城市居民认知距离透视认知变形 ———以北京市为例

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.02.013

地理科学进展 ›› 2008, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 96-103.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.02.013

城市居民认知距离透视认知变形 ———以北京市为例

薛露露,申思,刘瑜,张毅

北京大学遥感与地理信息系统研究所,北京 100871

收稿日期:2008-01-01 修回日期:2008-02-01 出版日期:2008-03-25 发布日期:2008-03-25
通讯作者: 刘瑜, Email:liuyu@urban.pku.edu.cn E-mail:liuyu@urban.pku.edu.cn
作者简介:薛露露(1983-), 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向地理信息系统.Email: xuelulu@pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(40701134), 国家高科技研究发展计划(863 计划) (2007AA12Z216).

Measur ement and Analysis on City Residents'Cognitive Distance Distor tion—A Case Study of Beijing

XUE Lulu,SHEN Si,LIU Yu,ZHANG Yi

Institute of RS and GIS, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2008-01-01 Revised:2008-02-01 Online:2008-03-25 Published:2008-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对距离的认知是人类建立认知空间框架的重要基础。本文在相关研究的基础上，对认知距离的特点进行了分析，提出从数量认知距离与实际认知距离两种分析角度来分析这一概念。通过分别利用定义一元线性回归，与采用多维标度法(MDS)及二维回归(BR)，对认知距离的标量变形和向量变形进行定量分析。在此基础上，以北京市为例，对北京市居民进行抽样调查。通过认知心理学实验的方式，令被试估计城市主要地标两两之间的距离。对实验结果分别将上述方法应用于计算北京市居民在标量变形和向量变形的定量化表示，并进一步通过方差分析 (ANOVA)讨论了影响北京市居民对城市距离认知变形的因素，包括年龄、居住地区等。

关键词: 变形, 城市, 多维标度法, 二维回归, 距离估计, 认知距离

Abstract:

Through generalizing related literature, we summarized some properties of cognitive distance and reduced all research on this concept into two aspects: pure value, and real cognitive distance. Further, we proposed a Distance Estimate Index (DEI) to quantify the scalar cognitive distance distortion. As far as vector cognitive distance distortion is considered, the Distortion Index (DI) computed by bi- dimensional regression is adopted to descript the degree of vector cognitive distance distortion. Based on these quantification methods, we conducted a survey on sampled Beijing residents, requesting the subjects to estimat the pairwise distances between 8 landmarks. And then we calculated the distortion of the two types of cognitive distances respectively by using linear regression and multidimensional scaling methods. Further, through ANOVA, we analyzed the factors that would possibly have influence on such distortion, like age and neighborhood. The result shows that the years of residence and the resident districts are the demographic variables that could influence an individual's accuracy in cognitive distance.

Key words: Bidimensional Regression (BR), cognitive distance, distance estimate, distortion, intra- urban, Multidimensional Scaling (MDS)

薛露露,申思,刘瑜,张毅. 城市居民认知距离透视认知变形 ———以北京市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(2): 96-103.

XUE Lulu,SHEN Si,LIU Yu,ZHANG Yi. Measur ement and Analysis on City Residents'Cognitive Distance Distor tion—A Case Study of Beijing[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 27(2): 96-103.

参考文献

[1] Lloyd R. Spatial Cognition - Geographic Environments. Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

[2] Mennis J L. Cognition & Semantic Database Representation in GIS
[D]. The Pennsylvania State University, 2001.8.

[3] Piaget J, Inhelder B. The child's conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., 1956.

[4] Montello D R. The geometry of environmental knowledge. In A. U. Frank, I. Campari, & U. Formentini (Eds.), Theories and methods of spatio - temporal reasoning in geographic space. Berlin: Springer, 1992, 136~152.

[5] Ishikawa T, Montello D R. Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places, Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 52:93~129.

[6] 顾朝林, 宋国臣. 北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究. 地理学报, 2001, 56(1):64~74.

[7] Cadwallader MT. Problems in cognitive distance: Implications for cognitive mapping. Environment and Behavior, 1979, 11:559~576.

[8] Golledge R G, Stimson R.J. Spatial behavior: A geographic Perspective. New York: The Guilford press, 1997.

[9] Friedman A, Montello D R. Global - Scale location and distance estimates: common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments, Journal of experimental psychology learning, memory and cognition, 2006, 32 (3):333~346.

