兰西城市群“双核分离”结构探讨:区域经济一体化背景下民营企业的投资网络
Dual-core separation structure of the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration: Investment network of private enterprises under the background of regional economic integration
通讯作者:
收稿日期: 2022-10-31 修回日期: 2023-03-12
基金资助: |
|
Received: 2022-10-31 Revised: 2023-03-12
Fund supported: |
|
作者简介 About authors
周恒(1998— ),男,甘肃天水人,硕士生,主要研究方向为城市与区域发展。E-mail:
区域经济一体化已成为中国推动区域高质量发展的必由之路,但民营企业投资视角的相关研究罕见。论文运用统计分析和社会网络分析等方法,通过分析2013—2021年兰西城市群民营企业投资网络的演化过程,研究该区域经济一体化进程,并尝试进行机制探讨。结果表明:① 兰西城市群已处于工业化中期发展阶段,但民营企业投资网络仍表现出明显的省际“双核分离”结构,青海省部分一体化水平相对较高,城市群内不同产业的企业投资网络存在较大差异;② 民营企业投资网络“双核分离”结构的形成主要受到当前区域所处发展阶段的影响,省会城市仍以极化作用为主,导致企业跨省投资联系极弱;③ 行政区经济与制度厚度分别通过外部环境与内部决策对民营企业跨省投资施加阻滞作用。根据上述结论,从兰西城市群较低的区域经济一体化水平出发,提出相关政策建议,推动形成以高质量发展为目标的省际互补的区域经济布局。
关键词:
Regional economic integration has become a necessary path to promote regional high-quality development in China, but relevant studies from the perspective of private enterprise investment are rare. Using statistical analysis and social network analysis methods, we analyzed the process of regional economic integration through the evolution of private enterprise investment network in the Lanzhou-Xining (Lan-Xi) urban agglomeration from 2013 to 2021, and explored the mechanism of change. The study showed that: 1) The Lan-Xi urban agglomeration was in the middle and late stage of industrialization, but the private enterprise investment network still showed an obvious inter-provincial "dual-core separation" structure, with a relatively high level of integration in Qinghai Province, and there were large differences in the inter-provincial investment behavior of different industries within the urban agglomeration. 2) The formation of the dual-core separation structure of the private enterprise investment network was mainly influenced by the current development stage of the region, and the provincial capital cities played a dominant role in this polarization, leading to extremely weak inter-provincial investment ties. 3) The administrative region economy and institutional thickness exerted a deterrent effect on the inter-provincial investment of private enterprises through external environment and internal decision making, respectively. Based on the above conclusions, starting from the low level of regional economic integration in the Lan-Xi Urban Agglomeration, this paper puts forward relevant policy recommendations to promote the formation of inter-provincial complementary regional economic layout with the goal of high-quality development.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
周恒, 杨永春.
ZHOU Heng, YANG Yongchun.
不合理的区际分工及市场分割会使整个区域的经济增长受到负面影响[1-2],区域经济一体化是资源合理配置的必然结果,其过程也是区域利益不断增进的过程[3]。区域经济一体化作为多种社会主体共同参与的过程[4],是中国当前经济发展的内在要求。改革开放以来,中国实现了工业化与城镇化的快速发展,当前中国已进入工业化发展后期阶段[5],中国的城镇化发展也处于由快速发展阶段向稳定阶段转变的关键时期[6]。在这一阶段,实现区域协调治理和区域经济一体化发展已成为促进中国当前区域发展的关键。近年来,中国政府出台的《粤港澳大湾区发展规划纲要》《长江三角洲区域一体化发展规划纲要》及《中共中央、国务院关于加快建设全国统一大市场的意见》等政策均强调区域经济一体化发展规划,突出区域的整合发展。2022年10月,党的二十大报告明确指出,中国未来发展需贯彻新发展理念,坚持高质量发展,加快建设全国统一大市场,推动区域协调发展。与此同时,各地新出台的发展规划也都在强调区域经济一体化发展。目前,区域一体化已成为各级政府谋求经济发展的政策工具[7⇓⇓-10]。
综观目前区域经济和城市化发展态势,以经济一体化为主导的城市群成为中国参与全球合作和竞争的基本单位[26]。在新型城镇化建设的新发展格局下,中国城市群地区作为国家实现区域经济一体化战略的引领地位进一步提升[27]。针对城市群内部经济结构和经济联系的研究,就成为解构区域经济一体化内部机理的重要途径。目前,有关城市群内部联系的研究多从空间结构角度开展。国内学者对中国城市群内部经济联系进行分析,将各城市群空间结构划分为单中心、双中心及多中心3种模式[28⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-34]。其中,企业联系视角下,长三角地区除上海与各省会城市及其他区内主要核心城市间保持较强的联系之外,大多数的城市联系对仍集中在省内,区域单中心结构较为突出[35-36]。金融一体化视角下京津冀城市群呈现出以北京、天津为核心的双中心空间结构,北京与天津两市关联程度不断增强,远高于区内其他城市间联系[37]。在流空间视角下,粤港澳大湾区以广州—深圳—香港之间的城市联系强度最为强烈,表现出明显的多中心结构[38]。相比于其他经济联系数据,企业跨城市的资本流动能反映城市之间真正的经济关联[39]。已有的基于企业跨城市投资的研究多以城市网络视角为切入点[40-41],并通过网络结构的演化来反映区域经济空间结构的特征[42⇓⇓⇓⇓-47]。上述研究对区域内经济联系有深入探讨,但在以下方面有待完善:① 多数研究仍以单纯分析区域经济联系空间格局为主,并未深入剖析区域经济一体化的内在机制;② 国内的研究主要集中于东部沿海发达地区,对西部欠发达地区城市群的相关研究较为缺乏;③ 所选取的企业投资数据多以上市企业或全类型企业为主,没有对国有企业及民营企业做出区分。在以GDP为核心的考核背景下,政府官员有强烈的动机干预地方国企的投资,财政压力与晋升压力均能导致地方国企过度投资,进而影响国企的投资效率。相较国营企业,地方政府直接干预辖区内民营企业难度较大[45,48⇓-50]。因此民营企业对市场的敏感性更高,其资本流动和投资差异更能反映城市群内部经济联系水平和一体化程度。
鉴于此,本文选取位于西部地区的兰西城市群作为研究对象,通过城市群内部民营企业2013—2021年的投资数据,运用社会网络分析方法,对兰西城市群内部民营企业投资网络进行分析,从经济空间结构演化视角揭示城市群的经济一体化发展进程及其存在问题,进一步在理论上剖析西部欠发达地区城市群区域协同发展的内在机制,为促进区域一体化建设提供参考,对区域经济一体化研究进行有效补充。
1 数据来源与方法
1.1 研究区概况
兰西城市群横跨甘肃、青海两省,省会兰州、西宁为域内核心城市。计划经济时期,兰州、西宁等西部中心城市成长主要受益于国家重工业优先发展、东西均衡发展和“三线建设”等国策。改革开放以来,西部地区在中国以外向型经济为主的发展历程中逐渐落后于东部地区,市场化程度较低,政府对国企的干预动机较为强烈[51]。以兰州市、西宁市作为核心的兰(州)西(宁)城市群横跨甘肃、青海两省,是典型的跨省级行政区的城市群。兰西城市群是“一带一路”的重要节点,拥有石油化工、装备制造及盐湖资源综合利用等优势产业,是维护国家安全和生态安全的重要基地,更是西北经济发展的重要增长极。兰西城市群共包括9个市(州)40个区(县),包括兰州市的城关区、七里河区、安宁区、西固区、红古区、榆中县、皋兰县、永登县、兰州新区,白银市的白银区、平川区、靖远县、景泰县,定西市的安定区、陇西县、渭源县、临洮县,临夏回族自治州的临夏市、东乡族自治县、永靖县、积石山保安族东乡族撒拉族自治县;西宁市的城中区、城东区、城西区、城北区、湟中区、大通回族土族自治县、湟源县,海东市的乐都区、平安区、互助土族自治县、民和回族土族自治县、化隆回族自治县、循化撒拉族自治县,海南藏族自治州的共和县、贵德县、贵南县,海北藏族自治州的海晏县,以及黄南藏族自治州的同仁县、尖扎县。为便于统计,将兰州市的城关区、七里河区、安宁区、西固区和西宁市的城中区、城东区、城西区、城北区分别作为两市的主城区处理。
1.2 数据来源
