[24] Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 277(1): 24~49.

[25] Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C. The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Defence: Techniques and Data for 2003. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.

[26] Buchele B, Kreibich H, Kron A et al. Flood-risk mapping: Contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2006，(6): 485~503.

[27] Kelman I. Physical Flood Vulnerability of Residential Properties in Coastal, Eastern England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2002.

[28] FEMA. HAZUS -MH, Flood Model: Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency，2003.

[29] FEMA. HAZUS-MH, Flood Model: User Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency，2003.

[30] USACE. Business Depth-Damage Analysis Procedures, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Institute for Water Resources, Research Reports85-R-5，1985.

[31] Dutta D，Tingsanchali T. Development of loss functions for urban flood risk analysis in Bangkok. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia, ICUS, The University of Tokyo,2003，229~238.

[32] 冯民权，周孝德，张根广. 洪灾损失评估的研究进展. 西北水资源与水工程，2002，13(1):33~36.

[33] Clausen L K. Potential Dam Failure: Estimation of Consequences, and Implications for Planning. Middlesex: Middlesex Polytechnic,1989.

[34] 施国庆. 洪灾损失率及其确定方法探讨. 水利经济， 1990，(2)：37~42.

[35] 陈秀万. 洪水灾害损失评估系统-遥感与GIS 技术应用研究. 北京:中国水利水电出版社，1999.

[36] 万庆. 洪水灾害系统分析与评估. 北京: 科学出版社， 1999.

[37] 林俊. 建筑物水灾破坏经济损失浅析. 建筑技术开发， 2006，33(1)：107~109.

[38] 孙雷蕾. 对构建我国洪水保险体系的研究. 天津：天津大学，2004.

[39] 王艳艳，陆吉康，郑晓阳等. 上海市洪涝灾害损失评估系统的开发. 灾害学，2001，16(2): 7~13.

洪水灾害脆弱性研究进展

A Review on Development of Vulnerability Assessment of Floods

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郭倩, 廖和平, 王子羿, 刘愿理, 李涛. 秦巴山区村域稳定脱贫测度及返贫防控风险识别——以重庆市城口县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 232-244.
[2]	陈明星, 黄莘绒, 黄耿志, 杨燕珊. 新型城镇化与非正规就业：规模、格局及社会融合[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 50-60.
[3]	张永勇, 陈秋潭. 淮河中上游流域洪水主要类型及其时空分布特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 627-635.
[4]	薛倩, 谢苗苗, 郭强, 王亚男, 武蓉蓉, 刘琦. 地理学视角下城市高温热浪脆弱性评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 685-694.
[5]	熊琛然, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 向宁, 王博. 地缘政治风险研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[6]	宁思雨, 黄晶, 汪志强, 王慧敏. 基于投入产出法的洪涝灾害间接经济损失评估——以湖北省为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 420-432.
[7]	刘迪, 陈海, 耿甜伟, 张行, 史琴琴. 基于地貌分区的陕西省区域生态风险时空演变[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 243-254.
[8]	王辉, 宋长春. 三江平原湿地区域生态风险评价研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 872-882.
[9]	杨晴青, 杨新军, 高岩辉. 1980年以来黄土高原半干旱区乡村人居环境系统脆弱性时序演变——以陕西省佳县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 756-771.
[10]	方佳毅, 史培军. 全球气候变化背景下海岸洪水灾害风险评估研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
[11]	叶超, 尹梁明, 殷清眉, 徐建华. 地理学是一门脆弱的学科吗?——哈佛大学撤销地理系事件及其反思[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 312-319.
[12]	张会, 李铖, 程炯, 吴志峰, 吴艳艳. 基于“H-E-V”框架的城市洪涝风险评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[13]	张宁, 王大为. 基于风险地形建模的毒品犯罪风险评估和警务预测[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1131-1139.
[14]	萧凌波. 1736-1911年中国水灾多发区分布及空间迁移特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(4): 495-503.
[15]	刘艳华, 徐勇. 扶贫模式可持续减贫效应的分析框架及机理探析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(4): 567-578.