[10] Stevens S S. The direct estimate of sensory magnitudes - loudness. American journal of psychology, 1956, 69:1~25.

[11] Crompton A. Perceived distance in the city as a function of time. Environment and Behavior, 2006, 38:173~182.

[12] Qi C, Shu H, Xu A. Formal Properties of Cognitive Distance in Geographical Space," in 16th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence- -Workshops (ICAT'06), 2006: 408~412.

[13] Lee T R. Brenman's law of shopping behavior. Psychological Reports, 1962, 11:662.

[14] Paskin J. Are differences in children's travel reflected in their cognitive maps? In Underwood G. (Eds.) Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and Application, London, Elsevier, 2005:49~62.

[15] Xiao D, Liu Y. Cross - culture study of biases in location judgments, in: Winter S., Duckham M., Kulik L., Kuipers B. (Eds) COSIT'07, Lecture notes in computer science 4736, Berlin: Springer- Verlag, 2007, 20~31.

[16] Montello D R. The perception and cognition of environment distance: direct sources of information, in Hirtle S. C., Frank A.U. (Eds.) COSIT'97. Lecture notes in computer science 1329, Berlin: Springer- Verlag, 1997, 1329: 297~311.

[17] Buttenfield B SIG. Comparing distortion on sketch maps and MDS configurations, Professional Geographer, 1986, 38(3): 238~246.

[18] Schiffman S S, Reynolds M L. Introduction to multidimensional scaling: theory, methods, and applications, Burlington: Academic press, 1981.

[19] Friedman A, Kohler B. Bidimensional regression: Assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two dimensional data sets, Psychology methods, 2003, 8(4):468~491.

[20] Nobbir A, Miller, H J. Time- space transformations of geographic space for exploring, analyzing and visualizing transportation systems, Journal of Transport Geography, 2007, 15:2~17.

[21] Kruskal J B, Wish M. Multidimensional Scaling, London: Sage Publications, 1978.

[22] Tobler W R. Bidimensional regression, unpublished manuscript, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1978.

城市居民认知距离透视认知变形 ———以北京市为例

Measur ement and Analysis on City Residents'Cognitive Distance Distor tion—A Case Study of Beijing

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	马晓冬,李鑫,胡睿,KHUONG ManhHa. 基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392.
[2]	施利锋,黄贤金. 中国大运河沿线城市扩张时空差异研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1206-1216.
[3]	田野, 罗静, 孙建伟, 董莹, 陈国磊. 武汉城市圈内部空间联系及其轴-辐网络结构演化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 1093-1102.
[4]	朱鹤, 刘家明, 龙江智, 余玲, 李涛. “空间-主题”框架下中美城市旅游研究对比——以2008—2017年城市旅游博士论文为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 1056-1068.
[5]	刘吉祥, 周江评, 肖龙珠, 杨林川. 建成环境对步行通勤通学的影响——以中国香港为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 807-817.
[6]	周亮, 赵琪, 杨帆. 基于POI与NPP/VIIRS灯光数据的城市群边界定量识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 840-850.
[7]	刘炳春, 齐鑫, 王庆山. 北京城市代谢预测研究——基于长短期记忆神经网络模型[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 851-860.
[8]	王立, 张健君. 个体-家庭地方认同迭代的生命历程空间叙事[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 896-903.
[9]	申犁帆, 张纯, 李赫, 王烨, 王子甲. 城市轨道交通通勤与职住平衡状况的关系研究——基于大数据方法的北京实证分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 791-806.
[10]	焦利民, 龚晨, 许刚, 董婷, 张博恩, 李泽慧. 大都市区城市扩张过程及形态对比分析——以东京、纽约和上海为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 675-685.
[11]	温康民, 任国玉, 李娇, 任玉玉, 孙秀宝, 周雅清, 张爱英. 国家基本/基准站地面气温资料城市化偏差订正[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 600-611.
[12]	姜玉培, 甄峰, 王文文, 赵梦妮. 城市建成环境对居民身体活动的影响研究进展与启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 357-369.
[13]	梁珊, 邓羽, 贾宁, 刘毅. 基于虚拟城市模型的城市形态对污水系统影响研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 441-451.
[14]	王甫园, 王开泳. 珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 428-440.
[15]	张会, 李铖, 程炯, 吴志峰, 吴艳艳. 基于“H-E-V”框架的城市洪涝风险评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.