根据甘肃省、青海省工商业联合会最新公布的2021年甘肃省民营企业50强及2020年青海省民营企业50强名单,选取其中位于兰西城市群的66家企业作为研究对象。通过企查查(
在已调查的53家企业中,有39家为有限责任公司,股份有限公司仅14家。企业所属行业主要包括制造业、批发和零售业、房地产业及建筑业,其中从事制造业与批发和零售业的企业约占总数的64%。通过企业上榜年份的年营业收入额可知,年营收额最高的是位于西宁市主城区的远东智慧能源股份有限公司,其2019年企业销售收入达到了171.6亿元,而72%的企业年营收额均在20亿元以下;在前30位企业中,甘肃省占有的数量达到了19家,可见甘肃省民营企业的营收水平领先于青海省。
本文选取2013、2015、2018、2021年作为时间节点,对兰西城市群民营企业投资数据进行分析。
1.3 研究方法
本文主要采取统计分析和社会网络分析等方法。社会网络是由作为节点的社会能动者及其之间关系共同构成的集合,而社会网络分析能够以双向交互的角度对网络中节点、节点间关系及整体网络特征做出较好的分析,尤其适用于分析关系数据及网络变量[52]。Gephi作为一款社会网络分析工具,能够处理任何被表示为节点和边的网络数据。本文利用Gephi对企业投资网络中各节点及整体网络特征进行分析,使用加权中心度来反映节点的网络特征,以网络节点数、平均加权度、平均路径长度、网络直径以及图密度等指标来反映网络的整体特征(相关指标的计算公式及指标意义见表1),通过模块化处理对网络进行社区分析,同时采用连接组件工具探测网络中的强连通分量[53]。
表1 网络指标公式解释及意义
Tab.1
指标 | 计算公式 | 公式解释 | 意义 |
---|---|---|---|
加权中心度 | DWi表示网络节点i的加权中心度,DWAi与DWBi分别表示节点i的加权出度与加权入度,其中加权出度为其输出的投资数量,加权入度为其输入的投资数量 | 加权中心度表示一个节点城镇在投资网络中的地位,该值越大则表明节点城镇拥有越丰富的往来投资行为 | |
平均加权度 | 平均加权度在一定程度上表示各节点城镇的投资关联程度,反映了投资网络整体的联系强度 | ||
平均路径长度 | L表示网络的平均路径长度,dij表示网络中节点i与节点j之间的最短路径长度 | 平均路径长度指投资网络中存在连通路径的节点城镇之间最短距离的算术平均值,反映网络中各个节点间的分离程度。该值越小代表网络的通达性越好 | |
图密度 | D表示网络的图密度,m表示网络中实际存在的边数 | 图密度反映网络整体联系紧密的程度,该值越大代表网络联系越紧密 |
2 结果分析
2013年,兰西城市群69.1%的民营企业投资行为发生在企业所在区县,跨区县投资行为仅占30.9%;到2021年,该比例已分别转变为61.2%与38.8%。可见,城市群内部跨区县投资行为相对较少,企业更多倾向于在本地投资。同时,跨区县投资比例近年不断提高,表明兰西城市群民营企业更加以城市群内部其他地区作为投资目的地。
2.1 民营企业投资网络演变
兰西城市群民营企业的投资网络(图1)整体呈现明显的“双核分离”结构,即形成了分别以兰州、西宁为核心的省域投资网络,核心城市间联系十分微弱。
图1
图1
兰西城市群民营企业投资网络及其演化
Fig.1
Investment network of private enterprises in the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration and its evolution
2013—2021年,兰西城市群民营企业投资网络节点数量持续增长,总体规模不断扩大,表明不断有新城镇融入网络。其中,兰州市与西宁市以外向性投资为主,吸入性投资相对较少。民营企业投资网络平均加权度及边的权重均呈上升状态,反映了城市群内部各城镇企业投资目的地日益增多,投资强度稳步提升(表2),投资网络不断紧密。投资总量在2015—2018年提升最快。就投资网络整体特征而言,网络直径较为稳定,平均路径长度在甘、青两省间发生投资行为后持续走低,网络通达性不断改善。然而,网络图密度却保持在低水平,可见,兰西城市群受限于欠发达地区落后的经济基础,企业投资网络发育水平较低。
表2 兰西城市群民营企业投资网络的整体特征
Tab.2
指标 | 2013年 | 2015年 | 2018年 | 2021年 |
---|---|---|---|---|
网络节点数 | 16 | 23 | 22 | 25 |
网络直径 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
平均加权度 | 2.38 | 2.61 | 3.64 | 3.96 |
图密度 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
平均路径长度 | 1.74 | 2.17 | 2.09 | 2.00 |
2013年,民营企业投资网络以甘肃、青海两省为界,“跨省割裂”现象严重,呈现完全分离的双核型网络结构。在两省内部,网络节点数量较少,企业的投资区域有限。除了同省会城市联系外,其余城镇间投资联系较弱,兰州、西宁主城区以外向性投资为主,各省域投资网络以树状结构为主要特征。西宁市主城区有明显的加权度优势,表明其在本省投资网络中具有核心地位,而兰州市主城区首位优势不突出。2015年,2个省会城市之间发生联系,2个省域的企业投资网络融合,投资网络节点数目明显增加,网络规模有较大提升,但省际联系水平很低。投资网络内部各城镇等级化明显,兰州、西宁主城区已成为网络核心,同时衍生出联系能力弱于核心的次级城镇及处于网络边缘的节点城镇。2018年,投资网络中边数量、平均加权度及图密度等指标均有提高,证明投资网络规模取得进一步发展,且网络联系更加紧密,投资联系强度有大幅提升。相较之前,甘肃省节点城镇间投资联系水平提升有限,仅个别节点城镇间联系强度有所增加,网络结构仍表现为以兰州市外向性投资为主的树状网络。青海省大部分节点城镇均同时与多个城镇发生了投资联系,且西宁市的吸入性投资数量有明显提升;海东市互助县加权度有显著提升,青海省企业投资网络结构已由树状结构向网络化方向演变,较甘肃地区一体化水平更高。总体而言,兰西城市群投资网络不断趋于成熟,但核心城市间联系水平仍然较低,绝大多数投资仍发生在各自省域范围内。2021年,投资网络规模和联系流的强度得到进一步发展。青海省企业投资网络在原有基础上持续发育,区域经济一体化趋向良好。甘肃省节点城镇开始与各级别城镇同时发生联系,某些城镇与原有的投资网络相互独立。省内投资流向单一,兰州市主城区的吸入性投资数量不增反降,以兰州市主城区为核心向外辐射成为甘肃省投资网络的主要特点,甘青两省网络格局呈现较大差异。同时,由于两省之间投资联系水平十分有限,总体表现为明显的省际分离的双核型结构,跨省经济协同发展水平极低,城市群经济一体化进程缓慢。
值得注意的是,企业投资网络中西宁市主城区与兰州市主城区的中介中心度始终保持前两位,省会城市在区域投资网络中一直处于核心地位,具有高度的控制能力;然而,度数中心度的表现则不同,西宁市主城区始终保持网络内第一位,互助县增长迅速,于2018年同兰州市主城区持平,并于2021年成为网络中第二位,其直接影响力已超过兰州市主城区。就联系强度而言,最初同兰州、西宁主城区关联最密切的是邻近区县,如榆中县、湟中区等;随着经济的发展,其他区县替代了这一位置。如2018年,西宁—互助、兰州—兰州新区已成为城市群中最强的联系流。由此可见,城市群内各城镇协同发展可能打破距离约束,企业的市场需求会使其不断调整最优发展区位,形成经济空间新格局。
2.2 民营企业投资网络社区分析
西宁、兰州社区囊括了兰西城市群内的大多数城镇,构成了投资网络的主体部分(图1、表3)。各社区以省域为界限分布,存在明显的集聚现象,表现出明显的省际分离结构。初始阶段,甘肃省仅存在一个社区,青海省则包含西宁及湟源2个社区。随着网络规模的扩大,社区数量有所增加。其中,甘肃省于2015年新增皋兰、白银社区。至2018年,青海省各城镇融合成同一社区,而甘肃省继续保持多社区共存的状态。总体而言,青海省社区构成较为稳定,西宁社区城镇数量持续上升,城镇之间联系日趋紧密,投资网络稳步发育。甘肃省自2015年起始终保持3个社区共存的状态,其中兰州、皋兰社区较为稳定,白银社区于2021年融入兰州社区,同时又出现了新的红古—东乡社区。兰西城市群的社区构成反映出城市群企业投资网络始终保持省际分离结构,且相较于青海省,甘肃省内尚未形成一个完整的社区,区域一体化存在明显的等级化差别。城市群首位度较高,两省企业投资网络发展程度存在较大差异。
表3 兰西城市群投资网络的社区分析
Tab.3
年份 | 社区一 | 社区二 | 社区三 | 社区四 | 社区五 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 西宁市主城区、湟中区、大通县,海东市平安区、互助县、海南州共和县 | 兰州市主城区、榆中县、皋兰县、永登县、兰州新区,白银市白银区、平川区,定西市临洮县 | 西宁市湟源县,黄南州尖扎县 | ||
2015 | 青海西宁主城区、湟中区、大通县,海东市平安区、乐都区、互助县、民和县、化隆县,海南州贵德县 | 兰州市主城区、榆中县、兰州新区、红古区,定西市临洮县、陇西县、渭源县,临夏州临夏市 | 兰州市皋兰县、永登县 | 白银市白银区、平川区 | 西宁市湟源县,黄南州尖扎县 |
2018 | 西宁市主城区、湟中区、大通县、湟源县,海东市乐都区、平安区、互助县、民和县、化隆县,黄南州同仁县,海南州贵德县 | 兰州市主城区、榆中县、兰州新区,定西市临洮县、陇西县、渭源县 | 兰州市皋兰县、永登县,白银市景泰县 | 白银市白银区、平川区 | |
2021 | 西宁市主城区、湟中区、大通县、湟源县,海东市平安区、乐都区、互助县、民和县、化隆县,海南州贵德县、共和县,黄南州同仁县 | 兰州市主城区、榆中县、兰州新区,白银市白银区、平川区、靖远县,定西市临洮县、陇西县 | 兰州市皋兰县、永登县,白银市景泰县 | 兰州市红古区,临夏东乡族自治县 |
2.3 民营企业投资网络的强连通分量探测
在有向网络中,若网络中任何一个节点沿着边都可以到达其余任意节点,则称之为强连通网络。现实中,绝大多数有向网络仅体现出弱连通性,即仅部分节点可沿着边到达其他任何一个节点。若弱连通网络中部分节点之间存在着相互连通的关系,那么可称这部分节点为一个强连通分量[53]。在投资网络中,强连通分量意味着多个城市之间存在相互投资的情况,表明网络中部分城镇之间存在更为密切的投资联系,是投资网络较理想的状态。2013—2021年,民营企业投资网络分别以兰州、西宁主城区为核心,与周边同省域范围内的次级城镇或节点城镇通过相互投资共同构成强连通分量。由于仅存在甘肃省向青海省的单向投资,故城市群企业投资网络强连通分量的构成同样表现出极为明显的省域限制(表4)。其中,青海省企业投资网络仅保持一个强连通分量,该分量以西宁市主城区为核心并且其包含的城镇数量持续增长,说明青海省内企业投资网络发育状况良好,各城镇间联系日趋紧密,经济一体化水平持续走高。而甘肃省投资网络强联通分量的数量在2021年增加为2个,即以兰州市主城区为核心的单一分量演变成分别以兰州市主城区、白银市白银区为核心的2个分量,且兰州分量内城镇数量较少并呈现波动状态。由此可见,相较青海省,甘肃省民营企业投资网络发展缓慢,原有的强连通分量未能持续扩张,网络组织松散,表现出较低水平的一体化状态。
表4 兰西城市群投资网络强连通分量的构成
Tab.4
省份 | 2013年 | 2015年 | 2018年 | 2021年 |
---|---|---|---|---|
青海 | 西宁市主城区 西宁市湟源县 海东市互助县 西宁市大通县 | 西宁市主城区 海东市互助县 西宁市湟源县 海东市民和县 西宁市大通县 | 西宁市主城区 海东市互助县 海东市民和县 西宁市大通县 西宁市湟源县 西宁市湟中区 | 西宁市主城区 海东市互助县 海东市民和县 海东市化隆县 西宁市湟源县 西宁市大通县 |
甘肃 | 兰州市主城区 兰州市榆中县 兰州市皋兰县 兰州新区 | 兰州市主城区 兰州市榆中县 兰州市皋兰县 | 兰州市主城区 兰州市榆中县 兰州市皋兰县 兰州新区 | 兰州市主城区 兰州市皋兰县 兰州市榆中县 白银市白银区 白银市平川区 |
2.4 分产业类型的投资网络演变
将民营企业按其所属的产业类型进行划分,分析不同产业类型民营企业投资网络的演变规律。选取投资数量占比位居前5位的产业进行统计,分别为房地产业、批发和零售业、制造业、金融业及建筑业(图2)。可以看出,兰西城市群中各产业的民营企业投资网络结构始终较为分散,在各自省域范围内进行投资是其突出特征,投资网络省际分离现象显著。仅有房地产业及批发和零售业在2015年出现了跨省投资行为,均为由兰州市主城区到西宁市主城区的单向投资;2021年,仅房地产业仍存在跨省投资行为,其他产业均无投资往来。显然,相对于跨省投资,城市群内绝大部分产业的民营企业会在其所在的省域进行投资,投资网络表现出明显的省际分离结构。
图2
图2
兰西城市群各产业投资网络演化
Fig.2
Evolution of the investment networks of industries in the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration
2013—2021年,房地产业和制造业投资网络总体呈现不断发展的态势。其中,房地产业投资网络基础较差而发展速度最快,平均加权度同比增长均超过50%,其不仅在2015年之后始终保持着跨省的投资,而且在2021年成长为网络化水平最高的产业。制造业投资网络发展相对平缓,网络中核心城市表现不够突出,分散化发展特征显著。至2018年,批发与零售业、金融业及建筑业投资网络均呈现较快增长,而在2021年却出现了不同程度的衰退(表5)。其中,批发与零售业的跨省投资中断,产业投资网络再度呈现割裂状态。总体而言,房地产业、批发与零售业在兰西城市群民营企业投资网络的跨省融合过程中表现突出,是区间联系的优势产业,未来可以此为突破点促进跨省经济的融合发展。
表5 兰西城市群各产业投资网络平均加权度
Tab.5
产业 | 2013年 | 2015年 | 2018年 | 2021年 |
---|---|---|---|---|
房地产业 | 0.50 | 0.70 (50.0%) | 1.17 (55.6%) | 1.78 (52.4%) |
批发与零售业 | 1.38 | 1.54 (11.9%) | 1.92 (24.6%) | 1.69 (-11.7%) |
制造业 | 1.11 | 1.08 (-3.1%) | 1.13 (5.2%) | 1.38 (21.4%) |
金融业 | 0.47 | 0.70 (54.7%) | 1.10 (51.3%) | 1.09 (-0.8%) |
建筑业 | 0.75 | 0.75 (0) | 1.00 (33.3%) | 0.88 (-12.5%) |
注:括号中数值为企业投资网络的平均加权度较上一时期的增长率。
3 理论解释
兰西城市群民营企业投资网络表现出明显的“双核分离”结构,此现象可用相关的区域发展理论和行政区经济模式、制度厚度加以解释。前者主要是其所遵循的一般性的发展规律,后者则是中国特色社会主义市场经济体制所反映的基本特征。
首先,空间经济一体化理论认为在一定区域范围内,随着工业化程度的拓深和工业化范围的延伸,必然导致区域内各空间系统突破自身传统边界,进而实现空间子系统的重组[58]。因此,区域空间的地域结构受到了工业化进程的直接影响,使其在工业化发展的不同阶段有不同表现。就区域空间结构的演化而言,美国学者弗里德曼根据区域工业化的进程将其划分为前工业化时期、工业化初期、工业化中后期及后工业化时期4个阶段[59]。由此,将现阶段兰西城市群投资网络结构的演化特征分为2种形态(图3),即(a) 省际分离的树状结构和(b) 省域融合的网络化结构。投资网络会随着工业化的不断推进呈现出由(a)向(b)的演化趋势。然而,由于区域中不同产业发展水平存在差异,各产业的投资网络表现可能差异较大,因此,2种状态可能会同时存在于不同产业。
图3
图3
双核型城市群网络结构演化模型
Fig.3
Network structure evolution model of a dual-core urban agglomeration
根据《中国工业化进程报告(1995—2020)》,兰西城市群所在的甘、青两省均于2010年由工业化初期阶段进入工业化中期阶段,2019年数据显示两省均处于工业化中期后半阶段。因此,兰西城市群研究时段内应处于工业化中期阶段。根据区域发展学说,在工业化中期前半阶段,区域内部原有核心城市的规模经济和集聚经济效应仍在不断作用,使得核心城市仍处于极化增长阶段。核心区域依靠其支配地位不断吸引边缘地区的生产要素向其集中,在回流效应的作用下持续发挥区域增长极的作用。在西部地区,较为典型的是省会城市。一方面,省会城市自身的区位条件、资源禀赋以及历史基础使其在省域范围内处于优势区位;另一方面,省会城市本身拥有的行政力量更有能力集聚资源,进一步加强了极化作用。以上各因素促使该阶段区域经济结构表现为各省域内以省会城市为增长极集中发展,城镇之间的联系以不同等级城镇之间的纵向联系为主,同级别城镇间几乎不存在联系。伴随工业化的不断深入,在工业化中期的后半阶段,区域内将出现新的经济中心,这些新中心之间及与原有的经济中心之间相互关联,进而产生新的区域经济地域结构。此时,城镇间联系日益增多,区域经济空间结构由传统的树状结构向网状结构转化,呈现出经济协同发展的趋势。迄今,兰西城市群在工业化中期阶段,民营企业投资行为仍未能有效突破省级行政区界线,省内投资依然作为主导,省际间经济融合水平低,一体化进程缓慢。
其次,区域经济一体化不仅仅是经济过程,更是政府与市场相互作用、相互影响的过程[60-61]。受行政区经济的影响,欠发达地区跨省域城镇之间的经济交流实际非常有限。所谓“行政区经济”是指由于行政区划对区域经济的刚性约束而产生的一种特殊区域经济现象,即行政区以各自的经济发展为首要目标,从而使区域经济运行带有强烈的地方政府行为色彩[1]。中国改革开放后行政和财政的分权改革及以经济增长为指标的官员晋升机制使得原有的利益配置格局被打乱,地方各级政府的财税自主权和经济控制力得到强化。经济增长型导向的地方政府为招商引资,需要在基础设施建设中投入大量资金,同时还要担负地方所应支付的福利,这促使地方政府不愿让地方企业对外投资,这事实上进一步强化了行政区内部的经济联系,弱化了行政区之间的经济联系,从而导致地方保护主义和市场分割。根据粤港澳大湾区研究院、21世纪经济研究院联合发布的2020年中国296个城市营商环境报告,兰州、西宁市排名分别为65、77名,两市区域市场环境相差不大且在省会城市中排名落后,较差的市场环境也抑制了企业家进行跨省投资的意愿。如此,促进了甘青两省省际贸易壁垒的形成,尤其市场化程度较低的西部地区省会城市的经济集聚能力很强,使得生产要素持续向省会城市流入,导致省会城市的经济首位度过大[62⇓⇓⇓-66],同时对外的投资十分有限。
最后,民营企业的跨省投资意愿或行为受到了中国特色社会主义市场经济体制下所形成的地方化的制度厚度及企业规模的影响。被调查的民营企业都承认企业对其所依赖的地方资源(如矿产、农业等)、地方市场、政府及相关制度更为敏感,即至少民营企业在其“原生地”存在地利与人和的优势,如一名甘肃的企业家说“人地都熟对企业发展非常重要”“有问题能及时得到解决”。同时,基于中国文化传统,个人的地方性文化情感较深,尤其是基于深厚的家庭关系和亲情网络形成的社会资本,在企业创立、技术模仿创新中有着重要影响[67],使得部分企业家更愿意在省内投资。民营企业在本省投资,有以下优点:第一,企业家感觉安全。企业在当地的经营基础较为深厚,人际关系更为默契,这使得企业在突发事件防备工作上存在优势。第二,企业所在地所形成的制度层面的“地方黏性”,使得企业可以利用本省的资源、信息、政策等优势,降低成本,获得更高的收益。而且,我们调查的企业都承认当自身规模比较小或投资风险比较大时,必然选择进行“本地投资”,尤其不会进行跨省投资。为进一步了解企业投资行为与其自身规模的相关性,对二者进行相关性分析。由于大部分企业资产信息不对外公开,因此,使用被调查企业的年营业收入额代表其规模,分析企业规模与企业对外投资的关系。在剔除异常值后,对企业营收额及投资数量之间进行拟合分析,发现二者间呈正相关关系,即随着企业规模的扩大,企业对外投资数量也相应增加(图4)。因此,民营企业规模越大,对跨省投资风险的承受力就越强,其对外的投资意愿才越高。
图4
图4
企业年营业收入与投资数量的相关性拟合
Fig.4
Correlation between annual revenue and investment amount of enterprises in the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration
4 结论
基于民营企业投资网络,本文通过分析兰西城市群经济空间结构的演化,主要探索跨省的区域经济一体化水平及其成因。
本文从整体网络、子网络、强连通分量及分产业网络4个层面对企业投资网络进行分析。首先,2013—2021年兰西城市群民营企业投资网络始终表现出明显的“双核分离”结构,省际之间经济联系十分微弱,区域经济一体化水平较低,呈现非协同状态。整体上,民营企业投资网络主要围绕兰州、西宁2个省会城市各自发育,核心城市间仅保持极低的联系水平。两省投资网络结构的演化趋向存在明显区别:青海省企业投资网络已表现出由单一的树状结构向网状结构不断演化的态势;而甘肃省投资网络发展较为缓慢,投资网络始终以树状结构为主,省内经济一体化水平较低。根据社区分析结果,民营企业投资网络社区构成集聚现象明显,未出现跨省现象。青海省社区构成表现出“由多至少”的趋向,2018年后仅保持一个社区存在;甘肃省社区构成则表现出“由少至多”的趋向,自2015年起始终保持3个社区共存的状态。从强连通分量角度看,企业投资网络中强连通分量的分布也受到了明显的省域限制,分别围绕兰州市、西宁市主城区为核心构成,未能突破行政区边界。相较青海省,甘肃省强连通分量构成较为分散,区域经济一体化水平更低。同时,各产业的投资网络省际分离结构更为显著,且表现不同。其中房地产业、批发和零售业均出现了跨省域的投资行为,而其他产业均表现出显著的分散发展趋势。
其次,兰西城市群民营企业投资网络演化既遵循区域发展理论的基本原理,又受到行政区经济和制度厚度的制约或影响。甘青两省处于工业化中期阶段,城市群省会城市仍以极化作用为主,民营企业的规模和实力有限,投资主要发生在省会城市同省其他区县之间,跨省投资联系极弱。同时,地方民营企业的投资行为受到地方政府行为的影响,表现出都希望投资集中在各自省内的现象,阻碍了城市群内部经济一体化进程。而且,民营企业的投资行为还受到本地的制度厚度的影响,尤其当企业规模比较小或投资风险较大时,必然选择进行本地投资,跨省投资意愿很弱。此外,民营企业的跨省投资意愿还受到企业规模的影响,即企业规模越大,对跨省投资风险的承受力越强,对外投资意愿越高。
最后,兰西城市群区域经济一体化发展仍处于较低水平,缺乏真正意义上经济协同发展的条件与基础。未来一定时期,两省应优先推动兰州、西宁都市圈建设,持续发挥区域增长极的作用,坚持“强省会”战略。在此基础上,兰西城市群可逐步完善城市群内部的各类设施链接和共享,以区间联系优势产业作为突破点,建立跨行政区利益共享和成本共担机制,打造省际统一大市场,做到要素、商品和服务市场的统一化,即通过市场主导资源配置,推动经济的高质量发展。当时机成熟后,再全面推动兰西城市群内的区域一体化进程。
因为针对企业的调研困难甚大,而且所获取的关键信息也不允许公开发表,这影响了机制分析的深度。同时,本文以民营企业作为主要研究对象,缺少对国营企业及外商投资企业投资行为的研究,未能对区域的整体投资网络进行全面分析。未来,我们将进一步深化此方面的研究工作。
参考文献
中国转型期“行政区经济”现象透视: 兼论中国特色人文—经济地理学的发展
[J].
Perspective of the "administrative region economy" phenomenon in China's transitional period: An introduction of human economic geography with Chinese characteristics
分割市场的经济增长: 为什么经济开放可能加剧地方保护?
[J].
Fragmented growth: Why economic opening may worsen domestic market segmentation?
利益主体多元化背景下的区域经济一体化
[J].
The regional economic integration under the background of benefit main bodies diversity
协同治理视角下长三角一体化的理论与实践
[J].
Theory and practice of regional integration in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of collaborative governance
2020年我国已经基本实现了工业化: 中国共产党百年奋斗重大成就
[J].
China basically realized industrialization in 2020: Great achievements in the centennial struggle of the communist party of China
世界城市化发展的S型曲线
[J].
S-shaped curve of world urbanization development
China's special economic zones: An analysis of policy to reduce regional disparities
[J].DOI:10.1080/21681376.2018.1430612 URL [本文引用: 1]
Urban-rural integration drives regional economic growth in Chongqing, Western China
[J].DOI:10.1080/23792949.2016.1151758 URL [本文引用: 1]
Core and periphery in the world economy: An empirical assessment of the integration of the developing countries into the world economy
[J].DOI:10.1080/10168739900000043 URL [本文引用: 1]
The core and periphery of the world economy
[J].
Not quite a twin city: Cross-boundary integration in Hong Kong and Shenzhen
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.003 URL [本文引用: 1]
粤港澳大湾区区域一体化及其互动关系
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlxb201912003
[本文引用: 1]
粤港澳大湾区一体化过程中存在跨社会制度、跨法律体系、跨行政等级的复杂性,必然会遭遇一系列的摩擦。发掘粤港澳之间合作与冲突的焦点与关键时间节点,是对粤港澳大湾区一体化研究的重要补充。本文通过GDELT全球新闻事件数据库梳理了粤港澳大湾区一体化发展的历史和现状,对粤港澳三地互动关系进行研究。结果发现:① 内地与香港关系呈现出“M”型波动,两者之间的冲突被新闻媒体有所强化。② 内地与澳门之间的政策与民意表现为较高的一致性,两者之间的言语合作是互动关系的主导因素。③ 内地与港澳之间的互动关系总体上变得更加紧密,合作与冲突的频率都在上涨,内地—香港关系在粤港澳互动关系中的重要性不断被凸显。④ 粤港澳大湾区一体化建设的推进过程中,实际合作项目相对短缺,缺少多元化的抓手。粤港的经济和科技的竞合关系和香港局势的发展是粤港澳互动关系的主要影响因素。未来,粤港澳大湾区区域协调发展不仅要关注区域政策在空间上的投影,更要关注其在社会舆论与新闻媒体上的投影,促进一体化建设从实体空间建设向虚拟、话语空间的综合引导转变,强化“硬联通”与“软联通”的互动。
Regional integration and interaction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
DOI:10.11821/dlxb201912003
[本文引用: 1]
The integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area will inevitably encounter a series of frictions because of the cross-social system, cross-legal system and cross-administrative hierarchy. Research on the cooperation and conflict between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao is an important supplement to the integration study of the area. This paper reviews the process of integration development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 1997 to 2019 through the global news event database GDELT. The results show that: (1) the relationship between China's mainland and Hong Kong presents a "M" type fluctuation, and the conflict between them has been amplified by the news media compared with the mainland-Macao relationship. (2) The policy and public opinion between China's mainland and Macao are highly consistent, as the verbal cooperation between them is the leading factor of the interaction. (3) The interaction between China's mainland, Hong Kong and Macao has generally become closer, along with the increasing frequency of cooperations and conflicts. The importance of the mainland-Hong Kong relationship in the interactive relationship between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao has been increasingly highlighted. (4) Material cooperation projects are still insufficient in the process of the regional integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, and there is an urgent need for diversified cooperation. The economic and technological competitions and cooperations between Guangdong and Hong Kong are the main factors affecting the interactive relationship between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, as well as the tensions in Hong Kong. In the future, the coordinated development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area should focus on not only the projection of regional policies on space, but also its projection on social public opinion and the news media. It is necessary to combine the integration of physical space and virtue/discourse space, and strengthen the interactions between "hard connection" and "soft connection".
1999—2019年珠江三角洲区域一体化进程: 基于政府门户网站新闻报道的分析
[J].
Integration of the Pearl River Delta in 1999-2019: An analysis of news media on government portal site
京津地区区域一体化程度分析
[J].
Analysis on Beijing-Tianjin integration under the background of economic globalization
城市区域经济一体化水平测度: 基于深莞惠次区域的实证研究
[J].
Measuring economic integration of city region: A case study of Shenzhen-Dongguan-Huizhou sub-region
Domestic market fragmentation and economic growth in China
[C]// European Regional Science Association (ERSA). The 43rd congress of the European regional science association:Peripheries centers, and spatial development in the new Europe.
粤港澳大湾区及周边城市经济空间联系与空间结构: 基于改进引力模型与社会网络分析的实证分析
[J].
Economic spatial connection and spatial structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay and the surrounding area cities: An empirical analysis based on improved gravity model and social network analysis
川渝黔经济一体化助推成渝地区双城经济圈建设研究
[J].
Research on economic integration of Sichuan, Chongqing and Guizhou to boost the construction of Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle
新区域主义视角下长株潭城市群区域一体化过程与影响因素
[J].
Study on regional integration process of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration under the perspective of new regionalism
区域一体化指数的构建与编制: 以西宁—海东一体化为例
[J].
Construction and establishment of regional integration index: Taking Xining and Haidong as examples
徐淮宿区域一体化发展综合测度研究
[J].
Comprehensive measurement of integration development in Xuzhou-Huaibei-Suzhou region
Asia-Pacific regional integration index: Construction, interpretation, and comparison
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.001 URL [本文引用: 1]
1985—2007年京津冀区域市场一体化水平测度与过程分析
[J].
Study on the level and procedure of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan regional market integration from 1985 to 2007
DOI:10.11821/yj2009060004
[本文引用: 1]
Based on the theory of relative prices, this paper evaluates the degree of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional market integration from the perspective of commodity markets. All of the data applied in the models in this study are obtained in the period of 1985~2007, coming from three areas, which are Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province. These panel data cover nine categories of the most important commodities. The study found that, in the period of 23 years, the level of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional market integration experiences a course of "Smooth - Fluctuating - Smooth". Specifically, from 1985 to 1988, the regional variance of relative price changes in a small range. This implied that the regional markets of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei are in the state of integration. From 1989 to 1997, the relative price variance is in the trend of fluctuations, indicating that in this period, the problems of regional market segmentation are more serious. The study based on time series data also revealed that since the end of the 20th century, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei market integration has developed rapidly and stably. Overall, the level of this regional market integration improves year by year. The analysis of market integration between any two areas showed that internal imbalances exist in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region. The leading rank of regional market integration is Beijing-Tianjin, followed by Beijing-Hebei, and Tianjin-Hebei. It is worth noting that the regional market of Beijing-Tianjin is a key factor to the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional market integration. The conclusions of the research enriches the current theoretical studies on the market integration of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Further efforts will be made to strengthen the stage of regional integration and policy analysis of how to accelerate the pace of regional market integration.
新发展格局下的中国城市群与都市圈建设
[J].
China's urban agglomeration and metropolitan area construction under the new development pattern
DOI:10.2307/141854 URL [本文引用: 1]
中国城市群空间结构的稳定性分析
[J].
Spatial structure stability of urban agglomerations in China
DOI:10.11821/xb200612008
[本文引用: 1]
This paper brings forward the concept for the first time based on central place theory and fractal theory by creating the model of centricity exponent firstly, and then integrates centricity exponent and fractal dimension with each other to measure the stability. Before the assessment, we select K = 4 as a parameter to calculate centricity exponent and fractal dimension, and suppose that it is right to select central place system as the frame of reference. The Result shows that spatial structure stability is in direct proportion with the value of central index, the number of nodes, the value of network dimension, and comparability of urban agglomerations' spatial structure with that of central place structure system. We classify urban agglomerations in China into five types according to the value of centricity exponent and the spatial contact direction, and then divide the level of stability into five grades according to the value of semi-trapezoid fuzzy membership function. According to the number of urban agglomerations in different grades of stability, we find that the degree of spatial structure stability is low for urban agglomerations in China on the whole. This study is valuable to promote the development and exertion of spatial operation efficiency for urban agglomerations following on reasonable spatial allocation of nodes.
中国城市群多中心网络的拓扑结构
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.012
[本文引用: 1]
在既有理论基础上扩展了城市群多中心网络的度量工具,考察中国12个城市群总部—分支机构的企业关联网络,比较梳理了地级城市空间联系的拓扑结构。实证研究发现:①包括长三角、珠三角和京津冀三大典型城市群在内,中国城市群内部网络系统的拓扑结构依然发育不完善,在联系数据方面均呈现出一定的稀疏矩阵特征,空间组合关系均为树状结构。②总部区位(出度)的层级性差异均高于分支机构区位(入度)的层级性差异,显示出城市群内部空间“流”的不对称性。③针对12个城市群内部网络的拓扑结构聚类分析表明:长三角、珠三角、京津冀、山东半岛、海峡西岸地区的城市群内部网络联系较为紧密,呈现出一定程度的一体化网络特征;其中三大典型城市群存在明显的企业总部集聚核心,其余城市群内部的网络联系松散,跨城企业联系比重较低,在拓扑结构上大多呈现出以省会或副省级城市为指向的向心式联系。
Polycentric network topology of urban agglomerations in China
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.012
[本文引用: 1]
This study puts forward a systematic analysis tool of urban agglomeration polycentric networks according to the space of flow theory, investigates the enterprise association networks of the twelve urban agglomerations in China empirically, and identifies the basic patterns of prefecture-level cities' spatial relationships through classification. The result indicates that the internal network topology of Chinese urban agglomerations, including the three most typical urban agglomerations (Yangtze River Delta-YRD, Pearl River Delta-PRD, and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region-BTH), is still far from reaching maturity. Specifically, the data of connection to some extent constitute a sparse matrix and the spatial association shows a tree structure. The hierarchy of headquarter locations (outflow) is more concentrated than that of branch locations (inflow), which shows asymmetry of the flows within the urban agglomerations. At the urban agglomeration level, two basic network connection patterns can be identified using cluster analysis of the twelve urban agglomerations internal network topology. The first type including the Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Shandong Peninsula, and the western side of the Taiwan Straits, is internally closely connected urban agglomeration networks and shows characteristics of integrated networks. The three most typical urban agglomerations (YRD, PRD, and BTH) are distinct headquarter hubs. The other type containing the rest of the urban agglomerations is internally loosely connected networks and the percentages of cross-city connections are lower than the first type. Most of them show a centripetal structure around the provincial capital or sub-provincial cities topologically.
尺度重构视角下中国城市多元网络结构研究
[J].
Multi-flow network characteristics of cities in China under the rescaling perspective
成渝城市群高质量发展水平评价
[J].
Evaluation on high-quality development of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration
中部地区长江沿线城市群空间结构与经济发展研究
[J].
Spatial structure and economy development of large city clusters along Yangtze River in central China
流空间视角下的粤港澳大湾区空间网络格局: 基于信息流与交通流的对比分析
[J].
Urban network structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area with the view of space of flows: A comparison between information flow and transportation flow
流空间视角下中国城市群网络结构特征比较: 基于铁路客运班次的分析
[J].
DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210309
[本文引用: 1]
铁路客流是城市群内经济社会联系的重要反映,也是区域流空间的关键体现。本文依据流空间理论,采用复杂网络方法和2018年中国铁路班次OD数据,从全国尺度分析城市群社区结构特征,并从城市群尺度比较分析了5个主要城市群的空间结构、规模结构和网络节点结构。结果显示,从铁路客运班次联系来看,城市组团片区与国家规划方案中的城市群在范围上存在一定的空间错位。5个主要城市群具有不同的局部特征:① 长江三角洲城市群呈网络状的空间形态和相对集聚的规模分布,主要问题为局部节点的枢纽作用与规模的匹配性有待提高;② 珠江三角洲城市群呈放射状的空间形态和相对集聚的规模分布,主要问题为与全国其他城市群的联系相对薄弱;③ 京津冀城市群呈放射状的空间形态和相对集聚的规模分布,主要问题为存在边缘化的节点;④ 长江中游城市群呈组团状的空间形态和相对分散的规模分布,主要问题为内部结构较为松散;⑤ 成渝城市群呈哑铃状的空间形态和相对集聚的规模分布,主要问题为与全国其他城市群的联系薄弱。随着区域一体化进程,需要根据不同城市群网络结构发展阶段的差异,补足城市群内和城市群间的联系短板,促进规模位序结构与网络结构的耦合协调,推动建设层次分明、枢纽协作、网络化发展的客运服务网络,支撑城市群一体化发展。
Comparison of network structure patterns of urban agglomerations in China from the perspective of space of flows: Analysis based on railway schedule
长三角地区城市网络结构及其演变研究: 基于企业联系的视角
[J].
The spatial structure and evolution of Yangtze River Delta urban network: Analysis based on enterprise connection
基于企业联系的长三角城市网络结构演变研究
[J].
Evolution of the urban network spatial structure in Yangtze River Delta: Based on enterprise connections
京津冀区域金融一体化发展水平测度研究: 基于区域金融一体化及其城市间关联强度的分析
[J].
Research on the measurement of the development level of financial integration in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: Based on the analysis of regional financial integration and the strength of inter-city association
基于流空间视角的城市群空间结构研究: 以珠三角城市群为例
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlyj020180635
[本文引用: 1]
随着现代交通、通信以及信息技术的发展,基于网络社会的“流空间”成为研究城市群空间结构的重要理论前沿。借助珠三角城市群9个城市的人流、物流、资金流和信息流数据,对珠三角城市群空间结构的现状和发展趋势进行综合性判断。研究发现:① 珠三角城市群的空间结构现状在“点-线-网-面域”4个层面均呈现出明显单极化态势,广州市是“流空间”视角下珠三角城市群的核心,区域网络结构呈现出“缺位型金字塔形结构”;② 珠三角城市群网络的未来发展中位于不同层级的城市将起着不同的作用,其中广州、深圳、东莞等城市对空间结构发展起着导向性作用,而佛山、中山等城市将承担着联系中转站功能;③ 珠三角各城市的流度辐射区一体化明显,各城市辐射影响区的空间形态也表明了各城市的功能圈和势力范围。未来随着全球化趋势和区域一体化政策的加强,珠三角城市群的集聚效应将不断转化为扩散效应,将极大提升珠三角城市群对全球范围内资源的吸聚和配置能力,助力珠三角城市群走向网络化的发展时代。
Spatial structure of the urban agglomeration based on space of flows: The study of the Pearl River Delta
DOI:10.11821/dlyj020180635
[本文引用: 1]
With the development of modern transportation, communication and information technology, the "space of flow" based on network society has become an important theoretical frontier for studying urban spatial structure. Based on the passenger flow, material flow, fund flow and internet information flow in nine cities of the Pearl River Delta, this paper makes a comprehensive judgment on the present situation and development trend of spatial structure of urban agglomeration in this region. Research findings are as follows: (1) The present situation of urban spatial structure in the Pearl River Delta presents obvious unipolarization, and Guangzhou is the core of the delta based on the "space of flow". (2) Cities at different levels will play different roles in the future development of the urban agglomeration network. Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Dongguan play a leading role in the development of spatial structure, while Foshan, Zhongshan and other cities will assume the function of connecting transit stations. (3) The urban areas of the Pearl River Delta are well integrated. The spatial form of the radiated area of each city also indicates the functional circle and sphere of influence of each city. In the future, with the strengthening of globalization and regional integration policies, the agglomeration effect of the Pearl River Delta region will be transformed into diffusion effect, which will greatly improve the ability of the delta to absorb and allocate resources on a global scale.
中国城市间投融资网络结构及其影响因素
[J].
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2019044
[本文引用: 1]
基于企业网络联系构建城市网络研究是近年来的研究热点。以往研究多运用企业总部与分支机构的空间位置关系建立企业内部联系,以构建城市网络,缺少从企业间实际联系层面对城市网络的研究。本文利用企业间跨城市投融资关系建立城市联系并探究其驱动机制,为中国城市网络研究提供了新的思路。研究发现:①2013—2016年全国企业间跨城市资本流动数量不断增加,全国范围内投融资覆盖面越来越广,资本越发集中于大城市。②中国资本流动城市网络基本形成了以京津冀、长三角、珠三角、成渝地区以及武汉等城市为重要节点相互联系的空间结构,京深、京沪和深沪是网络中最重要的城市联系对。③长三角城市群内部联系最为密切,形成的城市网络最为复杂,资本活跃程度高;京津冀、珠三角城市群内部城市间联系相对较弱,“核心-边缘”结构分化较为严重。④中国城市网络嵌入在独特的制度环境中,市场和政府作用共同导致了城市网络空间结构演化。
Spatial structure and influencing factors of urban investment and financing network in China
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2019044
[本文引用: 1]
In recent years, it has been an increasing number of studies on the construction of urban networks based on network of firms, in particular, using intra-firm links established by spatial location of headquarters and branches to build urban networks. Different from previous researches, the article builds interurban capital flow network based on the inter-city investment and financing relationship of companies, and finds that:1) The number of interurban capital flows among enterprises increases from 2013 to 2016, and the cover range of investment and financing is becoming wider. Capital is increasingly concentrated in large cities.2) Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Chengdu-Chongqing area and Wuhan area stand out in the urban networks shaped by China’s capital flows. The capital flows among Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen are the most important connections in the network.3) Compared with the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and the Pearl River Delta, the internal links of the Yangtze River Delta are more complex and stronger, with a higher level of activity of capital.4) The interurban capital flow is embedded in China's unique institutional environment. The market and the government have influenced the evolution of spatial structure of urban network together.
功能疏解背景下京津冀中部核心区产业投资网络演化研究
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.002
[本文引用: 1]
非首都功能疏解作为京津冀协同发展战略的核心,对解决北京大城市病、实现京津冀可持续发展具有重要意义。论文构建了一个“四位一体”的产业投资网络演化分析框架,以京津冀中部核心区为研究对象,利用工商企业投资大数据测度了非首都功能的3类重点行业在2010、2014、2018年的资本流动特征,并从“节点—路径—格局”3个层面分析了功能疏解背景下产业投资网络演化过程。研究结果表明,非首都功能疏解背景下,北京市各行业对外投资增强,投资集聚中心逐渐向外围转移,但不同行业演化格局存在差异。制造业呈现由邻近扩散向等级扩散转变的演化路径,并向着多中心格局发展;批发零售业在资本净流动层面显示出扩散特征,在骨干路径层面呈现集聚现象,分布格局由北京单极放射状向京津双核联动演化;交通运输仓储和物流业向郊区物流园区所在地集聚,但网络整体发育滞后。研究结果能够为科学认识首都功能疏解情况、了解中部核心区产业结构及产业发展的变动态势提供参考。
Change of industrial investment networks in the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the background of non-capital function dispersal
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.002
[本文引用: 1]
As the key of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development strategy, non-capital function transfer is of great significance for solving the problem of a congested Beijing and achieving the sustainable development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. This study constructed an analytical framework of change of industrial investment networks, which include the intrinsic attributes of industries, resource endowments, market mechanisms, and governmental response mechanisms. Taking the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as a sample, the study used the big data of industrial and commercial enterprise investment to measure the capital flow characteristics of the three key industries with non-capital functions in 2010, 2014, and 2018, and analyzed the process of change of industrial investment networks from the three levels of node-path-pattern under the background of functional dispersal. The research results show that the spillover trend of various industries' investment in Beijing has increased, and industrial agglomerations of non-capital functions are gradually shifting to the periphery of the central city under the background of non-capital function dispersal, but the pattern of change of different industries varies. The manufacturing industry presents a path of change from neighborhood diffusion to hierarchical diffusion, and is developing towards a multi-center pattern; the wholesale and retail industry shows the characteristics of spillover at the level of net capital flow, and agglomeration at the level of backbone path, which evolves from the single centric pattern around Beijing to the dual core linkages between Beijing and Tianjin; the transportation, warehousing, and logistics industries are clustered around the locations of suburban logistics parks outside the city, but the overall development of the network is lagging. The results of this study can provide a reference for understanding of the capital's functional transfer and the dynamic change of industrial structure and industrial development of the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.
京津冀城市工业对雾霾污染影响的溢出效应: 基于制造业投资城市网络的视角
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.02.003
[本文引用: 1]
工业生产对城市环境质量的影响具有空间溢出效应,但鲜有研究从城市网络的视角探讨城市工业基于产业投资联系对环境污染影响的溢出效应。论文使用2004—2018年京津冀城市间制造业企业投资数据,分析京津冀制造业投资城市网络特征,并创建城市间制造业投资联系矩阵,结合空间计量模型,实证检验基于制造业投资城市网络的京津冀城市工业对雾霾污染影响的溢出效应。研究发现:京津冀城市间制造业互投资中污染型制造业投资增长最显著,且相比于其他类型的制造业投资,污染型制造业投资城市网络更加分散,是造成城市工业对雾霾污染影响溢出的重要渠道。从时空演变来看,京津冀城市间污染型制造业投资城市网络不断扩张,可能造成城市工业对空气质量更广泛的跨地区影响。实证结果验证了城市工业通过制造业投资城市网络带来雾霾污染的空间溢出,这种溢出的传输机制是通过城市间的产业投资联系,且和投资的产业类型有关。相比于其他类型的制造业投资,污染型制造业投资联系造成的雾霾污染溢出效应最强。因此,城市群地区需要统筹协调好城市间的产业发展,才能更有效地应对区域环境挑战。
Spillover effects of urban industries on haze pollution among cities of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: From the perspective of inter-city manufacturing investment network
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.02.003
[本文引用: 1]
In urban agglomerations, the environmental impact of urban industries may spillover between cities not only through the pollution diffusion, but also through the inter-city linkages of industrial investment and transfer. The spillover effect of urban industries on air quality through the urban industrial investment network has been largely ignored in the literature. Due to the urban network externality, the air quality in a city is not only influenced by its own industrial activities, but also closely related to the industrial development of other cities connected through the industrial investment in the urban network. By applying the investment data of manufacturing enterprises among cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2004 to 2018, this study investigated the characteristics of the inter-city manufacturing investment network in the region. This study created inter-city manufacturing investment network matrices under a spatial econometric model to empirically test the spillover effect of urban industries on haze pollution via the inter-city manufacturing investment network in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The findings suggest that the investment in polluting manufacturing has increased significantly under the mutual investment in manufacturing between cities in the region. Furthermore, compared with other types of manufacturing investment, the polluting manufacturing investment network among cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is more dispersed. Those extensive investment linkages in polluting manufacturing industries between cities in the region are important channels for the spillover effect of urban industries on haze pollution. From the perspective of spatiotemporal evolution, our results indicate that the gradual expansion of the network of polluting manufacturing investment between cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is more likely to generate extensive cross-city environmental impacts. Our empirical results confirm the spillover effect of urban industries on haze pollution via the inter-city manufacturing investment network. The transmission mechanism of this spillover effect is based on the investment linkages between cities and depends on the types of invested industries. Specifically, the polluting manufacturing investment linkages result in more significant and stronger spillover effects of urban industries on haze pollution through the urban network. Therefore, the coordinated development of urban industries among cities in the urban agglomeration is necessary for meeting the regional environmental and sustainability challenges.
企业跨区域投资格局及其影响因素: 以福建上市企业为例
[J].
Enterprise's cross-region investment pattern and its determinants: A case study of Fujian listed firms
DOI:10.2307/142274 URL [本文引用: 1]
基于企业投资行为的中国沿海城市产业网络空间联系特征
[J].
Spatial distribution characteristics of industrial network in coastal cities of China based on enterprise investment behavior
中国异地投资网络结构演化及影响因素研究
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.001
[本文引用: 1]
随着城市间经济联系日益密切,资本跨区域流动逐渐成为影响区域发展的关键因素,企业异地投资是资本流动的微观体现,探讨企业异地投资特征对于区域发展具有重要意义。为此,论文以1998—2018年中国上市企业异地投资数据为研究对象,构建中国异地投资网络,从全国和东中西3大地区角度分析异地投资网络的空间演化特征及影响因素。研究发现:全国和3大地区异地投资网络节点中心性空间集聚特征明显,主要集中在5大城市群地区;异地投资网络空间上表现出明显的层级结构、空间集聚性、路径依赖等特征;投资净流入和净流出城市仍主要位于东部地区,但投资活动存在向中部和西部发展的趋势;城市的经济发展水平、产业结构、金融环境等均对全国和东中西3大地区呈现差异化的影响。
Change and influencing factors of China's cross-regional investment network structure
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.001
[本文引用: 1]
With the increasing economic interaction between cities, capital flow across regions has gradually become a key factor affecting the regional economic disparities. Cross-regional enterprise investment is regarded as the micro embodiment of capital flows. It is of great significance to explore the characteristics of cross-regional enterprise investment for reducing regional economic disparities. Thus, this study examined the cross-regional investment network using the cross-regional investment data of Chinese listed companies in 1998-2018, and analyzed the characteristics of the spatial evolution of China's cross-regional investment network and its influencing factors at the national and regional levels. The results show that: the spatial agglomeration trend of node centrality in China's cross-regional investment network at the national and regional levels is obvious and the cities with high node centrality are mainly concentrated in the five major urban agglomerations. There are obvious hierarchical structure, spatial heterogeneity, and path dependence of the cross-regional investment network; the net investment inflows and outflows are mainly in the eastern region, and the investment activities tend to develop toward the central and western regions; the influence of city economic development level, industrial structure, and financial environment varies across regions and types of cities with different population scales.
基于创新企业的中国城市网络联系特征
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlxb202104005
[本文引用: 2]
多部门创新企业的跨城布局能够增进城市间的知识流动与创新联系,大量创新企业部门关联构成的城市网络是理解国家创新格局的重要认知基础。本文运用1778家国家级创新企业部门关联数据和“总部—分支机构”方法建立中国城市间有向关系矩阵,借助社会网络分析、GIS技术及空间交互模型方法,对创新企业建构的中国城市网络联系特征进行分析。结果发现:① 基于创新企业的中国城市网络联系覆盖广但极不均质,菱形联系格局在次级网络中逐步显现,京津冀、长三角和珠三角城市群是网络联系的核心枢纽。② 城市间创新企业流具有明显的行政中心指向特征与省级边界效应,直辖市及省会城市对创新企业流具有较强吸引力,北京是网络联系最强核心,上海和深圳次之。③ 城市网络区域异质性突出,东部区域“内联外控”与中、西部区域“内弱外强”的联系格局呈现鲜明对比,东部区域内沿海三大城市群网络的联系结构也存在较大差异。④ 城市的行政等级、经济水平和创新环境等属性指标,以及城市间地理、技术、制度的邻近性关系指标,都对城市吸收和输出创新企业流产生了不同程度的影响,外资并不利于促进中国城际创新企业流和网络的形成。
Connectivity characteristics for city networks in China based on innovative enterprises
DOI:10.11821/dlxb202104005
[本文引用: 2]
Improving the connectivity of multi-sector enterprises at a cross-regional level can enhance knowledge and technology transfer and stimulate innovation and synergies among cities. Therefore, the study of city networks, which comprise a large number of multi-sector enterprises, can provide an important knowledge base for innovation and development at the regional and national levels. Based on an evaluation of innovative enterprises in China by authoritative institutions, data were collected on 1778 multi-sector enterprises, which included details on the headquarters, the branches (a total of 30,625) and the locations. A city-based network for the country was established, using the data for the multi-sector linkages and a model for the headquarters-branches, to explore the network connectivity characteristics via social network analysis, the GIS method and the spatial interactive model. The results showed that (1) although the network covered 353 cities across China, the spatial distribution of the network was extremely uneven. For instance, a diamond-shaped connectivity pattern emerged gradually as the network hierarchy decreased. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta were found to be the three key hubs of the network. (2) The intercity linkages between innovative enterprise sectors (innovative enterprise flows), had a clear administrative center and a provincial boundary effect. Moreover, the innovative enterprises were strongly attracted to the municipalities and provincial capitals. Beijing was at the heart of the network, followed by Shanghai and Shenzhen. (3) Differences existed in regional connectivity. There was a striking difference between the eastern region and the central-western region. The former had a high connectivity with respect to both the internal and the external networks, while the latter had lower connectivity for the internal network but a higher connectivity at the external level. At the same time, although the network structures for all the three eastern megalopolises showed strong cohesion, their connectivity characteristics were quite different. (4) The input and output of innovative enterprise flows were to varying degrees influenced by the indicator attributes for each city, and these in turn were related to the administrative hierarchy, the economic strength and the innovative environment of the region, as well as proximity indicators, which were related to geographical, technological and institutional factors. Foreign capital was not conducive to innovative enterprise flows and to the formation of innovative intercity company-based networks in China.
京津冀城市群产业投资网络演变及影响因素研究
[J].
Evolution and influencing factors of industrial investment network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration
The influence of enterprise investment behavior on the cyberspace connection of coastal cities: Empirical evidence from China
[J].
财政压力、晋升压力、官员任期与地方国企过度投资
[J].
Fiscal pressure, promotion pressure tenure of office and local state-owned companies' overinvestment
官员晋升压力、管理者过度自信与国企投资效率
[J].
Official promotion pressure, manager overconfidence and investment efficiency of state-owned enterprises
知识流动空间的城市关系建构与创新网络模拟
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlxb202004004
[本文引用: 1]
知识经济时代城市间的创新关系是新时代城市间相互作用关系的新内涵,研究者尝试采用各种方法探索城市间创新关系及其网络特征。然而,如何从理论上建构知识流动空间的城市间创新关系?如何设计更加合理的城市间创新网络模拟方法?这些问题却少有专门探讨。基于相关研究,本文提出了城市间创新关系构建的理论框架,认为城市间创新网络本质上是区别于“硬网络”的“软网络”,是一种主观的关系建构过程,需要经过异城创新主体间的点—点关系向城—城之间关系的尺度转换,这一转换过程容易发生夸大或偏离城市间客观存在的创新关系,对结果的精确度产生很大影响,应对关系建构给予充分理论论证;本文论述了4种城市间创新关系建构和网络模拟方法,包括科技成果异城合作的城市间无向网络构建方法、科技成果转让转移的城市间有向网络构建方法、高端人才跨城移动的城市间创新网络建构方法和创新企业机构多城分布的城市间创新网络建构方法,并运用相关数据进行了模拟试验与结果展示,来反映城市间创新关系的不同方面。本研究有助于推动从城市地理学视角和城市关系的维度探讨全球/区域的创新空间格局,为城市间创新网络研究提供理论和方法支撑。
The theoretical construction and network simulation of intercity innovative relationships in knowledge flow space
DOI:10.11821/dlxb202004004
[本文引用: 1]
The interactive relationships between cities in the knowledge economy era have attracted much attention. Researchers have applied a range of methods to explore intercity innovative relationships and associated network characteristics. It nevertheless remains unclear just how intercity innovative relationships can be theoretically constructed based on knowledge flow space and how further scientific simulation methods can be designed. Research questions in this area have rarely been explored in detail, an issue which has inevitably placed obstacles on further exploration. A framework for the theoretical construction of intercity innovative relationships is presented in this study; the basis for this research is that an intercity innovation network is essentially a 'soft network', distinct from a 'hard network'. These interconnections are founded on a subjective relationship construction process and therefore necessitate scale transformation from 'point-point' connections between innovative subjects in different cities with respect to 'city-city' interactions. At the same time, this transformation process is prone to exaggerations and deviations from objective intercity innovative relationships and therefore exerts considerable influence on the accuracy of results such that constructions must be entirely theoretical. Four construction methods for intercity innovative relationships and network simulation are summarized in this study, including an intercity undirected network based on cross-city co-operations between scientific and technological achievements, an intercity directed network based on the cross-city transfer of scientific and technological achievements, an intercity innovation network based on the cross-city flow of high-end talents, and an intercity innovation network based on the multi-city distribution of innovative enterprises and institutions. Simulation tests were then undertaken using relevant data to reflect aspects of these relationships. The results of this analysis are conducive to further exploration of global and regional innovative spatial patterns from the perspective of urban geography and intercity relationships and provide a theoretical and methodological foundation for further research on intercity innovation networks.
政府干预、GDP增长与地方国企过度投资
[J].
GDP growth and local SOE overinvestment
基于城际创业投资联系的中国城市网络结构和组织模式
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlyj020191023
[本文引用: 1]
鉴于现有的城市网络研究尚没有关注企业间投资这一最重要的经济行为之一,所得认知不全面,本文基于城际创业投资联系这一全新视角,刻画了中国城市网络的结构和组织模式,以丰富城市等级和距离衰减作用下的城市网络研究。从节点看,城际创业投资空间分布不均,高度集中在超大城市和直辖市。从联系看,城际创业投资具有明显的层级性,形成以京沪深为顶点的三角形框架,同时城际投资联系的距离衰减特征不充分,高等级城市不受距离约束,尤其是以京沪深为核心的三大城市群间的远距离联系,在1200 km左右形成投资“热岛”。从子网络看,城际创业投资可分成7个社区,社区分布具有“大集聚、小分散”特征,不同社区内部的组织模式各异,主要包括“单中心”模式、“一核多副”模式、“两核多副”模式和“多中心”模式。本文的创新点不仅在于填补了企业间投资网络研究的空白,还与企业总部分支网络进行了比较,结果发现城际创业投资的距离衰减特征强于企业总部分支网络,而等级联系特征则弱于企业总部分支网络。。
The spatial structures and organization patterns of China's city network based on inter-city startup investments
DOI:10.11821/dlyj020191023
[本文引用: 1]
The multi-level perspective city network is of great significance in understanding spatial interaction and linkages. Based on inter-city startup investments data, this study offers a new perspective to identify the spatial structure of China's city networks from node- to linkage-level, and further explore the organization patterns from sub-network-level. This study can deepen the understanding of city network structure under the effects of city hierarchy and distance decay. The results are shown as follows. At the node-level, the distribution of startup investments is uneven and highly concentrated in megacities and municipalities. Moreover, the rank-size distribution of startup investments tends to be more monocentric than that of population and GDP. At the linkage-level, first, the city network based on startup investments has an obvious hierarchical structure, and the connections between Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen are the strongest and form a triangular framework. Second, inter-city startup investments are mainly flowing within the same industry, and the service industry owns the most outflows and inflows. Third, inter-city startup investments display distance decay, but high-hierarchy cities can break the distance constraint. For example, the linkages are close between the three urban agglomerations with Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen as the cores. At the sub-network-level, seven communities are identified through community analysis, and we suggest that the community boundaries have two spatial characteristics including administrative district economy and the spillovers from high-hierarchy cities. Additionally, the organization patterns of communities are various, including single-core; single-core and multi-pairs; double-core and multi-pairs; and multi-core patterns. Compared with the existing research for other perspectives of city network, there are two new findings in our study.
社会网络分析工具Ucinet和Gephi的比较研究
[J].
Comparative study of the social network analysis tools: Ucinet and Gephi
基于微博大数据的中国城市群空间结构研究
[J].
Spatial structure study of urban agglomerations in China based on Weibo big data
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
[J].
城市圈区域一体化发展的理论基础与协调机制探讨
[J].
Discussion on theoretical basis and coordination mechanism of regional integration development in urban circle
粤港澳区域联动发展的关键科学问题与重点议题
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.001
[本文引用: 1]
在新时期新背景下,实现粤港澳区域联动发展具有紧迫性、必要性和重大现实意义。本文认为研究粤港澳区域联动发展需要以区域一体化理论体系、“全球—地方”尺度理论、区域空间相互作用理论体系为主要的理论基础。其关键科学问题是研究“一国两制”下粤港澳尺度的区域联动理论,探索粤港澳区域联动的机制、关键因素、模式与路径;提出了粤港澳区域联动发展关注的4个重点议题:①粤港澳区域一体化/协同理论的研究与探索;②粤港澳地位与作用研究;③粤港澳联动的多尺度、多主体影响机制与模式研究;④粤港澳联动发展的实施路径研究。
Key scientific issues and important topics in the joint development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao region
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.001
[本文引用: 1]
Given the modern background of economic globalization, regional economic integration, new global economic development trends caused by modern technological reforms, the Belt and Road initiative, and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development strategy, there is a growing sense of urgency, necessity, and practical significance in achieving the joint development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao region. This requires an in-depth understanding and accurate grasp of the key scientific issues and important topics related to this task. This article argues that research related to the joint development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau region must be based on a regionally unified theoretical framework, "global-local" scale theory, and regional spatial interaction theory as its theoretical basis. In this regard, key scientific issues include the study of the theory of regional linkages of scale in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, and the exploration of mechanisms, factors, models, and pathways governing linkages in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau region. In so doing, this article proposes four important topics that can be considered with regard to the joint development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau region: (1) Research and exploration of unification/coordination theory in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau region under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework; (2) Research related to the location and role of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau region; (3) Research related to the multi-scale and multi-agent impact mechanisms and models for the linkages between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau; (4) Research related to implementation pathways for the unified development of Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau.
区域经济一体化视角下“行政区经济”约束强度的定量测度及时空演化分析: 以成德绵地区为例
[J].
Spatiotemporal evolution of the constraint strength of "administrative regional economy" from the perspective of regional economic integration: A case study of the Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang region, China
论区域协调发展视角下“行政区经济”的演变
[J].
On the evolution of "administrative district economy" from the perspective of regional coordinated development
官员晋升竞争与边界效应: 以省区交界地带的经济发展为例
[J].
Bureaucratic promotion competition and border effect: Evidence from economic development in China's border regions
中国行政区经济理论的哲学思考
[J].
Philosophical thinking on the economic theory of administrative regions in China
区际壁垒与贸易的边界效应
[J].
Interregional barriers and the boundary effect of trade
从行政区和经济区关系演化探析我国省际交界地区发展
[J].
The provincial border regions in China from the relation between the administrative area and the economic zone
中国中部农区企业集群的竞争优势研究: 以河南省虞城县南庄村钢卷尺企业集群为例
[J].
Competitive advantages of enterprise clusters in rural area of central China: A case of steel tape clusters in Nanzhuang Village, Yucheng County, Henan Province
DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2004.02.136
[本文引用: 1]
The competitive advantages of enterprise clusters in rural areas of central China are resulted from not only the triple factors of the economies of scale, the economies of the division of labor and the network linkage, which is the common characteristic of all clusters, but also from the imitative innovation, the context of the central Chinese culture, the institutional support and the lower production costs. This article takes the example of the steel tape clusters in Nanzhuang Village, Yucheng County, Henan Province to examine the theory in view of the practice.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |
